Skip to main content
Log in

The regional transport megaproject of the baikal–amur mainline: Lessons of development

  • Spatial Features of Sectoral Development
  • Published:
Regional Research of Russia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper summarizes the construction experience of the Baikal–Amur Mainline (BAM) and analyzes the causes of its noncompletion and loss-making operation. It is shown that BAM tunnels were not only useful for transport but they also proved a large-scale testing ground for new models of domestic and foreign equipment designed for mining and tunnel works and developing new technologies for tunneling in permafrost conditions and methods for fortifying earthworks. New construction technologies developed for the BAM and tested when it was laid make it possible today to confidently build roads, tunnels, and ports in extreme climatic conditions. Excessive staff turnover was due to errors in the development of the railway construction project. As a result, housing, which prevails in settlements along the BAM, is often rundown and dilapidated. The conclusion is made that effective implementation of major projects in the BAM zone is impossible without the protectionist policy of the state and that without the intensification of economic development of the adjacent territory, the BAM will never be cost-effective. Conditions are shown under which the BAM can be fit for heavy trains, and the Trans-Siberian Mainline, for specialized trains.

“Railway is not only an auxiliary means of exchange, but also a powerful productive force. But this does not exhaust the significance of railways.”

S.Yu. Vitte

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mother of Kuzma. Results. BAM–well done! http://russia.tv/brand/show/brand_id/57811. Accessed March 15, 2014.

  2. Orlov, B. and Lavrov, V., The BAM we do need, Zvezda, 1988, no. 10, pp. 160–164.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Modernization of the housing in the zone of Baikal–Amur Mainline requires 45 billion rubles. http://stonetorg.ru/news_build/622. Accessed July 8, 2014.

  4. Bessolov, V.A. and Kleva, A.G., Tunnels of the Baikal–Amur Mainline, in BAM: pervoe desyatiletie (BAM: First Decade), Aganbegyan, A.G. and Kin, A.A., Eds., Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1984, pp. 38–44.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Piedmont. The pneumatic hammer was first used at the construction of the Mont Cenis railway tunnel, Vokrug Sveta, 2011, no. 1, p. 28.

  6. People’s interviews, Baikal–Amur Mainline: past, present, and future. http://bd.fom.ru/report/map/projects/dominant/dom0430/dd043013. Accessed August 11, 2004.

  7. BAM: waiting for the thaw. http://rassia.tv/brand/show/brand_id/58122. Accessed August 8, 2014.

  8. Regulation of the Russian Federation Government of January 16, 1996 No. 50-r On Main Types of Strategic Mineral Resources, in Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF (Collection of Legislative Acts of Russian Federation), 1996, no. 4, art. 390.

  9. Nauchnye osnovy programmy khozyaistvennogo osvoeniya Baikalo-Amurskoi magistrali (Scientific Principles of the Program of Economic Development of the Baikal–Amur Mainline Zone), Novosibirsk: Nauch. Sovet Akad. Nauk SSSR po Probl. BAM, 1977.

  10. Regulation of the Russian Federation Government of June 16, 1997 no. 728 On Primary Measures for Stimulation of Economic Development of the Baikal–Amur Railway Zone, in Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF (Collection of Legislative Acts of Russian Federation), 1997, no. 25, art. 2946.

  11. Kibalov, E.B., Organizational alternatives of the control of development of the Baikal–Amur Mainline zone, Reg.: Ekon. Sotsiol., 1998, no. 4, pp. 56–75.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kola region in Soviet period. http://2004.murman.ru/history/kola_land/kolskiy_kray_history-6/index.shtm. Accessed March 14, 2013.

  13. Ogorodnikov, E., Elga must be occupied without ammunition. http://expert.ru/expert/2014/28/elguvzyat-patronov-ne-davat. Accessed August 5, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stupin, I., Give the road for economics, Ekspert, 2012, no. 25 (808). http://expert.ru/expert/2012/25. Accessed July 26, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Russian newspaper. 2012. November, 26.

  16. For Baikal–Amur Mainline and Transsib 562 billion rubles will be spent. http://www.dni.ru/economy/2013/7/26/256929.html. Accessed August 11, 2013.

  17. Government approved the 260 billion ruble spent for Baikal–Amur Mainline and Transsib. http://lenta.ru/news/2013/07/26/bam. Accessed August 24, 2013.

  18. Regulation of the Russian Federation Government of June 17, 2008 no. 877-r On the strategy of development of railway transport in Russian Federation until 2030, in Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF (Collection of Legislative Acts of Russian Federation), 2008, no. 29, part 2, art. 3537.

  19. Kibalov, E.B. and Kin, A.A., Baikal–Amur Mainline—Transsib system as the basis for sustainable development of adjacent territories, Reg.: Ekon. Sotsiol., 1999, no. 4, pp. 38–84.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. A. Kin.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © A.A. Kin, 2014, published in Region: Ekonomika i Sotsiologiya, 2014, No. 4 (84), pp. 55–72.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kin, A.A. The regional transport megaproject of the baikal–amur mainline: Lessons of development. Reg. Res. Russ. 5, 316–322 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970515040097

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079970515040097

Keywords

Navigation