Advertisement

Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry B

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 98–102 | Cite as

Influence of Small Xe Additives on the Detonation Threshold for O2−H2−He Mixtures

  • S. V. Kulikov
  • N. A. Chervonnaya
Combustion, Explosion, and Shock Waves
  • 10 Downloads

Abstract

The effect of a small Xe additive on the conditions of detonation initiation in incident shock waves of various intensities is studied. The experiments are carried out on a shock tube facility with 10% H2 + 5% O2 + 85% He, 10% H2 + 5% O2 + 84.75% He + 0.25% Xe, and 10% H2 + 5% O2 + 84.5% He + 0.5% Xe mixtures. The addition of Xe led to a shift in the detonation threshold toward weaker shock waves. This effect is probably due to a significant increase in the frequency of high-energy collisions between O2 and Xe molecules in the shock wave front in comparison with that characteristic of the equilibrium behind the wave, a factor that significantly accelerates the chemical reaction between O2 and H2 behind the front. The effect is a consequence of the formation of a specific translational nonequilibrium in the wave front. A previously performed numerical study of the distributions of pairs of O2 and Xe molecules in the shock wave front shows that this effect can be enhanced by decreasing the Xe concentration from 0.5 to 0.25%. The experiment performed indirectly confirms this conclusion. It turns out that, for the mixture with 0.25% Xe, the detonation threshold shifts more strongly to the region of weaker shock waves than for the mixture with 0.5% Xe. This result gives additional arguments in favor of the assumption that this effect is due to the specifics of the translational nonequilibrium in the wave front.

Keywords

shock tube shock wave detonation wave translational nonequilibrium 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    T. V. Bazhenova, A. V. Emelianov, A. V. Eremin, and V. Y. Velicodny, in Proceedings of the International Symposium on Shock Waves ISSW-21, Great Keppel, Australia, 1998, Ed. by A. Howling, p. 195.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. Yu. Velikodnyi, A. V. Emel’yanov, and A. V. Eremin, Tech. Phys. 44, 1150 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. V. Emeliyanov, A. V. Eremin, and S. V. Kulikov, Tech. Phys. 58, 647 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    O. G. Divakov, A. V. Eremin, V. S. Ziborov, and V. E. Fortov, Dokl. Chem. 373, 141 (2000).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. Yu. Velikodnyi and V. A. Bityurin, Khim. Fiz. 16 (9), 14 (1997).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. V. Kulikov and G. B. Manelis, Dokl. Chem. 382, 29 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. V. Kulikov, G. B. Manelis, and O. N. Ternovaya, Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B 1, 250 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    O. I. Dodulat, Yu. Yu. Kloss, and F. G. Cheremisin, Fiz. Khim. Kinet. Gaz. Dynam. 14 (1) (2013). http://www.chemphys.edu.ru.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shock Tubes, Collection of Articles, Ed. by Kh. A. Rakhmatullin and S. S. Semenov (Inostr. Liter., Moscow, 1962) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ya. B. Zel’dovich, A. P. Genich, and G. B. Manelis, Sov. Phys. Dokl. 24, 756 (1979).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. V. Kulikov, Shock Waves 7 (1), 25 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    E. V. Stupochenko, S. A. Losev, and A. I. Osipov, Relaxation Processes in Shock Waves (Nauka, Moscow, 1965) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. V. Kulikov, Russ. J. Phys. Chem. B 2, 894 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Problems of Chemical PhysicsRussian Academy of SciencesChernogolovka, Moscow oblastRussia

Personalised recommendations