Rotation parameters of the Siberian domain and its eastern surrounding structures during different geological epochs

  • V. Yu. Timofeev
  • A. Yu. Kazansky
  • D. G. Ardyukov
  • D. V. Metelkin
  • P. Yu. Gornov
  • N. V. Shestakov
  • A. V. Timofeev
  • G. Z. Gil’manova
Article

Abstract

The motion of lithospheric blocks was analyzed in the junction zone between the Eurasian Plate and its surrounding structures. Its present-day stage was considered using GPS and seismologic data. Models of the movement of a rigid plate are considered for Eurasia. A model of Eurasia (northern part of Asia) was used to determine the rotation parameters of its southern periphery (Amur Plate) based on GPS data for the Far East (Sikhote Alin profile), and Transbaikal regions are shown as an example. A model of the Amur Plate was used to illustrate the behavior of the extension zone on its western boundary represented by the Lake Baikal depression during the Kultuk earthquake (M = 6.3, August, 27, 2008). Paleomagnetic data made it possible to determine the rotation pole of the Siberian Craton relative to its surrounding folded structures during the Mesozoic and to estimate its kinematic parameters. The permanent position of the rotation pole in the relative coordinate system since the terminal Paleozoic until the Recent indicates a constant rotation velocity of the Siberian domain within the Eurasian Plate structure.

Keywords

rotation of tectonic plates present-day stage Mesozoic GPS method paleomagnetic method Siberian domain Eurasian Plate 

References

  1. 1.
    S. V. Ashurkov, V. A. San’kov, A. I. Miroshnichenko, et al., “GPS Geodetic Constraints on the Kinematics of the Amurian Plate,” Geol. Geofiz., No. 2, 299–311 (2011).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. L. Bazhenov and A. A. Mossakovskii, “Horizontal Movements of the Siberian Platform in the Triassic on the Basis of Paleomagnetic and Geological Data,” Geotektonika, No. 1, 59–69 (1986).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. L. Belyakov, G. E. Bondarenko, V. V. Ivanyuk, and A. V. Smirnov, “New Data on Late Mesozoic Strike-Slip Deformations in Sedimentary Cover of the Northern Sector of the West Siberian Plate,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk 372 (2000) [Dokl. Earth Sci. 372, 646–649 (2000)].Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. M. Buslov, T. Matanabe, L. V. Smirnova, et al., “Role of Strike-Slip Faulting in the Late Paleozoic-Early Mesozoic Tectonics and Geodynamics of the Altai-Sayan and East Kazakhstan Fold Regions,” Geol. Geofiz. 44(1–2), 49–75 (2003).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. M. Buslov, D. A. Kokh, and I. Grave, “Mesozoic-Cenozoic Tectonics and Geodynamics of the Altai, Tien-Shan, and Northern Kazakhstan from Apatite Fission-Track Data,” Geol. Geofiz. 49(9), 862–870 (2008).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. G. Bykov, V. A. Bormotov, A. A. Kokovkin, et al., “Onset of the Formation of a Single Network of Geodynamic Observations of the Far East Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences,” Vestn. Dal’nevost. Otd. Ross. Akad. Nauk, No. 4, 83–93 (2009).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    N. F. Vasilenko, A. S. Prytkov, Ch. U. Kin, and H. Takahashi, “Coseismic Deformations of the Earth’s Surface in Sakhalin Related to the August 2, 2007, Mw = 6.2 Nevelsk Earthquake,” Tikhookean. Geol. 28(5), 6–22 (2009) [Russ. J. Pacif. Geol. 3 (5), 424–428 (2009)].Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. S. Voronov, “Tangential Regional Strike-Slip Deformations of the Earth’s Crust: Evidence from Middle Siberia,” Inf. byul. Inst. Geol. Arktiki 17, 13–20 (1959) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. S. Voronov and A. N. Khramov, “Rotation of the Siberian Platform and its Shear Tectonics,” in Shear Tectonic Movements and their Role in the Formation of Mineral Deposits (Leningrad, 1988), pp. 91–95 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yu. G. Gatinskii and D. V. Runquist, “Geodynamics of Eurasia: Plate Tectonics and Block Tectonics,” Geotektonika, No. 1, 3–20 (2004) [Geotectonics 38, 1–16 (2004)].Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. D. Glukhmanchuk, “Manifestation of Shear Deformations in the Cover of the Western Siberiam Playe with Reference to the Petroleum Potential of the Bazhenov Formation,” in Tectonics of Platformal Areas (Nauka, Novosibirsk, 1988), pp. 121–125 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    L. P. Zonenshain, M. I. Kuzmin, and L. M. Natapov, Tectonics of the Lithospheric Plates of the USSR Territory (Nedra, Moscow, 1990), Vol. 2 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Yu. Kazansky, Extended Abstract of Doctoral Dissertation in Geology and Mineralogy (Novosibirsk, 2002).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    V. A. Kontorovich, “The Meso-Cenozoic Tectonics and Petroleum Potential of West Siberia,” Geol. Geofiz. 50(4), 461–474 (2009).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    N. V. Koronovsky, G. N. Gogenkov, M. A. Goncharov, et al., “Role of Shear along Horizontal Plane in the Formation of Helicoidal Structures,” Geotektonika, No. 5, 50–64 (2009) [Geotectonics 43, 379–391 (2009)].Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. V. Lukhnev, V. A. San’kov, A. I. Miroshnichenko, et al., Present-day Tectonic Deformations of Central Asia based on GPS Measurement during 1994–2004, in Present-Day Geodynamics and Hazardous Natural Processes in Central Asia, Ed. by K. G. Levi and S. I. Sherman (Inst. Zemn. Kore. Sib. Otd. RAN, Irkutsk, 2005), Vol. 2, pp. 26–38 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    A. V. Lukhnev, V. A. San’kov, A. I. Miroshnichenko, et al., “Rotations and Deformations of the Earth’s Surface in the Baikal-Monglo Region based on Measurements,” Geol. Geofiz. 51(7), 1006–1017 (2010).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yu. F. Malyshev, V. Ya. Podgornyi, B. F. Shevchenko, et al., “Deep Structure of the Amur Lithospheric Plate Border Zone,” Tikhookean. Geol. 26(2), 3–17 (2007) [Russ. J. Pac. Geol. 1, 107–119 (2007)]Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    D. V. Metelkin, I. V. Gordienko, Kh. Zhao, and V. S. Klimuk, “Early Cretaceous Geodynamics of the Transbaikal Region: Paleomagnetic Aspect,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk 393 (2003) [Dokl. Earth Sci. 393, 1221–1226 (2003)].Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    D. V. Metelkin, I. V. Gordienko, and Kh. Zhao, “Paleomagnetism of Early Cretaceous Volcanic Rocks from Transbaikalia: Argument for Mesozoic Strike-Slip Motions in Central Asian Structure,” Geol. Geofiz. 45(12), 1404–1417 (2004).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    D. V. Metelkin, I. V. Gordienko, and V. S. Klimuk, “Paleomagnetism of Upper Jurassic Basalts from Transbaikalia: New Data on the Time of Closure of the Mongol-Okhotsk Ocean and Mesozoic Intraplate Tectonics of Central Asia,” Geol. Geofiz. 48(10), 1061–1073 (2007).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    D. V. Metelkin, V. A. Vernikovskii, A. Yu. Kazansky, et al., “The Mesozoic Apparent Polar Wander Path for the Siberian Domain of the Eurasian Plate,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk 418(4), 500–505 (2008) [Dokl. Earth Sci. 418, 62–67 (2008)].Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    D. V. Metelkin, Extended Abstract of Doctoral Dissertation in Geology and Mineralogy (Novosibirsk, 2010).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    G. L. Mitrofanov and A. P. Taskin, “Structural Relations of the Siberian Platform with Folded Surrounding Structures,” Geotektonika, No. 1, 3–15 (1994).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    L. M. Parfenov, B. M. Kozmin, V. S. Imaev, and L. A. Savostin, “Tectonic Nature of the Olekma-Stanovoy Seismic Zone,” Geotektonika, No. 6, 94–108 (1987).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Role of Strike-Slip Tectonics in the Structure of the Earth’s Lithosphere and Terrestrial Planets (Nauka, St. Petersburg, 1997) [in Russian].Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    V. A. San’kov, A. V. Lukhnev, A. I. Miroshnichenko, et al., “Extension in the Baikal Rift: Present-Day Kinematics of Passive Rifting,” Dokl. Akad. Nauk 424(5), 664–668 (2009) [Dokl. Earth Sci. 425, 205–209 (2009)].Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    V. A. San’kov, A. V. Chipizubov, A. V. Lukhnev, et al., “Assessment of a Large Earthquake Risk in the Zone of Main Sayan Fault using GPS Geodesy and Paleoseismology,” Geol. Geofiz. 45(11), 1369–1376 (2004).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    V. Yu. Timofeev, P. Yu. Gornov, D. G. Ardyukov, et al., “GPS Measurements (2003–2006) in the Sikhote Alin Network, the Far East,” Tikhookean. Geol. 27(4), 39–49 (2008) [Russ. J. Pac. Geol. 1, 314–324 (2008)].Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    V. Yu. Timofeev, P. Yu. Gornov, D. G. Ardyukov, et al., “Simulation of Plate Motions as Exemplified by the Amur Plate,” in Proceedings of Symposium on Problems of Seismicity and Present-Day Geodynamics of Far East and East Siberia, Khabarovsk, Russia, 2010 (ITiG DVO, Khabarovsk, 2010), pp. 65–67 [in Russian].Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yu. V. Filippovich, “NEw Concept of Tectonic Structure of the Basement and Sedimentary Cover of the West Siberian Plate,” Geol. Nefti Gaza, No. 5, 51–62 (2001).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    B. M. Chikov, “Regional Mesozoic Deformations in the Inner Regions of the West Siberian Playe: Seismostructural Analysis,” Geol. Nefti Gaza, No. 2, 32–37 (2000).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    E. V. Apel, R. Burgmann, G. Steblov, et al., “Independent Active Microplate Tectonics of Northeast Asia from GPS Velocities and Block Modelling,” Geophys. Rev. Lett. 33(11), L11303 (2006), doi: 10.1029/2006GL026077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Z. Altamimi, X. Collilieux, J. Legrand, et al., “ITRF 2005: A New Release of the International Terrestrial Reference Frame Based on Time Series of Station Positions and Earth Orientation Parameters,” J. Geophys. Res. 112(B9), B09401 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    J. Besse and V. Courtillot, “Apparent and True Polar Wander and Geometry of the Geomagnetic Field Over the Last 200 Myr,” J. Geophys. Res. 107(B11), 1–31 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    C. Boucher, Z. Altamimi, P. Sillard, and M. Feissel-Vernier, “The ITRF 2000,” IERS Technical Note, No. 31, (2001).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    E. Calais, M. Vergnolle, V. San’kov, et al., “GPS Measurements of Crustal Deromation in the Baikal-Mongolia Area (1994–2002); Implications for Current Kinematics of Asia,” J. Geophys. Res. 108(B10), 2501 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    E. Calais, L. Dong, M. Wang, et al., “Continental Deformation in Asia from a Combined GPS Solution,” Geophys. Res. Lett. 33(24), L24319 (2006). Doi: 10.1029/2006GL028433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    J.-P. Gogne, V. A. Kravchinsky, N. Halim, and F. Hankard, “Late Jurassic — Early Cretaceous Closure of the Mongol-Okhotsk Ocean Demonstrated by New Mesozoic Palaeomagnetic Results from the Trans-Baikal Area (SE Siberia),” Geophys. J. Int. 163, 813–832 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    J. De Grave, M. M. Buslov, and P. Haute, “Distant Effects of India-Eurasia Convergence and Mesozoic Intracontinental Deformation in Central Asia: Constraints from Apatite Fission-Track Thermochronology,” J. Asian Earth Sci. 29, 194–213 (2007).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    C. De Mets, R. G. Gordon, D. F. Argus, and S. Stein, “Current Plate Motions,” Geophys. J. Int. 101, 135–353 (1990).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    C. De Mets, R. G. Gordon, D. F. Argus, et al., “Effect of Recent Revisions to the Geomagnetic Reversal Time Scale on Estimates of Current Plate Motions,” Geophys. Res. Lett. 21(20), 2191–2194 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    P. C. England and P. Molnar, “Late Quaternary to Decadal Velocity Fields in Asia,” J. Geophys. Res. 110(B12401) (2006). Doi: 10.1029/2004JB003541.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    S. Gilder and V. Courtillot, “Timing of North-South China Collision from New Middle To Late Mosozoic Paleomagnetic Data from the North China Block,” J. Geophys. Res. 102, 17713–17727 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    K. Heki and T. Hiroaki, et al., “The Amurian Plate Motion and Current Plate Kinematics in Eastern Asia,” J. Geophys. Res. 104(B12), 147–155 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    W. E. Holt and N. Chamot-Rooke, et al., “Velocity Field in Asia Inferred from Quaternary Faults Slip Rate and Global Positioning System Observations,” J. Geophys. Res., No. (B8), 19185–19209 (2000).Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hsu Houtze, Pil-Ho Park, Teruyuki Kato, et al. “Amurian—A Nassiance Plate: New GPS Result Supplemented by Geological and Geophysical Evidence,” in APSG Abstract Book. 2006. The 6-th Workshop of Asia-Pacific Space Geodynamics Program, ICC Jeju, Jeju, Korea, 2006 (APSG, Jeju, 2006).Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    B. C. Huang, Y. X. Zhou, and R. X. Zhu, “Paleomagnetic Discussions on the Phanerozoic Evolution and Chinese Continent,” Earth Sci. Front. 15(3), 348–359 (2008).Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sh. Jin, P.-H. Park, and W. Zhu, “Micro-Plate Tectonics and Kinematics in Northeast Asia Inferred from a Dense Set of GPS Observations,” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 257, 486–496 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    V. A. Kravchinsky, J.-P. Cogne, W. P. Harbert, and M. I. Kuzmin, “Evolition of the Mongol-Okhotsk Ocean As Constrained by New Palaeomagnetic Data from the Mongol-Okhotsk Suture Zone, Siberia,” Geophys. J. Int. 148, 34–57 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    C. Kreemer, G. Blewitt, and W. E. Holt, “On the Stability of a Geodetic No-Net-Rotation Frame and Its Implication for the International Terrestrial Reference Frame,” Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L17306 (2006). diuL 19,1929/2996GL027058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    C. Kreemer, W. E. Holt, and A. J. Haines, “An Integrated Global Model of Present-Day Plate Motions and Plate Boundary Deformation,” Geophys. J. Int. 154(1), 8–34 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    G. Meng, X. Shen, J. Wu, and E. A. Rogozhin, “Present-Day Crustal Motion in Northeast China Determined from GPS Measurements,” Earth Planet. Sp. 56, 1441–1445 (2006).Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    D. V. Metelkin, V. A. Vernikovsky, A. Yu. Kazansky, and M. T. D. Wingate, “Late Mesozoic Tectonics of Central Asia Based on Paleomagnetic Evidence,” Gondwana Res. 18, 400–419 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    P. Molnar and P. Tapponnier, “Cenozoic Tectonics of Asia: Effects of a Continental Collision,” Science 189, 419–426 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    L. Prawirodirdjo and Y. Bock, “Instantaneous Global Plate Motion Model 12 Years of Continuous GPS Observations,” J. Geophys. Res. 109(B8), B084405 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    G. F. Sella, T. H. Dixon, and A. Mao, “REVEL: A Model for Recent Plate Velocities from Space Geodesy,” J. Geophys. Res. 107(B4), 2081 (2002). Doi: 10.1029/2999JB000033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    N. V. Shestakov, M. D. Gerasimenko, A. G. Kolomiets, et al., “About Current Geodynamic Activity of the Central Sikhote-Alinsky Fault and Southern Part of the Russian Far East As a Whole According to GPS Observations,” in The 13rd Workshop of Asia-Pacific Space Geodynamic Program: Abstract Book, Novosibirsk, Russia, 2008 (Novosibirsk, 2008), pp. 16–17.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    N. Shestakov, M. Gerasimenko, A. G. Kolomiets, et al., “Recent Crustal Movements of Russian Far East As Seen from GPS Observations,” in Program and Abstracts. APSG Workshop 2010 on Progress in Space Geodesy and Earth Environment Change, Shanghai, China, 2010 (Shanghai, 2010), p. 22.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    S. Stein and R. Gordon, “Statistical Tests of Additional Plate Boundaries from Plate Motion Inversions,” Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 69, 401–412 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    V. Yu. Timofeev, D. G. Ardyukov, P. Yu. Gornov, and E. V. Boyko, “Sikhote Alin GPS Profile Results and Amur Plate Motion,” in Proceedings of APSG 2008 Symposium on Space Geodynamics and Modeling of the Global Geodynamic Processes, International Conference in the frames of the Asian-Pacific Space Geodynamics, Novosibirsk, Russia, 2009 (Inst. Neftegaz. Geol. Geofiz., Novosibirsk, 2009), pp. 14–21.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    D. Wei and T. Seno, “Determination of the Amurian Plate Motion,” in Mantle Dynamics and Plate Interaction in East Asia, Ed. by M. Flower, S. Chung, C. Lo, and T. Lee (AGU, Washington, 1998), pp. 337–346.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Z. Y. Yang and J. Besse, “New Mesozoic Apparent Polar Wander Path for South China: Tectonic Consequences,” J. Geophys. Res. 106, 8493–8520 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    L. P. Zonenshain and L. A. Savostin, “Geodynamics of the Baikal Rift Zone and Plate Tectonics of Asia,” Tectonophysics 76, 1–45 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. Yu. Timofeev
    • 1
  • A. Yu. Kazansky
    • 1
  • D. G. Ardyukov
    • 1
  • D. V. Metelkin
    • 1
  • P. Yu. Gornov
    • 2
  • N. V. Shestakov
    • 3
    • 4
  • A. V. Timofeev
    • 1
  • G. Z. Gil’manova
    • 2
  1. 1.Trofimuk Institute of Petroleum Geology and Geophysics, Siberian BranchRussian Academy of SciencesNovosibirskRussia
  2. 2.Kosygin Institute of Tectonics and Geophysics, Far East BranchRussian Academy of SciencesKhabarovskRussia
  3. 3.Institute of Applied Mathematics, Far East BranchRussian Academy of SciencesVladivostokRussia
  4. 4.Kwangwoon UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations