Skip to main content
Log in

The Moderating and Mediating Role of Corporate Reputation in the Link Between Service Innovation and Cross-Buying Intention

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Corporate Reputation Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study has been undertaken with following aims; first, to establish the plausibility of a positive relationship between service innovation and corporate reputation and their effect together on cross-buying intention of customers of telecommunication industry in India. Second, empirically examine the mediating and moderating effect of corporate reputation between service innovation and cross-buying intention. The descriptive approach was applied and tested by adopting a survey method where the sample units comprised of customers from various telecommunication service providers. Convenience sampling method was used based on which 256 customers of major service providers in southern part of India were approached for their opinion on the constructs. Smart—partial least square (hereinafter PLS) software tool was used to test the conceptual framework. On analyzing the result, it was observed that corporate reputation explained the relationship between service innovation and cross-buying intention; further corporate reputation also strengthens the effect of service innovation on cross-buying intention. The survey results indicate that decision makers/managers of telecommunication service firms need to understand that building reputation is one of the key aspects that would strengthen their initiatives of bringing service innovation frequently, as well as make their customers to cross-buy other services. The study fills the gap by analyzing the combined effect of service innovation and corporate reputation and cross-buying intention. Further, the study estimates the mediating and the moderating effect of corporate reputation between service innovation and cross-buying intention in telecommunication service settings which was not attempted earlier.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aas, T.H., and P.E. Pedersen. 2011. The impact of service innovation on firm-level financial performance. The Service Industries Journal 31 (13): 2071–2090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E.W., C. Fornell, and D.R. Lehmann. 1994. Customer satisfaction, market share, and profitability: Findings from Sweden. The Journal of Marketing 58 (3): 53–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J.C., and D.W. Gerbing. 1991. Predicting the performance of measures in a confirmatory factor analysis with pre-test assessment of their substantive validities. Journal of Applied Psychology 76 (5): 732–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderton, B. 1999. Innovation, product quality, variety, and trade performance: an empirical analysis of Germany and the UK. Oxford Economic Papers 51 (1): 152–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreassen, T.W., and S. Streukens. 2009. Service innovation and electronic word-of-mouth: is it worth listening to? Managing Service Quality: An International Journal 19 (3): 249–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avlonitis, G.J., P.G. Papastathaopoulou, and S.P. Gounaris. 2001. An empirically-based typology of product innovativeness for new financial services: Success and failure scenarios. Journal of Product Innovation Management 18 (5): 324–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R.M., and D.A. Kenny. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (6): 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barras, R. 1986. Towards a theory of innovation in services. Research Policy 15 (4): 161–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettencourt, L.A. 2004. Change-oriented organizational citizenship behaviors: The direct and moderating influence of goal orientation. Journal of Retailing 80 (3): 165–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blazevic, V., and A. Lievens. 2004. Learning during the new financial service innovation process: antecedents and performance effects. Journal of Business Research 57 (4): 374–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossink, B.A.G. 2002. The strategic function of quality in the management of innovation. Total Quality Management 13 (2): 195–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowling, A. 2002. Research Methods in Health: Investigating Health and Health Services, 2nd ed. Buckingham: Biddies Limited, University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brignall, S., and J. Ballantine. 1996. Performance measurement in service businesses revisited. International Journal of Service Industry Management 7 (1): 6–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, D.B. 2001. Relationships between personal and corporate reputation. European Journal of Marketing 35 (3/4): 316–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, N., and S.K. Grove. 1993. The Practice of Nursing Research. Conduct, Critique, and Utilization. Philadelphia: Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butera, A. 2000. Cross-selling: capitalizing on the opportunities. Hoosier Bank 87 (7): 14–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrigan, M., and A. Attalla. 2001. The myth of the ethical consumer–do ethics matter in purchase behavior? Journal of consumer marketing 18 (7): 560–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caruana, A. 1997. Corporate reputation: concept and measurement. Journal of Product and Brand Management 6 (2): 109–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caruana, A., and M.T. Ewing. 2010. How corporate reputation, quality, and value influence on online loyalty. Journal of Business Research 63 (9): 1103–1110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cellular Operators Association of India- COAI, 2015. GSM Subscriber Figure Report—2015, http://www.coai.com/Statistics/GSM-Subscriber-Figure-Report. 19 March, 2015.

  • Chen, Y.S. 2008. The driver of green innovation and green image–green core competence. Journal of Business Ethics 81 (3): 531–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W.W., B.L. Marcolin, and P.R. Newsted. 2003. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research 14 (2): 189–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, G.A., and P.J. Peter. 1984. Research design effects on the reliability of rating scales: a meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing Research 21 (4): 360–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, R., and I. Miles. 2000. Innovation, Measurement and Services: The New Problematique. In Innovation Systems in the Service Economy, ed. J.S. Metcalfe, and I. Miles, 85–103. Boston, MA: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Corkindale, D., and M. Belder. 2009. Corporate brand reputation and the adoption of innovation. Journal of Product and Brand Management 18 (4): 242–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cravens, K., E. Goad Oliver, and S. Ramamoorti. 2003. The reputation index: Measuring and managing corporate reputation. European Management Journal 21 (2): 201–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cretu, A.E., and R.J. Brodie. 2007. The influence of brand image and company reputation where manufacturers market to small firms: A customer value perspective. Industrial Marketing Management 36 (2): 230–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damanpour, F., R.M. Walker, and C.N. Avellaneda. 2009. Combinative effects of innovation types and organizational performance: A longitudinal study of service organizations. Journal of Management Studies 46 (4): 650–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datta, A. 2011. An integrative model to explain the ability to commercialize innovations: Linking networks, absorptive capacity, ambidexterity and environmental factors. Journal of Management & Strategy 2 (2): 2–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, G., R. Chun, R.V. da Silva, and S. Roper. 2001. The personification metaphor as a measurement approach for corporate reputation. Corporate Reputation Review 4 (2): 113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F.D., R. Bagozzi, and P.R. Warshaw. 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science 35 (8): 982–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Brentani, U., and R.G. Cooper. 1992. Developing successful new financial services for businesses. Industrial Marketing Management 21 (3): 231–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Ruyter, K., M. Wetzels, and M. Kleijnen. 2001. Customer adoption of e-service: an experimental study. International Journal of Service Industry Management 12 (2): 184–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, D.H. 2003. Consumer perception of corporate donations effects of company reputation for social responsibility and type of donation. Journal of Advertising 32 (4): 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande, R., J.U. Farley, and F.E. Webster Jr. 1993. Corporate culture customer orientation and innovativeness in Japanese firms: A quadrad analysis. Journal of Marketing 57 (1): 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dortok, A. 2006. A managerial look at the interaction between internal communication and corporate reputation. Corporate Reputation Review 8 (4): 322–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edvardsson, B. 1997. Quality in new service development: key concepts and a frame of reference. International Journal of Production Economics 52 (1): 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edvardsson, B., and J. Olsson. 1996. Key concepts for new service development. Service Industries Journal 16 (2): 140–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, L., R. Johnston, T.J. Brignall, R. Silvestro, and C. Voss. 1991. Performance Measurement in Service Businesses. London: CIMA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, L.R., and R.E. Goldsmith. 1993. A validation of the Goldsmith and Hofacker innovativeness scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement 53 (4): 1105–1116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fogelman, K., and C. Comber. 2002. Surveys and sampling. Research Methods in Educational Leadership and Management 2: 93–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C. 1996. Reputation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C.J., N.A. Gardberg, and J.M. Sever. 2000. The reputation quotient: A multi-stakeholder measure of corporate reputation. Journal of Brand Management 7 (4): 241–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C.J. 2007. List of lists: A compilation of international corporate reputation ratings. Corporate Reputation Review 10 (2): 144–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., and F.L. Bookstein. 1982. Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research 19 (4): 440–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., and D.F. Larcker. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1): 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fryxell, G.E., and J. Wang. 1994. The fortune corporate reputation index: Reputation for what? Journal of Management 20 (1): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadrey, J., F. Gallouj, and O. Weinstein. 1995. New modes of innovation: how services benefit industry. International Journal of Service Industry Management 6 (3): 4–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganesan, P., and M. Sridhar. 2016. Service Innovation and Customer Performance of Telecommunication Service Provider: A Study on Mediation Effect of Corporate Reputation. Corporate Reputation Review 19 (1): 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghozali, I. 2006. Analisis Multivariate lanjutan dengan program SPSS. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez Mieres, C., J. Angel Lopez Sanchez, and M. Leticia Santos Vijande. 2012. Internal marketing, innovation and performance in business services firms: The role of organizational unlearning. International Journal of Management 29 (4): 403–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodhue, D.L., W. Lewis, and R. Thompson. 2012. Does PLS have advantages for small sample size or non-normal data? MIS Quarterly 36 (3): 891–1001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J.F., C.M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt. 2011. PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice 19 (2): 139–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair Jr., J.F., M. Sarstedt, L. Hopkins, and V.G. Kuppelwieser. 2014. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review 26 (2): 106–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, F., and L. De Chernatony. 2001. Corporate branding and corporate brand performance. European Journal of Marketing 35 (3/4): 441–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helm, S., and C. Klode. 2011. Challenges in Measuring Corporate Reputation. Reputation Management, 99–110. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helm, S., A. Eggert, and I. Garnefeld. 2010. Modeling the impact of corporate reputation on customer satisfaction and loyalty using partial least squares. In Handbook of Partial Least Squares, ed. V. Vinzi, 515–534. Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Helm, S., I. Garnefeld, and J. Tolsdorf. 2009. Perceived corporate reputation and consumer satisfaction–an experimental exploration of causal relationships. Australasian Marketing Journal 17 (2): 69–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henard, D.H., and P.A. Dacin. 2010. Reputation for product innovation: Its impact on consumers. Journal of Product Innovation Management 27 (3): 321–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillenbrand, C., and K. Money. 2007. Corporate responsibility and corporate reputation: Two separate concepts or two sides of the same coin? Corporate Reputation Review 10 (4): 261–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holak, S.L., and D.R. Lehmann. 1990. Purchase intentions and the dimensions of innovation: an exploratory model. Journal of Product Innovation Management 7 (1): 59–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong, S.Y., and S.U. Yang. 2009. Effects of reputation, relational satisfaction, and customer–company identification on positive word-of-mouth intentions. Journal of Public Relations Research 21 (4): 381–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, M.L.M., J.S. Horng, and Y.H.C. Sun. 2009. Hospitality teams: Knowledge sharing and service innovation performance. Tourism Management 30 (1): 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iacobucci, D., and A. Duhachek. 2003. Advancing alpha: Measuring reliability with confidence. Journal of Consumer Psychology 13 (4): 478–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, G.R., P.J. LaPlaca, and A. Sharma. 2006. Innovation and new product introductions in emerging markets: Strategic recommendations for the Indian market. Industrial Marketing Management 35 (3): 373–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, L.R., and J.M. Brett. 1984. Mediators, moderators, and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology 69 (2): 307–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssens, A.C.J., Y.S. Aulchenko, S. Elefante, G.J. Borsboom, E.W. Steyerberg, and C.M. Van Duijn. 2006. Predictive testing for complex diseases using multiple genes: fact or fiction? Genetics in Medicine 8 (7): 395–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeng, S.P. 2008. Effects of corporate reputations, relationships and competing suppliers marketing programmes on customers cross-buying intentions. The Service Industries Journal 28 (1): 15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin, B., J. Yong Park, and J. Kim. 2008. Cross-cultural examination of the relationships among firm reputation, e-satisfaction, e-trust, and e-loyalty. International Marketing Review 25 (3): 324–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamakura, W.A., B.S. Kossar, and M. Wedel. 2004. Identifying innovators for the cross-selling of new products. Management Science 50 (8): 1120–1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keh, H.T., and Y. Xie. 2009. Corporate reputation and customer behavioral intentions: The roles of trust, identification and commitment. Industrial Marketing Management 38 (7): 732–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerlinger, F.N. 1986. Foundations of Behavioral Research, 3rd ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J.B., and C.J. Choi. 2003. Reputation and product tampering in service industries. The Service Industries Journal 23 (4): 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R.B. 2005. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Methodology in the Social Sciences, 3rd ed. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kostopoulos, K., A. Papalexandris, M. Papachroni, and G. Ioannou. 2011. Absorptive capacity, innovation, and financial performance. Journal of Business Research 64 (12): 1335–1343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, C.S., C.J. Chiu, C.F. Yang, and D.C. Pai. 2010. The effects of corporate social responsibility on brand performance: The mediating effect of industrial brand equity and corporate reputation. Journal of Business Ethics 95 (3): 457–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Lei. 2012. The impact of service innovation on firm performance: Evidence from the Chinese tourism sector. The Service Industries Journal 33 (15/16): 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, M.B., and D.B. Montgomery. 1988. First-mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal 9 (S1): 41–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippman, S.A., and K.F. McCardle. 1987. Does cheaper, faster, or better imply sooner in the timing of innovation decisions? Management Science 33 (8): 1058–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, T.D., N.A. Card, J.A. Bovaird, K.J. Preacher, and C.S. Crandall. 2007. Structural Equation Modeling of Mediation and Moderation with Contextual Factors. Modeling Contextual Effects in Longitudinal Studies, (chapter -9), vol. 1, 207–230. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, T.C., and L.W. Wu. 2007. Customer retention and cross-buying in the banking industry: An integration of service attributes, satisfaction and trust. Journal of Financial Services Marketing 12 (2): 132–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock, C., and E. Gummesson. 2004. Whither services marketing? In search of a new paradigm and fresh perspectives. Journal of service research 7 (1): 20–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, P.B., and J. Gaskin. 2014. Partial least squares (PLS) structural equation modeling (SEM) for building and testing behavioral causal theory: When to choose it and how to use it. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 57 (2): 123–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu, H.P., and P.Y.J. Su. 2009. Factors affecting purchase intention on mobile shopping web sites. Internet Research 19 (4): 442–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luoma-aho, V. 2007. Neutral reputation and public sector organizations. Corporate Reputation Review 10 (2): 124–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthing, J., B. Sandén, and B. Edvardsson. 2004. New service development: Learning from and with customers. International Journal of Service Industry Management 15 (5): 479–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, R., and G. Armstrong. 2001. A symbiosis of quality and innovation in SMEs: A multiple case study analysis. Managerial Auditing Journal 16 (7): 394–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menor, Larry J., Mohan V. Tatikonda, and Scott E. Sampson. 2002. New service development: Areas for exploitation and exploration. Journal of Operations Managements 20 (2): 135–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, A.D., and J.B. Goes. 1988. Organizational assimilation of innovations: A multilevel contextual analysis. Academy of Management Journal 31 (4): 897–923.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelis, M., D.M. Woisetschläger, C. Backhaus, and D. Ahlert. 2008. The effects of country of origin and corporate reputation on initial trust: An experimental evaluation of the perception of Polish consumers. International Marketing Review 25 (4): 404–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M.P., and J.G. Covin. 2000. Environmental marketing: a source of reputational, competitive, and financial advantage. Journal of Business Ethics 23 (3): 299–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngobo, P.V. 2004. Drivers of customers cross-buying intentions. European Journal of Marketing 38 (9/10): 1129–1157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, N., and G. Leblanc. 2001. Corporate image and corporate reputation in customers retention decisions in services. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 8 (4): 227–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J.C. 1978. Psychometric Theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A. 2010. Service productivity, quality and innovation: Implications for service-design practice and research. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences 2 (3): 277–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, C., and T.M. Lee. 2009. Information direction, website reputation and e-WOM effect: A moderating role of product type. Journal of Business Research 62 (1): 61–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J.W., R. Robertson, and C.L. Wu. 2006. Modelling the impact of airline service quality and marketing variables on passengers future behavioral intentions. Transportation Planning and Technology 29 (5): 359–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R.A. 2000. A meta-analysis of variance accounted for and factor loadings in exploratory factor analysis. Marketing Letters 11 (3): 261–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, J.E., R. Lewis, L. Mobilio, D. Perry, and N. Raman. 2004. Viral marketing or electronic word-of-mouth advertising: Examining consumer responses and motivations to pass along email. Journal of Advertising Research 44 (4): 333–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ping, R. A., 2009. Is there any way to improve average variance extracted (AVE) in a latent variable (LV) X (Revised). http://home.att.net/-rpingjr/ImprovAVE1.doc. Accessed 3 June, 2013.

  • Price, R., and R.J. Brodie. 2001. Transforming a public service organization from inside out to outside in the case of Auckland City-New Zealand. Journal of Service Research 4 (1): 50–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichheld, F.P., and W.E. Sasser. 1990. Zero defeciions: Quoliiy comes to services. Harvard Business Review 68 (5): 105–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinartz, W.J., and V. Kumar. 2003. The impact of customer relationship characteristics on profitable lifetime duration. Journal of Marketing 67 (1): 77–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P.W., and G.R. Dowling. 2002. Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management Journal 23 (12): 1077–1093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, C., and S. Thomsen. 2004. The impact of corporate reputation on performance: Some danish evidence. European Management Journal 22 (2): 201–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosebush, M. 2011. Validations of the Character Mosaic Report. Air Force Academy Colorado Springs Co. Accessed on 4 November, 2014.

  • Salisbury, W.D., R.A. Pearson, A.W. Pearson, and D.W. Miller. 2001. Perceived security and World Wide Web purchase intention. Industrial Management and Data Systems 101 (4): 165–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J.A. 1934. The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Transaction Publishers 55: 1–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selnes, F. 1993. An examination of the effect of product performance on brand reputation, satisfaction and loyalty. Journal of Product & Brand Management 2 (4): 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sichtmann, C., M.V. Selasinsky, and A. Diamantopoulos. 2011. Service quality and export performance of business-to-business service providers: The role of service employee-and customer-oriented quality control initiatives. Journal of International Marketing 19 (1): 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirilli, G., and R. Evangelista. 1998. Technological innovation in services and manufacturing: Results from Italian surveys. Research Policy 27 (9): 881–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, M. 1982. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects on structural equation models. In Sociological Methodology, vol. 13, ed. S. Leichardt, 290–312. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soureli, M., B.R. Lewis, and K.M. Karantinou. 2008. Factors that affect consumers cross-buying intention: a model for financial services. Journal of Financial Services Marketing 13 (1): 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staw, B.M., and L.D. Epstein. 2000. What bandwagons bring: Effects of popular management techniques on corporate performance, reputation, and CEO pay? Administrative Science Quarterly 45 (3): 523–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Su, C.S. 2011. The role of service innovation and customer experience in ethnic restaurants. The Service Industries Journal 31 (3): 425–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, TRAI (2017) Telecom Subscription Data as on 28th February—2017, http://www.trai.gov.in/sites/default/files/Press_Release_34_Eng_28_04_2017_0.pdf. Accessed 16 June, 2017.

  • Vickery, S.K., J. Jayaram, C. Droge, and R. Calantone. 2003. The effects of an integrative supply chain strategy on customer service and financial performance: an analysis of direct versus indirect relationships. Journal of Operations Management 21 (5): 523–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Victorino, L., R. Verma, G. Plaschka, and C. Dev. 2005. Service innovation and customer choices in the hospitality industry. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal 15 (6): 555–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voss, C.A. 1992. Measurement of INNOVATION and design performance IN SERVICES. Design Management Journal (Former Series) 3 (1): 40–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, G., K. Dinnie, and K.P. Wiedmann. 2006. How do corporate reputation and customer satisfaction impact customer defection? A study of private energy customers in Germany. Journal of Services Marketing 20 (6): 412–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, G., V.W. Mitchell, P.R. Jackson, and S.E. Beatty. 2009. Examining the antecedents and consequences of corporate reputation: a customer perspective. British Journal of Management 20 (2): 187–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C.L., and P.K. Ahmed. 2004. The development and validation of the organizational innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analyses. European Journal of Innovation Management 7 (4): 303–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y.S., T.I. Tang, and J.T.E. Tang. 2001. An instrument for measuring customer satisfaction toward web sites that market digital products and services. Journal Electronic Commerce Research 2 (3): 89–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wischnevsky, J.D., and F. Damanpour. 2006. Organizational transformation and performance: An examination of three perspectives. Journal of Managerial Issues 18 (1): 104–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, E., H.J. Guffey, and V. Kijewski. 1993. The effects of information and company reputation on intentions to buy a business service. Journal of Business Research 27 (3): 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaltman, G., R. Duncan, and J. Holbek. 1973. Innovations and Organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Q., M.A. Vonderembse, and J.S. Lim. 2003. Manufacturing flexibility: Defining and analyzing relationships among competence, capability, and customer satisfaction. Journal of Operations Management 21 (2): 173–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Sridhar.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Questionnaire

This questionnaire is to measure Innovation, Corporate Reputation, and Cross-Buying Intention with Telecommunication Service Provider. There is no right or wrong answers. You are requested to choose the best as per your knowledge or experience and mark ( ) in the space provided. Please fill all questions.

figure a
figure b
figure c

Appendix 2

figure d

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sridhar, M., Mehta, A. The Moderating and Mediating Role of Corporate Reputation in the Link Between Service Innovation and Cross-Buying Intention. Corp Reputation Rev 21, 50–70 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-018-0044-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-018-0044-9

Keywords

Navigation