Corporate Reputation Review

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 71–83 | Cite as

Developing a New Measure of Media Reputation

Original Article
  • 39 Downloads

Abstract

This study developed a new composite measure of media reputation combining media favorability, media visibility, and recency. It showed that this new measure had superiority over the measure of media favorability in predicting corporate reputation, and local newspapers were a better news source to measure media reputation than elite newspapers. This study was based on the content analysis of 2817 news articles from two elite newspapers and many local newspapers in the United States.

Keywords

Media reputation Corporate reputation Agenda-setting Measurement 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Reputation Institute for providing the RepTrak® Pulse index data, and Dr. Guido Berens and the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions to improve the quality of this article.

References

  1. Antle, J. 1999. The new economics of agriculture. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81: 993–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baltagi, B.H. 2008. Econometric analysis of panel data. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Bansal, P., and I. Clelland. 2004. Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural Environment. Academy of Management Journal 47 (1): 93–103.Google Scholar
  4. Bowen, R.M., A.K. Davis, and D.A. Matsumoto. 2005. Emphasis on pro forma versus GAAP earnings in quarterly press releases: determinants, sec intervention and market reactions. The Accounting Review 80 (4): 1011–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carmines, E.G., and R.A. Zeller. 1979. Reliability and validity assessment, vol. 17. CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carpentier, F.R.D., D.R. Roskos-Ewoldsen, and B.B. Roskos-Ewoldsen. 2008. A test of the network model of political priming. Media Psychology 11 (2): 186–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carroll, C.E., and M.E. McCombs. 2003. Agenda-setting effects of business news on the public's images and opinions about major corporations. Corporate Reputation Review 6 (1): 36–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Collins, A.M., and M.R. Quillian. 1969. Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Memory 8: 240–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dalisay, F., and A. Tan. 2009. Assimilation and contrast effects in the priming of asian american and african american stereotypes through TV exposure. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 86 (1): 7–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deephouse, D.L. 1996. Does isomorphism legitimate? Academy of Management Journal 39 (4): 1024–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deephouse, D.L. 2000. Media reputation as a strategic resource: An integration of mass communication and resource-based theories. Journal of Management 26 (6): 1091–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DiStaso, M.W. 2009. Corporate intermedia agenda-setting power: impression management use of pro forma earnings and tone. Unpublished dissertation, University of Miami.Google Scholar
  13. Dyck, A., and Zingales, L. 2002. The corporate governance role of media. In World Bank Institute (Eds.). The Right to Tell: The Role of Mass Media in Economic Development. Washington DC., pp 107–140.Google Scholar
  14. Einwiller, S., C.E. Carroll, and K. Korn. 2010. Under what conditions do the news media influence corporate reputation? the roles of media systems dependency and need for orientation. Corporate Reputation Review 12 (4): 299–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fombrun, C.J. 2006. The RepTrak system. Presented at 10th anniversary conference on reputation, image, identity and competitiveness, 25–28 May 2006, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Fombrun, C.J., and M. Shanley. 1990. What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal 33: 233–258.Google Scholar
  17. Gans, H.J. 1979. Deciding what’s news: a study of cbs evening news, nbc nightly news newsweek and time. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  18. Gilbert, S., C. Eyal, M.E. McCombs, and D. Nicholas. 1980. The state of the union address and press agenda. Journalism Quarterly 57 (4): 584–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Golan, G., and W. Wanta. 2001. Second-level agenda-setting in the new hampshire primary: a comparison of coverage in three newspapers and public perceptions of candidates. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 78: 247–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gordon, M.T., and L. Health. 1981. The news business, crime, and fear. In Reactions to crime, ed. D.A. Lewis, 227–251. CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Henriques, D.B. 2000. Business reporting: behind the curve. Columbia Journalism Review 39 (4): 18–21.Google Scholar
  22. Higgins, E.T., J.A. Bargh, and W. Lombardi. 1985. Nature of priming effects on categorization. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 11: 59–69.Google Scholar
  23. Holsti, O. 1969. Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Don Mills: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  24. Kiousis, S. 2004. Explicating media salience: A factor analysis of the new york times issue overage during the 2000 U.S. presidential election”. Journal of Communication 54 (1): 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kiousis, S., P. Bantimaroudis, and H. Ban. 1999. Candidate image attributes: experiments on the substantive dimension of second level agenda setting. Communication Research 26: 414–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kiousis, S., C. Popescu, and M. Mitrook. 2007. Understanding influence on corporate reputation: an examination of public relations efforts, media coverage, public opinion, and financial performance from an agenda-building and agenda-setting perspective. Journal of Public Relations Research 19 (2): 147–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee, S.Y., and C.E. Carroll. 2010. The emergence, variation and evolution of CSR on the media and public agenda. Journal of Business Ethics 104 (1): 115–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lombard, M., J. Snyder-Duch, and C.C. Bracken. 2002. Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Human Communication Research 28: 587–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McCombs, M.E. 2004. Setting the agenda: the mass media and public opinion. CA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  30. McCombs, M.E., and S. Ghanem. 2001. The convergence of agenda setting and framing. In Framing public life, ed. S. Reese, O. Gandy, and A. Grant, 67–81. NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  31. McCombs, M.E., and A. Reynolds. 2009. How the news shapes our civic agenda. In Media effects: advances in theory and research, ed. J. Bryant, and M.B. Oliver, 1–16. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
  32. McCombs, M.E., and D.L. Shaw. 1972. The agenda setting function of the mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly 36: 176–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Meijer, M. 2004. Does success breed success? effects of news and advertising on corporate reputation. Amsterdam: Aksant Academic Publisher.Google Scholar
  34. Meijer, M., and J. Kleinnijenhuis. 2006. News and corporate reputation: Empirical findings from the Netherlands. Public Relations Review 32: 341–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pew Research Center. 2012. 72% of Americans follow local news closely. http://pewresearch.org/pubs/2238/local-news-enthusiasts-newspaper-television-internet-communities. Accessed 13 Jun 2012.
  36. Pollock, T.G., and V.P. Rindova. 2003. Media legitimation effects in the market for initial public offerings. Academy of Management Journal 46 (5): 631–642.Google Scholar
  37. Ponzi, L.J., C.J. Fombrun, and N.A. Gardberg. 2011. RepTrak™ Pulse: Conceptualizing and validating a short-form measure of corporate reputation. Corporate Reputation Review 14 (1): 15–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Preston, P. 2009. Making the news: journalism and news cultures in Europe. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Ragas, M.R 2010. Agenda-building and agenda-setting in corporate proxy contests: Exploring influence among public relations efforts, financial media coverage and investor opinion. Unpublished dissertation, University of Florida.Google Scholar
  40. Ragas, M.R. 2013. Agenda-building and agenda-setting theory: Which companies we think about and how we think about them. In The handbook of communication and corporate reputation, ed. C.E. Carroll, 334–346. Wiley: Hoboken.Google Scholar
  41. Reese, S., and Danielian, L.H. 1989. Intermedia influence and the drug issue: converging on cocaine. In Communication campaigns about drugs: government, media, and the public, ed. P. Shoemaker, 29–45. Hilisdale: Lawrence Erlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
  42. Roskos-Ewoldsen, R.D., B. Roskos-Ewoldsen, and F.D. Carpentier. 2009. Media priming: An updated synthesis. In Media effects: advanced in theory and research, ed. J. Bryant, and M.B. Oliver. NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  43. Sanbonmatsu, D.M., and R.H. Fazio. 1990. The role of attitudes in memory-based decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59: 614–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sanbonmatsu, D.M., and R.H. Fazio. 1991. Construct accessibility determinants, consequences and implications for the media. In Responding to the screen reception and reaction processes, eds. J. Bryant, and D. Zillmann, 45–62. NJ, Erlbaum: Hillsdale.Google Scholar
  45. Scheufele, D.A., and D. Tewksbury. 2007. Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication 57 (1): 9–20.Google Scholar
  46. Schoenbach, K., and D.H. Weaver. 1985. Finding the unexpected: cognitive bonding in a political campaign. In Mass media and public thought, ed. S. Ktaus, and R.M. Perloff, 157–176. CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Severin, W., and J. Tankard. 2001. Communication theories: origins, methods, and uses in the mass media, 5th ed. NY: Longman.Google Scholar
  48. Shaw, D.A., and B.H. Sparrow. 1999. From the inner ring out: News congruence, cue-taking and campaign coverage. Political Research Quarterly 52 (2): 323–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sheiham, A., M. Marmot, D. Rawson, and N. Ruck. 1987. Food values: health and diet. In British social attitudes: The 1987 report, ed. R. Jowell, S. Witherspoon, and L. Brook. London: Cower Pub Co.Google Scholar
  50. The Alliance for Audited Media 2013. Top 25 U.S. newspapers for march 2013. http://auditedmedia.com/news/blog/top-25-us-newspapers-for-march-2013. Accessed 30 April 2013.
  51. Wartick, S.L. 1992. The relationship between intense media exposure and change in corporate reputation. Business and Society 31: 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Weaver, D.A., and B. Bimber. 2008. Finding news stories: A comparison of searches using LexisNexis and Google News. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 85 (3): 517–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wooldridge, J.M. 2003. Introductory econometrics: a modern approach. Ohio: South-Western College Publication.Google Scholar
  54. Wry, T., D. Deephouse, and G. McNamara. 2006. Substantive and evaluative media reputations among and within cognitive strategic groups. Corporate Reputation Review 9 (4): 225–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Zhang, X. 2016. Measuring media reputation: A test of the construct validity and predictive power of seven measures. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 94 (3): 884–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd., part of Springer Nature & Reputation Institute 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Media ArtsUniversity of North TexasDentonUSA

Personalised recommendations