Skip to main content

Proportional Reasoning among 7th Grade Students with Different Curricular Experiences

Abstract

Contextual problems involving rational numbers and proportional reasoning were presented to seventh grade students with different curricular experiences. There is strong evidence that students in reform curricula, who are encouraged to construct their own conceptual and procedural knowledge of proportionality through collaborative problem solving activities, perform better than students with more traditional, teacher-directed instructional experiences. Seventh grade students, especially those who study the new curricula, are capable of developing their own repertoire of sense-making tools to help them to produce creative solutions and explanations. This is demonstrated through analysis of solution strategies applied by students to a variety of rate problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

REFERENCES

  1. Behr, M. J., Harel, G., Post, T. and Lesh, R.: 1992, ‘Rational Number, Ratio, and Proportion’, in D. A. Grouws (ed), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, New York: MacMillan Publishing Company, pp. 296-333.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bell, A., Greer, B., Grimison, L. and Mangan, C.: 1989, ‘Children's performance on multiplicative word problems: elements of descriptive theory’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 20, 434-449.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bouck, M. and Lappan, G.: in press, ‘Developing algorithms for adding and subtracting fractions’, in 1998 NCTM Yearbook, Teaching and Learning of Algorithms in School Mathematics.

  4. Cramer, K. and Post, T.: 1993, ‘Proportional reasoning’, The Mathematics Teacher 86, 404-407.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cramer, K., Post, T. and Currier, S.: 1993, ‘Learning and teaching ratio and proportions: Research implications’, in D. T. Owens (ed), Research Ideas for the Classroom, Middle Grades Mathematics, New York: MacMillan Publishing Company, pp. 159-178.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Freudenthal, H.: 1978, Weeding and Sowing: A Preface to a Science of Mathematical Education, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Freudenthal, H.: 1983, Didactical Phenomenology of Mathematical Strategies, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Chapters 5 and 6, pp. 133-209.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fuson, K. S.: 1978, ‘An Analysis of Research Needs in Projective, Affine, and Similarity Geometrics, Including an Evaluation of Piaget's Results in These Areas,’ in R. Lesh (ed), Recent Research Concerning the Development of Spatial and Geometric Concepts, Columbus, Ohio: ERIC, pp. 243-260.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Harel, G. and Confrey, J. (eds): 1994, The Development of Multiplicative Reasoning in the Learning of Mathematics, Albany, New York: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hart, K. M.: 1981, Children's Understanding of Mathematics: 11-16, London: John Murray Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hoffer, A.: 1988, ‘Ratios and proportional thinking’, in T. Post (ed), Teaching Mathematics in Grades K-8: Research Based Methods, Boston: Allyn and Bacon, pp. 285-313.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Inhelder, B. and Piaget, J.: 1958, The Growth of Logical Thinking From Childhood to Adolescence, New York: Basic Books, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Karplus, R., Pulos, S. and Stage, E. K.: 1983a, ‘Early adolescents' proportional reasoning on ‘rate’ problems’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 14: 219-233.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Karplus, R., Pulos, S. and Stage, E. K.: 1983b, ‘Proportional reasoning of early adolescents’, in R. Lesh and M. Landau (eds), Acquisition of Mathematics Concepts and Processes, New York: Academic Press, Inc., pp. 45-90.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lamon, S.: 1994, ‘Ratio and proportion: Cognitive foundations in unitizing and norming’, in G. Harel and J. Confrey (ed), The Development of Multiplicative Reasoning in the Learning of Mathematics, Albany, New York: SUNY Press, pp. 89-120.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lappan, G., Fey, J., Fitzgerald, W., Friel, S. and Phillips, E.: 1996a, Bits and Pieces I , Understanding Rational Numbers, Palo Alto, CA: Dale Seymour Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lappan, G., Fey, J., Fitzgerald, W., Friel, S. and Phillips, E.: 1996b, Bits and Pieces II , Using Rational Numbers, Palo Alto, CA: Dale Seymour Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lappan, G., Fey, J., Fitzgerald, W., Friel, S. and Phillips, E.: 1997a, Stretching and Shrinking, Palo Alto, CA: Dale Seymour Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lappan, G., Fey, J., Fitzgerald, W., Friel, S. and Phillips, E.: 1997b, Comparing and Scaling,Palo Alto, CA: Dale Seymour Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lappan, G., Fey, J., Fitzgerald, W., Friel, S. and Phillips, E.: 1997c, Data Around Us,Palo Alto, CA: Dale Seymour Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lawton, C. A.: 1993, ‘Contextual factors affecting errors in proportional reasoning’, Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 24, 460-466.

    Google Scholar 

  22. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.: 1989, Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics, Reston, VA.: The Council.

    Google Scholar 

  23. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.: 1991, Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics, Reston, VA: The Council.

    Google Scholar 

  24. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.: 1995, Assessment Standards for Mathematics, Reston, VA: The Council.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nunes, T., Schliemann, A. D. and Carraher, D.: 1993, Street Mathematics and School Mathematics, Cambridge University Press.

  26. Post, T. R., Behr, M. J. and Lesh, R.: 1988, ‘Proportionality and the development of prealgebra understanding’, in A. Coxford and A. Schute (eds), The Ideas of Algebra, K-12, 1988 Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, VA.: The Council, pp. 78-90.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Streefland, L.: 1983, ‘The long term learning process for ratio’, in R. Hershkowitz (ed), Proceedings of the Seventh Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Rehovot, Israel, pp. 182-187.

  28. Streefland, L.: 1984, ‘Search for the roots of ratio: Some thoughts on the long term learning process (towards... a theory). Part I - Reflections on a teaching experiment’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 15, 327-348.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Streefland, L.: 1985, ‘Search for the roots of ratio: Some thoughts on the long term learning process (towards... a theory). Part II - The outline of the long term learning process’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 16, 75-94.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tourniaire, F.: 1986, ‘Proportions in elementary school’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 17, 401-412.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tourniaire, F. and Pulos, S.: 1985, ‘Proportional reasoning: A review of the literature’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 16, 181-204.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Treffers, A. and Goffree, F.: 1985, ‘Rational analysis of realistic mathematics education — The Wiskobas Program’, in L. Streefland (ed), Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference For the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Van den Brink, F. J. and Streefland, L.: 1979, ‘Young Children (6-8) — Ratio and Proportion’, Educational Studies in Mathematics 10, 403-420.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ben-Chaim, D., Fey, J.T., Fitzgerald, W.M. et al. Proportional Reasoning among 7th Grade Students with Different Curricular Experiences. Educational Studies in Mathematics 36, 247–273 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003235712092

Download citation

  • Proportion
  • Rates
  • Unit of Rate
  • Ratios
  • Reasoning
  • Strategies
  • Problem-Based Curriculum
  • Traditional Curriculum
  • Middle School
  • Adolescents