Skip to main content
Log in

Development of a method for clinical medication review by a pharmacist in general practice

  • Published:
Pharmacy World and Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Medication review of patients on long-term treatment in general practice in the UK has been reported to be inadequate. Proposals followed suggesting that pharmacists could use their expertise to lead such a medication review in conjunction with the general practitioner. This paper describes the concept of clinical medication review by a pharmacist based in general practice. We describe the development of a method for a structured and systematic process for undertaking such a review in clinics conducted by a pharmacist. The method was developed for a nationally funded study in the UK. We provide a definition of clinical medication review and suggests a structure for the process through data gathering, evaluation and implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Zermansky AG. Who controls repeats? Br J Gen Pract 1996;46:643-7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. McGavock H, Wilson-Davis K, Connolly JP. Repeat prescribing management – a cause for concern? Br J Gen Pract 1999;49:343-7.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Harris CM, Dajda R. The scale of repeat prescribing. Br J Gen Pract 1996;46:649-53.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Larmour 1, Dolphin RG, Baxter H, Morrison S, Hooke DH, McGrath BP. A prospective study of hospital admission due to drug reactions. Aust J Hosp Pharm 1991;21(2):90-9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ives TJ, Bentz EJ, Guryther RE. Drug related admissions to a family medicine inpatient service. Arch Intern Med 1987;147:1117-25.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tully MP, Tallis RC. Inappropriate prescribing and adverse drug reactions in patients admitted to an elderly care unit. J Geriatr Drug Ther 1991;6(1):63-74.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lindley CM, Tully MP, Paramsolty V, Tallis RC. Inappropriate medication is a major cause of adverse drug reactions in elderly patients. Age & Ageing 1992;21:294-300.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gosney M, Tallis R. Prescription of contraindicated & interacting drugs in elderly patients admitted to hospital. Lancet 1984;564-7.

  9. Purves I, Kennedy J. The quality of general practice repeat prescribing. Newcastle: University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Annual Report of the NHS Health Technology Assessment Programme 1999. London: Department of Health.

  11. Audit Commission. A prescription for improvement. Towards more rational prescribing in general practice. London: HMSO, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Royal College of Physicians. Medication for older people. 2nd ed. London: RCP, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Department of Health. Choice and opportunity, Primary Care: The Future. London: HMSO, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Department of Health. Primary Care: Delivering the future. London: HMSO, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pharmacy Practice Research Resource Centre. Pharmacy Practice Research Directory: Health Authorities. Manchester: PPRRC, University of Manchester, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hanlon JT, Weinberger M, Samsa GP, Schmader KE, Uttech KM, Lewis IK, Cowper PA, Laindsman PB, Cohen HJ, Feusorer JR. A randomised, controlled trial of a clinical pharmacist intervention to improve inappropriate prescribing in elderly outpatients with polypharmacy. Am J Med 1996;100:428-37.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cassidy IB et al. Impact of pharmacist-operated general medicine chronic care refill clinics on practitioner time and quality of care. Ann Pharmacother 1996;30:745-51.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Borgsdorf LR, Miano JS, Knapp P R. Pharmacist-managed medication review in a managed care system. Am J Hosp Pharm 1994;51:772-7.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Deady JE et al. Measuring the ability of clinical pharmacists to effect drug therapy changes in a family practice clinic using prognostic indicators. Hosp Pharm 1991;26:93-7.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lobas NH et al. Effects of pharmaceutical care on medication cost and quality of patient care in an ambulatory-care clinic. Am J Hosp Pharm 1992;49:1681-8.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cantril JA, Bueton S, Sibbald B. Indicators of the appropriateness of long term prescribing in general practice in the United Kingdoms’ Consensus development, face & content validity, feasibility and reliability. Q Health Care 1998;7:130-5.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Burtonwood AM, Hinchliffe AL, Tinkler GS. A prescription for quality: a role for the clinical pharmacist in general practice. Pharm J 1998;261:678-80.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Goldstein R, Hulme H, Willits J. Reviewing repeat prescribing – general practitioners and community pharmacists working together. Int J Pharm Pract 1998;6:60-6.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sykes D, Westwood P, Gilleghan J. Development of a review programme for repeat prescription medicines. Pharm J 1996;256:458-60.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Granas AG, Bates I. The effect of pharmaceutical review of repeat prescriptions in general practice. Int J Pharm Pract 1999;7:264-75.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lowe CJ, Raynor DK, Courtney EA, Purvis J. Effects of self-medication programme on knowledge of drugs & compliance with treatment in elderly patients. Br Med J 1995;310:1229-31.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lowe CJ, Raynor DK, Purvis J, Farrin AJ, Hudson J. Effects of a medicine review and education programme in an elderly general practice population. BR J Clin Pharm 2000; In Press.

  28. Department of Health. Review of prescribing, supply and administration of medicines, London: HMSO; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lowe, C., Petty, D., Zermansky, A. et al. Development of a method for clinical medication review by a pharmacist in general practice. Pharm World Sci 22, 121–126 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008758823788

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008758823788

Navigation