Skip to main content
Log in

Partial-depth paved shoulder effect on part-time shoulder use pavement bearing capacity

  • Published:
International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In areas of high population density, widening all classifications of roadways for growing traffic volumes becomes increasingly complex and expensive to complete. For major highways in Europe and the United States (US), use of the shoulder as a part-time lane is becoming progressively common and may be a solution to growing traffic on lower roadway classifications. This approach is known as hard shoulder running internationally and part-time shoulder use (PTSU) in the US. For interstates or other major highways, the shoulder design is a full-depth paved shoulder, the same pavement cross-section as the mainline lanes, and is structurally sound. For arterials and collectors, the shoulder design commonly has a different pavement cross-section from the mainline lanes, a partial-depth paved shoulder design. This study focused on evaluating the design strength of typical partial-depth paved shoulder designs in the US for PTSU using the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Guidelines for Design of Pavement Structures 1993 design. The study sites were also redesigned according to the AASHTO design methodology to handle the PTSU design traffic volumes. This study found that two of the nine states evaluated could withstand PTSU with minor to no reconstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT), Pavement Design and Type Selection Process, Missouri, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  2. New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT), Section 5 Major Cross Section Elements, Roadway Design Manual. BDCM12MR-02, NJ., 2015.

  3. Washington State Department of Transportation (WSDOT), WSDOT Pavement Policy, Washington, D.C., 2011.

  4. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Chapter 610 Pavement Engineering Considerations, Highway Design Manual, California, 2012.

  5. Delaware Department of Transportation (DelDOT), Chapter Nine Pavement Selection, Roadway Design Manual, 2011.

  6. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), Flexible Pavement Design Manual. Topic # 625-010-002. Florida, 2015.

  7. Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT), Criteria for Implementing Full Width/Depth Shoulders to Accommodate Hard Shoulder Running, Transportation Synthesis Report, Wisconsin, 2011.

  8. Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (KYTC), Pavement Design Guide (2007 Revision), Kentucky, 2007.

  9. Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT), Section 604 Guidelines for Use of the 1993 AASHTO Pavement Design Procedure, Virginia, 2017.

  10. Michigan Department of Transportation, Chapter 6 Surfacing and Shoulders, Michigan Design Manual Road Design, Michigan, 2000.

  11. Mississippi Department of Transportation, Roadway Design Manual, Mississippi, 2001.

  12. Tennessee Department of Transportation, Roadway Design Guidelines, Tennessee, 2012.

  13. North Dakota Department of Transportation, Chapter III Roadway Design, ND, 2007.

  14. South Dakota Department of Transportation, Chapter 7 Cross Sections, Road Design Manual, SD, 2017, http://sddot.com/business/design/forms/roaddesign/Default.aspx (Accessed November 2017)

  15. P. Jenior, R. Dowling, B. Nevers, L. Neudorff, Use of Freeway Shoulders for Travel — Guide for Planning, Evaluating, and Designing Part-Time Shoulder Use as a Traffic Management Strategy. Publication FHWA-HOP-15-023. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., February 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  16. N. Mazzenga, M. Demetsky, Investigation of Solutions to Recurring Congestion on Freeways. Publication VTRC 09-R10. Virginia Transportation Research Council, Virginia, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Federal Highway Administration. Development of Modeling Capabilities of Shoulders Using Part-Time Travel Lanes. FHWA-HOP-14-017. 2014. Washington, D.C., 2014.

  18. H. Taale, Regional Traffic Management Method and Tool. Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, Directorate-General of Public Works and Water Management, The Netherlands, Presentation to PCM Scan Team, AVV Transport Research Centre, Rotterdam, June 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Translated Document: “Europe on Course—Telematics on German Roads” German Ministry for Transportation, Construction, and Housing, 2005.

  20. Federal Highway Administration. Long-Term Pavement Performance Program. Washington, D.C., https://infopave.fhwa.dot.gov/. Accessed November 2017.

  21. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, AASHTO Guidelines for Design of Pavement Structures 1993, Washington, D.C., 1993.

  22. Federal Highway Administration, Geotechnical Aspects of Pavements Reference Manual Appendix C: 1993 AASHTO Design Method, https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/engineering/geotech/pubs/05037/ac.cfm, Washington, D.C., 2006.

  23. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Guide for Mechanistic-Empirical Design of New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures, Washington, D.C., 2004.

  24. J. T. Harvey, F. Long, F, CAL/APT Program — Comparison of Caltrans and AASHTO Pavement Design Manual. FHWA/CA/OR-99/16, Washington, D.C., 1999.

  25. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Long-Term Pavement Performance Program, https://infopave.fhwa.dot.gov/, Washington, D.C., 2017 (Accessed November 2017)

  26. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), Optional Base Group and Structural Number. FDOT Design Standards 2013, Florida, 2013.

  27. T. Khanum, J. N. Mulandi, M. Hossain, Implementation of the 2002 AASHTO Design Guide for Pavement Structures in KDOT. K-Tran: KSU-04-4, Kentucky, 2008.

  28. H.L. Von Quintus, Evaluation of Procedure to Estimate Subgrade Resilient Modulus for Use in Pavement Structural Design. Report No. KS-07-10, Kansas, 2007.

  29. M. Hossain, G. Fager, R.G. Maag, Superpave Volumetric Mixture Design and Analysis Handbook, Kansas, 2016.

  30. Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (KYTC), Appendix A Pavement Design, Kentucky, 2016.

  31. Kentucky Transportation Cabinet (KYTC), Pavement; Pavement Design, Highway Design, Kentucky, 2006.

  32. Missouri Department of Transportation (MoDOT), Type A2 Shoulders, Missouri, 2009

  33. J. Mallela, L. Titus-Glover, H. Von Quintus, M. Darter, M. Stanley, C. Rao, S. Sadaiva, Implementing The AASHTO Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide in Missouri: Volume 1 Study Findings, Conclusion, and Recommendations. Missouri Study RI04-002, Missouri Department of Transportation, Missouri, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  34. New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT), New Flexible Pavement Design Example: 1993 AASHTO Pavement Design, Trenton, NJ, http://www.state.nj.us/transportation/eng/pavement/technologies.shtm, (Accessed November 2017.)

  35. B. C. Smith, B.K. Diefenderfer, Development of Truck Equivalent Single-Axle Load (ESAL) Factors Based on Weigh-in-Motion Data for Pavement Design in Virginia. VTRC 09-R18. Virginia Transportation Research Council, Virginia, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  36. S. Coffey, S. Park, L. Myers McCarthy, Sensitivity Analysis of the Mainline Travel Lane Pavement Service Life When Utilizing Part-Time Shoulder Use With Full Depth Paved Shoulders, Inter. J. Pave. Res. Tech. 11 (1) (2018) 58–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sen Park.

Additional information

Peer review under responsibility of Chinese Society of Pavement Engineering

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Coffey, S., Park, S. & Myers McCarthy, L. Partial-depth paved shoulder effect on part-time shoulder use pavement bearing capacity. Int. J. Pavement Res. Technol. 12, 178–184 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42947-019-0023-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42947-019-0023-2

Keywords

Navigation