Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analysis of genetic variation using ISSR and the development of SCAR marker in synthetic autotetraploids of Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Vegetos Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Autopolyploidy is one of the foremost mechanisms by which additional numbers of genome copies are acquired resulting in genetic and evolutionary novelty to the organisms. As such, it is considered to be a pathway for adaptation and has played a significant role in plant speciation. Autopolyploids are characterized by increased genome flexibility, allowing them to adapt and persist across heterogeneous landscapes in the long run. Genomic redundancy and polysomic inheritance are the hallmarks of doubled genome(s). In view of the significance of autopolyploidy in plant evolution, plant breeding and crop improvement, we sought to investigate the genetic variation/s associated with genome multiplication by exploiting artificial somatic autopolyploids in Vigna mungo. ISSR was employed to detect and identify any genomic DNA variation in colchitetraploids of V. mungo of three different generations, viz. C0, C1 and C2, in comparison to their putative diploids plants. Our data suggests a random, ‘short-term’ rapid change of the genome that may have occurred immediately after polyploidization. The population of autopolyploids demonstrated some degree of genetic heterozygosity in comparison to their diploid counterparts. Further, a polymorphic ISSR DNA loci was identified among the colchitetraploids which was translated into SCAR marker for identification of colchitetraploids versus the putative diploids of V. mungo.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barker MS, Arrigo N, Baniaga AE, Li Z, Levin DA (2016) On the relative abundance of autopolyploids and allopolyploids. New Phytol 210:391–398

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen ZJ (2007) Genetic and epigenetic mechanisms for gene expression and phenotypic variation in plant polyploids. Annu Rev Plant Biol 58:377–406

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Chen ZJ, Ni Z (2006) Mechanisms of genomic rearrangements and gene expression changes in plant polyploids. BioEssays 28:240–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Comai L (2005) The advantages and disadvantages of being polyploid. Nat Rev Genet 6:836–846

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cronn RC, Small RL, Wendel JF (1999) Duplicated genes evolve independently after polyploid formation in cotton. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:14406–14411

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cunha CM, Hinz RH, Pereira A, Tcacenco FA, Paulino EC, Stadnik MJ (2015) A SCAR marker for identifying susceptibility to Fusariumoxysporum f. sp. cubense in banana. Sci Hortic 191:108–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dar TH, Raina SN, Goel S (2013) Molecular analysis of genomic changes in synthetic autotetraploidPhlox drummondii Hook. Biol J Linnean Soc 110:591–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dar TH, Raina SN, Goel S (2017) Cytogenetic and molecular evidences revealing genomic changes after autopolyploidization: a case study of synthetic autotetraploidPhlox drummondii Hook. Physiol Mol Biol Pla 23:641–650

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Das K, Ganie SH, Mangla Y, Chaudhary M, Thakur RK, Tandon R, Raina SN, Goel S (2017) ISSR markers for gender identification and genetic diagnosis of Hippophaerhamnoides ssp. turkestanica growing at high altitudes in Ladakh region (Jammu and Kashmir). Protoplasma 254:1063–1077

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gao R, Wang H, Dong B, Yang X, Chen S, Jiang J, Zhang Z, Liu C, Zhao N, Chen F (2016) Morphological, genome and gene expression changes in newly induced autopolyploid Chrysanthemum lavandulifolium (fisch. Ex trautv.) makino. Int J Mol Sci 17:1690–1702

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty MJ, Hiscock SJ (2008) Genomic clues to the evolutionary success of polyploid plants. Curr Biol 18:435–444

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jaccard P (1901) Étude comparative de la distribution floraledansune portion des Alpeset des Jura. Bull Soc Vaud Sci Nat 37:547–579

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitch IJ, Bennett MD (2004) Genome downsizing in polyploid plants. Biol J Linn Soc 82:651–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Yang Y, Wei F, Duan J, Braynen J, Tian B, Cao G, Shi G, Yuan J (2017) Autopolyploidy leads to rapid genomic changes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Theor Biosci 136:199–206

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mable BK, Beland J, Di Berardo C (2004) Inheritance and dominance of self-incompatibility alleles in polyploid Arabidopsis lyrata. Heredity 93:476–486

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murray MG, Thompson WF (1980) Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 8:4321–4326

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Otto SP (2007) The evolutionary consequences of polyploidy. Cell 131:452–462

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parisod C, Holderegger R, Brochmann C (2010) Evolutionary consequences of autopolyploidy. New Phytol 186:5–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Del Pozo JC, Ramirez-Parra E (2015) Whole genome duplications in plants: an overview from Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot 66:6991–7003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rajesh MK, Jerard BA, Preethi P, Thomas RJ, Fayas TP, Rachana KE, Karun A (2013) Development of a RAPD-derived SCAR marker associated with tall-type palm trait in coconut. Scientia Hortic 150:312–316

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rao SR, Raina SN (2005) Cytological evalutation of colchitetraploidy in moth bean (Vigna aconitifolia) and its allied species. J Arid Legume 2:389–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy MP, Sarla N, Siddiq EA (2002) Inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) polymorphism and its application in plant breeding. Euphytica 128:9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieseberg LH (2001) Polyploid evolution: keeping the peace at genomic reunions. Curr Biol 11:R925–928

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf FJ (1998) NTSYSpc. Version 2.10p. Applied biostatistics, Setauket, NY 11733–2870, USA. Available from: https://www.exetersoftware.com/cat/ntsyspc/ntsyspc.html

  • Sairkar PK, Sharma A, Shukla NP (2016) SCAR marker for identification and discrimination of Commiphora wightii and C. myrrha. Mol Biol Int 1:2. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/1482796

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sattler MC, Carvalho CR, Clarindo WR (2016) The polyploidy and its key role in plant breeding. Planta 243:281–296

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soltis DE, Soltis PS (1999) Polyploidy: recurrent formation and genome evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 14:348–352

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soltis PS, Soltis DE (2000) The role of genetic and genomic attributes in the success of polyploids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:7051–7057

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Rieseberg LH (1993) Molecular data and the dynamic nature of polyploidy. Crit Rev Plant Sci 12:243–273

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spoelhof JP, Soltis PS, Soltis DE (2017) Pure polyploidy: closing the gaps in autopolyploid research. J Syst Evol 55:340–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stupar RM, Bhaskar PB, Yandell BS, Rensink WA, Hart AL, Ouyang S, Veilleux RE, Busse JS, Erhardt RJ, Buell CR, Jiang J (2007) Phenotypic and transcriptomic changes associated with potato autopolyploidization. Genetics 176:2055–2067

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Tian L, Lee HS, Wei NE, Jiang H, Watson B, Madlung A, Osborn TC, Doerge RW, Comai L, Chen ZJ (2006) Genomewidenonadditive gene regulation in Arabidopsis allotetraploids. Genetics 172:507–517

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wu M, Zhang JP, Wang JC, Yang XM, Gao AN, Zhang XK, Liu WH, Li LH (2010) Cloning and characterization of repetitive sequences and development of SCAR markers specific for the P genome of Agropyron cristatum. Euphytica 172:363–372

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu Z, Haage K, Strei VE, Gierl A, Torres Ruiz RA (2009) A large number of tetraploid Arabidopsis thaliana lines, generated by a rapid strategy, reveal high stability of neo-tetraploids during consecutive generations. Theor Appl Genet 118:1107–1119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yuskianti V, Shiraishi S (2010) Sequence characterized amplified region (SCAR) markers in Sengon (Paraseriathes falcataria (L.) Nielsen. HAYATI J Biosci 17:167–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Ma HX, Zhou YJ, Xing JC, Chen JH, Yu GH, Sun XB, Wang L (2014) Identification and genetic division of Fusarium graminearum and Fusarium asiaticum by species-specific SCAR markers. J Phytopathol 162:81–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The present work was carried out in Plant Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong. The authors are thankful to Indian Institute of Pulses Research, Kanpur for providing the germplasm, Department of Biotechnology, Government of India and Ministry of Tribal Affairs, Government of India– National fellowship for Higher education of ST students’ scheme for financial assistance and fellowship grants. Sincere appreciations are also due to the members of Plant Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong for their constant help and encouragement.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Plant Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong, 793022, India

    Daniel Regie Wahlang, Wanfulmi Suchiang & Satyawada Rama Rao

  2. Department of Botany, University of Delhi, North Campus, Delhi, 110007, India

    Shailendra Goel

Authors
  1. Daniel Regie Wahlang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wanfulmi Suchiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shailendra Goel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Satyawada Rama Rao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satyawada Rama Rao.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wahlang, D.R., Suchiang, W., Goel, S. et al. Analysis of genetic variation using ISSR and the development of SCAR marker in synthetic autotetraploids of Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper. Vegetos 32, 48–57 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42535-019-00006-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42535-019-00006-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation