Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Putting Marxism into Action: The Role of “Exploitation” in Land Reform in a North Zhejiang Village

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Chinese Political Science Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using archival data of a North Zhejiang village (Taiping), we examine two important issues of land reform in China in the early 1950s, namely the determinants of class status and the criteria of land redistribution. Our analysis based on the bootstrap estimation of the ordered logit models and tobit models yields two important findings. First, despite the emphasis on “preserving the Rich Peasant Economy”, class status was determined by whether a household had committed “exploitation”—specifically whether it had rented out land to other households—and by the amount of land which a household owned. Second, not every household classified as belonging to the “underclass” benefited from land redistribution. In addition to considering the amount of land owned, the beneficiaries had to be those who rented in land from only the landlords and rich peasants; those who rented land from other social classes were unable to benefit. These findings suggest that land reform was a complex social process, with the Marxian concept of “exploitation” figured importantly both in class determination and land redistribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. “Liberated area” refers to the area controlled by CCP. Therefore, in this paper, “Old Liberated Area” refers to the area where land reform was completed before 30 June 1950 when the Central People’s Government promulgated “the Land Reform Law of the People’s Republic of China”, whereas “Newly-Liberated Area” refers to the area where land reform was not completed before 30 June 1950. In general, OLA is mainly located in north and north-east China and part of east China. On the other hand, NLA is mainly located in south and south-west China and part of east China.

  2. In the next chapter, we will discuss in detail the differences in economic features and government policies between the NLA and the OLA.

  3. There are two well-known studies (Cao et al. 2001; Zhang 2005) that used these materials.

  4. Therefore, we will explore the migration of Taiping Village in detail below.

  5. In the NLA, the subject of the public appraisal was the members of the Peasant Association.

  6. Per mu yield in Haining County in the 1940s was about 300 catties of paddy rice.

  7. After exploring the incomes from agricultural and non-agricultural sectors, Cao also drew the same conclusion (Cao 1996).

References

Archives

  • Zhuhui Township Government. 1951. The summary of land reform in Zhuhui Township.

  • Haining County Government. 1951. The summary of land reform in Zhuhui Township.

  • Revolutionary Committee in Hongjiang Commune. 1970. Reactionary organization in Zhuhui Area. Zhuhui Commune.

  • Revolutionary Committee in Hongjiang Commune. 1971. The organization of bogus government before liberation in Hongjiang Commune. Haining County.

  • Revolutionary Committee in Hongjiang Commune. 1972. The organization of Gongqingtuan League before liberation in Zhuhui Area.

Articles and Books

  • Ash, R. 1976. Economic aspects of land reform in Kiangsu, 1949–52. The China Quarterly 66: 261–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bo, Y. 1991. The retrospection of some important decision and event (Ruogan Zhongda Juece yu Shijian de Huigu). Beijing: The Party School of the Central Committee of the CPC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, J.L. 1930. Chinese farm economy: A study of 2866 farms in seventeen localities and seven provinces in China. Shanghai: Commercial Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, J.L. 1937. Land utilization in China: A study of 16,786 farms in 168 localities, and 38,256 farm families in twenty-two provinces in China, 1929–1933. Shanghai: Commercial Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, J., L. Zhang, and Z. Chen. 2001. The vicissitude of the social and culture in contemporary North-Chekiang province (Dangdai Zhebei Xiangcun de Shehui Wenhua Bianqian). Shanghai: Shanghai Fareast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao, X. 1996. Traditional Chinese peasant economy in Southern Jiangsu (Jiu Zhongguo Sunan Nongjiajingji Yanjiu). Beijing: Central Compilation & Translation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, A.C., and P.K. Trivedi. 2005. Microeconometrics: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chao, K. 1960. Agrarian policy of the Chinese Communist Party, 1951–1959. New Delhi: Asia Publishing House Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee of chorography of Haining County. 1995. The chorography of Haining County (Haining Xianzhi). Shanghai: Hanyu Dacidian Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook, D., and C. Isabel. 1959. Revolution in a Chinese village: Ten mile inn. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook, D., and C. Isabel. 1979. Mass movement in a Chinese village: Ten mile inn. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du, R. 1996. China’s land reform (Zhongguo de Tudi Gaige). Beijing: Contemporary China Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, E., P. Pickowicz, and M. Selden. 1991. Chinese village, socialist state. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, W. 1966. Fanshen: A documentary of revolution in a Chinese village. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, T.L. 1969. The land revolution in China, 1930–1934: A study of documents. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Philip. 1985. The Peasant Economy and Social Change in North China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, P.C. 1990. The peasant family and rural development in the Yangzi Delta, 1350–1988. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, R. 2006. The research of rural land ownership: 1949–1983 A case study of Xinzhou County in Hubei province (Nongcun Diquan Yanjiu: 1949–1983 yi Hubei Sheng XinzhouXian wei ge’an). Shanghai: Shanghai Academy of Social Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, S. 1998. The spiral road: Change in a Chinese village through the eyes of a communist party leader. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, R.C. 1981. Class and class conflict in contemporary China. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kung, J.K.S. 2008. The political economy of land reform in China’s “Newly Liberated Areas”: Evidence from Wuxi County. The China Quarterly 195: 675–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kung, J.K.S., Wu, X., and Wu, Y. 2009. Class Formation under Communist Transition: One Policy, Two Chinas. Unpublished manuscript, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Division of Social Science.

  • Kung, J.K.S., N. Bai, and Y.F. Lee. 2011. Human capital, migration, and a ‘vent’ for surplus rural labour in 1930s China: The case of the Lower Yangzi. The Economic History Review 64 (s1): 117–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H.Y. 1991. Class conflict in Chinese socialism. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, P. 2005. The history of land reform movement (Tudi Gaige Yundong Shi). Fuzhou: Fujian People’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mo, H. 2007. The research of land reform in South Jiangsu province (Sunan Tudi Gaige Yanjiu). Hefei: Hefei Industry University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moise, E.E. 1983. Land reform in China and North Vietnam. London: The University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, S.H., and J.M. Potter. 1990. China’s peasants: The anthropology of a revolution. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ruf, G.A. 1998. Cadres and Kin: Making a socialist village in west China, 1921–1991. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shue, V. 1980. Peasant China in transition: The dynamics of development toward socialism, 1949–1956. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger, J. 1982. Education under Mao: Class and competition in Canton Schools, 1960–1980. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. 2006. Studying land reform of liberated areas, 1941–1948, A case of Junan County, Shantung Province. Shanghai: Shanghai Academy of Social Science Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, J. 1973a. Chinese land reform in retrospect. Hong Kong: The University of Hong Kong Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, J. 1973b. Land reform in the People’s Republic of China. Institutional transformation in agriculture. Peking: Foreign Languages Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, M.J. 2002. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C.K. 1959. A Chinese village in early communist transition. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., and Q. Zhao. 1985. The history of China’s land reform (Zhongguo Tudi Gaige Shi). Wuhan: Wuhan University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, X. 2006. Village transition and peasant memory: A case study on land reform in Shandong base area, 1941–1951 (Xiangcun Bianqian yu Nongmin Jiyi: Shandong Laoqu Ju’nan Xian Tudi Gaige Yanjiu, 1941–1951). Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L. 2005. Say good-bye to dreams: Studying people’s commune system (Gaoboe Lixiang: Renmingongshe Zhidu Yanjiu). Shanghai: Shanghai People Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Bingdao Zheng received financial support from Ministry of Education in China (15YJC630189) and “Chenguang Program” cosponsored by Shanghai Education Development Foundation and Shanghai Municipal Education Commission.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bingdao Zheng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gu, Y., Zheng, B. Putting Marxism into Action: The Role of “Exploitation” in Land Reform in a North Zhejiang Village. Chin. Polit. Sci. Rev. 3, 430–463 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-018-0103-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-018-0103-5

Keywords

Navigation