Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gender Differences in Health Expenditure of Rural Cancer Patients: Evidence from a Public Tertiary Care Facility in India

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Quantitative Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates if there are gender differences in health expenditures and treatment seeking behavior among cancer patients and finds that the results are consistent with gender discrimination. Using a survey on rural patients suffering from cancer in a public tertiary health center in an Indian state Odisha, the study finds that expenditures on female patients are significantly lesser than those on males. Even after controlling for other covariates, in particular the type of cancer, demographic and socio-economic variables, 73% of the difference persists. Our paper attributes it to gender discrimination. Moreover, the biggest reason for the difference in expenditure is attributed to differences in treatment seeking and medical expenditures before coming to the tertiary center. These results are corroborated using a nationally representative survey on health for the whole country.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. MDS is a study conducted by the Centre for Global Health Research, (http://www.cghr.org) to study premature mortality in the world. It includes the study of the cause of death; of uncertified cause as well using verbal autopsy.

  2. This is based on cancer incidence data (2006–08) and actual growth rates (2001–2011) observed in India. Source: Indiastat: http://www.indiastat.com/health/16/diseases/77/cancer/17811/stats.aspx.

  3. Joint family is defined as a household that has more members than just the patient, his/her spouse and his/her children.

  4. The patients reach the tertiary center at various stages of cancer (Appendix Table 6). Almost 42% of the sample reaches the hospital in Stages 0 and 1, which is consistent with the low median duration. Females reach the hospital at a relatively higher stage than males.

  5. The classification is largely for the ease of presentation. The results in this paper are equally true for a sub sample of the three main cancers: head and neck, breast and cervix, where no such classification is done. The observations on the other cancers are too few so as to yield any robust results on their own.

  6. The kurtosis of log scale residuals (with log of cumulative expenditure as the dependent variable and the regressors used in the analysis) is 2.96. The analogous kurtosis of log scale residuals (with log of medical expenditure as the dependent variable) is 2.75.

  7. It is also possible that health care is cheaper in remote places. We do not take into account the price of health care.

References

  • Anderson, S., and D. Ray. 2009. Missing Women: Age and Disease. Review of Economic Studies 77 (4): 1262–1300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S., and D. Ray. 2012. The age distribution of missing women in India. Economic and Political Weekly 47 (47–48): 87–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asfaw, A., S. Klasen, and L. Francesca. 2007. Intra-household Gender Disparities in Children’s Medical care before death in India. IZA Discussion paper 2586. http://ftp.iza.org/dp2586.pdf.

  • Asfaw, A., S. Klasen, and F. Lammana. 2008. Intra-household health care financing strategy and gender gap: empirical evidence from India. America Institute for Econ. Research (IAI) Discussion Paper No. 177, Ibero-America Institute for Economic Research.

  • Baeten, S., T.V. Ourti, and E. Doorslaer. 2013. Rising inequalities in Income and Health in China: Who is left Behind? Journal of Health Economics 32 (6): 1214–1229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrman, J.R. 1988. Intra-household allocation of nutrients in rural India: Are boys favored more? Do parents exhibit inequality aversion? Oxford Economic Papers 40 (1): 32–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borooah, V. 2004. Gender Bias among children in India in their diet and immunisation against disease. Social Science and Medicine 58 (9): 1719–1731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denton, M., S. Prus, and V. Walters. 2004. Gender differences in Health: a Canadian study of the psychosocial, structural and behavioural determinants of health. Social Science and Medicine 58 (12): 2585–2600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dikshit, R., P.C. Gupta, C. Ramasundarahettige, V. Gajalakshmi, L. Aleksandrowicz, R. Badwe, R. Kumar, S. Roy, W. Suraweera, F. Bray, M. Mallath, P.K. Singh, D.N. Sinha, A.S. Shet, S. Gelband, and P. Jha. 2012. Cancer mortality in India: a nationally representative survey. Lancet 379 (9828): 1807–1816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gantara, B., and S. Hirve. 1994. Male Bias in health care utilization for under-fives in a rural community in western India. Bulltein of the World Health Organization 72 (1): 101–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosoniu, G.D., S. Ganapathy, J. Kemp, C. Auer, D. Somma, F. Karim, and M.G. Weiss. 2008. Gender and socio-cultural determinants of delay to diagnosis of TB in Bangladesh, India and Malawi. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 12 (7): 848–855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, T. 2014. Where there is a will: Fertility behavior and sex bias in large families. Journal of Human Resources 49 (2): 393–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayachandran, S., and R. Pande. 2012. Why Do Mothers Breastfeed Girls Less than Boys? Evidence and Implications for Child Health in India. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 126 (3): 1485–1538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joe, W., U.S. Mishra, and K. Navaneetham. 2008. Health Inequality in India: Evidence from NFHS 3. Economic and Political Weekly 43 (31): 41–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, W.G., and J. Mullahy. 2001. Estimating log models: to transform or not to transform? Journal of Health Economics 20 (4): 461–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, V., T. Roy, and R. Retherford. 2004. Sex Differentials in childhood feeding, healthcare and nutritional status in India. Population and Development Review 30 (2): 269–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanti, B., A. Mukhopadhyay, S. Das, K. Sharma, and S. Dash. 2011. The Economic Burden of Cancer. Economic and Political Weekly 46 (43): 112–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikiema, B., S. Haddad, and L. Potvin. 2008. Women Bargaining to Seek Healthcare: Norms, Domestic Practices, and Implications in Rural Burkina Faso. World Development 36 (4): 608–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pande, R. 2003. Selective gender differences in childhood nutrition and immunization in rural India: the role of siblings. Demography 40 (3): 395–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, A., P.G. Sengupta, S.K. Mondal, D.N. Gupta, B. Manna, S. Ghosh, D. Sur, and S.K. Bhattacharya. 2002. Gender differences in health care seeking during common illnesses in a rural community of West Bengal, India. Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition 20 (4): 306–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purohit, B.C., and T.A. Siddiqui. 1994. Utilisation of Health Services in India. Economic and Political Weekly 29 (18): 1071–1080.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajeshwari, S. 1996. Gender Bias in utilization of health care facilities in rural Haryana. Economic and Political Weekly 31 (8): 489–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekher, T.V., and N. Hatti. 2004. Lives at Risk: Declining Child Sex Ratios in India. Lund Papers in Economic History, 93.

  • Sen, G., A. Iyer, and A. George. 2007. Systematic Hierarchies and Systematic failure: Gender and Health Iniquities in Koppal District. Economic and Political Weekly 42 (8): 682–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, Y., and Y. Bian. 2014. Gender differences in the use of health care in China: cross-sectional analysis. International Journal for Equity in Health 13 (1): 8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, R.G., and M. Marmot. 2003. Social determinants of health: the solid facts. Geneva: World Health Organisation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abhiroop Mukhopadhyay.

Additional information

We wish to thank Planning and Policy Research Unit, Indian Statistical Institute and the Institute of Economic Growth for funding this study. We wish to thank Soumitra Dash, Devmani Upadhyaya and Shalini Rudra for research assistance. We wish to acknowledge the late Professor Sanghamitra Das who thought it important to study the plight of cancer patients in Odisha. The usual disclaimers apply.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 6.

Table 6 Staging of cancer patients

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Batra, A., Gupta, I. & Mukhopadhyay, A. Gender Differences in Health Expenditure of Rural Cancer Patients: Evidence from a Public Tertiary Care Facility in India. J. Quant. Econ. 16, 615–629 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40953-017-0113-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40953-017-0113-4

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation