Advertisement

The Psychological Record

, Volume 68, Issue 1, pp 103–105 | Cite as

Applied Behavior Analysis: Definitional Difficulties

  • Todd M. Furman
  • Tracy L. Lepper
Theoretical Article

Abstract

A new science should provide an intensional definition of itself to delineate the necessary and sufficient conditions for an activity to qualify as an instance of said science (Baronett, 2013, pp. 46–48). However, current definitions of applied behavior analysis offered in leading ABA textbooks are descriptive instead of intensional. Therefore, an intensional definition of ABA is offered.

Keywords

Applied behavior analysis Experimental analysis of behavior Intensional definition Science 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

This submission complies with all of the ethical rules of the journal The Psychological Record. As this manuscript is conceptual in nature, human and non-human animals were not involved in this project.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Disclaimer

This work has not been previously published; nor, is this work under consideration for publication elsewhere.

References

  1. Bagley, M. (2014). What is chemistry? Retrieved on 8/24/2016 from http://www.livescience.com/45986-what-is-chemistry.html
  2. Baronett, S. (2013). Logic (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Carnap, R. (1950). Empiricism, semantics, and ontology. Internationale de Philosophie, 4, 20–40.Google Scholar
  4. Chalmers, A. (1999). What is this thing called science?(3 rd edition). Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc..Google Scholar
  5. Cooper, J., Heron, T., & Heward, W. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc..Google Scholar
  6. Feibleman, J. (1961). Pure science, applied science, technology, engineering: An attempt at definitions. Technology and Culture, 2(4), 305–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Feyerabend, P. (2010). Against Method (4th ed.). Brooklyn, NY: Verso.Google Scholar
  8. Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge?: Thinking from Women’s lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hayes, S., & Brownstein, A. (1986). Mentalism, behavior-behavior relations, and a behavior-analytic view of the purpose of science. The Behavior Analyst, 9(2), 175–190.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolution (2 nd Edition, Enlarged). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. New York: Basic Books, Inc..Google Scholar
  12. Malott, R., & Shane, J. (2016). Principles of behavior (7th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. McIlvane, W., Dube, W., Lionelloe-DeNolf, K., Serna, R., Barros, R., & Galvo, O. (2011). Some current dimensions of transitional behavior analysis: From laboratory research to intervention for persons with autism spectrum disorders. In E. A. Mayville & J. A. Mulick (Eds.), Behavioral Foundations of Effective Autism Treatment (pp. 155–181). Cornwall-on-Hudson, NY: Sloan Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Miltenberger, R. (2012). Behavior modification: Principles & procedures (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  15. Skinner, B.F. (2014) Science and human behavior. The B.F. Skinner Foundation.Google Scholar
  16. Vargas, J. (2013). Behavior analysis for effective teaching (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Wallace, M., & Mayer, G. (2017). Principles of applied behavior analysis: For behavior technicians and other practitioners. Cornwall-on-Hudson, NY: Sloan Publishing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Behavior Analysis International 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyMcNeese State UniversityLake CharlesUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyMcNeese State UniversityLake CharlesUSA

Personalised recommendations