Abstract
The purpose of this quasi-experimental study was to examine whether attention cueing can assist learners in learning the structure and functions of the brain. This study investigated the interactive effects of the experimental treatment and learners’ prior knowledge on their test results and cognitive load. Self-regulatory, mobile-phone-based animations depicting the brain comprised the instrument. A total of 55 English as a foreign language learners from two sections of a linguistics course were recruited. First, the participants’ prior knowledge concerning the functions of the brain was assessed. Next, they were randomly assigned into two modes—animation-only or animation-plus-cueing. Immediately, after the treatment period, the participants were administered retention, matching, organization, and transfer test along with cognitive load questionnaire. Experimental treatment and prior knowledge were the independent variables, while comprehension tests, cognitive load, and study time were the dependent variables. The results demonstrated that the learners in the cueing condition outperformed the non-cueing condition for matching and organization test, but not for transfer test. No differences were observed between the cueing and non-cueing condition concerning the cognitive load. The results stressed the importance of presenting relation cueing emphasizing cause–effect relationship on dynamic external representations can facilitate learners’ selection and organization of information so as to enhance general comprehension of external representations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The GEPT (General English Proficiency Test) is developed by Taiwan’s LTTC (Language Training and Testing Center). GEPT tests comprise four levels—elementary, intermediate, high-intermediate and advanced to suit EFL learners of different English proficiency level. The intermediate reading test includes three sections: grammar and structure, cloze test, and reading comprehension. These are a total of 40 multiple-choice questions. The highest possible score for the overall test is 120 with 80 as passing. The GEPT is similar to other international standardized tests, such as TOEFL and TOEIC.
References
Amadieu, F., Mariné, C., & Laymay, C. (2011). The attention-guiding effect and cognitive load in the comprehension of animations. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 36–40.
Boucheix, J. M., & Guignard, H. (2005). What animated illustrations conditions can improve technical document comprehension in young students? Format, signaling and control of the presentation. European Journal of Psychology of Education, xx(4), 369–388.
Boucheix, J. M., & Lowe, R. K. (2010). An eye tracking comparison of external pointing cues and internal continuous cues in learning with complex animations. Learning and Instruction, 20, 123–135.
Boucheix, J. M., Lowe, R. K., Putri, D. K., & Groff, J. (2013). Cueing animations: Dynamic signaling aids information extraction and comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 25, 71–84.
Carter, R. (1998). Mapping the mind. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Crooks, S. M., Cheon, J., Inan, F., Ari, F., & Flores, R. (2012). Modality and cueing in multimedia learning: Examining cognitive and perceptual explanations for the modality effect. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1063–1071.
de Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Paas, F. (2009). Towards a framework for attention cueing in instructional animations: Guidelines for research and design. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 113–140.
de Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Paas, F. (2010). Attention guidance in learning from a complex animation: Seeing is understanding? Learning and Instruction, 20, 111–122.
de Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M. J. P., & Paas, F. (2011). Attention cueing in an instructional animation: The Role of presentation speed. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 41–45.
Dorling Kindersley. (2013). Knowledge encyclopedia. London: Dorling Kindersley.
Hegarty, M., Kriz, S., & Cate, C. (2003). The roles of mental animations and external animations in understanding mechanical systems. Cognition and Instruction, 21(4), 325–360.
Huk, T., Steinke, M., & Floto, C. (2010). The educational value of visual cues and 3D-representational format in a computer animation under restricted and realistic conditions. Intructional Science, 38(5), 455–469.
Imhof, B., Scheiter, K., Edelmann, J., & Gerjets, P. (2013). Learning about locomotion patterns: Effective use of multiple pictures and motion indication arrows. Computers and Education, 65, 45–55.
Jamet, E. (2014). An eye-tracking study of cueing effects in multimedia learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 47–53.
Jamet, E., Gavota, M., & Quaireau, C. (2008). Attention guiding in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 18, 135–145.
Jian, Y. C., Wu, C. J., & Su, J. H. (2014). Learners’ eye movements during construction of mechanical kinematic representations from static diagrams. Learning and Instruction, 32, 51–62.
Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1999). Managing split-attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 351–371.
Kriz, S., & Hegarty, M. (2007). Top-down and bottom-up influences on learning from animation. International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 65, 911–930.
Kühl, T., Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P., & Gemballa, S. (2011). Can differences in learning strategies explain the benefits of learning from static and dynamic visualizations? Computers and Education, 56, 176–187.
Lin, L., & Atkinson, R. K. (2011). Using animations and visual cueing to support learning and scientific concepts and processes. Computers and Education, 56, 650–658.
Lindner, M. A., Eitel, A., Strobel, B., & Koller, O. (2017). Identifying processes underlying the multimedia effect in testing: An eye-movement analysis. Learning and Instruction, 47, 91–102.
Lowe, R. K., & Boucheix, J. M. (2008a). Learning from animated diagrams: How are mental models built? In G. Stapleton, J. Howse, & J. Lee (Eds.) Diagrams 2008. LNCS (LNAI, Vol. 5223, pp. 266–281). Heidelberg: Springer.
Lowe, R. K., & Boucheix, J. M. (2008b). Supporting relational processing in complex animated diagrams. In G. Stapleton, J. Howse, & J. Lee (Eds.), Diagrammatic representation and inference (pp. 391–394). Berlin: Springer.
Lowe, R. K., Boucheix, J. M. (2010). Attention direction in static and animated diagrams. In A. K. Goel, M. Jamnik, & N. H. Narayanan (Eds.) Diagrammatic representation and inference. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 6170, pp. 250–256). Berlin: Springer.
Lowe, R. K., & Boucheix, J. M. (2011). Cueing complex animations: Does direction of attention foster learning processes? Learning and Instruction, 21, 650–663.
Lowe, R. K., & Boucheix, J. M. (2012). Dynamic diagrams: A composition alternative. In P. Cox, B. Plimmer, & P. Rodgers (Eds.) Diagrammatic representation and inference. Diagrams 2012. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 7352). Berlin: Springer.
Lowe, R. K., & Boucheix, J. M. (2016). Principled animation design improves comprehension of complex dynamics. Learning and Instruction, 45, 72–84.
Lowe, R. K., Schnotz, W., & Rasch, T. (2011). Aligning affordances of graphics with learning task requirements. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 452–459.
Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2010). Techniques that reduce extraneous cognitive load and manage intrinsic cognitive load during multimedia learning. In J. L. Plass, R. Moreno, & R. Brunken (Eds.), Cognitive load theory (pp. 131–152). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Ozcelik, E., Arslan-Ari, I., & Cagiltay, K. (2010). Why does signaling enhance multimedia learning? Evidence from eye movements. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 110–117.
Ozcelik, E., Karakus, T., Kursun, E., & Cagiltay, K. (2009). An eye-tracking study of how color coding affects multimedia learning. Computers and Education, 53, 445–453.
Paas, F. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive load approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 429–434.
Ploetzner, R., & Lowe, R. (2012). A systematic characterisation of expository animations. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 781–794.
Schneider, S., Beege, M., Nebel, S., & Rey, G. D. (2018). A meta-analysis of how signaling affects learning with media. Educational Research Review, 23, 1–24.
Tversky, B., Morisson, J. B., & Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 57, 247–262.
Wu, M. L., & Tu, J. T. (2006). SPSS and statistical application analysis. Taipei: Wu-Nan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, HY. The effects of visual cueing on pictorial and verbal tests through mobile-phone-based animation. J. Comput. Educ. 5, 393–414 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-018-0113-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-018-0113-1