Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Exploring Medical Students’ and Faculty’s Perspectives on Benefits of Undergraduate Research Experience

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In terms of curriculum development, it is important for faculties to set up a learning environment that supports activities that facilitate the achievement of the intended learning outcomes. This study explores perspectives from medical students and faculty on the benefits of undergraduate research experiences. Thematic analyses of interview data from 18 students and 11 faculty members indicated that transferable skills (e.g., active learning and critical appraisal) were commonly perceived as benefits of undergraduate research (UR) by students (28.6%) and faculty members (35.5%). On the other hand, the most commonly identified benefit of UR among students was research-specific skills (e.g., conducting rigorous experiments and designing a study) (39.7%) and knowledge (22.2%). Faculty members intended to enhance students’ attitudes toward research during UR (e.g., having an inquisitive mind and being research-minded) (50.9%). This study demonstrates that this perception gap is caused by the students’ perceptions of research and faculty members’ difficulties in engaging students during research through mentorship. Therefore, students and faculty members need to thoroughly discuss how they engage mutually, negotiate common purposes, and develop resources for UR. It should be noted that institutional support for mentoring relationships such as offering more opportunities where the faculty members can discuss the best pedagogical approach in UR with others across departments and institutions is key to aligning teaching for constructive learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wenzel TJ. What is undergraduate research? Counc Undergrad Res Q. 1997;17:163.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kuh GD. High-impact educational practices: what they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Washington DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zimbardi K, Myatt P. Embedding undergraduate research experiences within the curriculum: a cross-disciplinary study of the key characteristics guiding implementation. Stud High Educ. 2014;39(2):233–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chang Y, Ramnanan CJ. A review of literature on medical students and scholarly research: experiences, attitudes, and outcomes. Acad Med. 2015;90(8):1162–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Laidlaw A, Aiton J, Struthers J, Guild S. Developing research skills in medical students: AMEE Guide No. 69. Med Teach. 2012;34(9):754–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dekker FW. Science education in medical curriculum: teaching science or training scientists? Med Sci Educ. 2011;21:258–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lopatto D. Survey of undergraduate research experiences (SURE): first findings. Cell Biol Educ. 2004;3:270–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Burgoyne LN, O’Flynn S, Boylan GB. Undergraduate medical research: the student perspective. Med Educ Online. 2010;15(1):5212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Imafuku R, Saiki T, Kawakami C, Suzuki Y. How do students’ perceptions of research and approaches to learning change in undergraduate research? Int J Med Educ. 2015;6:47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Knight SE, Van Wyk JM, Mahomed S. Teaching research: a programme to develop research capacity in undergraduate medical students at the University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Linn MC, Palmer E, Baranger A, Gerard E, Stone E. Undergraduate research experiences: impacts and opportunities. Science. 2015;347(6222):1261757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hunter AB, Laursen SL, Seymour E. Becoming a scientist: the role of undergraduate research in students’ cognitive, personal, and professional development. Sci Educ. 2007;91(1):36–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zydney A, Bennett J, Shahid A, Bauer K. Faculty perspectives regarding the undergraduate research experience in science and engineering. J Eng Educ. 2002;91:291–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hanauer DI, Frederick J, Fotinakes B, Strobel SA. Linguistic analysis of project ownership for undergraduate research experiences. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2012;11(4):378–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Biggs J, Tang C. Teaching for quality learning at university – what the student does. Berkshire: Open University Press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Biggs J. Aligning teaching for constructing learning. York: Higher Education Academy; 2003. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/aligning-teaching-constructing-learning. Accessed 12 Jun 2018

    Google Scholar 

  17. Oliveira CC, de Souza RC, Abe ÉHS, Móz LES, de Carvalho LR, Domingues MA. Undergraduate research in medical education: a descriptive study of students’ views. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kharraz R, Hamadah R, Alfawaz D, Attasi J, Obeidat AS, Alkattan W, et al. Perceived barriers towards participation in undergraduate research activities among medical students at Alfaisal University—College of Medicine: a Saudi Arabian perspective. Med Teach. 2016;38(sup1):S12–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Healey M, Jordan F, Pell B, Short C. The research-teaching nexus: a case study of students’ awareness, experiences and perceptions of research. Innov Educ Teach Int. 2010;47(2):235–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Houlden RL, Raja JB, Collier CP, Clark AF, Waugh JM. Medical students’ perceptions of an undergraduate research elective. Med Teach. 2004;26(7):659–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lopatto D. The essential features of undergraduate research. Counc Undergrad Res Q. 2003;24:139–42.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Behar-Horenstein LS, Roberts KW, Dix AC. Mentoring undergraduate researchers: an exploratory study of students’ and professors’ perceptions. Mentor Tutor Partnersh Learn. 2010;18(3):269–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pfund C, Pribbenow CM, Branchaw J, Lauffer SM, Handelsman J. The merits of training mentors. Science. 2006;311(5760):473–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Imafuku R, Nishiya K, Saiki T, Okada H. Online and face-to-face: developing an inter-university undergraduate research. Med Sci Educ. 2018;28(1):5–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Imafuku R, Saiki T, Suzuki Y. Developing undergraduate research in Japanese medical education. Counc Undergrad Res Q. 2016;37(1):34–40.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Willison J, O’Regan K. Commonly known, commonly not known, totally unknown: a framework for students becoming researchers. High Educ Res Dev. 2007;26(4):393–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Healey M, Jenkins A. Developing undergraduate research and inquiry. York: The Higher Education Academy; 2009. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/developing-undergraduate-research-and-inquiry. Accessed 21 Mar 2018

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wenger E. Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This paper was financially supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) Number 17K15741.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Medical Education Development Center, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido Gifu, Gifu, 501-1194, Japan

    Rintaro Imafuku, Koji Tsunekawa & Takuya Saiki

  2. School of Medicine, Gifu University, 1-1 Yanagido Gifu, Gifu, 501-1194, Japan

    So Yasuda, Koji Hashimoto, Daiya Matsunaga, Yusuke Ohashi & Kazuo Yamamoto

Authors
  1. Rintaro Imafuku
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. So Yasuda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Koji Hashimoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Daiya Matsunaga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yusuke Ohashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Kazuo Yamamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Koji Tsunekawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Takuya Saiki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rintaro Imafuku.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical Approval and Consent to Participate

This work was granted by the Institutional Review Board at Gifu University (25-360).

Additional information

This study was undertaken as part of undergraduate research in medical education in 2017. SY, KH, DM, YO and KY were third-year medical students at Gifu University at the time of this investigation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Imafuku, R., Yasuda, S., Hashimoto, K. et al. Exploring Medical Students’ and Faculty’s Perspectives on Benefits of Undergraduate Research Experience. Med.Sci.Educ. 28, 553–560 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-018-0593-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-018-0593-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation