Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Graphic Stories as Cultivators of Empathy in Medical Clerkship Education

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Physician empathy is an integral component of the patient-physician relationship and contributes to positive health outcomes. However, the direction of empathy change in medical trainees remains unclear. The aims of this study were (1) to qualitatively assess factors associated with empathy change in clerkship medical training and (2) to investigate the effect of graphic stories about diabetes self-management on affecting empathy and learning processes in medical trainees.

Methods

Third and fourth year medical students (clerks) were recruited. Participants viewed two online comics, responded to empathy-exploring surveys, and were interviewed individually. Interviews were coded following an inductive thematic approach, and emergent themes were developed using the constant-comparison method.

Results

Sixteen medical students participated. Qualitative analysis revealed five themes: (1) conceptualization and perceived value of empathy, (2) barriers and facilitators of empathy, (3) empathy and burnout, (4) strategies to promote empathy and prevent burnout, and (5) comics in medical education. Empathy was highly valued by clerks; however, a spectrum of empathy change occurs in clerkship. Major barriers included the hidden curriculum, physiological stressors, and burnout. Positive role models and peer support were key strategies to maintaining empathy. Clerks perceived the comics to be an innovative, quick, and effective reminder of the value empathy.

Conclusions

Graphic stories can be used as a medical education tool to simulate reflective practice and promote empathy retention during clerkship. Further strategies aimed at reducing burnout, improving student wellness, and fostering teaching of empathy by clinical faculty may enhance the retention of empathy by clerks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Glaser KM, Markham FW, Adler HM, Mcmanus PR, Hojat M. Relationships between scores on the Jefferson scale of physician empathy, patient perceptions of physician empathy, and humanistic approaches to patient care: a validity study. Med Sci Monit. 2007;13(7):291–4.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hojat M, Louis DZ, Markham FW, Wender R, Rabinowitz C, Gonnella JS. Physicians' empathy and clinical outcomes for diabetic patients. Acad Med. 2011;86(3):359–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hojat M. Empathy in patient care: antecedents, development, measurement, and outcomes. New York, NY: Springer; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shanafelt TD, West C, Zhao X, et al. Relationship between increased personal well-being and enhanced empathy among internal medicine residents. J Gen Intern Med 2005;20(7):559–564.

  5. Larson EB, Yao X. Clinical empathy as emotional labor in the patient-physician relationship. JAMA. 2005;293(9):1100–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lamothe M, Boujut E, Zenasni F, Sultan S. To be or not to be empathic: the combined role of empathic concern and perspective taking in understanding burnout in general practice. BMC Fam Pract. 2014;15(1):15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferreira-Valente A, Monteiro JS, Barbosa RM, Salgueira A, Costa P, Costa MJ. Clarifying changes in student empathy throughout medical school: a scoping review. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2017;22(5):1293–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hojat M, Vergare MJ, Maxwell K, et al. The devil is in the third year: a longitudinal study of erosion of empathy in medical school. Acad Med. 2009;84(9):1182–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Neumann M, Edelhäuser F, Tauschel D, et al. Empathy decline and its reasons: a systematic review of studies with medical students and residents. Acad Med 2011;86(8):996–1009.

  10. Bombeke K, Symons L, Debaene L, DeWinter B, Schol S, Van Royen P. Help, I’mlosing patient-centredness! Experiences of medical students and their teachers. Med Educ. 2010;44:662–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Spencer J. Decline in empathy in medical education: how can we stop the rot? Med Educ. 2004;38(9):916–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tavakol S, Dennick R, Tavakol M. Empathy in UK medical students: differences by gender, medical year and specialty interest. Educ Prim Care. 2011a;22(5):297–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dilalla LF, Hull SK, Dorsey JK. Effect of gender, age, and relevant course work on attitudes toward empathy, patient spirituality, and physician wellness. Teach Learn Med. 2004;16(2):165–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Newton BW, Savidge MA, Barber L, et al. Differences in medical students' empathy. Acad Med. 2000;75(12):1215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bellini LM, Shea JA. Mood change and empathy decline persist during three years of internal medicine training. Acad Med. 2005;80(2):164–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shapiro J, Morrison E, Boker J. Teaching empathy to first year medical students: evaluation of an elective literature and medicine course. Educ Health. 2004;17(1):73–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rosenthal S, Howard B, Schlussel YR, et al. Humanism at heart: preserving empathy in third-year medical students. Acad Med. 2011;86(3):350–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Batt-Rawden SA, Chisolm MS, Anton B, Flickinger TE. Teaching empathy to medical students: an updated, systematic review. Acad Med. 2013;88(8):1171–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Green MJ, Myers KR. Graphic medicine: use of comics in medical education and patient care. BMJ. 2010;340:c863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pieper C, Homobono P. Comic as an education method for diabetic patients and general population. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2000;15(1):31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Carney RN, Levin JR. Pictorial illustrations still improve Students' learning from text. Educ Psychol Rev. 2002;14(1):5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dolev J, Friedlander L, Braverman I. Use of fine art to enhance visual diagnostic skills. JAMA. 2001;286:1020–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Naghshineh S, Hafler JP, Miller AR, et al. Formal art observation training improves medical students' visual diagnostic skills. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(7):991–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Tsao P, Yu C. "There's no billing code for empathy." animated comics remind medical students of empathy: a qualitative study. BMC Med Educ. 2016;16:204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. New – sample size Kuzel A. Sampling in qualitative research. In: Crabtree B, Miller W, editors. Doing Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1999. p. 33–45.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Koopmanschap M. Coping with Type II diabetes: the patient's perspective. Diabetologia. 2002;45(suppl 7):18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Song M, Lipman TH. Concept analysis: self-monitoring in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008;45(11):1700–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yu C, Man J. Not the needle! Ann Intern Med. 2016;164(5):GM1. https://doi.org/10.7326/G15-0015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yu CH, Man JH. Annals graphic medicine: the daily grind: a day in the life of someone living with diabetes. Ann Intern Med. 2015;163(9):GM1. https://doi.org/10.7326/G15-0002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tavakol S, Dennick R, Tavakol M. Psychometric properties and confirmatory factor analysis of the Jefferson scale of physician empathy. BMC Med Educ. 2011b;11:54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Boyatzis R. Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health. 2000;23:334–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Provincial Physician Health Programs. Canadian medical association. 2016. https://www.cma.ca/En/Pages/provincial-physician-health-programs.aspx. Accessed 13 Dec 2016.

  35. Irving P, Dickson D. Empathy: towards a conceptual framework for health professionals. Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv. 2004;17(4–5):212–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sulzer SH, Feinstein NW, Wendland CL. Assessing empathy development in medical education: a systematic review. Med Educ. 2016 Mar;50(3):300–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Eikeland F, Ornes K, Finest A, Pedersen R. The physician’s role and empathy – a qualitative study of third year medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Martimianakis MA, Michalec B, Lam J, Cartmill C, Taylor JS, Hafferty FW. Humanism, the hidden curriculum, and educational reform: a scoping review and thematic analysis. Acad Med. 2015;90(Suppl 11):5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sambunjak D, Straus SE. A systematic review of qualitative research on the meaning and characteristics of mentoring in academic medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(1):72–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Jeffrey D. A meta-ethnography of interview-based qualitative research studies on medical students' views and experiences of empathy. Med Teach. 2016;38(12):1214–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ahrweiler F, Neumann M, Goldblatt H, Hahn EG, Scheffer C. Determinants of physician empathy during medical education: hypothetical conclusions from an exploratory qualitative survey of practicing physicians. BMC Med Educ. 2014a;12:122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Shanafelt TD, Bradley KA, Wipf JE, Back AL. Burnout and self-reported patient care in an internal medicine residency program. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136(5):358–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ahrweiler F, Scheffer C, Roling G, Goldblatt H, Hahn E, Neumann M. Clinical practice and self-awareness as determinants of empathy in undergraduate education: A qualitative short survey at three medical schools in Germany. GMS JME. 2014b;31(4):Doc46.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kelm Z, Womer J, Walter JK, Feudtner C. Interventions to cultivate physician empathy: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Schön D. The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. London: Temple Smith; 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kerfoot BP, Fu Y, Baker H, Connelly D, Ritchey ML, Genega EM. Online spaced education generates transfer and improves long-term retention of diagnostic skills: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211(3):331–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Dyrbye LN, Eacker A, Durning SJ, et al. The impact of stigma and personal experiences on the help-seeking behaviors of medical students with burnout. Acad Med 2015;90:961–969.

  48. Schwenk TL, Davis L, Wimsatt LA. Depression, stigma, and suicidal ideation in medical students. JAMA. 2010;304:1181–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Susan Hall and Marc Settino for their administrative help during focus groups. We would also like to acknowledge Dr. Pamela Tsao and Julie Mann.

Funding

Dr. Wang was funded in part by a Charles Hollenberg Summer Studentship 2014 from the Banting & Best Diabetes Centre, University of Toronto.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catherine H. Yu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This study was approved by the University of Toronto Research Ethics Board, reference number 30314, and Queen’s University Research Ethics Board, reference number 6013058. This research involved only human participants. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(PDF 128 kb)

ESM 2

(PDF 205 kb)

ESM 3

(PDF 161 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, R., Houlden, R.L. & Yu, C.H. Graphic Stories as Cultivators of Empathy in Medical Clerkship Education. Med.Sci.Educ. 28, 609–617 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-018-0590-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-018-0590-x

Keywords

Navigation