Program Directors’ Perceptions of a Post-Match Competency Handover Between Medical School and Residency
An educational handover at the completion of medical school that transmits competency information about individual learners has been proposed as a means for improving the sub-optimal communication between medical school and residency. The authors created an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) milestones handover (MH) for graduating medical students entering surgery, pediatrics, and OBGYN residencies utilizing assessments primarily from residency preparatory courses. This pilot study investigated residency program directors’ (PDs) perspectives on the potential utility of the MH.
The authors mapped medical school assessment data to the specialty-specific ACGME level one milestones for 39 graduating medical students. The MH reported whether the student had met the level one milestone competencies. After the residency match, the MH was sent to PDs with an electronic survey asking about their perceptions of the handover.
The MHs reported level one competency determinations for most of the ACGME milestones (12 of 16 for surgery, 26 of 28 for OBGYN, and 18 of 21 milestones for pediatrics). Of the 38 surveyed PDs, 25 (66%) responded. PDs reported that the MH provided better level one competency information for new trainees compared to the Medical Student Performance Evaluation [Likert score 2.07 (SD 1.16) vs. 3.67 (SD 1.14), P < 0.05] however did not feel that it was superior in describing the attributes of a new intern [Likert score 3.32 (SD 0.95) vs. 3.68 (SD 0.95), P = 0.09].
This preliminary data suggests that the MH could be a potentially useful tool. Further work will need to expand these efforts to improve the generalizability and validity evidence of a competency-based educational handover between medical school and residency.
KeywordsAssessment Milestones Competencies Handover Residency Program director
The authors wish to thank Ms. Sarah Block for her assistance with manuscript review and preparation.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All students participating in the RPCs provided written consent for the MHs to be sent to their future PDs. This project received exempt status from the University of Michigan Institutional Review Board.
Conflict of Interest
Dr. Santen, Dr., Mangrulkar, and Dr. Morgan have all been primary investigators of the AMA Accelerating Change in Medical Education Grant. All other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
- 8.Minter RM, Amos KD, Bentz ML, Blair PG, Brandt C, D'Cunha J, et al. Transition to surgical residency: a multi-institution study of perceived intern preparedness and the effect of a formal residency preparatory course in the fourth year of medical school. Acad Med. 2015;90:1116–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Milestones. In: Program and institutional accreditation. (https://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/tabid/430/ProgramandInstitutionalAccreditation/NextAccreditationSystem/Milestones.aspx). Accessed February 8, 2016.
- 16.Boot camps prepare medical students for the rigors of residency. Available at https://news.aamc.org/medical-education/article/boot-camps-prepare-medical-students-rigors-residen/. Accessed January 5, 2018.
- 23.Schiller JH, Burrows H, Fleming AE, Keeley MG, Wozniak L, Santen SA. Responsible milestone-based educational handover with individualized learning plan from undergraduate to graduate pediatric medical education. Acad Ped. 2017; epub ahead of print.Google Scholar
- 29.Pereira AG ,Woods M , Olson APJ , van den Hoogenhof S , Duffy BL , Englander R . Criterion-based assessment in a norm-based world: how can we move past grades? Acad Med 2017; epub ahead of print.Google Scholar