Skip to main content
Log in

Student-Written Multiple-Choice Questions—a Practical and Educational Approach

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of our student-led project was to fulfill junior medical students’ demand for instructive, curriculum-specific practice questions while providing a learning experience and teaching opportunity for participating senior students. Eleven second-year students were taught how to write high-quality multiple-choice questions through an interactive workshop. Subsequently, they were instructed to write questions with detailed explanations for their assigned lecture topics. Thirty-four student-written and faculty-reviewed questions were combined with 16 purely faculty-written questions to create a 50-question exam. No significant difference was found in question difficulty between the student-written (79.5%) and faculty-written (84.0%) questions (p = 0.37). The discrimination index and point biserial correlation were higher for student-written (0.29, 0.32) vs. faculty-written (0.17, 0.25) questions (p < .01, < .05). The test-takers learned key course topics, while the test-writers reviewed key first-year objectives and refined their test-taking strategies. The project provided a model for feasibly developing comprehensive, high-quality, and curriculum-specific questions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Norcini JJ, Swanson DB, Grosso LJ, Webster GD. Reliability, validity and efficiency of multiple choice question and patient management problem item formats in assessment of clinical competence. Med Educ. 1985;19(3):238–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Velan GM, Jones P, McNeil HP, Kumar RK. Integrated online formative assessments in the biomedical sciences for medical students: benefits for learning. BMC Medical Education. 2008;8(1):52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Green ML, Moeller JJ, Spak JM. Test-enhanced learning in health professions education: a systematic review: BEME guide no. 48 Medical teacher. 2018;40(4):337–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Haladyna TM, Downing SM. Validity of a taxonomy of multiple-choice item-writing rules. Appl Meas Educ. 1989;2(1):51–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Paniagua M, Swygert K. Constructing written test questions for the basic and clinical. sciences. 2016.

  6. Kelley TL. The selection of upper and lower groups for the validation of test items. J Educ Psychol. 1939;30(1):17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Walsh J, Harris B, Tayyaba S, Harris D, Smith P. Student written single best answer questions predict performance in finals. Clin Teach. 2016;13(5):352–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manan P. Shah.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

IRB exempt

Informed Consent

NA

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shah, M.P., Lin, B.R., Lee, M. et al. Student-Written Multiple-Choice Questions—a Practical and Educational Approach. Med.Sci.Educ. 29, 41–43 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-018-00646-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-018-00646-5

Keywords

Navigation