Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Abstraction, Multiple Exemplar Training and the Search for Derived Stimulus Relations in Animals

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Perspectives on Behavior Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Symmetry and other derived stimulus relations are readily demonstrated in humans in a variety of experimental preparations. Comparable emergent relations are more difficult to obtain in other animal species and seem to require certain specialized conditions of training and testing. This article examines some of these conditions with an emphasis on what animal research may be able to tell us about the nature and origins of derived stimulus relations. We focus on two areas that seem most promising: 1) research generated by Urcuioli’s (2008) theory of the conditions necessary to produce symmetry in pigeons, and 2) research that explores the effects of multiple exemplar training on emergent relations. Urcuioli’s theory has successfully predicted emergent relations in pigeons by taking into account their apparent difficulty in abstracting the nominal training stimulus from other stimulus properties such as location and temporal position. Further, whereas multiple exemplar training in non-humans has not consistently yielded arbitrarily-applicable relational responding, there is a growing body of literature showing that it does result in abstracted same-different responding. Our review suggests that although emergent stimulus relations demonstrated in non-humans at present have not yet shown the flexibility or generativity apparent in humans, the research strategies reviewed here provide techniques that may permit the analysis of the origins of derived relational responding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Although Zentall et al. (2014) present an associative mediation theory of emergent relations in animals, the account developed in Urcuioli (2008, 2015) does not involve mediational constructs and is directly linked to the Sidman (2000) class approach.

References

  • Baer, D. M., & Sherman, J. A. (1964). Reinforcement control of generalized imitation in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1(1), 37–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baillargeon, R., & Carey, S. (2012). Core cognition and beyond: the acquisition of physical and numerical knowledge. In S. M. Pauen & S. M. Pauen (Eds.), Early childhood development and later outcome (pp. 33–65). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

  • Barnes, C. S., & Rehfeldt, R. A. (2013). Advances in language interventions based on relational frame theory for individuals with developmental disorders. In S. Dymond & B. Roche (Eds.), Advances in relational frame theory: research and application (pp. 151–177). Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., Smeets, P. M., Strand, P., & Friman, P. (2004). Testing and training relational responding in accordance with the relational frame of opposite in young children. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 4, 559–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, A., Perone, M., & Galizio, M. (1991a). Analyzing the reinforcement process at the human level:can application and behavioristic interpretation replace laboratory research? The Behavior Analyst, 14, 95–105.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, A., Perone, M., & Galizio, M. (1991b). The experimental analysis of human behavior: indispensible, ancillary, or irrelevant. The Behavior Analyst, 14, 145–155.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Berens, N. M., & Hayes, S. C. (2007). Arbitrarily applicable comparative relations: experimental evidence for a relational operant. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 45–71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, P. (2010). How pleasure works: the new science of why we like what we like. New York, NY: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodily, K. D., Katz, J. S., & Wright, A. A. (2008). Matching-to-sample abstract-concept learning by pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 34(1), 178–184.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brino, A. L., Campos, R. S., Galvão, O. F., & McIlvane, W. J. (2014b). Blank-comparison matching-to-sample reveals a false positive symmetry test in a capuchin monkey. Psychology & Neuroscience, 7, 193–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brino, A. L., Galvão, O. F., Picanco, C. R. F., Barros, R. S., Souza, C. B. A., Goulart, B. R. K., & McIlvane, W. J. (2014a). Generalized identity matching after multiple exemplar-training in capuchin monkeys. Psychological Record, 64, 693–704.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campos, H. C., Urcuioli, P. J., & Swisher, M. (2014). Concurrent identity training is not necessary for associative symmetry in successive matching. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 101, 10–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, D. E., & Werner, T. J. (1978). Complex learning and information processing by pigeons: a critical analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 29, 565–601.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Catania, A. C. (2013). Learning, 5th Ed. Cornwall on Hudson, NY: Sloan Publishing.

  • Cook, R. G., Kelly, D. M., & Katz, J. S. (2003). Successive two-item same-different discrimination and concept learning by pigeons. Behavioural Processes, 62, 125–144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Critchfield, T. S., & Fienup, D. M. (2010). Using stimulus equivalence technology to teach statistical inference in a group setting. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 763–768.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, W., & Berryman, R. (1965). The complex discriminated operant: studies of matching-to-sample and related problems. In D. I. Mostovsky (Ed.), Stimulus generalization (pp. 284–330). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, T. A., Goodman, A. M., Thompkins, A. M., Forloines, M. R., Lazarowski, L., & Katz, J. S. (2016). Generalization cannot predict abstract-concept learning. In M. C. Olmstead (Ed.), Animal cognition: principles, evolution and development (pp. 131–145). New York: Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, T. A., Wright, A. A., & Katz, J. S. (2015). Abstract-concept learning of difference in pigeons. Animal cognition, 18, 831–837.

  • Deacon, T. W. (1998). The symbolic species: the co-evolution of language and the brain. New York, NY: WW Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dube, W. V., & McIlvane, W. J. (1996). Implications of stimulus control topography analysis for emergent behavior and stimulus classes. In T. R. Zentall & P. M. Smeets (Eds.), Advances in psychology: stimulus class formation in humans and animals (Vol. 117, pp. 197–220). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dube, W. V., McIlvane, W. J., Callahan, T. D., & Stoddard, L. T. (1993). The search for stimulus equivalence in nonverbal organisms. The Psychological Record, 43, 761–778.

  • Dugdale, N., & Lowe, C. F. (2000). Testing for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of language-trained chimpanzees. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 73, 5–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dymond, S. (2014). Meaning is more than associations: relational operants and the search for derived relations in nonhumans. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 101, 152–155.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, A. J., & Wasserman, E. A. (2005). Associative symmetry in the pigeon after successive matching-to-sample training. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 84(2), 147–165.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Galizio, M. (2003). The abstracted operant: a review of Relational frame theory: a post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. The Behavior Analyst, 26, 159–169.

  • Gomez, J., Garcia, A., & Perez, V. (2014). Failure to find symmetry in pigeons after multiple exemplar training. Psicothema, 26, 435–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorham, M., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Berens, N. (2009). Derived comparative and transitive relations in young children with and without autism. The Psychological Record, 59, 221–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, H. M. (1959). Effects of discrimination training on stimulus generalization. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 321–334.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C. (1991). A relational control theory of stimulus equivalence. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior: the first international institute on verbal relations (pp. 19–40). Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C. (2016). Why contextual behavior science exists: an introduction to part 1. In R. D. Zettle, S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & A. Biglan (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of contextual behavioral science (pp. 9–16). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (2001). Relational frame theory: a post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S. C., & Sanford, B. T. (2014). Cooperation came first: evolution and human cognition. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 101, 112–129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heagle, A. I., & Rehfeldt, R. A. (2006). Teaching perspective-taking skills to typically developing children through derived relational responding. Journal of Early and Intensive Behavior Intervention, 3, 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, D. E., & Zentall, T. R. (1977). Backward associations in the pigeon. The American Journal of Psychology, 3–15.

  • Horne, P. J., & Lowe, C. F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65(1), 185–241.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, S., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2014). Associative concept learning, stimulus equivalence, and relational frame theory: working out the similarities and differences between human and nonhuman behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 101, 156–160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, S., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2016). Relational frame theory: the basic account. In R. D. Zettle, S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & A. Biglan (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of contextual behavioral science (pp. 129–178). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, I. H. (1997). Matching-to-sample performance in rats: a case of mistaken identity? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 68(1), 27–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, I. H., Sidman, M., & Carrigan, P. (1986). Stimulus definition in conditional discriminations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 45, 297–304.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kastak, C. R., Schusterman, R. J., & Kastak, D. (2001). Equivalence classification by California sea lions using class-specific reinforcers. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 76, 131–158.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. S., & Wright, A. A. (2006). Same/different abstract-concept learning by pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 32, 80–86.

  • Katz, J. S., Wright, A. A., & Bachevalier, J. (2002). Mechanisms of same/different abstract-concept learning by rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Journal of Experimental Psychology: animal Behavior Processes, 28, 358–368.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. S., Wright, A. A., & Bodily, K. D. (2007). Issues in the comparative cognition of abstract-concept learning. Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews, 2, 79–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler, W. (1918/1938). Simple structural functions in the chimpanzee and in the chicken. In W. D. Ellis (Ed.), A source book of gestalt psychology (pp. 217–227). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, D. H., & DeRivera, J. (1954). Evidence for relational transposition. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 47, 465–471.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lazareva, O. F. (2012). Relational learning in a context of transposition: a review. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 97, 231–248.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lazareva, O. F., Miner, M., Wasserman, E. A., & Young, M. E. (2008). Multiple-pair training enhances transposition in pigeons. Learning & Behavior, 36, 174–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazareva, O. F., Wasserman, E. A., & Young, M. E. (2005). Transposition in pigeons: reassessing Spence (1937) with multiple discrimination training. Animal Learning & Behavior, 33, 22–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazareva, O. F., Young, M. E., & Wasserman, E. A. (2014). A three-component model of relational responding in the transposition paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 40, 63–80.

  • Lionello, K. M., & Urcuioli, P. J. (1998). Control by sample location in pigeons matching to sample. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 70, 235–251.

  • Lionello-DeNolf, K. M. (2009). The search for symmetry: 25 years in review. Learning & Behavior, 37, 188–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lionello-DeNolf, K. M., & Urcuioli, P. J. (2002). Stimulus control topographies and tests of symmetry in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78, 467–495.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lipkens, R., Hayes, S. C., & Hayes, L. J. (1993). Longitudinal study of the development of derived relations in an infant. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 201–239.

  • Lipkens, R., Kop, P. F., & Matthijs, W. (1988). A test of symmetry and transitivity in the conditional discrimination performances of pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49, 395–409.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Luciano, C., Becerra, I. G., & Valverde, M. R. (2007). The role of multiple-exemplar training and naming in establishing derived equivalence in an infant. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 87, 349–365.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mackintosh, N. J. (2000). Abstraction and discrimination. In C. Heyes & L. Huber (Eds.), The evolution of cognition (pp. 123–141). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIlvane, W. J. (2013). Simple and complex discrimination learning. In G. J. Madden, W. V. Dube, T. D. Hackenberg, G. P. Hanley, & K. A. Lattal (Eds.), APA handbook of behavior analysis, Translating principles into practice (Vol. 2, pp. 129–163). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIlvane, W. J. (2014). “Associative concept learning in animals” by Zentall, Wasserman, and Urcuioli: a commentary. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 101, 161–164.

  • McIlvane, W. J., & Dube, W. V. (2003). Stimulus control topography coherence theory: foundations and extensions. The Behavior Analyst, 26, 195–213.

  • McIlvane, W. J., Serna, R. W., Dube, W. V., & Stromer, R. (2000). Stimulus control topography coherence and stimulus equivalence: reconciling test outcomes with theory. In J. C. Leslie & D. Blackman (Eds.), Experimental and applied analysis of human behavior (pp. 85–110). Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuringer, A. (2002). Operant variability: evidence, functions, and theory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 672–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oden, D. L., Thompson, R. K., & Premack, D. (1988). Spontaneous transfer of matching by infant chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 140–145.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O'Donnell, J., & Saunders, K. J. (2003). Equivalence relations in individuals with language limitations and mental retardation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 80(1), 131–157.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pelaez, M., Gewirtz, J. L., Sanchez, A., & Mahabir, N. M. (2000). Exploring stimulus equivalence formation in infants. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 9, 20–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penn, D. C., Holyoak, K. J., & Povinelli, D. J. (2008). Darwin's mistake: explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 109–130.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pilgrim, C., & Galizio, M. (1996). Stimulus equivalence: a class of correlations, or a correlation of classes? In T. R. Zentall & P. M. Smeets (Eds.), Advances in psychology: stimulus class formation in humans and animals (Vol. 117, pp. 173–195). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  • Pilgrim, C., & Galizio, M. (2000). Stimulus equivalence and units of analysis. In J. C. Leslie & D. Blackman (Eds.), Experimental and applied analysis of human behavior (pp. 111–126). Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilgrim, C., Jackson, J., & Galizio, M. (2000). Acquisition of arbitrary conditional discriminations by young normally developing children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 73, 177–193.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct: the new science of language and mind. New York, NY: HarperCollins.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Premack, D. (1978). On the abstractness of human concepts: why it would be difficult to talk to a pigeon. In S. H. Hulse, H. E. Fowler, & W. K. Honig (Eds.), Cognitive processes in animal behavior (pp. 423–451). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prichard, A., Panoz-Brown, D., Bruce, K., & Galizio, M. (2015). Emergent identity but not symmetry following successive olfactory discrimination training in rats. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 104(2), 133–145.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Reese, H. W. (1968). The perception of stimulus relations: discrimination learning and transposition. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodewald, H. K. (1974). Symbolic matching-to-sample by pigeons. Psychological Reports, 34, 987–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage-Rumbaugh, E. S. (1986). Ape language: from conditioned response to symbol. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schusterman, R. J., & Kastak, D. (1993). A California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) is capable of forming equivalence relations. The Psychological Record, 43, 823.

  • Sidman, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 14, 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: a research story. Boston: Authors Cooperative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M. (2000). Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 127–146.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M., Rauzin, R., Lazar, R., Cunningham, S., Tailby, W., & Carrigan, P. (1982). A search for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of rhesus monkeys, baboons, and children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 23–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sidman, M., & Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: an expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1956). A case history in scientific method. American Psychologist, 11, 221–233.

  • Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Vintage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1976). About behaviorism. New York: Appleton- Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, K. W. (1937). The differential response in animals to stimuli varying within a single dimension. Psychological Review, 44, 430–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suddendorf, T. (2013). The gap: the science of what separates us from other animals. Philadelphia, PA: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, M. M., & Urcuioli, P. J. (2010). Reflexivity in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 94, 267–282.

  • Urcuioli, P. J. (2008). Associative symmetry, antisymmetry, and a theory of pigeon’s equivalence class formation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 90, 257–282.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Urcuioli, P. J. (2011). Emergent identity matching after successive matching training, I: reflexivity or generalized identity? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 96, 329–341.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Urcuioli, P. J. (2015). A successful search for symmetry. Conductual, 3, 4–25.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Urcuioli, P. J., & Swisher, M. (2012a). A replication and extension of the antisymmetry effect in pigeons. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 98, 283–293.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Urcuioli, P. J., & Swisher, M. (2012b). Emergent identity matching after successive matching training. II: reflexivity or transitivity? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 97, 5–27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Urcuioli, P. J., & Swisher, M. J. (2015). Transitive and anti-transitive emergent relations in pigeons: support for a theory of stimulus-class formation. Behavioural Processes, 112, 49–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Urcuioli, P. J., Zentall, T. R., Jackson-Smith, P., & Steirn, J. N. (1989). Evidence for common coding in many-to-one matching: retention, intertrial interference, and transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 15(3), 264–273.

  • Vaughn, W. (1988). Formation of equivalence sets in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 36–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velasco, S. M., Huziwara, E. M., Machado, A., & Tomanari, G. Y. (2010). Associative symmetry by pigeons after few-exemplar training. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 94, 283–295.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Waxman, S. R., & Gelman, S. A. (2010). Different kinds of concepts and different kinds of words: what words to for human cognition. In D. Mareschal, P. C. Quinn, & S. E. G. Lea (Eds.), The making of human concepts (pp. 99–130). NY: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Weil, T. M., Hayes, S. C., & Capurro, P. (2011). Establishing a deictic relational repertoire in young children. The Psychological Record, 61, 371–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, A. A., Magnotti, J. F., Katz, J. S., Leonard, K., & Kelly, D. M. (2016). Concept learning set-size functions for Clark’s nutcrackers. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 105(1), 76–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, A. A., Magnotti, J. F., Katz, J. S., Leonard, K., Vernouillet, A., & Kelly, D. M. (2017). Corvids outperform pigeons and primates in learning a basic concept. Psychological Science, 28, 437–444.

  • Wright, A. A., Rivera, J. J., Katz, J. S., & Bachevalier, J. (2003). Abstract-concept learning and list-memory processing by capuchin and rhesus monkeys. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 29(3), 184–198.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto, J. I., & Asano, T. (1995). Stimulus equivalence in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). The Psychological Record, 45, 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zentall, T. R., Wasserman, E. A., & Urcuioli, P. J. (2014). Associative concept learning in animals. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 101(1), 130–151.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zinn, T. E., Newland, M. C., & Ritchie, K. E. (2015). The efficiency and efficacy of equivalence-based learning: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 48, 865–882.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Katherine Dyer, Madeleine Mason, Simone Nguyen, and Tiffany Phasukkan for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina Wilmington, 601 S. College Rd, Wilmington, NC, 28403, USA

    Mark Galizio & Katherine E. Bruce

Authors
  1. Mark Galizio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Katherine E. Bruce
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mark Galizio or Katherine E. Bruce.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Both Mark Galizio and Katherine Bruce declare that they have no conflicts of interest related to the material in this manuscript.

Funding

The first author was supported by grant DA 29252 during the preparation of this manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Galizio, M., Bruce, K.E. Abstraction, Multiple Exemplar Training and the Search for Derived Stimulus Relations in Animals. Perspect Behav Sci 41, 45–67 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-017-0112-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-017-0112-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation