Advertisement

Complexity Analysis and Algorithm Design of Pooling Problem

  • Yu-Hong Dai
  • Rui Diao
  • Kai Fu
Article

Abstract

The pooling problem, also called the blending problem, is fundamental in production planning of petroleum. It can be formulated as an optimization problem similar with the minimum-cost flow problem. However, Alfaki and Haugland (J Glob Optim 56:897–916, 2013) proved the strong NP-hardness of the pooling problem in general case. They also pointed out that it was an open problem to determine the computational complexity of the pooling problem with a fixed number of qualities. In this paper, we prove that the pooling problem is still strongly NP-hard even with only one quality. This means the quality is an essential difference between minimum-cost flow problem and the pooling problem. For solving large-scale pooling problems in real applications, we adopt the non-monotone strategy to improve the traditional successive linear programming method. Global convergence of the algorithm is established. The numerical experiments show that the non-monotone strategy is effective to push the algorithm to explore the global minimizer or provide a good local minimizer. Our results for real problems from factories show that the proposed algorithm is competitive to the one embedded in the famous commercial software Aspen PIMS.

Keywords

Pooling problem Complexity analysis Successive linear programming Non-monotone 

Mathematics Subject Classification

90C60 90C90 

References

  1. 1.
    Xia, X.-M.: The research on Beijing Yanshan chemical corporation’s PIMS optimizing resource. Master thesis, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alfaki, M., Haugland, D.: Strong formulations for the pooling problem. J. Glob. Optim. 56, 897–916 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Haverly, C.A.: Studies of the behavior of recursion for the pooling problem. Acm Sigmap Bull. 25, 19–28 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Haverly, C.A.: Behavior of recursion model: more studies. Acm Sigmap Bull. 26, 22–28 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baker, T.E., Lasdon, L.S.: Successive linear programming at Exxon. Manag. Sci. 31, 264–274 (1985)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lasdon, L.S., Waren, A.D., Sarkar, S., et al.: Solving the pooling problem using generalized reduced gradient and successive linear programming algorithms. Acm Sigmap Bull. 27, 9–15 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Diao, R. (ed.): Attacking some optimization problems in petrochemistry. Electricity and other fields. Ph.D. thesis, Academy of Mathematics and Systems Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Visweswaran, V., Floudas, C.A.: New formulations and branching strategies for the GOP algorithm. In: Zhang, J., Kim, N.-H., Lasdon, L.S. (eds.) Global Optimization in Engineering Design, pp. 75–109. Springer, Berlin (1996)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Androulakis, I.P., Visweswaran, V., Floudas, C.A.: Distributed decomposition-based approaches in global optimization. In: State of the Art in Global Optimization, pp. 285–301. Springer, US (1996)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Foulds, L.R., Haugland, D., Jörnsten, K.: A bilinear approach to the pooling problem. Optimization 24, 165180 (1992)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Adhya, N., Tawarmalani, M., Sahinidis, N.V.: A Lagrangian approach to the pooling problem. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 38, 1956–1972 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bental, A., Eiger, G., Gershovitz, V.: Global minimization by reducing the duality gap. Math. Program. 63(1–3), 193–212 (1994)MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gupte, A.: Mixed integer bilinear programming with applications to the pooling problem. Ph.D. thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pham, V., Laird, C., El-Halwagi, M.: Convex hull discretization approach to the global optimization of pooling problems. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 48, 1973–1979 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tawarmalani, M., Sahinidis, N.V.: Convexification and Global Optimization in Continuous and Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Programming: Theory, Algorithms, Software, and Applications. Springer, Berlin (2002)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee, S., Grossmann, I.E.: Global optimization of nonlinear generalized disjunctive programming with bilinear equality constraints: applications to process networks. Comput. Chem. Eng. 27, 1557–1575 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Quesada, I., Grossmann, I.E.: Global optimization of bilinear process networks with multicomponent flows. Comput. Chem. Eng. 19, 1219–1242 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Misener, R., Floudas, C.A.: Advances for the pooling problem: modeling, global optimization, and computational studies. Appl. Comput. Math. 8, 3–22 (2009)MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Realff, M., Ahmed, S., Inacio, H., et al.: Heuristics and upper bounds for a pooling problem with cubic constraints. In: Foundations of Computer-Aided Process Operations. Savannah (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    D’Ambrosio, C., Linderoth, J., Luedtke, J.: Valid inequalities for the pooling problem with binary variables. In: Diao, R. (ed.) Integer Programming and Combinatoral Optimization, pp. 117–129. Springer, Berlin (2011)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Meyer, C.A., Floudas, C.A.: Global optimization of a combinatorially complex generalized pooling problem. AIChE J. 52, 1027–1037 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Misener, R., Floudas, C.A.: Global optimization of large-scale generalized pooling problems: quadratically constrained MINLP models. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 49, 5424–5438 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Visweswaran, V. (ed.): MINLP: applications in blending and pooling problems. In: Encyclopedia of Optimization, pp. 2114–2121. Springer, Berlin (2009)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhang, J.-Z., Kim, N.-H., Lasdon, L.(eds.): State of the Art in Global Optimization. In: An improved successive linear programming algorithm. Manag. Sci. 31, 1312–1331 (1985)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Forrest, J.: COIN-OR linear programming solver. https://projects.coin-or.org/Clp
  26. 26.
    Audet, C., Brimberg, J., Hansen, P., et al.: Pooling problem: alternate formulations and solution methods. Manag. Sci. 50, 761–776 (2004)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Operations Research Society of China, Periodicals Agency of Shanghai University, Science Press, and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Scientific and Engineering Computing, Institute of Computational Mathematics and Scientific/Engineering Computing, Academy of Mathematics and Systems ScienceChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations