Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Working together in small-scale fisheries: harnessing collective action for poverty eradication

  • Research
  • Published:
Maritime Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper builds on lessons learned from case studies of organization-building and collective action as a means of eradicating poverty in small-scale fisheries. The Voluntary Guidelines for Securing Sustainable Small-Scale Fisheries in the Context of Food Security and Poverty Eradication, endorsed by FAO Member States in 2014, recognize that addressing poverty depends in large measure upon the collective agency of small-scale fishers and fish workers themselves. We first discuss the nature of poverty in small-scale fisheries and argue that lack of rights and debilitating power relations are among the factors contributing to poverty. Secondly, the paper explores the possibilities of collective action and suggests that the support—but not the domination—of government and civil society is crucial. Finally, we look into the characteristics of fisher and fish worker organizations and emphasize the importance of autonomous decision making, and the need to address internal obstacles and opportunities, including those related to gender.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. “Fishers and fish workers” are the term used by FAO to emphasize the need to include people involved both harvest and post-harvest activities. We will use the same term throughout this paper.

  2. For more extensive, theoretical perspectives on collective action, see Olson (1971), Hardin 1982: Tilly (1978), Ostrom (2001), and Miller (2014).

  3. The thematic series contains case studies from Barbados, Costa Rica, India, Indonesia, Norway, Tanzania, Timor-Leste, and the USA.

  4. FAO perceives root causes of poverty “in small-scale fishing communities to be “associated with a number of factors. Among these factors are as follows: the harvest nature of the production process; the high perishability of the product; the relatively higher capital investment needed for production, and the associated higher risks; the relative isolation of fishers’ work space from mainstream society; and the dangerous nature of the occupation and the uncertainties associated with the state of resources, which create fears and vulnerability” (SOFIA 2016a: 122).

  5. https://www.rochdalepioneersmuseum.coop/about-us/the-rochdale-principles/

References

  • Acheson, J.M. 1981. Anthropology of fishing. Annual Review of Anthropology 10: 275–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkire, S. 2008. Multidimensional poverty measures. Oxford: Oxford Poverty & Human Development Initiative http://hdr.undp.org/en/media/Alkire_Multidimensional_Poverty.ppt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonso-Población, E. 2014. O mar é femia. Riesgo y trabajo entre los pescadores de una villa costera gallega. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonso-Población, E., and A. Fidalgo-Castro. 2014. Webs of legitimacy and discredit: narrative capital and politics of ritual in a Timor-Leste community. Anthropological Forum 24 (3): 245–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.2014.948381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso-Población, E., Siar, S.V. 2018. Women’s participation and leadership in fisherfolk organizations and collective action in fisheries: a review of evidence on enablers, drivers and barriers. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular No. 1159. Rome, FAO.

  • Alonso-Población, E., Rodrigues, P., Wilson, C., Pereira, M. & Lee, R.U. 2018. Narrative assemblages for power-balanced coastal and marine governance. Tara Bandu as a tool for community-based fisheries co-management in Timor-Leste. Maritime Studies.

  • Amarasinghe, O., and M. Bavinck. 2017. Furthering the implementation of the SSF guidelines: Strengthening fisheries cooperatives in Sri Lanka. In The small-scale fisheries guidelines: Global implementation, ed. S. Jentoft, R. Chuenpagdee, M.J. Barragán Paladines, and N. Franz. Dorendrecht: Springer Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baland, J.M., P. Bardhan, and S. Bowles, eds. 2006. Inequality, cooperation and environmental sustainability. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bavinck, M. 2006. Don’t be hasty and impetuous—notes on women in fisheries. Samudra 43: 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bavinck, M. 2011. Wealth, poverty, and immigration—the role of institutions in the fisheries of Tamil Nadu, India. In Poverty mosaics: realities and prospects in small-scale fisheries, ed. S. Jentoft and A. Eide, 173–191. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bavinck, M. 2014. Investigating poverty through the lens of riches—immigration and segregation in Indian capture fisheries. Development Policy Review 32 (1): 33–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bavinck, M., and J. Gupta. 2014. Pluralism in freshwater and marine governance: a challenge fir earth system governance, architecture. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. 11: 75–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bavinck, M. & Vivekanandan, V. (2017). Qualities of self-governance and wellbeing in the fishing communities of northern Tamil Nadu, India—the role of Pattinavar ur panchayats. Maritime Studies, 16:16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40152-017-0070-8.

  • Bavinck, M., F. Berkes, A. Charles, C. Esteves Dias, P. Nauak, and M. Sowman. 2017. The impact of coastal grabbing on community conservation—a global reconnaissance. Maritime Studies (MAST) 16: 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40152-017-0062-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benda-Beckmann, F., K. von Benda-Beckmann, and A. Griffiths. 2009. The power of law in a transnational world. New York: Berghan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Béné, C. 2003. When fishery rhymes with poverty: a first step beyond the old paradigm on poverty in small-scale fisheries. World Development 31 (6): 949–975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Béné, C., and R.M. Friend. 2011. Poverty in small-scale fisheries: old issue, new analysis. Progress in Development Studies 11 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177/146499341001100203.

  • Béné, C., Devereux, S & Roelen, K. 2015. Social Protection and sustainable natural resources management: initial findings and good practices from small-scale fisheries. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular. No 1106. Rome. FAO.

  • Bennet, N.J., T.S. Whitty, E. Finkbeiner, J. Pittman, H. Bassett, S. Gelcich, and E.H. Allison. 2018. Environmental stewardship: A conceptual review and analytical framework. Environmental Management 61: 597–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0993-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, N.J., H. Govan, and T. Satterfield. 2015. Ocean grabbing. Marine Policy 57: 61–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464993410011002032015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., D. Feeny, B.J. McCay, and J.M. Acheson. 1989. The benefits of the commons. Nature 340 (6229): 91–93. https://doi.org/10.1038/340091a0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., T.P. Hughes, R.S. Stenech, J.A. Wilson, D.R. Bellwood, B. Crona, C. Folke, L.H. Gunderson, and H.M. Leslie. 2006. Globalization, roving bandits, and marine resources. Science 311 (5767): 1557–1558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child, A. (this thematic series) 2018. Beyond the cooperative: How innovative collective action saved livelihoods, culture and tourism in Ocracoke, North Carolina, USA. Maritime Studies.

  • Campling, L., E. Havice, and P. McCall-Howard. 2012. The political economy and ecology of capture Fisheries: market dynamics, resource access and relations of exploitation and resistance. Journal of Agrarian Change 12 (2 and 3): 177–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmona Badía, J. 1994. Recursos, organización y tecnología en el crecimiento de la industria española de conservas de pescado, Edited by J. Nadal & J. Catalán, La cara oculta de la industrialización en España. La modernización de los sectores no líderes (siglos XIX y XX), 127–162, Madrid: Alianza.

  • Chuenpagdee, R., P. Degnbol, M. Bavinck, S. Jentoft, D. Johnson, R. Pullin, and S. Williams. 2005. Challenges and concerns in capture fisheries and aquaculture. In Fish for life—interactive governance for fisheries, ed. J. Kooiman, M. Bavinck, S. Jentoft, and R. Pullin, 25–37. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordell, J. (Ed.) 1989. A sea of small boats. Cultural Survival Report 26. Cambridge: Cultural Survival Inc.

  • Delaney, A.E. 2015. Japanese fishing cooperative associations: Governance in an era of consolidation. In Interactive governance for small-scale fisheries: Global reflections, ed. S. Jentoft and R. Chuenpagdee, 263–280. Dordrecht: Springer Science.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • DuBois, C., and C. Zografos. 2012. Conflicts at sea between artisanal and industrial fishers: inter-sectoral interactions and dispute resolution in Senegal. Marine Policy 36 (6): 1211–1220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eide, A., M. Bavinck, and J. Raakjær. 2011. Avoiding poverty: Distributing wealth in fisheries. In Poverty mosaics: Realities and prospects in small-scale fisheries, ed. S. Jentoft and A. Eide, 13–26. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • FAO. 2002. Report of the Sustainable Fisheries Livelihoods Programme (GCP/INT/735/UK) and FAO Advisory Committee on Fisheries Research Joint Working Party on Poverty in Small-Scale Fisheries. Promoting the Contribution of the Sustainable Livelihoods Approach and the Code of Conduct for Responsible Fisheries in Poverty Alleviation. Rome, 10–12 April 2002. FAO Fisheries Report. No. 678. Rome.

  • FAO. 2012. The voluntary guidelines on the responsible governance of tenure of land, fisheries and forests in the context of National Food Security. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. 2015. Towards the implementation of the SSF Guidelines in the Southeast Asia region. Proceedings of the Southeast Asia Regional Consultation Workshop on the Implementation of the Voluntary Guidelines for Securing Sustainable Small-Scale Fisheries in the Context of Food Security and Poverty Eradication, Bali, Indonesia, 24–27 August 2015, Rome, Italy. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Proceedings No. 42. Rome, Italy.

  • FAO. 2016. Strengthening organizations and collective action in fisheries: Towards the formulation of a capacity development programme, Workshop report and case studies, Barbados, 4–6 November 2014, edited by Susana V. Siar and Daniela Kalikoski. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Proceedings No. 41. Rome, Italy.

  • Flyvbjerg, B. 2001. Making social science matter. Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frangoudes, K., B. Marugán-Pintos, and J.J. Pascual-Fernández. 2008. From open access to co-governance and conservation: the case of women shellfish collectors in Galicia (Spain). Marine Policy 32 (2): 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2007.09.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fröcklin, S., M. De la Torre-Castro, L. Lindström, and N.S. Jiddawi. 2013. Fish traders as key actors in fisheries: gender and adaptive management. AMBIO 42: 951–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, A., and A. Bennett. 2005. Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, J., N.R.M. Pouw, and M.A.F. Ros-Tonen. 2014. Towards an elaborated theory of inclusive development. European Journal of Development Research 27 (4): 541–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gyader, O., P. Berthou, C. Koutsikopoulos, F. Alban, S. Demanéche, M.B. Gaspar, R. Eschbaum, E. Fahy, O. Tully, L. Reynal, O. Curtil, K. Frangoudes, and F. Maynou. 2013. Small scale fisheries in Europe: a comparative analysis based on a selection of case studies. Fisheries 140: 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162 (3859): 1243–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. 1992. Collective action. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmsing, A.H.J., and S. Vellema. 2011. Governance, inclusion and embedding. In Value chains, social inclusion and economic development: Contrasting theories and realities, ed. A.H.J. Helmsing and S. Vellema, 1–19. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaacs, M. 2003. Understanding the social processes and politics of implementing a new fisheries policy, the Marine Living Resources Act 19 of 1998, in South Africa. PhD Thesis University of Western Cape.

  • Islam, M.M., and S. Jentoft. 2017. Addressing disaster risks and climate change in coastal Bangladesh: Using the Small-Scale Fisheries Guidelines. In The small-scale guidelines: Global implementation, ed. S. Jentoft, R. Chuenpagdee, M.J. Barragàn-Paladines, and N. Franz, 521–540. Dordrecht: Springer Science.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jentoft, S. 1986. Fisheries co-operatives; lessons drawn from international experiences. Canadian Journal of Development Studies VII (2): 197–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jentoft, S. 1989. Fisheries co-management: delegating government responsibility to fishermen’s organizations. Marine Policy 137–154.

  • Jentoft, S. 2013. Social justice in the context of fisheries—A governability challenge. In Governability of fisheries and aquaculture: Theory and applications, ed. M. Bavinck, R. Chuenpagdee, S. Jentoft, and J. Kooiman, 45–66. Dordrecht: Springer Science.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jentoft, S., and A. Eide. 2011. Poverty mosaics: realities and prospects in small-scale fisheries. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jentoft, S. & Finstad, B. (this thematic series) 2018. Building fisheries organizations through collective action in Norway. Maritime Studies.

  • Jentoft, S., P. Onyango, and M.M. Islam. 2010. Freedom and poverty in the fishery commons. International Journal of the Commons 4 (1): 345–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. 2006. Category, narrative, and value in the governance of small-scale fisheries. Marine Policy 30: 747–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D.S., T.G. Acott, N. Stacey, and J. Urquhart, eds. 2017. Social wellbeing and the values of small scale fisheries. Dordrecht: Springer Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalikoski, D., and N. Franz, eds. 2014. Strengthening organizations and collective action in fisheries. A way forward in implementing the international guidelines for securing sustainable small-scale fisheries. Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalikoski, D. C. & Vasconcellos, M. 2012. Case study of the technical, socioeconomic and environmental conditions of small scale fisheries in the estuary of the Patos Lagoon, Brazil: a methodology for assessment. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Circular. No 1075. Rome: FAO.

  • Kleiber, D., L.M. Harris, and A.C. Vincent. 2015. Gender and small-scale fisheries: a case for counting women and beyond. Fish and Fisheries 16 (4): 547–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurien, J. 1985. Technical assistance project and socio-economic change. Norwegian intervention in Kerela’s fisheries development. Economic and Political Weekly XX (25–26).

  • Kurien, J. 1988. The role of fishermen’s organizations in fisheries management of developing countries (with particular reference to the Indo-Pacific region). FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No 300. Rome: FAO.

  • Kurien, J. 2000. The Kerala model: Its central tendency and the outlier. In Kerala: The development experience, ed. G. Parayil. New York: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurien, J. 2007. The blessing of the commons: Small-scale fisheries, community property rights and coastal natural assets. In Reclaiming nature: Environmental justice and ecological restoration, ed. J. Boyce, S. Narain, et al. London: Anthem Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurien, J. 2014. Collective action and organizations in small-scale fisheries. In D.C. Kalikoski & N. Franz, eds. 2013. Strengthening organizations and collective action in fisheries: a way forward in implementing the international guidelines for securing sustainable small-scale fisheries, FAO Workshop, 18–20, pp. 41–104March, Rome:. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Proceedings No. 32. (Also available at www.fao.org/3/a-i3540e.pdf).

  • Kurien, J. (2017) . Collective action and co-management inititives in post-disaster Aceh, Indonesia. Maritime Studies, 16:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40152-017-0075-3

  • Mathew S. 2005. Fisheries and their contribution to sustainable development. Contribution to Discussion Panel A, 6th Meeting of the United Nations Open-Ended Informal Consultative Process on Oceans and the Law of the Sea, 6–10 June 2005.

  • McConney, P. & Medeiros, R. 2014. Strengthening organizations and collective action in smal-scale fisheries: lessons learned from Brazil and the Caribbean. In Strengthening organizations and collective action in fisheries: a way forward in implementing the international guidelines for securing sustainable small-scale fisheries, eds. D.C. Kalikoski and Franz, N. FAO Workshop, 18–20 march 2013, Rome, Italy, pp. 41–104. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Proceedings No. 32. Rome, FAO. Also available at www.fao.org/3/a-i3540e.pdf.

  • McConney, P., R. Medeiros & M. Pena. (Eds.) 2014. Enhancing stewardship in small-scale fisheries: Practices and perspectives. Too Big To Ignore (TBTI) and Centre for Resource Management and Environmental Studies, The University of the West Indies, Cave Hill Campus, Barbados. CERMES Technical Report No. 73.

  • McConney, P., Simmons, B., Nicholls, V. & Medeiros Pereira, R. (2017). Building the Barbados National Union of Fisherfolk Organisations. Maritime Studies, 16:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40152-017-0073-5.

  • Medeiros, R.P., T.Z. Serafini, and P. McConney. 2014. Enhancing ecosystem stewardship in small-scale fisheries: prospects for Latin America and the Caribbean. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente 32: 181–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meltzoff, S.K. 1995. Marisquadoras of the shellfish revolution: the rise of women in co-management on Illa de Arousa, Galicia. Journal of Political Ecology 2: 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michels, R. 2001. Political parties: A sociological study of oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy. Kitchener: Batoche Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D.L. 2014. Introduction to collective behaviour and collective action. Long Grove: Waveland Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. 1971. The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onyango, P. 2011. Occupation of last resort? Small-scale fishing in Lake Victoria, Tanzania. In Poverty Mosaics. Realities and prospects in small.-scale fisheries, ed. S. Jentoft and A. Eide, 125–146. Dordrecht: Springer Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onyango, P. (2018). Fisheries co-management: assessing the contribution of beach management units in Lake Victoria, Tanzania to reduce rural poverty. Maritime Studies .

  • Onyango, P., and S. Jentoft. 2011. Climbing the hill. Women’s social entrepreneurship in Lake Victoria. Maritime Studies (MAST) 10 (2): 117–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. 2001. Collective action and the evolution of social norms. Journal of Economic Perspectives 14 (3): 137–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, D. 2018. A vision for marine fisheries in a global blue economy. Marine Policy 87: 371–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravaillon, M. 2004. Pro-poor growth: A primer. Policy Research Working Paper 3242. Washington: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scholtens, J. 2016. The elusive quest for access and collective action: North Sri Lankan fishers’ thwarted struggles against a foreign trawler fleet. The International Journal of the Commons 10 (2): 929–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuhbauer, A., R. Chuenpagdee, W.W.L. Cheung, K. Greer, and U.R. Sumaila. 2017. How subsidies affect the economic viability of small-scale fisheries. Marine Policy 82: 111–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J.C. 1987. Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. 1999. Development as freedom. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. 2009. The Idea of Justice. Cambridge MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

  • Sen, A. 2006. Conceptualizing and measuring poverty. In Poverty and inequality, ed. D.B. Grusky and R. Kanbur. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinan, H., and D. Whitmarsh. 2010. Wealth-based fisheries management and resource rent capture: an application to the Maldives marine fisheries. Mar Policy 34 (3): 389–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SOFIA. 2016. The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2016. Contributing to food security and nutrition for all. Rome: FAO.

  • Solis Rivera, V., Madrigal Cordeo, P., Chacón Rojas, D. & O’Riordan, B. (2017). Institutions and collective action in a Costa Rican small-scale fisheries cooprrative the case of CoopeTárcoles RL. Maritime Studies 16:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40152-017.0055-1.

  • Spicker, P. 1999. Definitions of poverty: Eleven clusters of meaning. In The International Glossary of Poverty, ed. D. Gordon and P. Spicker. London: ZED Books, CROP International Series on Poverty.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanford, R.J., B. Wiryawan, D.G. Bengen, and R. Febriamansyah. 2014. Improving livelihoods in fishing communities of Wst Suamatra: more than just boats and machines. Marine Policy 45: 16–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundar, A. 2012. Alternatives to crisis: social movements in global fisheries governance. Human Geography 5 (2).

  • Sunde, J., M. Sowman, H. Smith, and W. Wicomb. 2014. Emerging proposals for tenure governance in small-scale fisheries in South Africa. Land Tenure Journal 1: 117–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. 1978. From mobilization to revolution. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urquhart, J., T.G. Acott, D. Symes, and M. Zhao, eds. 2014. Social issues in sustainable fisheries management. Dordrecht: Springer Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeratunge, N., K.A. Snyder, and P.S. Choo. 2010. Gleaner, fisher, trader, processor: understanding gendered employment in fisheries and aquaculture. Fish and Fisheries 11 (4): 405–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2010.00368.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper originated from the FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) project “Strengthening organizations and collective action in fisheries – Towards the formulation of a capacity development program on poverty eradication and collective action in small-scale fisheries.” The first project workshop was held in Barbados on 4–6 November 2014, organized by the Centre for Resource Management and Environmental Studies of The University of West Indies. The paper was also discussed at the MARE conference in 2015 in Amsterdam, and at FAO on 16–18 November 2016 in Rome, Italy. The authors thank FAO for supporting the development of this work. Svein Jentoft also wants to acknowledge the support of the Too Big To Ignore (TBTI) global small-scale fisheries research network.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Svein Jentoft.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jentoft, S., Bavinck, M., Alonso-Población, E. et al. Working together in small-scale fisheries: harnessing collective action for poverty eradication. Maritime Studies 17, 1–12 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-018-0094-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-018-0094-8

Keywords

Navigation