Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Videolaryngoskopie II: nun auch beim Neugeborenen überlegen!

  • Literatur kompakt
  • Published:
Pädiatrie Aims and scope

Erst kürzlich wurde der Videolaryngoskopie (VL) im Neugeborenenalter noch fehlende Evidenz attestiert [1]. Diese Cochrane-Aussage konnte nun durch die Veröffentlichung einer randomisierten Studie in Pediatrics eindrucksvoll entkräftet werden [2].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1:
Abb. 2:

Literatur

  1. Lingappan K et al. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation in neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;2: CD009975

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. O’Shea JE et al. Videolaryngoscopy to teach neonatal intubation: a randomized trial. Pediatrics 2015;136:912–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Moussa A et al. Videolaryngoscope for teaching neonatal endotracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics 2016;137:1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. http://www.springermedizin.de

    Thomas Hoppen

Authors
  1. Thomas Hoppen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hoppen, T. Videolaryngoskopie II: nun auch beim Neugeborenen überlegen!. Pädiatrie 28, 20–21 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s15014-016-0702-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s15014-016-0702-1

Search

Navigation