Advertisement

Effect of peanut shells amendment on soil properties and growth of seedlings of Senegalia senegal (L.) Britton, Vachellia seyal (Delile) P. Hurter, and Prosopis juliflora (Swartz) DC in salt-affected soils

  • Dioumacor Fall
  • Niokhor Bakhoum
  • Fatoumata Fall
  • Fatou Diouf
  • Cheikh Ndiaye
  • Mathieu N. Faye
  • Valérie Hocher
  • Diégane Diouf
Original Paper
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Key message

The soil amendment with peanut shells (4, 6 or 8 t ha −1 ) improves soil properties and growth of Senegalia senegal (L.) Britton , Vachellia seyal ( Delile) P . Hurter and Prosopis juliflora (Swartz) DC seedlings on salty soils (86, 171, 257 mM NaCl).

Context

Salinization causes the degradation of biological, chemical, and physical properties of soils. Salty soils reclamation can be achieved with organic amendments and afforestation with salt tolerant species.

Aims

The aim of the study was to assess in greenhouse conditions the effect of peanut shells on soil chemical characteristics and growth of multipurpose leguminous trees Senegalia senegal, Vachellia seyal, and Prosopis juliflora under salt-affected soils.

Methods

Seedlings were individually cultivated in plastic bags containing a mixture of non-saline and non-sterile soil and crushed peanut shells. Four doses of peanut shells (0, 4, 6, and 8 t ha−1) of 73-33 variety were tested. Salt stress was gradually applied after 1 month of cultivation at a rate of 43 mM NaCl per day until concentrations of 0, 86, 171, and 257 mM were reached. Seedlings growth, physiological responses, and soil characteristics were evaluated after 3 months of stress.

Results

Peanut shells application improved soil chemical properties (carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus contents, pH, total microbial activity, and cation-exchange capacity) and reduced soil salinity. They also increased height, collar diameter, shoots and root biomass, chlorophyll, and proline contents of seedlings.

Conclusion

The organic amendment with peanut shells improves soil fertility and tree growth under saline conditions.

Keywords

Organic amendment Salinization Saline soil reclamation Senegalia Senegal Vachellia seyal Prosopis juliflora 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge FIRST, LMI-LAPSE, and IFS for their financial support. The authors thank all the CNRF and LCM lab technicians for their technical assistance and Dr. Moussa DIENG (Michigan State University, USA) for the English revision and Dr. Mamadou CISS (ISRA/DG) for statistical analysis.

Funding

This work was funded by the “Fonds d’Impulsion de la Recherche Scientifique et Technologique (FIRST)” of the Ministry of Higher Education and Research of Senegal, the Laboratoire Mixte International “ Adaptation des Plantes et microorganismes associés aux Stress Environnementaux” (LMI-LAPSE), and the International Foundation for Science (IFS).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

13595_2018_714_MOESM1_ESM.docx (98 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 98 kb)
13595_2018_714_MOESM2_ESM.docx (98 kb)
ESM 2 (DOCX 97 kb)
13595_2018_714_MOESM3_ESM.docx (95 kb)
ESM 3 (DOCX 95 kb)

References

  1. Abari A, Nasr MH, Hojjati M, Bayat D (2011) Salt effects on seed germination and seedling emergence of two Acacia species. Afri J Plant Sci 5:52–56 http://www.academicjournals.org/AJPSGoogle Scholar
  2. Adam G, Duncan H (2001) Development of a sensitive and rapid method for the measurement of total microbial activity using fluorescein diacetate (FDA) in a range of soils. Soil Biol Biochem 33:943–951.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00244-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aderoju DO, Festus AG (2013) Influence of salinity on soil chemical properties and surrounding vegetation of Awe salt mining site, Nasarawa State, Nigeria. Afr J Environ Sci Technol 7(12):1070–1075.  https://doi.org/10.5897/AJEST2013.1600 Google Scholar
  4. Ahmad R, Chang MH (2002) Salinity control and environmental protection through halophytes. J Drain Water Manage 6:17–25Google Scholar
  5. Aliasgharzadeh N, Saleh Rastin N, Towfighi H, Alizadeh A (2001) Occurrence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in saline soils of the Tabriz Plain of Iran in relation to some physical and chemical properties of soil. Mycorrhiza 11:119–122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Anjum R, Ahmed A, Rahmatullah JM, Yousif M (2005) Effect of soil salinity/sodicity on the growth and yield of different varieties of cotton. Internat J Agr Biol 4:606–608 doi:1560–8530/2005/07–4–606–608Google Scholar
  7. Arnon DI (1949) Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplsts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol 24:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.24.1.1 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Asimi S, Gianinazzi-Pearson V, Gianinazzi S (1980) Influence of increasing soil phosphorus levels on interactions between vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae and rhizobium in soybeans. Can J Bot 58:2200–2205.  https://doi.org/10.1139/b80-253 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Asma L, Arshad M, Azam F, Sajjad MH (2009) Changes in mineral and mineralizable N of soil incubated at varying salinity, moisture and temperature regimes. Pak J Bot 41(2):967–980Google Scholar
  10. Ashraf M, Harris PJC (2004) Potential biochemical indicators of salinity tolerance in plants. Plant Sci 166:3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bao SD (2005) Analysis of soil agrochemistry, 3rd edn. China Agriculture Press, Beijing, 495 pGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen HJ, Chen JY, Wang SJ (2008) Molecular regulation of starch accumulation in rice seedling leaves in response to salt stress. Acta Physiol Plant 30:135–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bigham J (2013) The effect of calcium on soil physical properties and air-water management. 3rd annual Midwest symposium : research and pratical insights into using gypsum. Ohio State University /media-library/documents/45.PdfGoogle Scholar
  14. Chinnusamy V, Jagendorf A, Zhu JK (2005) Understanding and improving salt tolerance in plants. Crop Sci 45:437–448.  https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2005.0437 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Choudhary OP, Josan AS, Bajwa MS, Kapur L (2004) Effect of sustained sodic and saline-sodic irrigation and application of gypsum and farmyard manure on yield and quality of sugarcane under semi-arid conditions. Field Crops Res 87:103–116.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2003.10.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Evelin H, Kapoor R, Giri B (2009) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in alleviation of salt stress: a review. Ann Bot 104(7):1263–1280CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Fall D, Niokhor N, Fall F, Diouf F, Ly MO, Diouf M, Gully D, Hocher V, Diouf D (2016) Germination, growth and physiological responses of Senegalia senegal (L.) Britton, Vachellia seyal (Delile) P. Hurter and Prosopis juliflora (Swartz) DC to salinity stress in greenhouse conditions. Afr J Biotechnol 15(37):2017–2027.  https://doi.org/10.5897/AJB2016.15518 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fall D, Diouf D, Neyra M, Diouf O, Diallo N (2009) Physiological and biochemical responses of Acacia seyal (Del.) seedlings under salt stress. J Plant Nutr 32:1122–1136.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01904160902943155 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. FAO-LADA (2009) Field Manual for Local Level Land Degradation Assessment in Drylands. LADA-L Part 1: Methodological Approach, Planning and Analysis, Rome: FAO. 76 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Gentili F, Huss-Danell K (2002) Phosphorus modifies the effects of nitrogen on nodulation in split-root systems of Hippophaë rhamnoides. New Phytol 153:53–61.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0028-646X.2001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gentili F, Huss-Danell K (2003) Local and systemic effects of phosphorus and nitrogen on nodulation and nodule function in Alnus incana. J Exp Bot 54:2757–2767.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erg311 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Gerdemann JW, Nicolson TH (1963) Spores of mycorrhizal endogone extracted from soil by wet sieving and decanting. T Brit Mycol Soc 46:235–244.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1536(63)80079-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hanay A, Büyüksönmez F, Kiziloglu FM, Canbolat MY (2004) Reclamation of saline-sodic soils with gypsum and MSW compost. Compost Sci Util 12:175–179.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1065657X.2004.10702177 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hossain MB, Sarker RR (2015) Organic and inorganic amendments on rice (Oryza sativa L.) and soil in salt affected areas of Bangladesh. J Environ Sci Nat Resour 8:109–113.  https://doi.org/10.3329/jesnr.v8i2.26876 Google Scholar
  25. Khakpour O, Khara J (2012) Spore density and root colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in some species in the northwest of Iran. Inter Res J Appl Basic Sci 3(5):977–982Google Scholar
  26. Koide RT (1991) Nutrient supply, nutrient demand and plant response to mycorrhizal infection. New Phytol 117:365–386.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1991.tb00001.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lakhdara A, Scelza R, Scotti R, Rao MA, Jedidi N, Gianfreda L, Abdelly C (2010) The effect of compost and sewage sludge on soil biologic activities in salt affected soil. R C Suelo Nutr Veg 10:40–47.  https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27912010000100005 Google Scholar
  28. Liang Y, Yang Y, Yang C, Shen Q, Zhou J, Yang L (2003) Soil enzymatic activity and growth of rice and barley as influenced by organic manure in an anthropogenic soil. Geoderma 115:149–160.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(03)00084-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Madejon E, Burgos P, Lopez R, Cabrera F (2001) Soil enzymatic response to addition of heavy metals with organic residues. Biol Fertil Soils 34:144–150.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s003740100379 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mansour MMF, Salama KHA (2000) Cellular basis of salinity tolerance in plants. Environ Exp Bot 52:113–122.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2004.01.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marschner P, Kandeler E, Marschner B (2003) Structure and function of the soil microbial community in a long-term fertilizer experiment. Soil Biol Biochem 35:453–161.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(02)00297-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McKenzie NJ, Jacquier DJ, Isbell RF, Brown KL (2004) Australian soils and landscapes: an illustrated compendium. CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, VictoriaGoogle Scholar
  33. Mitchell JP, Shennan C, Singer MJ, Peters DW, Miller RO, Prichard T, Grattan SR, Rhoades JD, May DM, Munk DS (2000) Impacts of gypsum and winter cover crops on soil physical properties and crop productivity when irrigated with saline water. Agr Water Manage 45:55–71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3774(99)00070-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Monnevaux P, Nemmar M (1986) Contribution à l'étude de la résistance à la sécheresse chez le blé tendre Triticum aestivunt L. et chez le blé dur Triticum durum Desf.: étude de l'accumulation de la proline au cours du cycle de développement. Agronomie 6:583–590 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00884913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mojiri A, Jalalian A, Radnezhad H (2011) Effects of urban wastewater treatments on chemical properties of saline and alkaline soil. J Appl Sci Res 7:222–228Google Scholar
  36. Muhammad S, Müller T, Joergensen RG (2005) Relationships between soil biological and other soil properties in saline and alkaline arable soils from the Pakistani Punjab. In. Muhammad, S. “Microbial use of organic substrates and maize growth, especially in saline and alkaline soils of the Pakistani Punjab”. PhD thesis, Department of Soil Biology and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Organic Agricultural Sciences, University of Kassel. pp 48–71Google Scholar
  37. Nannipieri P, Ascher J, Ceccherini MT, Landi L, Pietramellara G, Renella G (2003) Microbial diversity and soil functions. Eur J Soil Sci 54:655–670.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1351-0754.2003.0556.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pattanayak SK, Mishra KN, Jena KN, Nayak RK (2001) Evaluation of green manure crops fertilized with various phosphorus sources and their effect on subsequent rice crop. J Indian Soc Soil Sci 49(2):285–291Google Scholar
  39. Phillips JM, Hayman DS (1970) Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. T Brit Mycol Soc 55(IN18):158–160.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-1536(70)80110-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pocknee S, Sumner ME (1997) Cation and nitrogen contents of organic matter determine its soil liming potential. Soil Sci Soc Am J 61:86–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. PROGERT (2008) Rapport final du Projet « Gestion et Restauration des Terres dégradées du Bassin Arachidier », Direction des Eaux et Forêts, Chasse et de la Conservation des Sols, Ministère de l’Environnement, de la Protection de la nature, des Bassins de rétentions et des Lacs artificiels du Sénégal, 20Google Scholar
  42. Qadir M, Oster JD (2004) Crop and irrigation management strategies for saline-sodic soils and waters aimed at environmentally sustainable agriculture. Sci Total Environ 323:1–19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2003.10.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Qadir M, Schubert S (2002) Degradation processes and nutrient constraints in sodic soils. Land Degrad Dev 13:275–294.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.504 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Qadir M, Oster JD, Schubert S, Noble AD, Sahrawat KL (2007) Phytoremediation of sodic and saline-sodic soils. Adv Agron 96:197–247.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(07)96006-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. R Core Team (2015) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.orgGoogle Scholar
  46. Rengasamy P (2002) Clay dispersion, pp. 200-210, In 'Soil physical measurement and interpretation for land Evaluation' (McKenzie BM et al Eds.). CSIRO publishing, CollingwoodGoogle Scholar
  47. Rietz DN, Haynes RJ (2003) Effects of irrigation-induced salinity and sodicity on soil microbial activity. Soil Biol Biochem 35:845–854CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sharma S, Vimala Y (2016) Effect of salt stress on germination and growth of T. foenum graecum seedlings. Int J Adv Res 4:40–45Google Scholar
  49. Schnürer J, Rosswall T (1982) Fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis as a measure of total microbial activity in soil and litter. Appl Environ Microbiol 43(6):1256–1261 Doi: 0099-2240/82/061256-06$02.00/0PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Scholander PF, Hammel HT, Bradstreet ED, Hemmingsen EA (1965) Sap pressure in vascular plants. Sci 148:339–346.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.148.3668.339 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shaaban M, Abid M, Abou-Shana RAI (2013) Amelioration of salt affected soils in rice paddy system by application of organic and inorganic amendments. Plant Soil Environ 59(5):227–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Shaimaa HAE, Mostafa MAM, Taha TA, Elsharawy MAO, Eid MA (2012) Effect of different amendments on soil chemical characteristics, grain yield and elemental content of wheat plants grown on salt-affected soil irrigated with low quality waterAnn. Agr Sci 57(2):175–182.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aoas.2012.09.001 Google Scholar
  53. Sharma BR, Minhas PS (2005) Strategies for managing saline/alkali waters for sustainable agricultural production in South Asia. Agr Water Manage 78:136–151.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2005.04.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Shrivastava P, Kumar R (2015) Soil salinity: A serious environmental issue and plant growth promoting bacteria as one of the tools for its alleviation. Saudi J Biol Sci 22(2):123–131.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2014.12.001
  55. Silveira A, Cardoso EJB (2004) Arbuscular mycorrhiza and kinetic parameters of phosphorus absorption by bean plants. Agr Sci 61:203–209.Google Scholar
  56. Smiciklas KD, Walker PM, Kelley PM (2002) Utilization of compost (food, paper, landscape and manure) in row crop production. Department of Agriculture and Health Scienes, Illinois State University, USAGoogle Scholar
  57. Tejada M, Garcia C, Gonzalez JL, Hernandez MT (2006) Use of organic amendment as a strategy for saline soil remediation: influence on the physical, chemical and biological properties of soil. Soil Biol Biochem 38:1413–1421.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.10.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Trouvelot A, Kough JL, Gianinazzi-Pearson V (1986) Mesure du taux de mycorhization ayant une signification fonctionnelle. Dans : Aspects physiologiques et génétiques des mycorhizes, Dijon, 1985. INRA (éd.), pp. 217–221Google Scholar
  59. Walker DJ, Bernal PM (2008) The effects of olive mill waste compost and poultry manure on the availability and plant uptake of nutrients in a highly saline soil. Bioresour Technol 99:396–403CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Wang L, Sun X, Li S, Zhang T, Zhang W, Zhai P (2014) Application of organic amendments to a coastal saline soil in North China: effects on soil physical and chemical properties and tree growth. PLoS One 9(2):e89185.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089185 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Wong VNL, Dalal RC, Greene RSB (2009) Carbon dynamics of sodic and saline soil following gypsum and organic material additions: a laboratory incubation. Appl Soil Ecol 41:29–40.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2008.08.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yaduvanshi NPS (2001) Effect of five years of rice-wheat cropping and NPK fertilizer use with and without organic and green manures on soil properties and crop yields in a reclaimed sodic soil. J Indian Soc Soil Sci 49(4):714–719Google Scholar
  63. Yamasaki S, Dillenburg LR (1999) Measurements of leaf relative water content in Araucaria angustifolia. Rev Bras Fisiol Veg 11:69–75Google Scholar
  64. Yassin A (2005) Adverse effects of salinity on citrus. Internat J Agr Biol 4:668–680 http://www.ijab.org Google Scholar

Copyright information

© INRA and Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dioumacor Fall
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Niokhor Bakhoum
    • 2
    • 3
  • Fatoumata Fall
    • 2
    • 3
  • Fatou Diouf
    • 2
    • 3
  • Cheikh Ndiaye
    • 2
    • 3
  • Mathieu N. Faye
    • 2
    • 3
  • Valérie Hocher
    • 4
  • Diégane Diouf
    • 2
    • 3
    • 5
  1. 1.Institut Sénégalais de Recherches Agricoles (ISRA), Centre National de Recherches Forestières (CNRF)DakarSénégal
  2. 2.LCM-Laboratoire Commun de Microbiologie IRD/ISRA/UCAD, Centre de Recherche de Bel-AirDakarSénégal
  3. 3.Laboratoire Mixte International Adaptation des Plantes et Microorganismes Associés aux Stress Environnementaux (LAPSE)DakarSénégal
  4. 4.Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Laboratoire des Symbioses Tropicales et Méditerranéennes (LSTM) TA A-82/JMontpellierFrance
  5. 5.Département de Biologie VégétaleUniversité Cheikh Anta Diop de DakarDakarSénégal

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options