Comparing nearest neighbor configurations in the prediction of species-specific diameter distributions
We examine how the configurations in nearest neighbor imputation affect the performance of predicted species-specific diameter distributions. The simultaneous nearest neighbor imputation for all tree species and separate imputation by tree species are evaluated with total volume calibration as a prediction method for diameter distributions.
This study considers the predictions of species-specific diameter distributions in Finnish boreal forests by means of airborne laser scanning (ALS) data and aerial images.
The aim was to investigate different configurations in non-parametric nearest neighbor (NN) imputation and to determine how changes in configurations affect prediction error rates for timber assortment volumes and the error indices of the diameter distributions.
Non-parametric NN imputation was used as a modeling method and was applied in two different ways: (1) diameter distributions were predicted at the same time for all tree species by simultaneous NN imputation, and (2) diameter distributions were predicted for one tree species at a time by separate NN imputation. Calibration to a regression-based total volume prediction was applied in both cases.
The results indicated that significant changes in the volume prediction error rates for timber assortment and for error indices can be achieved by the selection of responses, calibration to total volume, and separate NN imputation by tree species.
Overall, the selection of response variables in NN imputation and calibration to total volume improved the predicted diameter distribution error rates. The most successful prediction performance of diameter distribution was achieved by separate NN imputation by tree species.
KeywordsNN imputation Area-based approach Airborne laser scanning Diameter distribution
We would like to thank Prof. Heli Peltola and Prof. Jyrki Kangas for the acquisition of the financial support for the field measurements.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Axelsson P (2000) DEM generation from laser scanner data using adaptive TIN models. IAPRS, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 33:111–118Google Scholar
- Haara A, Korhonen K (2004) Kuvioittaisen arvioinnin luotettavuus. Metsätieteen aikakauskirja 2004. https://doi.org/10.14214/ma.5667
- Koivuniemi J, Korhonen KT (2006) Inventory by compartments. For Invent:271–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4381-3_16
- Laasasenaho J (1982) Taper curve and volume functions for pine, spruce and birch. Commun Inst For Fenn 108:1–74Google Scholar
- Lappi J (1993) Metsäbiometrian menetelmiä. University of Joensuu, Faculty of Forest SciencesGoogle Scholar
- Malinen J, Maltamo M, Harstela P (2001) Application of most similar neighbor inference for estimating marked stand characteristics using harvester and inventory generated stem databases. IJFE 12:33–41Google Scholar
- Maltamo M, Mehtätalo L, Valbuena R, Vauhkonen J, Packalen P (2017) Airborne laser scanning for tree diameter distribution modelling: a comparison of different modelling alternatives in a tropical single-species plantation. Forestry, pp 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpx041
- Moeur M, Stage AR (1995) Most similar neighbor: an improved sampling inference procedure for natural resource planning. For Sci 41:337–359Google Scholar
- Peuhkurinen J, Maltamo M, Malinen J (2008) Estimating species-specific diameter distributions and saw log recoveries of boreal forests from airborne laser scanning data and aerial photographs: a distribution-based approach. Silva Fenn 42. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.237
- R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical ComputingGoogle Scholar
- Reynolds M, Burk T, Huang W (1988) Goodness-of-fit tests and model selection procedures for diameter distribution models. For Sci 34:373–399Google Scholar
- Siipilehto J (1999) Improving the accuracy of predicted basal-area diameter distribution in advanced stands by determining stem number. Silva Fenn 33. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.650
- Tuominen S, Haapanen R (2013) Estimation of forest biomass by means of genetic algorithm-based optimization of airborne laser scanning and digital aerial photograph features. Silva Fenn 47. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.902