Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Biological effects of particulate matter emissions from residential pellet boilers in bacterial assays: influence of an electrostatic precipitation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many studies showed that there are associations between particulate matter (PM) emissions and negative health effects. Sources for particulate matter PM emissions are, in addition to industry and traffic, residential wood combustion. Such PM emissions consist typically of non-combustible impurities contained naturally within the wood fuels (e.g., ash). Additionally, heavy metals from the wood fuel and/or polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) formed during incomplete combustions may condense on the surface of these particulate matter and may increase the toxicity of these particles. To reduce negative health effects, wood combustion appliances are forced to emit less PM emissions. This may lead to an increased use of electrostatic precipitators to meet the valid threshold values. Against this background, the overall goal of this paper is it to compare biological effects of PM emissions released under full- and partial-load conditions of a wood pellet boiler with and without a flue gas treatment with an electrostatic precipitator in bacterial assays. The results show that PM emissions emitted under full-load conditions show a lower cytotoxic potential than those collected under partial load. No difference for the genotoxicity between full-load and partial-load conditions could be identified. However, significantly lower genotoxicity during full-load operation and precipitation but higher genotoxicity during partial load and precipitation have been found. Conclusively, the results indicate that the PM emissions emitted under full-load conditions show overall less cytotoxicity and genotoxicity than the emissions from partial-load operation. The PAH concentration doubles between full load and partial load with separator and quadruples between full load and partial load without precipitator.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The excess air ratio λ describes the ratio between the measured amount of combustion air and the theoretically required amount of combustion air. A simplified calculation using the oxygen content of the flue gas measured in vol.-% can be done using the following equation: λ = 21/(21 − O2).

  2. The sample concentration was adjusted to the expected amounts of chemicals at the particles (see Table 5 and Table 10). Wherein the sample concentration is limited upwards by the used optical measuring methods.

  3. Wasserbeschaffenheit - Bestimmung des erbgutverändernden Potentials in Wasser und Abwasser mittels Umu-Test

Abbreviations

BCT:

Bacterial contact assay

FAU:

Formazine attenuation units (standardized unit for turbidity)

NOEC:

No observed effect level

SMPS:

Scanning mobility particle sizer

STP:

Standard temperature and pressure

d.b.:

Dry basis

n.d.:

Not detectable

ESP:

Electrostatic precipitator

LOEC:

Lowest observed effect concentration

DL:

Dilution level

ONPG:

O-nitrophenyl-β-d-galactopyranoside

w.b.:

Wet basis

References

  1. Kasurinen S, Jalava PI, Tapanainen M, Uski O, Happo MS, Mäki-Paakkanen J, Lamberg H, Koponen H, Nuutinen I, Kortelainen M, Jokiniemi J, Hirvonen MR (2015) Toxicological effects of particulate emissions – a comparison of oil and wood fuels in small- and medium-scale heating systems. Atmos Environ 103:321–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lamberg H, Nuutinen K, Tissari J, Ruusunen J, Yli-Pirilä P, Sippula O, Tapanainen M, Jalava P, Makkonen U, Teinilä K, Saarnio K, Hillamo R, Hirvonen MR, Jokiniemi J (2011) Physicochemical characterization of fine particles from small-scale wood combustion. Atmos Environ 45(40):7635–7643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tapanainen M, Jalava PI, Mäki-Paakkanen J, Hakulinen P, Happo MS, Lamberg H, Ruusunen J, Tissari J, Nuutinen K, Yli-Pirilä P, Hillamo R, Salonen RO, Jokiniemi J, Hirvonen MR (2011) In vitro immunotoxic and genotoxic activities of particles emitted from two different small-scale wood combustion appliances. Atmos Environ 45(40):7546–7554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kappos AD, Bruckmann P, Eikmann T, Englert N, Heinrich U, Höppe P, Koch E, Krause GHM, Kreyling WG, Rauchfuss K, Rombout P, Schulz-Klemp V, Thiel WR, Wichmann HE (2004) Health effects of particles in ambient air. Int J Hyg Environ Health 207(4):399–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pope CA III, Burnett RT, Thun MJ, Calle EE, Krewinski D, Ito K et al (2002) Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. JAMA 287(9):1132–1141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Naeher LP, Brauer M, Lipsett M, Zelikoff JT, Simpson CD, Koenig JQ, Smith KR (2007) Woodsmoke health effects: a review. Inhal Toxicol 19(1):67–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Karvosenoja N, Tainio M, Kupiainen K, Tuomisto JT, Kukkonen J, Johansson M (2008) Evaluation of the emissions and uncertainties of PM2.5 originated from vehicular traffic and domestic wood combustion in Finland. Boreal Environ Res 13(5):465–474

    Google Scholar 

  8. Favez O, Cachier H, Sciare J, Sarda-Estève R, Martinon L (2009) Evidence for a significant contribution of wood burning aerosols to PM2.5 during the winter season in Paris, France. Atmos Environ 43(22–23):3640–3644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kocbach Bølling A, Pagels J, Yttri KE, Barregard L, Sallsten G, Schwarze PE, Boman C (2009) Health effects of residential wood smoke particles: the importance of combustion conditions and physicochemical particle properties. Part Fibre Toxicol 6:29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nussbaumer T. Characterisation of particles from wood combustion with respect to health relevance and electrostatic precipitation. In: 3rd Central European Biomass Conference: 26th to 29th January 2011, Graz, Austria: Proceedings; 2011

  11. Kaltschmitt M, Hartmann H, Hofbauer H (2016) Energie aus Biomasse: Grundlagen, Techniken und Verfahren, 3rd edn. Springer Vieweg, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nussbaumer T, Lauber A (2010) Verhalten von Staub und Teer in Elektroabscheidern. Holz-Zentralblatt:1126–1128

  13. Nussbaumer T (2003) Combustion and co-combustion of biomass: fundamentals, technologies, and primary measures for emission reduction. Energy Fuel 17(6):1510–1521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nussbaumer T, Lauber A (2010) Formation mechanisms and physical properties of particles from wood combustion for design and operation of electrostatic precipitators. In: ETA-Florence Renewable Energies, editor. Proceedings of the 18th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition, 3–7 May 2010

  15. Löndahl J, Pagels J, Boman C, Swietlicki E, Massling A, Rissler J, Blomberg A, Bohgard M, Sandström T (2008) Deposition of biomass combustion aerosol particles in the human respiratory tract. Inhal Toxicol 20(10):923–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nussbaumer T, Hasler P (1999) Bildung und Eigenschaften von Aerosolen aus Holzfeuerungen. Holz Roh Werkst 57(1):13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ghafghazi S, Sowlati T, Sokhansanj S, Bi X, Melin S (2011) Particulate matter emissions from combustion of wood in district heating applications. Renew Sust Energ Rev 15(6):3019–3028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Boman C, Nordin A, Boström D, Öhman M (2004) Characterization of inorganic particulate matter from residential combustion of pelletized biomass fuels. Energy Fuel 18(2):338–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pöschl U (2005) Atmospheric aerosols: composition, transformation, climate and health effects. Angew Chem Int Ed 44(46):7520–7540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Uski O, Jalava PI, Happo MS, Leskinen J, Sippula O, Tissari J, Mäki-Paakkanen J, Jokiniemi J, Hirvonen MR (2014) Different toxic mechanisms are activated by emission PM depending on combustion efficiency. Atmos Environ 89:623–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Forbes EGA, Easson DL, Lyons GA, McRoberts WC (2014) Physico-chemical characteristics of eight different biomass fuels and comparison of combustion and emission results in a small scale multi-fuel boiler. Energy Convers Manag 87:1162–1169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaivosoja T, Jalava PI, Lamberg H, Virén A, Tapanainen M, Torvela T, Tapper U, Sippula O, Tissari J, Hillamo R, Hirvonen MR, Jokiniemi J (2013) Comparison of emissions and toxicological properties of fine particles from wood and oil boilers in small (20–25 kW) and medium (5–10 MW) scale. Atmos Environ 77:193–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sippula O, Hokkinen J, Puustinen H, Yli-Pirilä P, Jokiniemi J (2009) Particle emissions from small wood-fired district heating units. Energy Fuel 23(6):2974–2982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Oekotube » Schräder Abgastechnologie; Available from: https://www.schraeder.com/oekotube

  25. Dekati® FPS | DEKATI; Available from: https://www.dekati.com/products/Aerosol%20Sample%20Conditioning/Dekati%C2%AE%20FPS

  26. Condensation Particle Counter 3772 | TSI; Available from: http://tsi.com/condensation-particle-counter-3772/

  27. DeCarlo PF, Slowik JG, Worsnop DR, Davidovits P, Jimenez JL (2004) Particle morphology and density characterization by combined mobility and aerodynamic diameter measurements. Part 1: theory. Aerosol Sci Technol 38(12):1185–1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Good J, Nussbaumer T (1993) Wirkungsgradbestimmung bei Holzfeuerungen. In: Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  29. Leskinen J, Tissari J, Uski O, Virén A, Torvela T, Kaivosoja T et al (2014) Fine particle emissions in three different combustion conditions of a wood chip-fired appliance – particulate physico-chemical properties and induced cell death. Atmos Environ 86:129–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Happo MS, Uski O, Jalava PI, Kelz J, Brunner T, Hakulinen P, Mäki-Paakkanen J, Kosma VM, Jokiniemi J, Obernberger I, Hirvonen MR (2013) Pulmonary inflammation and tissue damage in the mouse lung after exposure to PM samples from biomass heating appliances of old and modern technologies. Sci Total Environ 443:256–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rönnpagel K, Liss W, Ahlf W (1995) Microbial bioassays to assess the toxicity of solid-associated contaminants. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 31(2):99–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. DIN 38412–48: 2002–09. German standard methods for the examination of water, waste water and sludge - Bio-assays (group L) - Part 48: Toxicity test with Arthrobacter globiformis for contaminated solids (L 48)

  33. Heise S, Ahlf WA (2005) New microbial contact assay for marine sediments. J Soils Sediments 5(1):9–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Toolaram AP, Gutiérrez IR, Ahlf W (2012) Modification of the umu-assay (ISO 13829) accounting for cytotoxicity in genotoxicity assessment: a preliminary study. Mutat Res-Gen Tox En 747(2):190–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Oda Y, Nakamura S-i, Oki I, Kato T, Shinagawa H (1985) Evaluation of the new system (umu-test) for the detection of environmental mutagens and carcinogens. Mutat Res-Envir Muta 147(5):219–229

    Google Scholar 

  36. Nakamura S-i, Oda Y, Shimada T, Oki I, Sugimoto K (1987) SOS-inducing activity of chemical carcinogens and mutagens in Salmonella typhimurium TA1535/pSK1002: examination with 151 chemicals. Mutat Res Lett 192(4):239–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Parts of this study have been performed in the framework of the ToxOAb project.

Funding

The research leading to these results has received funding from the Federal Ministry of Education and Research under funding reference number 03KB090A.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna-Lena Schulze.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Highlights

- The cytotoxic potential of particulate matter (PM) emissions of an investigated pellet boiler seems to be higher if samples were taken downstream an electrostatic precipitator under full-load conditions.

- The genotoxicity of the particulate matter emission within the flue gas was significantly reduced by the precipitator during full-load operation but increased during partial load.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schulze, AL., Büchner, D., Klix, V. et al. Biological effects of particulate matter emissions from residential pellet boilers in bacterial assays: influence of an electrostatic precipitation. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 9, 227–239 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-018-0358-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-018-0358-y

Keywords

Navigation