Skip to main content
Log in

Simplified Estimation Method for Collective Uncertainty-Propagations of Hysteretic Energy Dissipating Device’s Properties

  • Published:
International Journal of Steel Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hysteretic energy dissipating devices (HEDDs) have been increasingly applied to building construction to improve the seismic performance. The seismic responses of such damped structures are significantly affected by HEDD’s structural properties. An accurate investigation on the propagation of HEDD’s structural properties is required for reasonable evaluation of the seismic performance of a structure. This study aims to develop simplified methods that can estimate the collective uncertainty-propagation to the seismic response of damped structures employing HEDDs. To achieve this, three- and six-story steel moment-resisting frames were selected and the propagations of the individual HEDD’s property-uncertainties were evaluated when they are subjected to various levels of seismic demand. Based on the result of individual uncertainty-propagations, a simplified method is proposed to evaluate the variation of seismic response collectively propagated by HEDD’s property-uncertainties and is verified by comparing with the exact collective uncertainty-propagation calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation method. The proposed method, called as a modified SRSS method in this study, is established from a conventional square root of the sum of the squares (SRSS) method with the relative contributions of the individual HEDD’s property-uncertainty propagations. This study shows that the modified SRSS method provides a better estimation than the conventional SRSS method and can significantly reduce computational time with reasonable accuracy compared with the Monte Carlo simulation method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Reproduced with permission from Ramirez et al. (2001)

Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASCE/SEI 7. (2010). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. Blacksburg, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calabrese, A., & Lai, C. G. (2016). Sensitivity analysis of the seismic response of gravity quay walls to perturbation of input parameters. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 83, 55–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, A. J. (2009). User’s manual of RUAUMOKO, the Maori god of Volcanoes and earthquakes. Christchurch: Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopoulo, C., & Filiatrault, A. (2007). Principles of passive supplemental damping and seismic isolation. Pavia: IUSS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, C. A. (1968). Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 58(5), 1583–1606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dargush, G. F., & Soong, T. T. (1995). Behavior of metallic plate dampers in seismic passive energy dissipation systems. Earthquake Spectra, 11(4), 545–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEMA 356. (2000). Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • FEMA-P695. (2009). Quantification of building seismic performance factors. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Y., & Chen, H. Y. (1992). Probabilistic analysis of uncertainties in seismic hazard assessment. Structural Safety, 11, 245–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra, L., & Krawinkler, H. (2011). Variance of collapse capacity of SDOF systems under earthquake excitations. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 40, 1299–1314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazantzi, A. K., Vamvatsikos, D., & Lignos, D. G. (2014). Seismic performance of a steel moment-resisting frame subject to strength and ductility uncertainty. Engineering Structures, 78, 69–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, O. S., & Elnashai, A. (2006). The effect of material and ground motion uncertainty on the seismic vulnerability curves of RC structures. Engineering Structures, 28(2), 289–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. H., & Mosalam, K. M. (2006) Probabilistic seismic evaluation of reinforced concrete structural components and systems. PEER technical report, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.

  • Lee, T. H., & Mosalam, K. M. (2009). Identifying significant components of structures for seismic performance using FOSM method. Journal of Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea, 13(4), 37–45. (in Korean).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mai, C., Konakli, K., & Sudret, B. (2017). Seismic fragility curves for structures using non-parametric representations. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 11(2), 169–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed, N. E., & Kim, J. K. (2013). Sensitivity analysis of pile-founded fixed steel jacket platforms subjected to seismic loads. Ocean Engineering, 85, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oviedo, A. J. A., Midorikawa, M., & Asari, T. (2010). Earthquake response of ten-story story-drift-controlled concrete frames with hysteretic dampers. Engineering Structures, 32, 1735–1746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, K. A., Beck, L. J., & Shaikhutdinov, R. V. (2002). Sensitivity of building loss estimation to major uncertain variables. Earthquake Spectra, 18(4), 719–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez, O. M., Constantinou, M. C., Kircher, C. A., Whittaker, A. S., Johnson, M. W, Gomez, J. D., & Chrysostomou, C. Z. (2001). Development and evaluation of simplified procedures for analysis and design of buildings with passive energy dissipation systems. Report No. MCEER 00-0010. Revision 1. Buffalo, NY: Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, University at Buffalo, State University of New York.

  • Rosenblueth, E. (1951) A basis for a seismic design, Ph.D. thesis. University of Illinois Urbana, Illinois.

  • Seo, J., Dueñas-Osorio, L., Craig, J. I., & Goodno, B. J. (2012). Metamodel-based regional vulnerability estimate of irregular steel moment-frame structures subjected to earthquake events. Engineering Structures, 45, 585–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, D. H., & Kim, H. J. (2014). Probabilistic assessment of structural seismic performance influenced by the characteristics of hysteretic energy dissipating devices. International Journal of Steel Structure, 14(4), 697–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, D. H., Yang, W. J., & Kim, H. J. (2016). Comparative evaluation of probabilistic uncertainty-propagations to seismic collapse capacity of low-rise steel moment-resisting frames. International Journal of Steel Structure, 16(3), 887–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Surana, M., Singh, Y., & Lang, D. H. (2018). Seismic characterization and vulnerability of building stock in Hilly Regions. Natural Hazards Review (ASCE), 19(1), 04017024 1-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, K. C., Cheng, H. W., Hong, C. P., & Su, Y. F. (1993). Design of steel triangular plate energy absorbers for seismic-resistant construction. Earthquake Spectra, 9(3), 505–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Geological Survey Hazard Curve Application, https://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/interactive/. Accessed January 2018.

  • Vamvatsikos, D., & Fragiadakis, M. (2010). Incremental dynamic analysis for estimating seismic performance sensitivity and uncertainty. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 39(2), 141–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, A. S., Bertero, V. V., Alonso, L. J., & Thompson, C. L. (1989) Earthquake simulator testing of steel plate added damping and stiffness elements. Report UCB/EERC-89/02. Engineering Research Center, University of California at Berkeley.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant funded by the Korea Government (MSIP) (No. NRF-2016R1A2B4011900).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyung-Joon Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shin, DH., Kim, HJ. Simplified Estimation Method for Collective Uncertainty-Propagations of Hysteretic Energy Dissipating Device’s Properties. Int J Steel Struct 18, 1508–1524 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-018-0050-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-018-0050-x

Keywords

Navigation