Journal of Food Science and Technology

, Volume 55, Issue 8, pp 3046–3055 | Cite as

Effects of plasticizers on the properties of fish myofibrillar protein film

  • Pimonpan Kaewprachu
  • Kazufumi Osako
  • Saroat Rawdkuen
Original Article


This study investigated the effects of various plasticizer types [glycerol (GLY), sorbitol (SOR), and polyethylene glycol (PEG)] on the properties of fish myofibrillar protein (FMP) film. FMP films plasticized with GLY showed the greatest elongation at break (116.53%). It also showed the greatest water vapor permeability (1.43 × 10−10 g m−1 s−1 Pa−1). The film plasticized with SOR exhibited the highest tensile strength (12.56 MPa) and film solubility (62.59%). PEG plasticized film showed to have yellowish colour as indicated by the high b* value and low light transmission at 280 nm. Furthermore, FMP films containing PEG and SOR possessed lower moisture content than films with GLY. FT-IR and electrophoretic properties were not affected by any types of plasticizer. The appearance of the FMP film was similar to that of the PVC film. It was concluded that plasticizers had major effects on FMP films. They not only plasticize the protein film, but also affected other major film properties.


Biodegradable film Fish myofibrillar protein Plasticizer 



The author would like to thank Mae Fah Luang University and the Thailand Research Fund for the financial support through the Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D. Program (Grant No. PHD/0029/2555) to Ms. Pimonpan Kaewprachu. Dr. Naathakan Rugnraeng was also acknowledged for the revision preparation. This manuscript was edited for grammatical accuracy by Matthew Robert Ferguson of Mahidol University International College, Bangkok, Thailand.


  1. Aguirre A, Borneo R, León AE (2013) Properties of triticale protein films and their relation to plasticizing–antiplasticizing effects of glycerol and sorbitol. Ind Crops Prod 50:297–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Hassan AA, Norziah MH (2012) Starch–gelatin edible films: water vapor permeability and mechanical properties as affected by plasticizers. Food Hydrocolloid 26:108–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antoniou J, Liu F, Majeed H, Qazi HJ, Zhong F (2014) Physicochemical and thermomechanical characterization of tara gum edible films: effect of polyols as plasticizers. Carbohydr Polym 111:359–365CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. ASTM (1989) Standard test methods for water vapor transmission of materials. Standard designation E96-E80. Annual book of ASTM standard, Philadelphia, pp 730–739Google Scholar
  5. ASTM (1999) Standard test method for tensile properties of thin plastic sheeting. Standards designations. Annual book of ASTM standard, Philadelphia, pp D882–D897Google Scholar
  6. Bergo P, Sobral PJA (2007) Effects of plasticizer on physical properties of pigskin gelatin films. Food Hydrocolloid 21:1285–1289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brzoska N, Müller M, Nasui L, Schmid M (2018) Effects of film constituents on packaging-relevant properties of sodium caseinate-based emulsion films. Prog Org Coat 114:250–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chang C, Nickerson M (2014) Effect of plasticizer-type and genipin on the mechanical, optical, and water vapor barrier properties of canola protein isolate-based edible films. Eur Food Res Technol 238:35–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cuq B, Gontard N, Cuq J-L, Guilbert S (1997) Selected functional properties of fish myofibrillar protein-based films as affected by hydrophilic plasticizers. J Agric Food Chem 45:622–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Galdeano MC, Wilhelm AE, Mali S, Grossmann MVE (2013) Influence of thickness on properties of plasticized oat starch films. Braz Arch Biol Technol 56:637–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Han J, Floros J (1997) Casting antimicrobial packaging films and measuring their physical properties and antimicrobial activity. J Plastic Film Sheet 13:287–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haq MA, Hasnain A, Azam M (2014) Characterization of edible gum cordia film: effects of plasticizers. LWT Food Sci Technol 55:163–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hazaveh P, Mohammadi Nafchi A, Abbaspour H (2015) The effects of sugars on moisture sorption isotherm and functional properties of cold water fish gelatin films. Int J Biol Macromol 79:370–376CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hoque MS, Benjakul S, Prodpran T (2010) Effect of heat treatment of film-forming solution on the properties of film from cuttlefish (Sepia pharaonis) skin gelatin. J Food Eng 96:66–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jongjareonrak A, Benjakul S, Visessanguan W, Prodpran T, Tanaka M (2006) Characterization of edible films from skin gelatin of brownstripe red snapper and bigeye snapper. Food Hydrocolloid 20:492–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaewprachu P, Osako K, Benjakul S, Rawdkuen S (2016a) Effect of protein concentrations on the properties of fish myofibrillar protein based film compared with PVC film. J Food Sci Technol 53(4):2083–2091CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaewprachu P, Osako K, Benjakul S, Tongdeesoontorn W, Rawdkuen S (2016b) Biodegradable protein-based films and their properties: a comparative study. Packag Technol Sci 29:77–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of Bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680–685CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee J-H, Lee J-H, Yang H-J, Won M, Song KB (2015a) Characterisation of jellyfish protein films with added transglutaminase and wasabi extract. Int J Food Sci Technol 50:1683–1689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee J-H, Lee J, Song KB (2015b) Development of a chicken feet protein film containing essential oils. Food Hydrocolloid 46:208–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leerahawong A, Tanaka M, Okazaki E, Osako K (2011) Effects of plasticizer type and concentration on the physicochemical properties of edible film from squid Todarodes pacificus mantle muscle. Fish Sci 77:1061–1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Limpan N, Prodpran T, Benjakul S, Prasarpran S (2010) Properties of biodegradable blend films based on fish myofibrillar protein and polyvinyl alcohol as influenced by blend composition and pH level. J Food Eng 100:85–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nie X, Zhao L, Wang N, Meng X (2017) Phenolics-protein interaction involved in silver carp myofibrilliar protein films with hydrolysable and condensed tannins. LWT Food Sci Technol 81:258–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nuanmano S, Prodpran T, Benjakul S (2015) Potential use of gelatin hydrolysate as plasticizer in fish myofibrillar protein film. Food Hydrocolloid 47:61–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Orliac O, Rouilly A, Silvestre F, Rigal L (2003) Effects of various plasticizers on the mechanical properties, water resistance and aging of thermo-moulded films made from sunflower proteins. Ind Crops Prod 18:91–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Perdomo J, Cova A, Sandoval AJ, García L, Laredo E, Müller AJ (2009) Glass transition temperatures and water sorption isotherms of cassava starch. Carbohydr Polym 76:305–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pérez LM, Piccirilli GN, Delorenzi NJ, Verdini RA (2016) Effect of different combinations of glycerol and/or trehalose on physical and structural properties of whey protein concentrate-based edible films. Food Hydrocolloid 56:352–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rezaei M, Motamedzadegan A (2015) The effect of plasticizers on mechanical properties and water vapor permeability of gelatin-based edible films containing clay nanoparticles. World J Nano Sci Eng 5:178–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Riquelme N, Díaz-Calderón P, Enrione J, Matiacevich S (2015) Effect of physical state of gelatin-plasticizer based films on to the occurrence of Maillard reactions. Food Chem 175:478–484CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Sai-Ut S, Benjakul S, Rawdkuen S (2015) Retardation of lipid oxidation using gelatin film incorporated with longan seed extract compared with BHT. J Food Sci Technol 52:5842–5849CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Singh N, Georget DMR, Belton PS, Barker SA (2009) Zein–iodine complex studied by FTIR spectroscopy and dielectric and dynamic rheometry in films and precipitates. J Agric Food Chem 57:4334–4341CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Singh N, Georget DMR, Belton PS, Barker SA (2010) Physical properties of zein films containing salicylic acid and acetyl salicylic acid. J Cereal Sci 52:282–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sothornvit R, Krochta JM (2001) Plasticizer effect on mechanical properties of β-lactoglobulin films. J Food Eng 50:149–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Srinivasa PC, Ramesh MN, Kumar KR, Tharanathan RN (2003) Properties and sorption studies of chitosan–polyvinyl alcohol blend films. Carbohydr Polym 53:431–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wittaya T (2013) Influence of type and concentration of plasticizers on the properties of edible film from mung bean proteins. KMITL Sci Technol J 13:51–58Google Scholar
  36. Yang L, Paulson AT (2000) Mechanical and water vapour barrier properties of edible gellan films. Food Res Int 33:563–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pimonpan Kaewprachu
    • 1
  • Kazufumi Osako
    • 2
  • Saroat Rawdkuen
    • 1
  1. 1.Unit of Innovative Food Packaging and Biomaterials, School of Agro-IndustryMae Fah Luang UniversityMuangThailand
  2. 2.Department of Food Science and TechnologyTokyo University of Marine Science and TechnologyTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations