Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of packaging materials on shelf life and quality of banana cultivars (Musa spp.)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Food Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was carried out to evaluate the effect of packaging materials on the shelf life of three banana cultivars. Four packaging materials, namely, perforated low density polyethylene bag, perforated high density polyethylene bag, dried banana leaf, teff straw and no packaging materials (control) were used with three banana cultivars, locally known as, Poyo, Giant Cavendish and Williams I. The experiment was carried out in Randomized Complete Block Design in a factorial combination with three replications. Physical parameters including weight loss, peel colour, peel thickness, pulp thickness, pulp to peel ratio, pulp firmness, pulp dry matter, decay, loss percent of marketability were assessed every 3 days. Banana remained marketable for 36 days in the high density polyethylene and low density polyethylene bags, and for 18 days in banana leaf and teff straw packaging treatments. Unpackaged fruits remained marketable for 15 days only. Fruits that were not packaged lost their weight by 24.0 % whereas fruits packaged in banana leaf and teff straw became unmarketable with final weight loss of 19.8 % and 20.9 %, respectively. Packaged fruits remained well until 36th days of storage with final weight loss of only 8.2 % and 9.20 %, respectively. Starting from green mature stage, the colour of the banana peel changed to yellow and this process was found to be fast for unpackaged fruits. Packaging maintained the peel and the pulp thickness, firmness, dry matter and pulp to peel ratio was kept lower. Decay loss for unpackaged banana fruits was16 % at the end of date 15, whereas the decay loss of fruits packaged using high density and low density polyethylene bags were 43.0 % and 41.2 %, respectively at the end of the 36th day of the experiment. It can, thus, be concluded that packaging of banana fruits in high density and low density polyethylene bags resulted in longer shelf life and improved quality of the produce followed by packaging in dried banana leaf and teff straw.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad S, Perviez MA, Thompson AK, Ullah H (2006) Effects of storage of banana in controlled atmosphere before ethylene treatments on its ripening and quality. J Agric Res 44(3):219–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Arias P, Dankers C, Liu P, Pilkauskas P (2003) The world banana economy. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaudry RM (2000) Responses of horticultural commodities to low oxygen: limits to the expanded use of modified atmosphere packaging. HortTechnology 10:491–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Yenonshuna S (1985) Individual seal packaging of fruits and vegetables in plastic film new postharvest technique. J Hort Sci 20:32–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Blankenship SM, Herdeman RW (1995) High relative humidity after ethylene gassing is important to banana fruit quality. HortTechnology 5(2):185–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Central Statistics Authority (2004) Agricultural statistics 2004. BS Publications, Addis Ababa

    Google Scholar 

  • Dadzie BK, Orchard JE (1997) Routin postharvest screening of banana/plantain hybrids criteria and methods. International network for banana and plantain (Inibap), Technical Guidelines. Rome, Italy

  • Gowen S (1995) Bananas and plantains. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 1–250

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haidar J, Demisse T (1999) Malnutrition and Xerophthagma in rural communities of Ethiopia. East Afr Med J 10:590–593

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson GI, Sharp JL, Mine DL, Oostluyse SA (1997) Postharvest technology and quarantine treatments. In: Litz RE (ed) The mango: botany, production and uses. Tropical Research and Education Center, USA, pp 444–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Kader AA (1992) Postharvest technology of Horticultural crops. University of California, division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, (quality and safety factors, definition and evaluation for fresh horticultural crops), 2nd edn, publication No 3311, pp. 228–345

  • Marriott J, Lancaster PA (1983) Bananas and plantains. In: Harvey TC Jr (ed) Handbook of tropical foods. Marcel Dekker, Inc. pp. 85–142

  • Morton J (1987) Banana. In: Morton JF, Miami FL (eds) Fruits of warm climates. Creative Resource System, Inc, Oakland, pp 29–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair H, Tung HF, Wan MW, Rosli M, Ahmad HS, Chang KK (1992) Low oxygen effect and storage Mas banana (Musa, AA group). Acta Hortic 292(21):209–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Salunkhe DK, Desai BB (1984) Postharvest biology of fruits. 1 CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida

  • Salunkhe DK, Kadam SS (1995) Banana. In: Hand book of fruit science and technology. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York pp. 67–90

  • Seifu GM (1999) Banana production and utilization in Ethiopia. Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Addis Ababa

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour GB (1993) Banana. In: Seymour GB, Taylor JE, Tucker GA (eds) Biochemistry of fruit ripening. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 83–106

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shamebo D (1999) Banan production socio-economic constrants in SRE. pp. 120–134. In: Picq C, Foure E, Frison EA (eds) Banana and food security. Proceding of an international symposium in Douala, Cameroon. Montpellier, France, 10–14 Nov. 1998, INIBAP

  • Simmonds NW (1959) Bananas. Webster printing service Ltd Bristol. Imperial College of Tropical Agriculture, Trinidad, West Indies

  • Stover RH, Simmonds NW (1987) Bananas, 3rd edn. Longman, New York, Tropical agricultural series

    Google Scholar 

  • Tadesse F (1991) Postharvest losses of fruits and vegetables in horticultural state farms. Acta Hortic 270:261–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson AK (2001) Controlled atmospheric storage of fruits and vegetables. CAB International Printed in UK Biddles Ltd, Guidford and Kings Lynn, UK

  • Tigist M, Workneh TS, Woldetsadik K (2011) Effects of variety on the quality of tomato stored under ambient conditions. J Food Sci Technol. doi:10.1007/s13197-011-0378-0

  • Turner DW (2001) Bananas and plantains. In: Mitra SK (ed) Postharvest physiology and storage of tropical and subtropical fruit. CAB International, London, pp 47–84

    Google Scholar 

  • WARC (2007) Progress report for the year 2006/7. Werer Agricultural Research Center (WARC). Ethiopian Institute of Agricultural Research, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

  • Wills RBH, McGlasson WB, Graham D, Tlee H, Hall EG (1989) Postharvest: - An introduction to the physiology and handling of fruit and vegetables, (3rd edn). Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, USA

  • Workneh TS, Osthoff G, Steyn MS (2009) Integrated agro-technology with preharvest ComCat® treatment, modified atmosphere packaging and forced ventilation evaporative cooling of tomatoes. Afr J Biotechnol 8(5):860–872

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Workneh TS, Osthoff G, Steyn MS (2011a) Influence of preharvest and postharvest treatments on stored tomato quality. Afr J Agric Res 6(12):2725–2736

    Google Scholar 

  • Workneh TS, Osthoff G, Steyn MS (2011b) Physiological and chemical quality of carrots subjected to pre-and postharvest treatments. Afr J Agric Res 6(12):2715–2724

    Google Scholar 

  • Workneh TS, Osthoff G, Steyn MS (2011c) Effects of preharvest treatment, disinfections and storage environment on quality of tomato. J Food Sci Technol. doi:10.1007/s13197-011-0391-3

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Seyoum Workneh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hailu, M., Seyoum Workneh, T. & Belew, D. Effect of packaging materials on shelf life and quality of banana cultivars (Musa spp.). J Food Sci Technol 51, 2947–2963 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-012-0826-5

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-012-0826-5

Keywords

Navigation