Skip to main content
Log in

The Sense of Agency in OCD

  • Published:
Review of Philosophy and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes an integrated account of the etiology of OCD that accommodates both dysfunctional cognitions and sensorimotor features of compulsive action. It is argued that cognitive/metacognitive theories do not aspire to address all obsessive-compulsive phenomenal properties and that empirical evidence concerning some of these requires the incorporation of motor deficits as an independent factor in a plausible conception of OCD. The difference in agency attribution between obsessive-compulsive persons and schizophrenia patients with delusions of control is also accounted for in terms of bottom-up processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. I will describe the differences between cognitive and metacognitive theories in some detail in Section 3. When talking about cognitive/metacognitive theories, I will use only those features that both types have in common.

  2. “I use the term “cognitive” in a narrow sense, in contradistinction from “perceptual”, as well as from “motivational” and “affective”. “Cognitive” as applied to “higher-order”, conceptual and propositional states and processes only is somewhat old-style, as the “cognitive” of cognitive science encompasses all information-processing. There are sufficient current examples of the more narrow usage, though, in philosophy and psychology in general, as well as in literature on OCD specifically, to make this use acceptable. See, e.g. Stillings et al. 1995; recent examples are Block 2014 and Marchi and Newen 2015.

  3. The most obvious exception is the “pure obsession” subtype, which does not involve compulsive features (see Section 4).

  4. Elevated sense of control should be distinguished from self-attributional bias. In both cases, the subject ascribes causal influence to themselves in a way that is not appropriately grounded in evidence. In self-attributional bias, successful outcomes tend to be self-attributed, while failures tend to be attributed to external factors. Elevated sense of control in OCD does not favour positive outcomes. Patients self-ascribe responsibility for bringing about or not preventing specific negative outcomes by performing compulsive acts. The motivation behind this is not the need for the maintaining or enhancement of self-esteem, but the prevention of negative outcomes.

  5. It should be noted that this is not an exaggerated sense of motor control, but rather a sense of being able to influence the state of the world in a particular way, that is, the action having particular consequences. This is why I labelled the contradiction ‘apparent’. More will be said about this in Section 3.

  6. Concerning the use of the N1 evoked potential see Schafer and Marcus 1973; Numminen et al. 1999.

  7. The hierarchical model Krigolson and Holroyd suggest has been used by Gentsch, in Gentsch 2011.

  8. In the study cited, the authors correlated washing symptoms with the parental expectations dimension only. Therefore, similar conclusions might apply to washing, which also involves motor activity. Further, out of six dimension of perfectionism on the Frost Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (Frost et al. 1990)--víz. Personal standards, doubts about actions, concern over mistakes, parental expectations, parental criticism, and organization—parental expectations and parental criticism did not show correlation with checking behavior, and doubts about action were found uniquely predictive of checking symptoms (Martinelli et al. 2014: 151).

  9. Over 80% of OCD patients have checking compulsions (Antony et al. 1998), associated with motor movements and feelings of incompleteness, so if OCD-related behavior originates in motor deficiencies, properties of checking-related behavior may carry over to non-checking behavior. This would explain the fact that, while the relationship is especially strong with checking and ordering, as it was found in another study, feelings of incompleteness statistically predict obsessive-compulsive symptoms of all types (Taylor et al. 2014).

  10. This does not mean that the OCD patient experiences herself as ‘making up’ the action task, i.e., what she has to do to avoid catastrophe. Rather, it appears to her as something objective, non-arbitrary, discovered rather than invented by her.

  11. Functionality was measured against the standards of the behavior of controls (e.g., what belongs to lighting a cigarette and what the superfluous elements are). Non-functional movements included waving hands, touching the floor, and shaking the object to be handled.

  12. That the feeling of incompleteness has a causal role in ritualization is in line with Ecker and Gönner’s claim that the motivation for ritualization is the feeling of incompleteness (Ecker and Gönner 2008).

  13. Ritualization itself may also influence agentive experience and the perception of action, perhaps even contributing to the perceptual deficit described, so there may be a dynamic, two-way relationship between both. There is some evidence from research on non-functional action sequences suggesting that this is the case. Nielbo, Schjoedt, and Sorensen found that behaviour dominated by ritualization increases cognitive load and focuses the subject’s attention on low-level details of executing the act (Nielbo et al. 2013). Non-functionality makes an action sequence less predictable, goes with a high error signal in prediction and a higher rate of sensory update (78).

  14. That checking is not readily categorizable as either harm avoidance or incompleteness dominated is an empirical statement by Ecker and Gönner (2008) to the effect that both motivational factors can be present and there may be no way of assigning more weight to one over the other. The subject has a sense that the checking needs to be performed due to the threat of harm and the repeated movements are meant to counter the feeling that the previous ones did not achieve their goal. The repeated motion cannot be explained by either the pursuit of avoiding harm (which might be averted by, e.g., a single motion) or the feeling of incompleteness (the motions being specifically directed at potential sources of physical harm) alone. This can be contrasted with symmetry/ordering, which was found to be “predominantly” incompleteness-related, that is, motivated by feelings of incompleteness. When, e.g., two rows of soda bottles have to exactly mirror each other, the theme of harm is fully absent.

  15. An exception is Gillan and Robbins (2014), as above.

  16. In passing, I would like to mention some therapeutic implications and a possible direction for further research. Apart from whether, at present, the underlying motor control deficits can be effectively treated or not, feelings of incompleteness, as well as cognitions attached to those feelings, can be targeted by therapy. Feelings of incompleteness can be influenced by brain stimulation methods: there is evidence to the effect that transcranial magnetic stimulation can reduce the sense of incompleteness (Mantovani et al. 2013). Deep brain stimulation, used in some very severe, treatment-refractory cases of OCD, may also have an impact on the sense of incompleteness, in that, according to subjects’ reports, it makes the experience of ‘rightness’ appear sooner, that is, shortens the period of NJREs (de Haan et al. 2015). Targeting the feelings of incompeteness themselves thus seems to constitute a promising direction of clinical practice.

    Patient’s focus on the details of action execution and stopping action when the outcome “feels right” suggests that they attach significance to the completeness/incompleteness of the action. Besides the feelings themselves, the cognitions that give meaning to them could also be modified. There is some evidence that the relevant cognitions can be influenced by cognitive-behavioral therapy: subjects reported fewer and less distressing episodes of NJREs after the completion of treatment (Coles and Ravid 2016).

    The inquiry undertaken in this paper could be extended to other conditions. One of the more obvious candidates would be major depressive disorder, which involves disbalanced motor control (see, e.g., Walther et al. 2012), difficulties choosing responses and initiating fewer movements (Hoffstaedter et al. 2012). The depressive patients’ perception that they are merely ‘struggling’ to perform simple motor tasks, the feeling of reduced control in action, and the sense of inability to initiate and complete actions, is likely to be at least partly attributable to the sensorimotor features of the action and not simply a consequence of lack of motivation to act. Besides pathologies with more or less explicit links to motor movement—such as eating disorders, phobias, and kleptomania—the influence of sensorimotor mechanisms on properties of agentive self-awareness and action identification could constitute a promising line of research even in the case of healthy persons as well.

References

  • American Psychiatric Association (APA). 2013. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author. (DSM-5).

  • Antony, M.M., F. Downie, and R.P. Swinson. 1998. Diagnostic issues and epidemiology in obsessive-compulsive disorder. In Obsessive-compulsive disorder: Theory, research, and treatment, ed. R.P. Swinson, M.M. Antony, S. Rachman, and M.A. Richter. New York, London: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balconi, M. 2010. Disruption of the sense of agency: From perception to self-knowledge. In Neuropsychology of the sense of agency, ed. M. Balconi, 125–144. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Belayachi, S., and M. Van Den Linden. 2010. Looking for outcomes: The experience of control and sense of agency in obsessive-compulsive Behaviors. In Neuropsychology of the sense of agency, ed. M. Balconi, 157–172. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, M.H., D.G. Sukhodolsky, P.A. Dombrowski, K.E. Panza, B.G. Craiglow, A. Landeros-Weisenberger, J.F. Leckman, B.S. Peterson, and R.T. Schultz. 2011. Poor fine-motor and visuospatial skills predict persistence of pediatric-onset obsessive-compulsive disorder into adulthood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 52 (9): 974–983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Block, N. 2014. Seeing-as in the light of vision science. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89 (3): 560–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, D., W. Gibb, A. Lees, P. Raven, J.A. Gray, E. Chen, and R. Shafran. 1998. 1999. Neurological soft signs in obsessive-compulsive disorder: Standardised assessment and comparison with schizophrenia. Behavioural Neurology 11: 197–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers, G. 2015. A metacognitive model of the feeling of agency over bodily actions. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice 2 (3): 210–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D.A., and C. Purdon. 1993. New perspectives for a cognitive theory of obsessions. Australian Psychologist 28: 161–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coles, M.E., and A. Ravid. 2016. Clinical presentation of not-just right experiences (NJREs) in individuals with OCD: Characteristics and response to treatment. Behaviour Research and Therapy 87: 182–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coles, M.E., R.O. Frost, R.G. Heimberg, and J. Rhéaume. 2003. “Not just right experiences”: Perfectionism, obsessive-compulsive features and general psychopathology. Behaviour Research and Therapy 41 (6): 681–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coles, M.E., R.G. Heimberg, R.O. Frost, and G. Steketee. 2005. Not just right experiences and obsessive-compulsive features: Experimental and self-monitoring perspectives. Behaviour Research and Therapy 43: 153–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cougle, J.R., K.E. Fitch, S. Jacobson, and H.-J. Lee. 2013. A multi-method examination of the role of incompletesness in compulsive checking. Journal of Anxiety Disorders 27 (2): 231–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dar, R.D., T. Kahn, and R. Carmeli. 2012. The relationship between sensory processing, childhood rituals, and obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 43 (1): 679–684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Brujn, E.R.A., and M. Ullsperger. 2011. Pathological changes in performance monitoring. In Neural basis of motivational and cognitive control, ed. R.B. Mars, J. Sallet, M.F.S. Rushworth, and N. Yeung. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Haan, S., E. Rietveld, M. Stokhof, and D. Denys. 2015. Effects of deep brain stimulation on the lived experience of obsessive-compulsive disorder patients: In-depth interviews with 18 patients. PLoS ONE 10-8: 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecker, W., and S. Gönner. 2008. Incompleteness and harm avoidance in OCD symptom dimensions. Behaviour Research and Therapy 46: 895–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeston, M.H., and R. Ladouceur. 1997. What do patients do with their obsessive thoughts? Behaviour Research and Therapy 35 (4): 335–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeston, M.H., R. Ladouceur, J. Rhéaume, and E. Léger. 1998. Applications of cognitive models of OCD in clinical practice. In Behavior and cognitive therapy today: essays in honor of Hans J. Eysenck; Selected proceedings of the XXVII Congress of the European Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies, ed. E. Sanavio, 117–126. Oxford: Elsevier Science.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Frith, C.D., S.-J. Blakemore, and D.W. Wolpert. 2000. Explaining the symptoms of schizophrenia: Abnormalities in the awareness of action. Brain Research Reviews 31 (2–3): 357–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R.O., P. Marten, C. Lahart, and R. Rosenblate. 1990. The dimensions of perfectionism. Cognitive Therapy and Research 15 (5): 449–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S. 2003. Self-narrative in schizophrenia. In The Self in Neuroscience and Psychiatry, ed. T. Kircher and A. David, 336–357. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gehring, W. J., J. Himle, J., and L. G. Nisenson. 2000. Action-monitoring dysfunction in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychological Science 11 (1): 1–6.

  • Gentsch, A. 2011. The Sense of Agency: Neural and Cognitive Correlates of the Self in Action. Doctoral thesis. Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin. 10.18452/16579.

  • Gentsch, A., and S. Schütz-Bosbach. 2015. Agency and outcome prediction. In The Sense of Agency, ed. P. Haggard and B. Eitam, 217–234. Oxford University Press.

  • Gentsch, A., S. Schütz-Bosbach, T. Endrass, and N. Kathmann. 2012. Dysfunctional forward model mechanisms and aberrant sense of agency in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Biological Psychiatry 71 (7): 652–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillan, C.M., and T.W. Robbins. 2014. Goal-directed learning and obsessive–compulsive disorder. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 369 (1655): 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, W.K., and R.B. Lydiard. 2007. Recognition and treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 68 (12): e30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grisham et al. 2011. Risk factors prospectively associated with adult obsessive–compulsive symptom dimensions and obsessive–compulsive disorder. Psychological Medicine 41(12): 2495–506.

  • Hoffstaedter, F., et al. 2012. Internally vs. externally triggered movements in patients with major depression. Behavioural Brain Research 228 (1): 125–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollander, E., E. Schiffman, B. Cohen, M.A. Rivera-Stein, W. Rosen, J.M. Gorman, A.K. Fryer, L. Papp, and M.R. Liebowitz. 1990. Signs of central nervous system dysfunction in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry 47 (1): 27–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalanthroff, E., A. Abramovitch, S.A. Steinman, and J.S. Abramowitz. 2016. The chicken or the egg: What drives OCD? Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders 11: 9–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krigolson, O.E., and C.B. Holroyd. 2006. Evidence for hierarchical error processing in the human brain. Neuroscience 137 (1): 13–17

  • Mantovani, A., J. Shubeck, J. Gowatsky, H.B. Simpson, and B. Greenberg. 2013. P 247. Incompleteness and harm avoidance in obsessive compulsive disorder: Different response to transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clinical Neurophysiology 124 (10): e182–e183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchi, F., and A. Newen. 2015. Cognitive penetrability and emotion recognition in human facial expressions. Frontiers in Psychology 6: 824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinelli, M., G.S. Chasson, C.T. Wetterneck, J.M. Hart, and T. Björgvinsson. 2014. Perfectionism dimensions as predictors of symptom dimensions of obsessive-compulsive disorder. The Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic 78 (2): 140–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFall, M.E., and J.P. Wollersheim. 1979. Obsessive-compulsive neurosis: A cognitive-behavioral formulation and approach to treatment. Cognitive Therapy and Research 3 (4): 333–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J.W., and P.C. Fletcher. 2012. Sense of agency in health and disease: a review of cue integration approaches. Consciousness and Cognition 21 (1): 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielbo, K.L., U. Schjoedt, and J. Sorensen. 2013. Hierarchical organization of segmentation in non-functional action sequences. Journal for the Cognitive Science of Religion 1 (1): 71–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Numminen, J., R. Salmelin, and R. Hari. 1999. Subject’s own speech reduces reactivity of the human auditory cortex. Neuroscience Letters 265: 119–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oren, E., Friedmann, N., and Dar, R. 2016. Things happen: Individuals with high obsessivecompulsive tendencies omit agency in their spoken language. Consciousness and Cognition 42: 125–134.

  • Pacherie, E. 2010. Self-agency. In The Oxford handbook of the self, ed. S. Gallagher, 440–462. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitman, R.K. 1987. A cybernetic model of obsessive-compulsive psychopathology. Comprehensive Psychiatry 28: 334–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postmes, L., H.N. Sno, S. Goedhart, J. van der Stel, H.D. Heering, and L. de Haan. 2014. Schizophrenia as a self-disorder due to perceptual incoherence. Schizophrenia Research 152 (1): 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rachman, S. 1993. Obsessions, responsibility and guilt. Behavior Research and Therapy 31: 149–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, G.F. 1983. Obsessional–compulsive disorder: A cognitive/structural approach. Canadian Psychology 24: 169–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees, C.S., and R.A. Anderson. 2013. A review of metacognition in the psychological models of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Clinical Psychologist 17 (1): 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuven-Magril, O., R. Dar, and N. Lieberman. 2008. Illusion of control and behavioral control attempts in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 117 (2): 334–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salkovskis, P.M. 1985. Obsessive–compulsive problems: a cognitive–behavioural analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy 23: 571–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salkovskis, P.M. 1999. Understanding and treating obsessive-compulsive disorder. Behaviour Research and Therapy 37 (Suppl1): S29–S59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, E.W., and M.M. Marcus. 1973. Self-stimulation alters human sensory brain responses. Science 181: 175–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stillings, N.A., S.E. Weisler, C.H. Chase, M.H. Feinstein, J.L. Garfield, and E.L. Rissland. 1995. Cognitive Science. 2nd ed. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summerfeldt, L.J. 2004. Understanding and treating incompleteness in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychology 60: 1155–1168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Synofzik, Matthis, Gottfried, Vosgerau, and Newen, Albert. 2008. Beyond the comparator model: A multifactorial two-step account of agency. Consciousness and Cognition 17 (1): 219–239

  • Synofzik, M., G. Vosgerau, and A. Lindner. 2009. Me or not me—An optimal integration of agency cues? Consciousness and Cognition 18: 1065–1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Synofzik, M. and M. Voss. 2010. Disturbances of the sense of agency in schizophrenia. In Neuropsychology of the Sense of Agency, ed. M. Balconi, 145–155. Dordrecht: Springer.

  • Synofzik, M., P. Thier, D.T. Leube, P. Schlotterbeck, and A. Lindner. 2010. Misattributions of agency in schizophrenia are based on imprecise predictions about the sensory consequences of one’s actions. Brain 133: 262–271.

  • Synofzik, Matthis, Vosgerau Gottfried, and Voss, Martin. 2013. The experience of agency: an interplay between prediction and postdiction. Frontiers in Psychology 4: 127.

  • Szechtman, H., and E. Woody. 2004. Obsessive-compulsive disorder as a disturbance of security motivation. Psychological Review 111: 111–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S., D. McKay, K.B. Crowe, J.S. Abramowitz, S. Jonathan, C.A. Conelea, J.E. Calamari, and C. Sica. 2014. The sense of incompleteness as a motivator of obsessive-compulsive symptoms: An empirical analysis of concepts and correlates. Behavior Therapy 45 (2): 254–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veale, D. 2007. Cognitive-behavioural therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment 13: 438–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahl, K., P.M. Salkovskis, and I. Cotter. 2008. “I wash until it feels right”: The phenomenology of stopping criteria in obsessive-compulsive washing. Journal of Anxiety Disorders 22: 143–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, F., T. Woodward, P. Allen, A. Aleman, and I. Sommer. 2010. Self-recognition deficits in schizophrenia patients with auditory hallucinations: A meta-analysis of the literature. Schizophrenia Bulletin 38 (4): 741–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walther, S., et al. 2012. Neural correlates of disbalanced motor control in major depression. Journal of Affective Disorders 136 (1–2): 124–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, A. 1997. Cognitive therapy of anxiety disorders: A practice manual and conceptual guide. Chichesterm: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, A., and G. Matthews. 1994. Attention and emotion: A clinical perspective. Hove: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitson, J.A., and A.D. Galinsky. 2008. Lacking control increases illusory pattern perception. Science 322 (5898): 115–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zor, R., H. Keren, H. Hermesh, H. Szechtman, J. Mort, and D. Eilam. 2009. Obsessive–compulsive disorder: A disorder of pessimal (non-functional) motor behavior. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 120 (4): 288–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The writing of this paper was funded by Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (OTKA) project no. 120375.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Judit Szalai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Szalai, J. The Sense of Agency in OCD. Rev.Phil.Psych. 10, 363–380 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-017-0371-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-017-0371-2

Navigation