Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An uncertain workforce planning problem with job satisfaction

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To investigate the effect of employees’ job satisfaction on the firm’s workforce planning, this paper builds a multi-period uncertain workforce planning model with job satisfaction level, where the labor demands and operation costs are characterized as uncertain variables. The job satisfaction level is defined as the employees’ psychological satisfaction about overtime through prospect theory. The proposed uncertain model can be transformed into an equivalent deterministic form, which contains complex nonlinear constraints and cannot be solved by conventional optimization methods. Thus, a hybrid joint operations algorithm (JOA) integrated with LINGO software is designed to solve the proposed workforce planning problem. Consequently, several numerical experiments are conducted to compare our proposed JOA with a hybrid particle swarm optimization algorithm to verify the effectiveness of the JOA algorithm. The results demonstrate that the firm’s total operation cost increases with the employees’ job satisfaction level, the loss averse degree and outside firms’ overtime level, respectively. Meanwhile, the firm would overpay in bounded rational cases with job satisfaction, and the overpayment can be seen as the value of bounded rationality, which ensures the firm’s normal operation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://usa.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2015-08/11/content_21558891.htm.

  2. The nurse staffing policy options are typically defined in terms of the flexibility to match the nursing staff with the demand requirements overtime [5].

References

  1. Ashfaq R, Wang X, Huang J, Abbas H, He Y (2016) Fuzziness based semi-supervised learning approach for Intrusion Detection System (IDS). Inform Sci. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2016.04.019 (in press)

  2. Anderson E Jr (2001) The nonstationary staff-planning problem with business cycle and learning effects. Manage Sci 47(6):817–832

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Andrews B, Parsons H (1989) LL Bean chooses a telephone agent scheduling system. Interfaces 19(6):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Azizi N, Zolfaghari S, Liang M (2010) Modeling job rotation in manufacturing systems: The study of employee’s boredom and skill variations. Int J Product Econ 123(1):69–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brusco M, Showalter M (1993) Constrained nurse staffing analysis. Omega: The. Int J Manage Sci 21(2):175–186

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brusco M, Jacobs L, Bongiorno R, Lyons D, Tang B (1995) Improving personnel scheduling at airline stations. Operat Res 43(5):741–751

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Campbell G (2011) A two-stage stochastic program for scheduling and allocating cross-trained workers. J Operat Res Soc 62(6):1038–1047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cai X, Li K (2000) A genetic algorithm for scheduling staff of mixed skills under multi-criteria. Euro J Operat Res 125(2):359–369

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Coomber B, Barriball K (2007) Impact of job satisfaction components on intent to leave and turnover for hospital-based nurses: A review of the research literature. Int J Nursing Stud 44(2):297–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Easton F (2014) Service completion estimates for cross-trained workforce schedules under uncertain attendance and demand. Prod Operat Manage 23(4):660–675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fowler J, Wirojanagud P, Gel E (2008) Heuristics for workforce planning with worker differences. Euro J Operat Res 190(3):724–740

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Freeman N, Mittenthal J, Melouk S (2014) Parallel-machine scheduling to minimize overtime and waste costs. IIE Trans 46(6):601–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. He Y, Wang X, Huang J (2016) Fuzzy nonlinear regression analysis using a random weight network. Inform Sci. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2016.01.037 (in press)

  14. Hewitt M, Chacosky A, Grasman S, Thomas B (2015) Integer programming techniques for solving non-linear workforce planning models with learning. Euro J Operat Res 242(3):942–950

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Hellman C (1997) Job satisfaction and intent to leave. J Soc Psychol 137(6):677–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hertz A, Lahrichi N, Widmer M (2010) A flexible MILP model for multiple-shift workforce planning under annualized hours. Euro J Operat Res 200(3):860–873

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Heinonen J, Pettersson F (2007) Hybrid ant colony optimization and visibility studies applied to a job-shop scheduling problem. Appl Math Comp 187(2):989–998

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Hu K, Zhang X, Gen M, Jo J (2015) A new model for single machine scheduling with uncertain processing time. J Intel Manufact. doi:10.1007/s10845-015-1033-9

  19. Kahneman D, Tversky A (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econ J Econ Soc 47(2):263–291

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaluszka M, Krzeszowiec M (2012) Pricing insurance contracts under cumulative prospect theory. Insur Math Econ 50(1):159–166

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Kuo I, Horng S, Kao T, Lin T, Lee C, Terano T, Pan Y (2009) An efficient flow-shop scheduling algorithm based on a hybrid particle swarm optimization model. Expert Syst Appl 36(3):7027–7032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee C, Vairaktarakis G (1997) Workforce planning in mixed model assembly systems. Oper Res 45(4):553–567

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Li G, Jiang H, He T (2015) A genetic algorithm-based decomposition approach to solve an integrated equipment-workforce-service planning problem. Omega: The. Int J Manage Sci 50:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  24. Li R, Liu G (2014) An uncertain goal programming model for machine scheduling problem. JJ Intel Manufact. doi:10.1007/s10845-014-0982-8

  25. Liu B (2007) Uncertainty theory, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu B, Wang L, Jin Y (2007) An effective PSO-based memetic algorithm for flow shop scheduling. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cyber Part B: Cybern 37(1):18–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu B (2010) Uncertainty theory: a branch of mathematics for modeling human uncertainty. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Liu Y (2013) Uncertain random variables: a mixture of uncertainty and randomness. Soft Comp 17(4):625–634

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Lu S, Wang X, Zhang G, Zhou X (2015) Effective algorithms of the Moore-Penrose inverse matrices for extreme learning machine. Intel Data Anal 19(4):743–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Maenhout B, Vanhoucke M (2013) An integrated nurse staffing and scheduling analysis for longer-term nursing staff allocation problems. Omega: The. Int J Manage Sci 41(2):485–499

    Google Scholar 

  31. Moslehi G, Mahnam M (2011) A Pareto approach to multi-objective flexible job-shop scheduling problem using particle swarm optimization and local search. Int J Product Econ 129(1):14–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ning Y, Liu J, Yan L (2013) Uncertain aggregate production planning. Soft Comp 17(4):617–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Othman M, Bhuiyan N, Gouw G (2012) Integrating workers differences into workforce planning. Comp Indust Eng 63(4):1096–1106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pasquariello P (2014) Prospect theory and market quality. J Econ Theory 149:276–310

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Parisio A, Jones C (2015) A two-stage stochastic programming approach to employee scheduling in retail outlets with uncertain demand. Omega 53:97–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ramos G, Daamen W, Hoogendoorn S (2014) A state of the art review: developments in utility theory, prospect theory and regret theory to investigate travellers’ behaviour in situations involving travel time uncertainty. Transp Rev 34(1):46–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Song H, Huang H (2008) A successive convex approximation method for multistage workforce capacity planning problem with turnover. Euro J Operat Res 188(1):29–48

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Soukour A, Devendeville L, Lucet C, Moukrim A (2013) A Memetic algorithm for staff scheduling problem in airport security service. Expert Syst Appl 40(18):7504–7512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sun G, Zhao R, Lan Y (2016) Joint operations algorithm for large-scale global optimization. Appl Soft Comp 38:1025–1039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Takahama T, Sakai S (2006) Constrained optimization by the constrained differential evolution with gradient-based mutation and feasible elites. IEEE Congress on In Evolutionary Computation, 2006. CEC 2006. (pp. 1–8). IEEE

  41. Tseng C, Liao C (2008) A particle swarm optimization algorithm for hybrid flow-shop scheduling with multiprocessor tasks. Int J Prod Res 46(17):4655–4670

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang X, Ashfaq R, Fu A (2015) Fuzziness based sample categorization for classifier performance improvement. J Intel Fuzzy Syst 29(3):1185–1196

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Wang X (2015) Uncertainty in Learning from Big Data-Editorial. J Intel Fuzzy Syst 28(5):2329–2330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wirojanagud P, Gel E, Fowler J, Cardy R (2007) Modelling inherent worker differences for workforce planning. Int J Prod Res 45(3):525–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Wright P, Mahar S (2013) Centralized nurse scheduling to simultaneously improve schedule cost and nurse satisfaction. Omega: The. Int J Manage Sci 41(6):1042–1052

    Google Scholar 

  46. Yang K, Lan Y, Zhao R (2014) Monitoring mechanisms in new product development with risk-averse project manager. J Intel Manufact. doi:10.1007/s10845-014-0993-5

  47. Yang G, Tang W, Zhao R (2015) An uncertain furniture production planning problem with cumulative service levels. Soft Comp. doi:10.1007/s00500-015-1839-6

  48. Yang G, Liu Y, Yang K (2015) Multi-objective biogeography-based optimization for supply chain network design under uncertainty. Comp Indust Eng 85:145–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhang X, Meng G (2013) Expected-variance-entropy model for uncertain parallel machine scheduling. Information 16(2):903–908

    Google Scholar 

  50. Zhou C, Tang W, Zhao R (2014) An uncertain search model for recruitment problem with enterprise performance. J Intel Manufact. doi:10.1007/s10845-014-0997-1

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 71371133, and supported partially by Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China under Grant No. 20120032110071.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Systems Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China

    Guoqing Yang, Wansheng Tang & Ruiqing Zhao

Authors
  1. Guoqing Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wansheng Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ruiqing Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wansheng Tang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, G., Tang, W. & Zhao, R. An uncertain workforce planning problem with job satisfaction. Int. J. Mach. Learn. & Cyber. 8, 1681–1693 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-016-0539-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-016-0539-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation