Abstract
Dimensional approach to personality disorders conceptualizes personality disorders quantitatively different from normal personality. Five-Dimensional Personality Test (5DPT; Coolidge et al. in Pers Individ Differ 44(6):1326–1334, 2008) provides an assessment based on this approach. The 5DPT holds considerable usefulness and potential for investigating personality, and this potential may be much better utilized through availability of abbreviated versions and culture-specific forms. This paper describes efforts to develop and validate a Persian form of 5DPT. Findings of the study showed that some items of the original form were not able to represent the theoretical factors. However, discarding these items did not affect the factor structure of the new measure. It was demonstrated that the Persian version is composed of five saturated factors (neuroticism, absorption, orderliness, extraversion, and insensitivity) fitted to the data. Also, the structural equivalence of the two forms was discussed. Since the final scale turned out to be more concise, consisting of 75 of the original 100 items, application of this measure in research and clinical settings is facilitated.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Archer, R. P. (2005). MMPI-A: Assessing adolescent psychopathology (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Beck, A. T., & Beck, R. W. (1972). Screening depressed patients in family practice: A rapid technic. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, 52(6), 81–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.1972.11713319.
Besharat, M. A. (2006). Reliability and validity of mental health inventory. Daneshvar-e- Raftar, 13(16), 11–16. (in Persian).
Brinthaupt, T. M., Hein, M. B., & Kramer, T. E. (2009). The self-talk scale: Development, factor analysis and validation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(1), 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802484498.
Brown, T. A., & Barlow, D. H. (2005). Dimensional versus categorical classification of mental disorders in the fifth edition of the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders and beyond: Comment on the special section. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114(4), 551–556. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843x.114.4.551.
Carrà, G., Sciarini, P., Segagni-Lusignani, G., Clerici, M., Montomoli, C., & Kessler, R. C. (2011). Do they actually work across borders? Evaluation of two measures of psychological distress as screening instruments in a non-Anglo-Saxon country. European Psychiatry, 26(2), 122–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2010.04.008.
Chalabianloo, G. R., & Garoosi-Farshi, M. T. (2010). Relation of NEO-PI-R personality inventory and SCL-90-R: Ability of NEO inventory in mental health evaluation. Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 4(1), 51–58. (in Persian).
Coolidge, F., Segal, D. L., Cahill, B. S., & Archuleta, J. L. (2008). A new five factor model of psychopathology: Preliminary psychometric characteristics of the five-dimensional personality test (5DPT). Personality and Individual Differences, 44(6), 1326–1334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.12.001.
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. (1985). The NEO personality inventory: Manual. Odessa, Fl: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Costa, P. T., & Widiger, T. A. (2002). Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Derogatis, L. R., Rickles, K., & Rock, A. (1976). The SCL-90 and the MMPI: A step in the validation of a new self-report scale. British Journal of Psychiatry, 128(3), 280–289. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.128.3.280.
Devellis, R. F. (2012). Scale development: Theory and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Farahani, M., & Kathirlou, Y. (2006). Comparing the big five personality traits among faulty and safe drivers. Journal of Modern Psychological Researches, 1(1), 123–142. (in Persian).
Goldberg, D. P. (1972). The detection of psychiatric illness by questionnaire. London: Oxford University Press.
Goudarzi, M. A. (2002). Reliability and validity of Beck hopelessness scale among Shiraz University students. Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities of Shiraz University, 18(2), 27–39. (in Persian).
Haren, E. G., & Mitchell, C. W. (2003). Relationships between the five-factor personality model and coping styles. Psychology and Education, 40(1), 38–49.
Hayes, N., & Joseph, S. (2003). Big 5 correlate of three measures of subjective well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(4), 723–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00057-0.
Hill, P., & Argyle, M. (2001). Happiness, introversion, extraversion, and happy introverts. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(4), 595–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00058-1.
Hilton, A., & Skrutkowski, M. (2002). Translating instruments into other languages: Development and testing processes. Cancer Nursing, 25(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002820-200202000-00001.
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 11–24.
John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The big five inventory-versions 4a and 54. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575.
Kessler, R. (2003). The impairments caused by social phobia in the general population: Implications for intervention. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 108(417), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0447.108.s417.2.x.
Khodayarifard, M., Akbari-Zardkhaneh, S., & Zeinali, S. (2011). Psychometric properties of self-talk scale among Iranian students. Journal of Applied Psychological Research, 2(2), 33–54. (in Persian).
Maneesriwongul, W., & Dixon, J. K. (2004). Instrument translation process: A methods review. Journal of Advanced Nursing Research, 48(2), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03185.x.
Mason, T. C. (2005). Cross-cultural instrument translation: Assessment, translation, and statistical applications. American Annals of the Deaf, 150(1), 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1353/aad.2005.0020.
Moor, C., Zimprich, D., Schmitt, M., & Kliegel, M. (2006). Personality, aging, self-perceptions, and subjective health: A mediation model. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 63(3), 241–257. https://doi.org/10.2190/AKRY-UM4K-PB1V-PBHF.
Najarian, B., & Davoodi, I. (2001). Construction and validation of a short form of the SCL-90-r (SCL-25). Journal of Psychology, 5(18), 136–149. (in Persian).
Nunnally, J. O. (1986). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw- Hill.
Poursharifi, H., Akbari-Zardkhaneh, S., Yaghubi, H., Peyravi, H., Hassanabadi, H. R., Hamidpour, H., et al. (2012). The standardization of Iranian mental health scale (IMHS): Preliminary study. Journal of Applied Psychological Research, 3(3), 61–84. (in Persian).
Ronan, G. F., Dreer, L. E., & Dollard, K. M. (2000). Measuring patient symptom change on rural psychiatry units: Utility of the symptom checklist-90 revised. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 61(7), 493–497.
Rosenman, S., Korten, A., Medway, J., & Evans, M. (2003). Dimensional vs. categorical diagnosis in psychosis. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 107(5), 378–384. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0447.2003.00059.x.
Samuels, J., Nestadt, G., Bienvenu, O. J., Costa, P. T., Riddle, M. A., Liang, K. Y., et al. (2000). Personality disorders and normal personality dimensions in obsessive-compulsive disorder. British Journal of Psychiatry, 177(5), 457–462. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.177.5.457.
San Martini, P., Di Pomponio, I., Dentale, F., & van Kampen, D. (2010). Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the five dimensional personality test (5DPT). Bollettino di Psicologia Applicata, 261(262), 105–115.
Taghavi, M. (2001). Validity and reliability of general health questionnaire (GHQ). Journal of Psychology, 5(4), 381–398. (in Persian).
Trull, T. J., & Durrett, C. A. (2005). Categorical and dimensional models of personality disorder. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1(1), 355–380. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.144009.
Van Kampen, D. (1997). Orderliness as a major dimension of personality: From 3DPT to 4DPT. European Journal of Personality, 11(3), 211–242. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)10990984(199709)11:33.0.CO;2-U.
Van Kampen, D. (2000). Idiographic complexity and the common personality dimensions insensitivity, extraversion, neuroticism, and orderliness. European Journal of Personality, 14(3), 217–243. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0984(200005/06)14:3<217:AID-PER374>3.0.CO;2-G.
Van Kampen, D. (2006). The Dutch DAPP-BQ: Improvements, lower- and higher-order dimensions, and relationship with the 5DPT. Journal of Personality Disorders, 20(1), 81–101. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2006.20.1.81.
Veit, C. T., & Ware, J. E. (1983). The structure of psychological distress and well-being in general population. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51(5), 730–742. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.51.5.730.
Veldhuizen, S., Cairney, J., Kurdyak, P., & Streiner, D. L. (2007). The sensitivity of the K6 as a screen for any disorder in community mental health surveys: A cautionary note. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 52(4), 256–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/070674370705200408.
Viola, R., Lovas, K., Szabo, Z., Czenner, Z., Meads, D. M., Soos, G., et al. (2008). Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Hungarian quality of life in depression scale. European Psychiatry, 23(1), 49–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2007.11.003.
Widiger, T. A., & Costa, P. T. (1994). Personality and personality disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103(1), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.103.1.78.
World Health Organization. (2017). Process of translation and adaptation of instruments. Retrieved March 28, 2017, from http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en/.
Yang, J., Dai, X., Yao, S., Cai, T., Gao, B., McCrae, R. R., et al. (2002). Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality in Chinese psychiatric patients. In P. T. Costa & T. A. Widiger (Eds.), Personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality (pp. 215–221). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Assessment Resources.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Authors mention that there is no conflict of interest in this study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Akbari-Zardkhaneh, S., Poursharifi, H., Yaghubi, H. et al. Five-Dimensional Personality Test: Development and Validation of a Persian Version. Psychol Stud 63, 219–227 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-018-0457-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-018-0457-7