Micromorphology and Optical Bandgap Characterization of Copper Oxide Nanowires
- 31 Downloads
Due to the industrial applications of nasno materials, the growth of Copper oxide (CuO) nanowires (NWs) at the same and opposite directions of the electric and gravitational fields was investigated to study the effects of fields on the NWs properties. The experiments were designed to grow NWs using thermal oxidation method at 450 °C for 50 h. NWs growth was evaluated to study two distinct cases; first, substrates exposed to the gravitational field and second those treated with electric field (EF) in-lined with gravitation field (GF). It was observed that the electric field developed a diameter homogeneity while compressing the NWs and decreasing the diameters. Furthermore, the GF influenced only the length of the NWs, while the EF had an impact on both length and diameter of the NWs. The direction of fields played an important role in NWs morphology and intensity of XRD pattern and optical properties. It was also observed that field direction greatly influenced the NWs length and diameter.
KeywordsCopper oxide nanowires Micro morphology Optical bandgap Gravitational field Electrical field
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors report no conflict of interests. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.
- 1.Molamohammadi M, Luna C, Arman A, Solaymani S, Boochani A, Ahmadpourian A, Shafiekhani A (2015) Preparation and magnetoresistance behavior of nickel nanoparticles embedded in hydrogenated carbon film. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 26:6814–6818Google Scholar
- 4.Talu S, Bramowicz M, Kulesza S, Solaymani S, Ghaderi A, Dejam L, Boochani A, Elahi S.M (2016) Microstructure and micromorphology of ZnO thin films: case study on Al doping and annealing effects. SuperlatticesMicrostruct 93:109–121Google Scholar
- 13.Ghijsen J, Tjeng L H, Van J, Eskes H, Westerink J, Sawatzky G A (1988) Electronic structure of Cu2O and CuO. Phys Rev B 38(16):11322Google Scholar
- 18.Wu H, Lin D, Pan W (2006) Fabrication, assembly, and electrical characterization of CuO nanofibers. Appl Phys Lett 89(13): 3125Google Scholar
- 22.Kumar A, Srivastava A K, Tiwari P, Nandedkar R V (2004) The effect of growth parameters on the aspect ratio and number density of CuO nanorods. J Phys: Condens Matter 16(47):8531Google Scholar
- 25.Kaur M, Muthe K P, Despande S K, Choudhury S, Singh J B, Verma N, Gupta S K, Yakhmi J V (2006) Selective growth and kinetic study of copper oxide nanowires from patterned thin-film multilayer structures. J Cryst Growth 22(10):2691– 2699Google Scholar
- 29.Talu S, Solaymani S, Bramowicz M, Kulesza S, Ghaderi A, Shahpouri S, Elahi S.M (2016) Effect of electric field direction and substrate roughness on three-dimensional self-assembly growth of copper oxide nanowires. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 27(9):9272–9277Google Scholar
- 31.Vila M, Diaz C, Piqueras J (2010) Optical and magnetic properties of CuO nanowires grown by thermal Oxidation. Appl Phys Lett 43(13):135403Google Scholar
- 32.Choopun S, Hongsith N, Wongrat E. (2010) Metal-oxide nanowires by thermal oxidation reaction technique. INTECH Open Access PublisherGoogle Scholar