Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Views on the Past, Present, and Future of Business and Information Systems Engineering

  • Discussion
  • Published:
Business & Information Systems Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

(Adapted from Soh and Markus 1995, p. 37)

Notes

  1. https://sfdora.org/.

  2. http://www.dfg.de/download/pdf/dfg_im_profil/reden_stellungnahmen/download/empfehlung_wiss_praxis_1310.pdf.

  3. http://www.wissenschaftsrat.de/download/archiv/4609-15.pdf.

  4. Please bear in mind: In those times we communicated with the program chair by exchanging “yellow” letters.

References

  • Applegate LM, McFarlan FW, McKenney JL (1996) Corporate information systems management: text and cases. Irwin McGraw-Hill, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur WB (2009) The nature of technology: what it is and how it evolves. Simon & Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ba S, Stallaert J, Whinston AB (2001) Research commentary: introducing a third dimension in information systems design—the case for incentive alignment. Inf Syst Res 12(3):225–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Bapna R, Goes P, Gupta A, Jin Y (2004) User heterogeneity and its impact on electronic auction market design: an empirical exploration. MIS Q 28(1):21–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17(1):99–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck R, Avital M, Rossi M, Thatcher JB (2017) Blockchain technology in business and information systems research. Bus Inf Syst Eng 59(6):381–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker J, König W, Schütte R, Wendt O, Zelewski S (eds) (1999) Wirtschaftsinformatik und Wissenschaftstheorie: Bestandsaufnahme und Perspektiven. Gabler, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker J, Kugeler M, Rosemann M (eds) (2013) Process management: a guide for the design of business processes. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker J, Clever N, Holler J, Neumann M (2018) Business process management in the manufacturing industry: ERP replacement and ISO 9001 recertification supported by the icebricks method. In: vom Brocke J, Mendling J (eds) Business process management cases: digital innovation and business transformation in practice. Springer, Cham, pp 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58307-5_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Beimborn D, Franke J, Gomber P, Wagner H-T, Weitzel T (2006) Die Bedeutung des Alignment von IT und Fachressourcen in Finanzprozessen—Eine Empirische Untersuchung. Wirtschaftsinformatik 48(5):331–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Bélanger F, Crossler RE (2011) Privacy in the digital age: a review of information privacy research in information systems. MIS Q 35(3):179–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Benlian A, Hess T, Buxmann T (2009) Drivers of SaaS-adoption—an empirical study of different. Application types. Bus Inf Syst Eng 1(5):357–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Bichler M, Frank U, Avison D, Malaurent J, Fettke P, Hovorka D, Krmer J, Schnurr D, Mller B, Suhl L, Thalheim B (2016) Theories in business and information systems engineering. Bus Inf Syst Eng 58(4):291–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhl HU, Lehnert M (2012) Information systems and business & information systems engineering: status quo and outlook. In: International conference on business information systems, Vilnius. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Buhl HU, Fridgen G, König W, Röglinger M, Wagner C (2012a) Where’s the competitive advantage in strategic information systems research? Making the case for boundary-spanning research based on the German business and information systems engineering tradition. J Strateg Inf Syst 21(2):172–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2012.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhl HU, Fridgen G, Müller G, Röglinger M (2012b) On dinosaurs, measurement ideologists, separatists, and happy souls. Bus Inf Syst Eng 4(6):307–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-012-0239-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhl HU, Müller G, Fridgen G, Röglinger M (2012c) Business and information systems engineering: a complementary approach to information systems—what we can learn from the past and may conclude from present reflection on the future. J Assoc Inf Syst 13(4):236–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Caserta M, Voß S (2014) A hybrid algorithm for the DNA sequencing problem. Discrete Appl Math 163:87–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen P (1976) The entity-relationship model—toward a unified view of data. ACM Trans Database Syst 1(1):9–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiasson M, Davidson E, Winter J (2018) Philosophical foundations for informing the future(S) through IS research. Eur J Inf Syst 27(3):367–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085x.2018.1435232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clemons EK, Hann IH, Hitt LM (2002) Price dispersion and differentiation in online travel: an empirical investigation. Manag Sci 48(4):534–549

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH (1993) Process innovation: reengineering work through information technology. Harvard Business Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • del-Río-Ortega A, Resinas M, Durán A, Bernárdez B, Ruiz-Cortés A, Toro M (2017) Visual PPINOT: a graphical notation for process performance indicators. Bus Inf Syst Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0483-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dibbern J, Heinzl A (2001) Outsourcing der Informationsverarbeitung im Mittelstand: test eines Multitheoretischen Kausalmodells. Wirtschaftsinformatik 43(4):339–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Diebold J (1959) Elektronische Computer – Eine Herausforderung für die Unternehmensleitung. elektronische datenverarbeitung 1(1):20–23. Reprint translated as: Electronic computers - the challenge to management. Bus Inf Syst Eng 2009 1(1):81–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Domschke W, Scholl A (2010) Rundreisen und Touren, 5th edn. Oldenbourg, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumas M, La Rosa M, Mendling J, Reijers HA (2018) Fundamentals of business process management, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Durward D, Blohm I, Leimeister JM (2016) Crowd work. Bus Inf Syst Eng 58(4):281–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend PK (1993) Against method, 3rd edn. Verso, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink A, Voß S (2003) Anwendung von Metaheuristiken zur Lösung betrieblicher Planungsprobleme—Potenziale und Grenzen einer softwaretechnischen Unterstützung. Wirtschaftsinformatik 45(4):395–407

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink A, Kliewer N, Mattfeld D, Mönch L, Rothlauf F, Schryen G, Suhl L, Voß S (2014) Model-based decision support in manufacturing and service networks. Bus Inf Syst Eng 6(1):17–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank U (2014) Higher value of research by promoting value for researchers. Commun AIS 34:43

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank U (2017) Theories in the light of contingency and change: possible future worlds and well-grounded hope as a supplement to truth. In: Proceedings of the 50th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/41853. Accessed 17 Oct 2018

  • Frank U, Schauer C, Wigand R (2008) Different paths of development of two information systems communities: a comparative study based on peer interviews. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 22(21):391–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank U, Strecker S, Fettke P, vom Brocke J, Becker J, Sinz E (2014) The research field “modeling business information systems”. Bus Inf Syst Eng 6(1):39–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman TL (2005) The world is flat. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaitanides M (1983) Prozeßorganisation: Entwicklung, Ansätze und Programme prozeßorientierter Organisationsgestaltung. Vahlen, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Gassmann O, Frankenberger K, Csik M (2014) Revolutionizing the business model. In: Gassmann O, Schweitzer F (eds) Management of the fuzzy front end of innovation. Springer, Cham, pp 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01056-4_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gawer A (2014) Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: toward an integrative framework. Res Policy 43(7):1239–1249

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer M, Champy J (1993) Reengineering the corporation: a manifesto for business revolution. Harper, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasenkamp U, Stahlknecht P (2009) Wirtschaftsinformatik—evolution of the discipline as reflected by its journal. Bus Inf Syst Eng 1(1):14–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-008-0022-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich L (1993) Computerunterstützung kooperativen Arbeitens. Wirtschaftsinformatik 35(2):99–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich LJ (1995) Informationsmanagement—Planung, Überwachung und Steuerung der Informationsinfrastruktur, 4th edn. Oldenbourg, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinzl A, Schoder D, Frank U (2008) WI-Journalliste 2008 sowie WI-Liste der Konferenzen, Proceedings und Lecture Notes 2008, Verabschiedete Fassung der WKWI-Sitzung vom 2008-02-27 in München. Wirtschaftsinformatik 50(2):155–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinz O, Spann M, Hann IH (2015) Research note—can’t buy me love… or can I? Social capital attainment through conspicuous consumption in virtual environments. Inf Syst Res 26(4):859–870

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitt LM, Brynjolfsson E (1996) Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: three different measures of information technology value. MIS Q 20(2):121–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui KL, Teo HH, Lee SYT (2007) The value of privacy assurance: an exploratory field experiment. MIS Q 31(1):19–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarke M (2009) Perspectives in the interplay between business and information systems engineering and computer science. Bus Inf Syst Eng 1(1):70–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarke M (2017) Data spaces: combining goal-driven and data-driven approaches in community decision and negotiation support. In: Schoop M, Kilgour DM (eds) Group decision and negotiation—17th International Conference GDN 2017, vol 293. Springer LNBIP, pp 3–14

  • Jarke M, Loucopoulos P, Lyytinen K, Mylopoulos J, Robinson WN (2011) The brave new world of design requirements. Inf Syst 36(7):992–1008

    Google Scholar 

  • Jouck T, Depaire B (2018) Generating artificial data for empirical analysis of control-flow discovery algorithms: a process tree and log generator. Bus Inf Syst Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0541-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jung D, Dorner V, Glaser F, Morana S (2018) Robo-advisory: digitalization and automation of financial advisory. Bus Inf Syst Eng 60(1):81–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0521-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kettner KH (1959) Der Integrationseffekt elektronischer Datenverarbeitung. elektronische datenverarbeitung 1(1):14–19. Reprint translated as: The integrative effect of electronic data processing. Bus Inf Syst Eng 2009 1(1):98–103

  • Kieser A (2012) JOURQUAL: Der Gebrauch, nicht der Missbrauch, ist das Problem. Oder: Warum Wirtschaftsinformatik die beste deutschsprachige betriebswirtschaftliche Zeitschrift ist. Die Betriebswirtschaft 72(1):93–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieser A (2016) Ineffizient, irreführend und teuer: wissenschaftliche Zeitschriften in der Krise. Ansätze zur Reform des Systems wissenschaftlicher Veröffentlichungen. Die Betriebswirtschaft 76(6):467–476

    Google Scholar 

  • Köbler F, Fähling J, Krcmar H, Leimeister JM (2010) IT governance and types of it decision makers in German hospitals: an empirical study among it decision makers. Bus Inf Syst Eng 2(6):359–370

    Google Scholar 

  • König W (2002) Industrialisierung des Bankgeschäfts. Wirtschaftsinformatik 44(6):517–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasnova H, Veltri NF, Günther O (2012) Self-disclosure and privacy calculus on social networking sites: the role of culture. Bus Inf Syst Eng 4(3):127–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Krcmar H (1997) Informationsmanagement. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn TS (1964) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Künne W (2003) Conceptions of truth. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacity MC, Willcocks LP (2003) IT sourcing reflections: lessons for customers and suppliers. Wirtschaftsinformatik 45(2):115–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacity MC, Willcocks LP (2016) Robotic process automation at Telefonica O2. MIS Q Exec 15(1):21–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee AS (1999) Researching MIS. In: Currie WL, Galliers B (eds) Rethinking management information systems: an interdisciplinary perspective. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 7–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee I, Lee K (2015) The Internet of Things (IoT): applications, investments, and challenges for enterprises. Bus Horizons 58(4):431–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Loos P, Mettler T, Winter R, Goeken M, Frank U, Winter A (2013) Methodological pluralism in business and information systems engineering? Bus Inf Syst Eng 5(6):453–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Maniezzo V, Stützle T, Voß S (eds) (2009) Matheuristics—hybridizing metaheuristics and mathematical programming. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Mata FJ, Fuerst WL, Barney JB (1995) Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based analysis. MIS Q 19(4):487–505

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendling J, Weber I, van der Aalst W, vom Brocke J et al (2018) Blockchains for business process management—challenges and opportunities. ACM Trans Manag Inf Syst 9(1):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertens P, Plattflaut E (1986) Informationstechnik als Strategische Waffe. Inf Manag 1986(2):6–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Mönch L (2006) Autonome und kooperative Steuerung komplexer Produktionsprozesse mit Multi-Agenten-Systemen. Wirtschaftsinformatik 48(2):107–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney JG, Gurbaxani V, Kraemer KL (1996) A process oriented framework for assessing the business value of information technology. ACM SIGMIS Database 27(2):68–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Bichler M (2018a) Editorial statement. Business and Information Systems Engineering. http://www.bise-journal.com/?page_id=146. Accessed 17 July 2018

  • Bichler M (2018b) Top 1000 scientists in computer science and electronics. http://www.guide2research.com/scientists/. Accessed 28 Aug 2018

  • Nievergelt J (1994) Complexity, algorithms, programs, systems: the shifting focus. J Symb Comput 17:297–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordsieck F (1934) Grundlagen der Organisationslehre. Poeschel, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Österle H, Becker J, Frank U, Hess T, Karagiannis D, Krcmar H, Loos P, Mertens P, Oberweis A, Sinz EJ (2011) Memorandum on design-oriented information systems research. Eur J Inf Syst 20(1):7–10. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2010.55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otto B, Lohmann S, Steinbiß S, Teuscher (eds) (2018) IDS reference architecture model industrial data space, version 2.0. International Data Space Association and Fraunhofer e.V., Berlin

  • Pentland A (2014) Social physics. Scribe, Brunswick

    Google Scholar 

  • Penzel H-G (1999) Post Merger Management in Banken—und die Konsequenzen für das IT-Management. Wirtschaftsinformatik 41(2):105–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Pham MC, Klamma R, Jarke M (2011) Development of computer science disciplines: a social network analysis approach. Soc Netw Anal Min 1(4):321–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Picot A, Baumann O (2009) The relevance of organization theory to the field of business and information systems engineering. Bus Inf Syst Eng 1(1):62–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-008-0027-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (1980) Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME (2008) The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harv Bus Rev 86(1):25–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME, Millar V (1985) How information gives you competitive advantage. Harv Bus Rev 65(4):149–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Potthof I (1998) Empirische Studien zum Wirtschaftlichen Erfolg der Informationsverarbeitung. Wirtschaftsinformatik 40(1):54–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Puschmann T, Alt R (2016) Sharing economy. Bus Inf Syst Eng 58(1):93–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Roemer M, Buhl HU (1996) Das World Wide Web als Alternative zur Bankfiliale: gestaltung Innovativer IKS für das Direktbanking. Wirtschaftsinformatik 38(6):565–577

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogerson S, Miller K, Winter J, Larson D (2017) Information systems ethics challenges and opportunities. J Inf Commun Ethics Soc. https://doi.org/10.1108/jices-07-2017-0041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roithmayr F, Wendner J (1992) Ergebnisse einer empirischen Studie über den Zusammenhang zwischen Unternehmensstrategie und Informationssystem-Strategie. Wirtschaftsinformatik 34(5):472–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty R (1999) Philosophy and social hope. Penguin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross ME, Boshoff WH (2017) The peer-review system for academic papers is badly in need of repair. The Conversation, 26 Feb 2017. https://theconversation.com/the-peer-review-system-for-academic-papers-is-badly-in-need-of-repair-72669. Accessed 17 July 2018

  • Rowe F (2018) Being critical is good, but better with philosophy! From digital transformation and values to the future of IS research. Eur J Inf Syst 27(3):380–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart DE, Hinton DE, Williams RJ (1986) Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature 323:533–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheer AW (1989) Enterprise-wide data modelling. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuff HK (1959) Elektronische Datenverarbeitung—Fachberichte über programmgesteuerte Maschinen und ihre Anwendung. In: elektronische datenverarbeitung, vol 1, no 1, pp 3–4

  • Schuh G, Kampker A, Wesch-Potente C (2011) Condition-based factory planning. Prod Eng 5(1):89–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumann M (1993) Wirtschaftlichkeitsbeurteilung für IV-Systeme. Wirtschaftsinformatik 35(2):167–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Sein M, Rossi M, Purao S (2007) Exploring the limits of the possible. Scand J Inf Syst 19(2):93–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Shachaf P (2008) Cultural diversity and information and communication technology impacts on global virtual teams: an exploratory study. Inf Manag 45(2):131–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2007.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith A (1776) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. W. Strahan and T. Cadell, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Soh C, Markus ML (1995) How IT creates business value: a process theory synthesis. In: International conference on information systems, Amsterdam, pp 29–41

  • Somogyi EK, Galliers RD (1987) Applied information technology: from data processing to strategic information systems. J Inf Technol 2(1):30–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitta T (1998) IV-Controlling in Mittelständischen Industrieunternehmen—Ergebnisse einer empirischen Studie. Wirtschaftsinformatik 40(5):424–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprenger M, Mettler T (2015) Service robots. Bus Inf Syst Eng 57(4):271–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Straub (2008) Editor’s comments: thirty years of service to the IS profession: time for renewal at MISQ? MIS Q 32(1):iii. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szyperski N, Schmitz P, Kronen J (1993) Outsourcing: profil und Markt einer Dienstleistung für Unternehmen auf dem Weg zur Strategischen Zentrierung. Wirtschaftsinformatik 35(3):228–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhlemann T, Lehmann C, Steinhilper R (2017) The digital twin: realizing the cyber-physical production system for Industry 4.0. Proc CIRP 61:335–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Urquhart C, Carte T, Heinzl A (2018) Time for some changes to ICIS? Reflections on our highest-quality conference. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 41(Article 8). http://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol41/iss1/8. Accessed 17 July 2018

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Aalst WMP (2016) Process mining—data science in action, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Aalst W, Bichler M, Heinzl A (2016a) Open research in business and information systems engineering. Bus Inf Syst Eng 58(6):375–379

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Aalst WMP, La Rosa M, Santoro FM (2016b) Business process management. Bus Inf Syst Eng 58(1):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Aalst WMP, Bichler M, Heinzl A (2017) Responsible data science. Bus Inf Syst Eng 59(5):311–313

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Aalst WMP, Bichler M, Heinzl A (2018) Robotic process automation. Bus Inf Syst Eng 60(4):269–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0542-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voigt F (1832) Der Handlungsreisende—wie er sein soll und was er zu tun hat, um Aufträge zu erhalten und eines glücklichen Erfolgs in seinen Geschäften gewiß zu sein—von einem alten Commis-Voyageur (The travelling salesman—how he must be and what he should do in order to get commissions and be sure of the happy success in his business—by an old commis-voyager)

  • vom Brocke J, Mendling J (2018) Business process management cases. Digital innovation and business transformation in practice. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • vom Brocke J, Rosemann M (2010) Handbook on business process management. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosoughi S, Roy D, Aral S (2018) The spread of true and false news online. Science 359(6380):1146–1151

    Google Scholar 

  • Voß S (2014) Interview with Daniel Dolk and Christer Carlsson on “Decision Analytics”. Bus Inf Syst Eng 56(3):181–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber R (1997) Ontological foundations of information systems. Coopers & Lybrand, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber I, Xu X, Riveret R, Governatori G, Ponomarev A, Mendling J (2016) Untrusted business process monitoring and execution using blockchain. In: International conference on business process management. Springer, Cham, pp 329–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinhardt C, Anandasivam A, Blau B, Borissov N, Meinl T (2009) Cloud computing—a classification, business models, and research directions. Bus Inf Syst Eng 1(5):391–399

    Google Scholar 

  • Willcocks L, Lacity M (2016) Service automation: robots and the future of work. SB Publishing, Ashford

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter R (2003) Modelle, Techniken und Werkzeuge im Business Engineering. In: Business engineering. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 87–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter R (2010) Interview with Jay F. Nunamaker, Jr. on “Toward a broader vision of IS research”. Bus Inf Syst Eng 2(5):321–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Zachman JA (1987) A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Syst J 26(3):276–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Zdravkovic J, Stirna J, Kirikova M, Karagiannis D, Winter R (2015) Advanced enterprise modeling. Bus Inf Syst Eng 57(1):1–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-014-0367-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuboff S (1988) In the age of the smart machine: the future of work and power. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • zur Muehlen M (2004) Workflow-based process controlling: foundation, design, and application of workflow-driven process information systems. Logos, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Informatics, Decision Sciences and Systems, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Boltzmannstr 3, 85748, Munich, Germany

    Martin Bichler

  2. University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany

    Armin Heinzl

  3. RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany

    Wil M. P. van der Aalst &  Matthias Jarke

  4. University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany

    Hans Ulrich Buhl

  5. Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany

    Oliver Hinz &  Wolfgang König

  6. University of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany

    Peter Mertens

  7. University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany

    Ulrich Hasenkamp

  8. AIS President, Atlanta, USA

    Matti Rossi

  9. University of Münster, Münster, Germany

    Jörg Becker

  10. Vienna University of Economics and Business, Vienna, Austria

    Jan Mendling

  11. Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Natalia Kliewer

  12. University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

    Stefan Voss

  13. Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong

    Kai-Lung Hui

  14. University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Dimitris Karagiannis

  15. Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden

    Jelena Zdravkovic

  16. Aalto University, Helsinki, Finland

    Matti Rossi

  17. University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany

    Ulrich Frank

  18. University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

    Jens Dibbern

  19. Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany

    Christof Weinhardt

  20. University of St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland

    Robert Winter

Authors
  1. Wil M. P. van der Aalst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jörg Becker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Martin Bichler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Hans Ulrich Buhl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jens Dibbern
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ulrich Frank
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ulrich Hasenkamp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Armin Heinzl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Oliver Hinz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Kai-Lung Hui
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Matthias Jarke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Dimitris Karagiannis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Natalia Kliewer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Wolfgang König
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Jan Mendling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Peter Mertens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Matti Rossi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Stefan Voss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Christof Weinhardt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Robert Winter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Jelena Zdravkovic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Bichler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

van der Aalst, W.M.P., Becker, J., Bichler, M. et al. Views on the Past, Present, and Future of Business and Information Systems Engineering. Bus Inf Syst Eng 60, 443–477 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0561-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0561-1

Search

Navigation