Introduction

There are physical and physiological sex differences in humans. For instance, on average, men are bigger and more muscular than women. In addition, men and women have different circulating levels of the sex hormone testosterone and estrogen. Compared to men, women demonstrate more profound changes in sex hormone status, body composition and neural-vascular profiles with normal aging due to menopause (loss of estrogen) in mid-life. These sex-specific differences may impact baroreflex function in health and disease (i.e., hypertension, heart failure, type II diabetes, etc.).

Indeed, epidemiological studies have suggested that impaired baroreflex function is one of the predictors of cardiovascular events and all-cause morbidity and mortality [6,7,8]. An increase in the prevalence of hypertension and cardiovascular disease with aging is higher in women than men [9, 10], which may be attributed, in part, to sex-specific differences in baroreflex function. Despite its clinical importance, how sex affects the baroreflex in the young and the old, during exercise, and in pathology has not been reviewed systematically.

The baroreflex, which includes the cardiovagal (cardiac control) and sympathetic (vasculature control) components (Fig. 1), plays an important role in both short-term and long-term regulation of blood pressure in humans [1,2,3]. Importantly, alterations in these baroreflex functions are associated with physiological factors including aging and sex or pathological conditions. In this review, the cardiovagal baroreflex refers to the relationship between heart rate or RR interval and blood pressure [4]. Also, the sympathetic baroreflex refers to the relationship between vasomotor sympathetic outflow, which can be recorded by the microneurographic technique as muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) [5], and blood pressure [4]. The purpose of this brief review is to systematically summarize the current knowledge on sex differences in baroreflex function, with the main focus on studies in humans.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Illustration of the cardiovagal and sympathetic baroreflex. BRS baroreflex sensitivity, DBP diastolic blood pressure, HR heart rate, MSNA muscle sympathetic nerve activity, RRI R–R interval, SBP systolic blood pressure

Cardiovagal baroreflex function

Sex differences in baroreflex sensitivity among young individuals

The first study on sex differences in cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity was published in the early 1990s. Abdel-Rahman et al. [11] found that the slope of the line relating changes in heart rate and mean arterial pressure was much steeper in healthy young men compared with young women when blood pressure was rapidly (i.e., within seconds) increased by an intravenous bolus injection of phenylephrine. These results suggest that the response of the cardiovagal baroreflex to acute hypertension is substantially greater in young men than in young women. Similarly, using the modified Oxford method (rapid hypo and hypertensive stimulations by intravenous bolus injections of nitroprusside and phenylephrine, respectively), it was confirmed that cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity was greater in healthy young men compared with young women despite no sex differences in other characteristics of the baroreflex function curve (e.g., the threshold, saturation, operating range, and operating point, Fig. 2) [12]. However, Tank et al. [13] reported that during incremental phenylephrine and nitroprusside infusions [slowly (i.e., within minutes) increasing and then decreasing blood pressure], cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity was similar between the sexes. Collectively, these studies indicate that the rate of blood pressure change (e.g., rapidly or slowly) can impact cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity differently in young men versus young women. On the other hand, a recent report showed that cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity to natural blood pressure variation around the operating point identified by transfer function analysis of the low-frequency region (0.04–0.15 Hz) between RR interval and mean arterial pressure was smaller rather than greater in healthy young men compared with young women [14]. These observations need to be confirmed in future studies.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Hypothetical cardiovagal baroreflex curve at rest and during exercise expressed as the relationship between heart rate and arterial blood pressure. Resetting of the baroreflex occurs from rest to exercise. OP, operating point

Similarly, we also found that cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity was not significantly different between young men and young women when blood pressure was rapidly decreased; however, baroreflex sensitivity was greater in men compared with women when blood pressure was rapidly increased (Fig. 3) [4]. Observations from the previous studies with experimental animals have shown that baroreflex-mediated bradycardia during acute hypertension involves reciprocal changes in vagal activation and sympathetic activity inhibition [15]. Sex dimorphism in cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity has been proposed, at least in part, to be associated with different autonomic cardiac control in males and females. An increase in vagal tone occurs rapidly, whereas sympathetic withdrawal happens more slowly [15, 16], indicating that baroreflex control of heart rate is mainly regulated by vagal outflow during a rapid change in blood pressure. Indeed, it was reported that an increase in vagal outflow to the heart in response to baroreceptor activation (loading) was smaller in females compared with males [17].

Fig. 3
figure 3

Effects of sex and the menstrual cycle on cardiovagal barorefex sensitivity in healthy young individuals. a cardiovagal BRS assessed during early phase II and phase IV of the Valsalva maneuver. b The slope of the linear relationship between R–R interval and SBP indicates cardiovagal BRS. c The sensitivity during decreasing BP was not different between the sexes and menstrual phases in women. d However, it was greater in men than women of both phases during increasing BP. Values are mean ± SE. BRS baroreflex sensitivity, BP blood pressure, EFP the early follicular phase, HR heart rate, MLP the mid-luteal phase, SBP systolic blood pressure. Reproduced with permission from Fu et al. [4]

One unique feature in young (premenopausal) women is fluctuations of the female sex hormone estrogen and progesterone during the normal menstrual cycle. Using the modified Oxford method, Minson et al. [18] found that cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity was similar between the early follicular phase (e.g., 1–5 days after the onset of menstruation when both estrogen and progesterone are low) and the mid-luteal phase (e.g., 19–22 days after the onset of menstruation when both hormones are high) in healthy premenopausal women. Our study [4] confirmed the findings of Minson et al. using a different technique that evaluates cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity—a Valsalva maneuver which includes a hypotensive stimulus in early phase II and a hypertensive stimulus in phase IV. These studies suggest that cyclic changes in estrogen and progesterone during the normal menstrual cycle have no significant impact on cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity in healthy young women. It is possible that these two hormones may have counteractive effects on the cardiovagal baroreflex.

Baroreflex resetting during exercise in young men and women

Both heart rate and blood pressure increase during exercise and the baroreflex resets to a higher pressure level [19,20,21,22,23]. The baroreflex curve is shifted to the right and upward from rest to exercise. Moreover, the operating point is also shifted to the right-upward which is away from the centering point and towards the threshold on the functional curve, and thus, at a locus of reduced gain (Fig. 2) [24]. It is believed that central command resets the baroreflex to the higher pressure level so that heart rate, and thus, cardiac output increase by the sudden withdrawal of vagal outflow to the heart to meet the metabolic demand during exercise [21]. In addition, activation of the exercise pressor reflex may also contribute to the resetting of the baroreflex [19,20,21,22,23]. Previous studies in humans and animals have suggested that both sex and sex hormones may modify central command and the exercise pressor reflex [25,26,27,28,29,30], and young women demonstrate attenuated metaboreflex activation compared with young men [25, 31]. Therefore, it would be expected that the differences in central command and exercise pressure reflex between men and women modify the resetting of baroreflex function during exercise. In contrast to this speculation, the magnitude of resetting of the baroreflex during exercise was not different between the sexes [32]. Likewise, there was a right-upward resetting of the baroreflex curve from rest to exercise in both sexes, but baroreflex sensitivity at the operating point during exercise was smaller in men compared with women during exercise [32]. These findings suggest that baroreflex sensitivity was modified by sex and/or sex hormones during exercise despite no significant difference in the resetting of baroreflex between men and women.

The impact of the menstrual cycle on baroreflex function in healthy premenopausal women during leg cycling exercise was also investigated in previous studies [32]. Subjects were evaluated three times: (1) during the early follicular phase when both estrogen and progesterone levels are low; (2) the late follicular phase when estrogen is high but progesterone is low; and (3) the mid-luteal phase when both sex hormone levels are high. It was found that menstrual cycle phases did not affect the maximal baroreflex sensitivity (gain) as well as the gain at the operating point in young women. However, augmented pressor responses to acute hypotension were observed in young women during the mid-luteal phase compared with the early- and late-follicular phase. Nevertheless, the effect of the menstrual cycle on the resetting of baroreflex function during exercise remains largely to be elucidated.

Age and sex dependency of cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity

Physiological factors, particularly age and sex have significant influences on cardiovagal baroreflex function in humans. Advancing age decreases baroreflex sensitivity even in the healthy population [33,34,35,36]. Previous investigations showed that the relative rate of decline in cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity with normal aging was similar between the sexes despite a greater baroreflex sensitivity in men compared with women (Fig. 4) [37]. Similar to our prior work in the healthy young population [4], we also found that cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity was greater in older men compared with older women during acute (rapid) hypertension, but it was not different between the sexes during acute hypotension [38]. In both men and women, cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity was found to be negatively correlated with diastolic or systolic blood pressure in young or middle-aged and older individuals, respectively [37]. On the other hand, cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity was positively correlated with peak oxygen uptake (an indication of physical fitness) and high-frequency power of heart rate variability (an indication of cardiovagal activity) in all individuals [37]. Of note, the positive correlation between baroreflex sensitivity and physical fitness reported by Laitinen et al. [35] could have been confounded by aging per se, as both young and older individuals were included in the analysis. However, previous longitudinal studies demonstrated that endurance exercise training increased both peak oxygen uptake and cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity in healthy young individuals [39]. These results indicate a potential link between physical fitness and baroreflex sensitivity independent of age.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Relationship between cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity and age in men (a) and in women (b). Regression slopes and 95% confidence intervals are shown. BRS baroreflex sensitivity. Reproduced with permission from Laitinen et al. [37]

The mechanisms underlying age- and sex-specific differences in cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity may be multifactorial. Numerous studies have shown that aging is associated with increased arterial stiffness in humans, especially in women and as a result, the stimulation of baroreceptors is decreased (arterial stiffness-induced decrease in the distortion of baroreceptors), which leads to a lower cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity in older women than older men [37]. It is also possible that normal aging reduces baroreflex sensitivity through changes in peripheral afferent and/or efferent pathways, central neural control of the baroreflex system, and sinus node function [37], while these changes may be more dramatic in women compared with men. Additionally, changes in autonomic function with age (e.g., increased sympathetic activity and decreased vagal tone, especially in older women) may also contribute to the sex-specific reduction in cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity with aging. Huikuri et al. [40] previously found that baroreflex sensitivity was greater in postmenopausal women taking hormonal replacement therapy than in those who did not. These results suggest that sex hormones, in particular, estrogen may play a role in the age-related decrease in cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity in older women. Interestingly, in premenopausal women, fluctuations of female sex hormones during the menstrual cycle do not impact cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity [4, 18]. The discrepancy between young and old women may be explained, in part, by differences in the source of hormones, namely, endogenous versus exogenous estrogen.

Sex differences in baroreflex sensitivity in hypertension and type 2 diabetes

The evidence that human hypertension is associated with impairment of cardiovagal baroreflex function is strong. Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure were found to be correlated significantly with cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity [37]. Increased arterial stiffness, augmented sympathetic activity and decreased vagal tone may be responsible for the reduction in cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity in patients with hypertension [41,42,43,44,45]. There is also evidence showing that impaired baroreflex function is not only a consequence of hypertension but also may contribute to the development of hypertension [44,45,46]. For instance, it was found in patients with essential hypertension, of all variables investigated, family history of hypertension was the strongest unique baroreflex sensitivity predictor [46]. These results suggest that the impairment in cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity in hypertension may be an important hereditary component in the pathogenesis of essential hypertension. Consistent with these previous observations [46], recent research showed that healthy young women with a positive family history of hypertension had reduced cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity determined by the Valsalva maneuver (phase IV) when blood pressure was rapidly increased [47]. This may be one possible mechanism for the increased risk of hypertension in people who have a positive family history.

In middle-aged patients with uncontrolled or un-medicated hypertension (mean age about 50 years old), cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity was reduced and the magnitude of reduction was significantly greater in female patients than in male patients [48]. Whether this is also true in older patients with hypertension remains to be determined. This is a clinically important issue to address because an increase in the prevalence and morbidity rate of hypertension with aging is higher in women than men [9, 10]. Furthermore, a depressed cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity predicts cardiovascular events, particularly in female patients [49].

Research in the Japanese population demonstrated that female patients with type 2 diabetes had lower cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity compared to male patients [49]. This finding may explain, at least in part, why diabetic women have a significantly greater rate of ischemic heart disease mortality than diabetic men [50, 51]. Taken together, these studies suggest that type II diabetes, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease attenuate cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity differently in men versus women, though the underlying mechanisms remain unknown.

Sympathetic baroreflex function

Sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity in healthy young men and women

Tank et al. [13] previously reported that the baroreflex curve was shifted toward lower systolic blood pressure values in young women (indicating a resetting of the sympathetic baroreflex), and at given systolic blood pressure, MSNA tended to be lower in women than in similarly aged men. However, there was no difference in sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity between the sexes [13, 52]. Consistent with these observations, we also found that sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity was similar in healthy young men and women [4]. In our study, we used diastolic pressure rather than systolic pressure as an input stimulus or an independent variable for MSNA, since it has been demonstrated that when, for each cardiac cycle, the occurrence of a sympathetic burst is correlated with different blood pressure parameters there is regularly a close negative correlation to diastolic pressure, a low correlation to systolic, and an intermediary negative correlation to mean arterial pressure [53].

We also found that baroreflex sensitivity assessed by the Valsalva maneuver (Fig. 5), as well as with the spontaneous breathing method was not significantly different between the early follicular phase and the mid-luteal phase in young women [4]. These results are inconsistent with the study by Minson et al. [18], showing that sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity measured by the modified Oxford method was greater in the mid-luteal phase than the early follicular phase in young women. The discrepancies between these studies may be attributed to the different methods used to evaluate sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity (i.e., pharmacologic versus non-pharmacologic approach) and/or variable surges in estrogen and progesterone (i.e., the ratio of the change in estrogen relative to the change in progesterone at different time point during the menstrual cycle) [54]. On the other hand, in response to orthostatic challenges, sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity was found to increase in all individuals and the increment was similar between healthy young men and women during different menstrual phases [4, 55].

Fig. 5
figure 5

Effects of sex and the menstrual cycle on sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity in healthy young individuals. a Sympathetic BRS assessed during the Valsalva maneuver. b The sensitivity was not different between the sexes and menstrual phases. Values are mean ± SE. BRS baroreflex sensitivity, EFP the early follicular phase, MLP the mid-luteal phase. Reproduced with permission from Fu et al. [4]

Age and sex dependency of sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity

The sympathetic baroreflex contains mechanical and neural components, and all together is considered integrated baroreflex [38]. Studinger et al. [56] reported that normal aging reduced mechanical component of sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity but did not change neural component and integrated baroreflex. These findings imply the possibility that aging may cause impairment in sympathetic baroreflex function. Indeed, it was found that sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity during falling blood pressure decreased with age despite no change during increasing blood pressure [50]. In contrast, previous research showed that sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity remained unchanged with advancing age in healthy individuals, although the line relating MSNA and diastolic blood pressure was shifted in parallel to the right (resetting) and the operating point of the baroreflex curve was shifted to the right-upward with age [34]. Therefore, the effect of aging on sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity remains controversial.

Among healthy older individuals, sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity was reported to be similar between the sexes [56, 57]. However, we found that older women had lower sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity compared with older men (Fig. 6) [38]. One main reason behind these contradictory findings is the age difference; participants in our study were 10 years older than those in previous studies (i.e., mean age about 70 versus 60 years old) [56, 57]. We also found that sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity was correlated with β-stiffness of carotid artery but not aorta in both sexes, while older women had greater carotid and aortic stiffness compared with older men [38]. The blunted sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity in older women may predispose them to an increased prevalence of hypertension and cardiovascular disease.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Adapted and reproduced with permission from Okada et al. [38]

Sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity calculated from burst incidence (a) and total muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA; b) during spontaneous breathing in the supine position in older men and older women. Values are mean ± SE. BRS baroreflex sensitivity

Sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity in hypertension and cardiovascular disease

Blunted sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity is linked with many pathological conditions. For instance, it was found that patients with hypertension, especially those with resistant hypertension had significantly lower sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity compared with age-matched healthy normotensive individuals [58]. In addition, recent studies showed that heart failure with preserved, midrange and reduced ejection fraction was associated with marked sympathetic overactivity, which was attributed to baroreflex dysfunction and decreased baroreflex sensitivity [59]. On the other hand, baroreflex activation therapy by implanting a small device to electrically stimulate baroreceptors in the carotid sinus region was reported not only to improve hemodynamic and clinical profile but also to exert profound sympathoinhibitory effects in patients with heart failure, allowing an almost complete restoration of physiological levels of the sympathetic neural function [60]. Despite the fact that the prevalence of hypertension and cardiovascular disease is greater in women than in men as they age [9, 10], sex-specific differences in sympathetic baroreflex function in pathological conditions have never been investigated in previous studies. It is not known whether the magnitude of reduction in sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity is similar or different in male and female patients with hypertension and cardiovascular disease.

Conclusions

Compared to men, women have lower cardiovagal baroreflx sensitivity during a rapid hypertensive (but not hypotensive) stimulus, which may be attributed to sex differences in vagal activation to the heart in response to baroreceptor loading. Cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity decreases with age presumably due to increased large-artery (barosensory) stiffness, as well as changes in afferent/efferent pathways, central neural control, and sinus node function; the rate of decline is similar between the sexes. Reduced cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity is linked to hypertension and type II diabetes, whereas the magnitude of reduction in sensitivity is greater in female than male patients. Although sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity is similar between healthy young men and women, it is lower in older women compared to older men. Blunted sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity is associated with hypertension and cardiovascular disease. However, whether sex differences exist in sympathetic baroreflex sensitivity in pathology needs to be determined.