Decomposition: population ageing at a sub-national level using Tasmania, Australia as a case study

Original Research

Abstract

While population ageing is considered a ‘major concern’ by over half the governments worldwide according to the UN and ‘the most important population issue for the ensuing two decades’ by a 2012 survey of leading demographers, research into population ageing and its causes at a sub-national level has only emerged more recently. This paper introduces a model for identifying the factors influencing the change in the mean age of a population. Through decomposition the model identifies how, and to what extent, each component of demographic change (fertility, mortality, overseas migration and interstate migration) contributes to the overall change in the mean age of the population over a given period. The paper uses the State of Tasmania, Australia to quantify, for the first time, the difference between national and sub-national population ageing. It finds that from 2005 to 2015, Tasmania’s predicted mean age increased by an average of 0.222 years per annum compared with 0.108 years per annum for Australia. This differential of 0.114 years is largely explained by the ageing effect of interstate migration, averaging 0.073 years per annum, which is not relevant at a national level. The paper confirms that as regional differences between fertility and mortality levels within a nation are usually small, it is migration which is predominantly responsible for different changes in the mean age of the population between national and sub-national levels.

Keywords

Decomposition Population ageing Demographic change Sub-national population ageing Internal migration 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Sincere thanks and gratitude go to Professor Martin Bell and Dr Tom Wilson for their invaluable comments and support of this paper as well as the extensive feedback provided by two anonymous reviewers.

References

  1. Atkins, M. T., & Tonts, M. (2016). Exploring cities through a population ageing matrix: A spatial and temporal analysis of older adult population trends in Perth, Australia. Australian Geographer, 47(1), 65–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2008). Population projections, Australia, 2006 to 2101. Canberra: ABS.Google Scholar
  3. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2013). Population projections, Australia, 2012 (base) to 2101. Canberra: ABS.Google Scholar
  4. Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2016). Australian Demographic Statistics, Jun 2016. Population by age and sex tables. Canberra: ABS.Google Scholar
  5. Blake, S. (2009). Subnational patterns of population ageing. Population trends (Vol. Summer 2009). UK: Office for National Statistics.Google Scholar
  6. Bucher, H., & Mai, R. (2005). Depopulation and its consequences for the regions of Europe. DG IIIsocial cohesion. Brussels.Google Scholar
  7. Carmichael, G. A. (2016). Fundamentals of demographic analysis: Concepts, measures and methods (Vol. 38, The Springer Series on Demographic methods and population analysis). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  8. Churchill, B., Denny, L., & Jackson, N. (2014). Thank god, you’re here: The coming generation and the role they will play in future-proofing Australia from the challenges of population ageing. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 49(3), 373–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Commonwealth of Australia (2002). Intergenerational report 2002-03: Budget paper no. 5. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  10. Commonwealth of Australia. (2007). Intergenerational report 2007. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  11. Commonwealth of Australia. (2010). Intergenerational report 2010: Australia to 2050: Future Challenges. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  12. Commonwealth of Australia (2015). 2015 Intergenerational report Australia in 2055. (Vol. 12). CanberraGoogle Scholar
  13. Denny, L. (2015). Tasmania’s population challenge: 650,000 by 2050. Tasmania: Background Issues Paper.Google Scholar
  14. Edmonston, B. (2009). Canadian provincial population growth: Fertility, migration, and age structure effects. Canadian Studies in Population, 36(1–2), 111–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haartsen, T., & Venhorst, V. (2010). Planning for decline: Anticipating on population decline in the Netherlands. Tijdschrift Voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 101(2), 218–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hugo, G., Harris, K., Bell, M., Spoehr, J., & Coffee, N. (2000). ‘Bringing them back home’: Factors influencing interstate migration to and from South Australia. Migration, 1991, 96.Google Scholar
  17. Jackson, N. (2014). Sub-national depopulation in search of a theory-towards a diagnostic framework. New Zealand Population Review, 40, 3.Google Scholar
  18. Jackson, N., & Kippen, R. (2001). Whither Tasmania? A note on Tasmania’s population problem. People and Place, 9(1), 27–37.Google Scholar
  19. Jackson, N., & Thompson, B. (2002). Population ageing and the ABC of educational demand. A focus on Tasmania and South Australia. People and Place, 10(3), 11–22.Google Scholar
  20. Jackson, N., & Wilde, P. (2010). Migration trends in Tasmania. Demographic Change Advisory Council.Google Scholar
  21. Káčerová, M., Ondačková, J., & Mládek, J. (2013). Contribution of population processes to population ageing: A comparison of the Czech and Slovak Republics. Acta Universitatis Palackianae Olomucensis-Geographica, 44(1), 27–43.Google Scholar
  22. Lutz, W., Sanderson, W., & Scherbov, S. (2008). Global and regional population ageing: How certain are we of its dimensions? Journal of Population Ageing, 1(1), 75–97.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12062-009-9005-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Notestein, F. (1950). The Population of the world in the year 2000. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 45(251), 335–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. O’Brien, E. (2015). Planning for population ageing: Implications of local demographic, spatial and fiscal differences. International Planning Studies, 1–12.Google Scholar
  25. Poulain, M. (1989). Interactions between population ageing and internal migration. ACTA Demographica, 9(3), 326–336.Google Scholar
  26. Preston, S. H., Himes, C., & Eggers, M. (1989). Demographic conditions responsible for population aging. Demography, 26(4), 691–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rowland, D. (2003). Demographic methods and concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Siddiq, F., & Babins, S. (2013). Trends in population growth: Inequality across subnational jurisdictions in Canada. Canadian Public Policy, 39(Supplement 1), S41–S64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smailes, P., Griffin, T., & Argent, N. (2014). Demographic change, differential ageing, and public policy in rural and regional Australia: A three-state case study. Geographical Research, 52(3), 229–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. South Australian Government (2004). Prosperity through people: A population policy for South Australia. Adelaide.Google Scholar
  31. Tasmanian Government. (2015). Population growth strategy: Growing Tasmania’s population to 650 000 by 2050. Tasmania: Department of State Growth.Google Scholar
  32. United Nations. (2013a). World population ageing 2013. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division.Google Scholar
  33. United Nations. (2013b). World population policies 2013. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division.Google Scholar
  34. Van Dalen, H. P., & Henkens, K. (2012). What’s on a demographer’s mind? A world-wide survey. Demographic Research, 26, 363–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yusuf, F., Martins, J. M., & Swanson, D. A. (2014). Methods of demographic analysis. Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for the Study of Social ChangeUniversity of TasmaniaHobartAustralia

Personalised recommendations