Skip to main content
Log in

Anglers’ Perceptions and Fish Consumption Risks in the Lower Tisza River Basin

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Exposure and Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study identifies risk perception and actual health risks from exposure to metals in fish from the Tisza River Basin of central Europe. Mining in the region has chronically introduced metals; however, two major mine-tailings spill in 2000 contributed an estimated 240,000 m3 of wastewater and tailings contaminated with cyanide and metals to the system. In 2013 and 2014, water and fish (N = 99) collected from the lower Tisza River Basin were analyzed for cadmium, copper, lead, nickel, and zinc. Concurrently, surveys (N = 45) collected near sampling sites assessed fish-consumption patterns and risk perception. Metals in water exceeded regulatory criteria at multiple sites; however, metals are not bioaccumulating to a degree of undue concern in fish as bioaccumulation factors were below 1. Average concentrations of metals in fish fillets (µg g−1 wet weight) in decreasing order were zinc (8.8) > copper (0.14) > nickel (0.06) > lead (0.02) > cadmium (0.004). Fillets were within European Food Safety Authority recommendations; however, the Target Hazard Quotient for lead was elevated at 1.5 for average consumers and 3.5 for people who consume fish twice weekly. The majority of survey participants were unconcerned with local fish consumption (87 %), citing the “clean” appearance of fishing locations. Participants also reported relatively low fish consumption, with most (76 %) eating basin fish once a week or less. While our study indicates fish are generally safe for human consumption, waters are polluted, suggesting that local fishing populations may be at risk from unseen pollutants and highlighting the need for monitoring and notification systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alipour H, Pourkhabbaz A, Hassanpour M (2015) Estimation of potential health risks for some metallic elements by consumption of fish. Water Qual Expo Health 7(2):179–185

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • APHA (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 21st edn. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Federation, Baltimore, MD

  • Bianco PG (1998) Diversity of Barbinae fishes in southern Europe with description of a new genus and a new species (Cyprinidae). Ital J Zool 65:125–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boischio AAP, Henshel D (2000) Fish consumption, fish lore, and mercury pollution—risk communication for the Madeira river people. Environ Res 84:108–126. doi:10.1006/enrs.2000.4035

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brodberg R, Klasing S (2003) Evaluation of potential health effects of eating fish from Black Butte reservoir (Glenn and Tahama counties): guidelines for sport fish consumption. Pesticide and Environmental Toxicology Section, Office of Environmental Protection Agency, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger J, Gochfeld M (2008) Knowledge about fish consumption advisories: a risk communication failure within a university population. Sci Total Environ 390:346–354. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.10.016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cardwell RD, DeForest DK, Brix KV, Adams WJ (2013) Do Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn Biomagnify in Aquatic Ecosystems? In: Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology, vol 226. Springer, New York, pp 101–122

  • Chess C, Burger J, McDermott MH (2005) Speaking like a state: environmental justice and fish consumption advisories. Soc Natur Resour 18:267–278. doi:10.1080/08941920590908132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csányi B (2002) Joint Danube survey: investigation of the Tisza River and its tributaries. International Commission for the protection of the Danube River

  • Djedjibegovic J, Larssen T, Skrbo A, Marjanović A, Sober M (2012) Contents of cadmium, copper, mercury and lead in fish from the Neretva river (Bosnia and Herzegovina) determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Food Chem 131:469–476. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.09.009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Erős T, Takács P, Czeglédi I, Sály P, Specziár A (2015) Taxonomic-and trait-based recolonization dynamics of a riverine fish assemblage following a large-scale human-mediated disturbance: the red mud disaster in Hungary. Hydrobiologia 758:31–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Food Safety Authority (2009) Cadmium in food- scientific opinion of the panel on contaminants in the food chain. EFSA J 7:1831. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2009.980

    Google Scholar 

  • European Food Safety Authority (2010a) Scientific opinion on lead in food. EFSA J 8:1570. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Food Safety Authority (2010b) Scientific Opinion on the safety evaluation of the substance, copper hydroxide phosphate, CAS No. 12158-74-6, for use in food contact materials. EFSA J 8:1838

  • European Food Safety Authority (2012) Cadmium dietary exposure in the European population. EFSA J 10:2251

    Google Scholar 

  • European Food Safety Authority (2014) Scientific opinion on dietary reference values for zinc. EFSA J 12:3844. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Food Safety Authority (2015a) Scientific opinion on dietary reference values for copper. EFSA J 13:4253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Food Safety Authority (2015b) Scientific opinion on the risks to public health related to the presence of nickel in food and drinking water. EFSA J 13:4002. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4002

    Google Scholar 

  • European Food Safety Authority (2015c) Statement on the benefits of fish/seafood consumption compared to the risks of methylmercury in fish/seafood. EFSA J 13:3982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO/WHO (2002) General standards for contaminants and toxins in food. Schedule 1 maximum and guideline levels for contaminants and toxins in food. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/World Health Organization- Codex Alimentarius Commission

  • Fleit E, Lakatos G (2003) Accumulative heavy metal patterns in the sediment and biotic compartments of the Tisza watershed. Toxicol Lett 140:323–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frewer LJ (2012) Risk perception, communication and food safety. In: Alpas H, Smith M, Kulmyrzaev A (eds) Strategies for achieving food security in Central Asia. NATO science for peace and security series C: environmental security. Springe, Dordrecht, pp 123–131

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Froese R, Pauly D (2016) FishBase. www.fishbase.org

  • Gajin S, Gantar M, Matavulj M, Obrecht Z, Erbeznik M (1989) Dominant bacterioflora in the water of the River Tisa and the Mrtva Tisa(Yugoslavia). Tiscia TSCAB 8:23

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvey T, Barlund K, Mara L, Marinov E, Morvay K, Verstrynge J-F, Weller P (2000) Report of the international task force for assessing the Baia Mare accident. Baia Mare Task Force

  • Grubbs FE, Beck G (1972) Extension of sample sizes and percentage points for significance tests of outlying observations. Technometrics 14:847–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guida RJ, Swanson TL, Remo JWF, Kiss T (2015) Strategic floodplain reconnection for the lower Tisza River, Hungary: opportunities for flood-height reduction and floodplain-wetland reconnection. J Hydrol 521:274–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallman TA, Brooks ML (2015a) The deal with diel: temperature fluctuations, asymmetrical warming, and ubiquitous metals contaminants. Environ Pollut 206:88–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hallman TA, Brooks ML (2015b) Metals-mediated climate susceptibility in a warming world: larval and latent effects on a model amphibian. Environ Toxicol Chem 35:1872–1882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harka Á (2006) Changes in the fish fauna of the River Tisza. Tiscia 35:65–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Has-Schön E, Bogut I, Strelec I (2006) Heavy metal profile in five fish species included in human diet, domiciled in the end flow of River Neretva (Croatia). Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 50(4):545–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson-Edwards KA, Jamieson HE, Lottermoser BG (2011) Mine wastes: past, present, future. Elements 7:375–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IBM (2015) SPSS Statistics for Windows, 23.0 edn. IBM Corp., Armonk

  • ICPDR (2008) Analysis of the Tisza River Basin 2007: Initial step toward the Tisza River Basin management plan-2009. ICPDR, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • ICPDR (2011) Integrated Tisza River basin management plan. International Commission for Protection of the Danube River

  • Idriss A, Ahmad A (2015) Heavy metal concentrations in fishes from Juru River, estimation of the health risk. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 94:204–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Islam MS, Ahmed MK, Habibullah-Al-Mamun M (2015) Determination of heavy metals in fish and vegetables in Bangladesh and health implications human and ecological risk assessment. Int J 21:986–1006

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Katner A, Ogunyinka E, Sun M-H, Soileau S, Lavergne D, Dugas D, Suffet M (2011) Fishing, fish consumption and advisory awareness among Louisiana’s recreational fishers. Environ Res 111:1037–1045. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2011.08.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kiss J (1982) The algal flora and its seasonal aspects in the Körtvélyes and Mártély backwaters of the Tisza. Tiscia Szeged 17:51–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenig R (2000) Wildlife deaths are a grim wake-up call in Eastern Europe. Science 287:1737–1738. doi:10.1126/science.287.5459.1737

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kottelat M, Jr Freyhof (2007) Handbook of European freshwater fishes. Publications Kottelat, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraft C, von Tümpling W, Zachmann DW (2006) The effects of mining in Northern Romania on the heavy metal distribution in sediments of the rivers Szamos and Tisza (Hungary). Acta Hydrochim Hydrobiol 34:257–264. doi:10.1002/aheh.200400622

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • László F (2006) Lessons learned from the cyanide and heavy metal accidental water pollution in the Tisa River basin in the year 2000. Manag Intent Accid Water Pollut 5:43–50

  • Leary S et al (2013) AVMA guidelines for the euthanasia of animals: 2013th edn, American Veterinary Medical Association, Schaumburg

  • Lóczy D, Kis E, Schweitzer F (2009) Local flood hazards assessed from channel morphometry along the Tisza River in Hungary. Geomorphology 113:200–209. doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.03.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macklin M et al (2006) A geomorphological approach to the management of rivers contaminated by metal mining. Geomorphology 79:423–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGeer JC, Brix KV, Skeaff JM, DeForest DK, Brigham SI, Adams WJ, Green A (2003) Inverse relationship between bioconcentration factor and exposure concentration for metals: implications for hazard assessment of metals in the aquatic environment. Environ Toxicol Chem 22:1017–1037

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Medeiros RJ, dos Santos LMG, Freire AS, Santelli RE, Braga AMC, Krauss TM, Jacob SdC (2012) Determination of inorganic trace elements in edible marine fish from Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil. Food Control 23:535–541

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore JW, Ramamoorthy S (2012) Heavy metals in natural waters: applied monitoring and impact assessment. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Msangi S, Kobayashi M, Batka M, Vannuccini S, Dey M, Anderson J (2013) Fish to 2030: prospects for fisheries and aquaculture. World Bank Report

  • NVivo (2012) NVivo Qualitative data analysis software, 10 edn. QSR International Pty Ltd., London

  • Page LM, Burr BM (1997) A field guide to freshwater fishes: North America north of Mexico. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Pálfai I (2003) Oxbow-lakes in Hungary. Ministry of Environmental Control and Water Management, Budapest

    Google Scholar 

  • Prusha BA, Clements WH (2004) Landscape attributes, dissolved organic C, and metal bioaccumulation in aquatic macroinvertebrates (Arkansas River Basin, Colorado). J N Am Benthol Soc 23:327–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins CR, Bailey RM, Bond CE, Brooker JR, Lachner EA, Lea RN, Scott WB (1991) Common and scientific names of fishes from the United States and Canada. Am Fish Soc Spec Publ 20:183

    Google Scholar 

  • Rochet M-J et al (2008) Ecosystem trends: evidence for agreement between fishers’ perceptions and scientific information. ICES J Mar Sci 65:1057–1068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapozhnikova Y, Zubcov N, Hungerford S, Roy LA, Boicenco N, Zubcov E, Schlenk D (2005) Evaluation of pesticides and metals in fish of the Dniester River. Moldova Chemosphere 60:196–205

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz E et al (2005) Threat of mining and damage floods on River Tisza: between catastrophes and management. Arch für Hydrobiol Supplementband Large Rivers 16:129–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzenbach RP, Egli T, Hofstetter TB, Von Gunten U, Wehrli B (2010) Global water pollution and human health. Annu Rev Environ Resour 35:109–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer F (2009) Strategy or disaster: flood prevention related issues and actions in the Tisza River Basin. Hung Geogr Bull 58:3–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Team RC (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing, Ver. 3.1.1. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

  • Teddlie C, Yu F (2007) Mixed methods sampling a typology with examples. J Mixed Methods Res 1:77–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Tourangeau R (1984) Cognitive sciences and survey methods. Cognitive aspects of survey methodology: building a bridge between disciplines. National Academy Press, Washington, pp 73–100

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2000) Spill of liquid and suspended waste at the Aurul S.A. retreatment plant in Baia Mare. United Nations Environment Programme

  • USEPA (2016) Regional screening levels (RSLs): summary table. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

  • Verbeke W, Sioen I, Pieniak Z, Van Camp J, De Henauw S (2005) Consumer perception versus scientific evidence about health benefits and safety risks from fish consumption. Public Health Nutr 8:422–429. doi:10.1079/PHN2004697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X et al (2016) Seasonal variations and health risk of heavy metals in the muscle of crucian carp (Carassius auratus) cultured in subsidence ponds near Suzhou, East-Central China. Expo Health 8:79–91

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein ND (1999) What does it mean to understand a risk? Evaluating risk comprehension. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 25:15–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westphal L, Longoni M, LeBlanc C, Wali A (2008) Anglers’ appraisals of the risks of eating sport-caught fish from industrial areas: lessons from Chicago’s Calumet Region. Hum Ecol Rev 15:46–62

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The United States National Science Foundation Grant No. 0903510 funded this research. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The authors would like to thank the Southern Illinois University IGERT in Watershed Science and Policy and associated colleagues for the opportunity to conduct this work. We would also like to thank Dr. Béla Csányi and collaborators from the Danube Research Institute, colleagues from the University of Szeged including Balint Csendes, Dr. Nicolae Popa from the West University of Timişoara, friends and colleagues from the University of Novi Sad including Dr. Ivana Teodorovic and Milan Tomić, as well as colleagues from the Stara Tisa Park Prirode for their support in this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amanda C. Marshall.

Ethics declarations

Research Involving Human and Animal Rights

The fish used in this study were collected following ICPDR methods (Csányi 2002), and euthanized according to American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) guidelines. All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Ethical Approval

The survey used in this study was approved by and conducted according to the guidelines for human subjects research of Southern Illinois University Carbondale’s Human Subjects Committee. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of Southern Illinois University and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marshall, A.C., Paul, J.S., Brooks, M.L. et al. Anglers’ Perceptions and Fish Consumption Risks in the Lower Tisza River Basin. Expo Health 9, 197–211 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-016-0233-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12403-016-0233-7

Keywords

Navigation