Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Understanding Banking Time Implementation in a Sample of Preschool Children Who Display Early Disruptive Behaviors

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
School Mental Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of a warm and supportive relationship with their teacher is protective for preschool children, and particularly beneficial for children who display early disruptive behaviors. Banking Time is a dyadic, short-term intervention to improve the quality of teacher–child interactions between a teacher and a specific child, building a more positive teacher–child relationship. During Banking Time sessions, both teacher and child interact toward an activity chosen by the child. This study used variable- and person-centered approaches to examine Banking Time implementation in a sample of diverse preschool teachers (N = 120) and children (N = 319) randomly selected to participate in the intervention. Results indicated that the majority of teachers implemented expected practices (i.e., observe and narrate the child’s actions, allow the child to lead) as intended. However, although teachers were instructed to limit teacher-directed practices (i.e., ask questions, give praise, and use commands), teachers’ use of these practices was not as limited as ideally expected. Three different implementation patterns were evident: (1) High Fidelity, in which the teachers engaged in the child’s activity while ensuring that the child led the session; (2) Low Engaged, in which the child led the session, but the teacher was not engaged in the child’s activity; and (3) Teacher-Led, in which the teacher was engaged in the child’s activity but also directing the session instead of ensuring the child’s lead. These implementation patterns were linked to changes in the quality of teacher–child interactions. Implementation findings from this study can inform interventions to improve the quality of teacher–child interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Berkel, C., Mauricio, A. M., Schoenfelder, E., & Sandler, I. N. (2011). Putting the pieces together: An integrated model of program implementation. Prevention Science, 12, 23–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-010-0186-1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, D., & O’Connor, D. (2010). Behavioral risk, teacher–child relationships, and social skill development across middle childhood: A child-by-environment analysis of change. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 31, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2009.05.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierman, K. L., Coie, J., Dodge, K., Greenberg, M., Lochman, J., McMohan, R., et al. (2013). School outcomes of aggressive-disruptive children: Prediction from kindergarten risk factors and impact of the Fast Track Prevention Program. Aggressive Behavior, 39, 114–130. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21467.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Birch, S., & Ladd, G. (1997). The teacher–child relationship and children’s early school adjustment. Journal of School Psychology, 35, 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4405(96)00029-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Century, J., Rudnick, M., & Freeman, C. (2010). A framework for measuring fidelity of implementation: A foundation for shared language and accumulation of knowledge. American Journal of Evaluation, 31, 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214010366173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, L. M., & Lanza, S. T. (2010). Latent class and latent transition analysis: With applications in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, H. A. (2003). Conceptualizing the role and influence of student–teacher relationships on children’s social and cognitive development. Educational Psychologist, 38, 207–234. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3804_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domitrovich, C. E., & Greenberg, M. T. (2000). The study of implementation: Current findings from effective programs that prevent mental health disorders in school-aged children. Journal of Education and Psychological Consultation, 11, 193–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doumen, S., Verschueren, K., Buyse, E., Germeijs, V., Luyckx, K., & Soenens, B. (2008). Reciprocal relations between teacher–child conflict and aggressive behavior in kindergarten: A three-wave longitudinal study. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 37, 588–599. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374410802148079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downer, J. T., Booren, L. M., Hamre, B., Pianta, R. C., & Williford, A. (2011). The Individualized Classroom Assessment Scoring (inCLASS). Unpublished technical manual, Curry School of Education, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.

  • Downer, J. T., Booren, L. M., Lima, O. K., Luckner, A. E., & Pianta, R. C. (2010). The Individualized Classroom Assessment Scoring System (inCLASS): Preliminary reliability and validity of a system for observing preschoolers’ competence in classroom interactions. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2009.08.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, K. C., & Pianta, R. C. (2010). Banking time in head start: Early efficacy of an intervention designed to promote supportive teacher–child relationships. Early Education and Development, 21, 38–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409280802657449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driscoll, K. C., Wang, L., Mashburn, A. J., & Pianta, R. C. (2011). Fostering supportive teacher–child relationships: Intervention implementation in a state-funded preschool program. Early Education & Development, 22, 593–619. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2010.502015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DuPaul, G. J., Power, T. J., Anastopoulos, A. D., & Reid, R. (1998). ADHD Rating Scale—IV: Checklists, norms, and clinical interpretation. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durlak, J. A. (2015). Studying implementation is not easy but it is essential. Prevention Science, 16, 1123–1127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-015-0606-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 327–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamre, B. K. (2014). Teachers’ daily interactions with children: An essential ingredient in effective early childhood programs. Child Development Perspectives, 8, 223–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2001). Early teacher–child relationships and the trajectory of children’s school outcomes through eighth grade. Child Development, 72, 625–638. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00301.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield, B., & Williford, A. (2017). Cortisol patterns for young Children displaying disruptive behavior: Links to a teacher–child, relationship-focused intervention. Prevention Science, 18, 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-016-0693-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hommersen, P., Murray, C., Ohan, J. L., & Johnston, C. (2006). Oppositional defiant disorder rating scale preliminary evidence of reliability and validity. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 14, 118–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/10634266060140020201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. N. (2012). Teacher–student relationships and school adjustment: Progress and remaining challenges. Attachment & Human Development, 14, 319–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2012.672288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, N. (2013). Social and emotional learning: A critical appraisal. London: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. M., & Bouffard, S. M. (2012). Social and emotional learning in schools: From programs to strategies. SRCD Social Policy Report, 26, 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15, 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • LoCasale-Crouch, J., Williford, A., Whittaker, J., DeCoster, J., & Alamos, P. (2017). Does fidelity of implementation account for changes in teacher–child interactions in a randomized control trial of Banking Time? The Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, Early View. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2017.1329365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mashburn, A. J., Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., Downer, J. T., Barbarin, O. A., Bryant, D., et al. (2008). Measures of classroom quality in prekindergarten and children’s development of academic, language, and social skills. Child Development, 79(3), 732–749. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01154.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCall, R. B. (2009). Evidence-based programming in the context of practice and policy. SRCD Social Policy Report, 23, 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2015). Mplus user’s guide (1998-2015): Seventh edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

  • Pianta, R. C. (1999). Enhancing relationships between children and teachers. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pianta, R., & Hamre, B. (2001). Students, teachers, and relationship support (STARS). Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianta, R., LaParo, K., & Hamre, B. (2008). The Classroom Assessment Scoring System Pre-K Manual. Baltimore, MD: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianta, R. C., & Stuhlman, M. W. (2004). Teacher–child relationships and children’s success in the first years of school. School Psychology Review, 33, 444–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., & Grolnick, W. S. (1995). Autonomy, relatedness, and the self: Their relation to development and psychopathology. In D. Cicchetti & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Developmental psychopathology: Theory and methods (pp. 618–655). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabol, T. J., & Pianta, R. C. (2012). Recent trends in research on teacher–child relationships. Attachment and Human Development, 14, 213–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spilt, J. L., Koomen, H. M., Thijs, J. T., & van der Leij, A. (2012). Supporting teachers’ relationships with disruptive children: The potential of relationship-focused reflection. Attachment and Human Development, 14, 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616734.2012.672286.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stuhlman, M., & Pianta, R. C. (2001). Teachers’ narratives about their relationships with children: Associations with behavior in classrooms. School Psychology Review, 31, 148–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster-Stratton, C., Reid, M. J., & Hammond, M. (2001). Preventing conduct problems, promoting social competence: A parent and teacher training partnership in head start. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 30, 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15374424JCCP3003_2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, J. E. V., Williford, A. P., Carter, L. M., Vitiello, V. E., & Hatfield, B. E. (2017). Using a standardized task to assess the quality of teacher–child dyadic interactions in preschool. Early Education and Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2017.1387960.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williford, A. P., LoCasale-Crouch, J., Vick Whittaker, J. V., DeCoster, J., Hartz, K. A., Carter, L. M., et al. (2017). Changing teacher–child dyadic interactions to improve preschool children’s externalizing behaviors. Child Development, 88, 1544–1553. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12703.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williford, A. P., Vick Whittaker, J. E., Vitiello, V. E., & Downer, J. T. (2013). Children’s engagement within the preschool classroom and their development of self-regulation. Early Education & Development, 24(2), 162–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2011.628270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williford, A. P., Wolcott, C. S., Vick Whittaker, J. E., & LoCasale-Crouch, J. (2015). Program and teacher characteristics predicting the implementation of Banking Time with preschoolers who display disruptive behaviors. Prevention Science, 16(8), 1054–1063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-015-0544-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This manuscript was supported by a grant awarded to Amanda P. Williford by the Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education, through Grant R324A100215 respectively to the University of Virginia, and by a scholarship awarded to Pilar Alamos by the Advanced Human Capital Program, of the National Commission of Scientific and Technological Research (CONICYT), Chile. The opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not represent views of the US Department of Education. The authors wish to thank the generous programs and teachers who participated in this study. We are grateful to all project staff for their contributions to this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Advanced Study of Teaching and Learning, University of Virginia, PO Box 800784, Charlottesville, VA, 22908-0784, USA

    Pilar Alamos, Amanda P. Williford & Jennifer LoCasale-Crouch

Authors
  1. Pilar Alamos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amanda P. Williford
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jennifer LoCasale-Crouch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pilar Alamos.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alamos, P., Williford, A.P. & LoCasale-Crouch, J. Understanding Banking Time Implementation in a Sample of Preschool Children Who Display Early Disruptive Behaviors. School Mental Health 10, 437–449 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-018-9260-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12310-018-9260-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation