Abstract
The Free (or Open) Boundary Condition (FBC, OBC) was proposed by Papanastasiou et al. (A New Outflow Boundary Condition, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Fluids, 1992; 14:587–608) to handle truncated domains with synthetic boundaries where the outflow conditions are unknown. In the present work, implementation of the FBC has been extended to viscoelastic fluids governed by explicit differential constitutive equations. As such we consider here the Criminale-Ericksen-Filbey (CEF) model, which also reduces to the Second-Order Fluid (SOF) for constant material parameters. The Finite Element Method (FEM) is used to provide numerical results in simple Poiseuille flow where analytical solutions exist for checking purposes. Then previous numerical results are checked against Newtonian highly non-isothermal flows in a 4:1 contraction. Finally, the FBC is used with the CEF fluid with data corresponding to a Boger fluid of constant material properties. Particular emphasis is based on a non-zero second normal-stress difference, which seems responsible for earlier loss of convergence. The results with the FBC are in excellent agreement with those obtained from long domains, due to the highly convective nature of viscoelastic flows, for which the FBC seems most appropriate. The FBC formulation for fixed-point (Picard-type) iterations is given in some detail, and the differences with the Newton–Raphson formulation are highlighted regarding some computational aspects.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papanastasiou TC, Malamataris N, Ellwood K (1992) A new outflow boundary condition. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 14:587–608
Sani RL, Gresho PM (1994) Résumé and remarks on the open boundary condition minisymposium. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 18:983–1008
Gartling DK (1990) A test problem for outflow boundary conditions – flow over a backward-facing step. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 11:953–967
Leone JM Jr (1990) Open boundary condition symposium benchmark solution: stratified flow over a backward-facing step. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 11:969–984
Malamataris NA (1991) Computer-aided analysis of flow on moving and unbounded domains: Phase-change fronts and liquid leveling, Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Michigan
Malamataris NT, Papanastasiou TC (1991) Unsteady free surface flows on truncated domains. Ind Eng Chem Res 30:2211–2219
Griffiths DF (1997) The ‘no boundary condition’ outflow boundary condition. Int J Numer Meth Fluids 24:393–411
Renardy M (1997) Imposing no boundary condition at outflow: why does it work? Int J Numer Meth Fluids 24:413–417
Wang MMT, Sheu TWH (1997) Implementation of a free boundary condition to Navier-Stokes equations. Int J Numer Meth Heat Fluid Flow 7:95–111
Park SJ, Lee SJ (1999) On the use of the open boundary condition method in the numerical simulation of nonisothermal viscoelastic flow. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 87:197–214
Sunwoo KB, Park SJ, Lee SJ, Ahn KH, Lee SJ (2001) Numerical simulation of three-dimensional viscoelastic flow using the open boundary condition method in coextrusion process. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 99:125–144
Dimakopoulos Y, Tsamopoulos J (2004) On the gas-penetration in straight tubes completely filled with a viscoelastic fluid. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 117:117–139
Mitsoulis E, Malamataris NA (2011) Free (open) boundary condition (FBC) revisited: some experiences with viscous flow problems. Int J Numer Meth Fluids doi:10 1002/fld. 2608
Tanner RI (2000) Engineering rheology, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Tanner RI (1973) Die-swell reconsidered: some numerical solutions using a finite element program. Appl Polym Symp 20:201–208
Bird RB, Armstrong RC, Hassager O (1977) Dynamics of polymeric liquids, Vol. 1, fluid mechanics. Wiley, New York
Mitsoulis E, Vlachopoulos J, Mirza FA (1985) A numerical study of the effect of normal stresses and elongational viscosity on entry vortex growth and extrudate swell. Polym Eng Sci 25:677–689
Tanner RI (1966) Plane creeping flow of incompressible second order fluids. Phys Fluids 9:1246–1247
Mitsoulis E (1990) Numerical simulation of viscoelastic fluids. In: Cheremisinoff NP (ed) Encyclopedia of fluid mechanics, Vol. 9, polymer flow engineering. Gulf Publ. Co, Dallas, pp 649–704
Luo X-L, Mitsoulis E (1990) An efficient algorithm for strain history tracking in finite element computations of non-Newtonian fluids with integral constitutive equations. Int J Num Meth Fluids 11:1015–1031
Hannachi A, Mitsoulis E (1993) Sheet coextrusion of polymer solutions and melts: comparison between simulation and experiments. Adv Polym Tech 12:217–231
Huebner KM, Thornton EA (1982) The finite element method for engineers. Wiley, New York
Taylor C, Hughes TG (1981) Finite element programming of the navier-stokes equations. Pineridge Press, Swansea
Brooks AN, Hughes TJR (1982) Streamline-Upwind/Petrov-Galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Comp Meth Appl Mech Eng 32:199–259
Mitsoulis E, Wagner R, Heng FL (1988) Numerical simulation of wire-coating low-density polyethylene: theory and experiments. Polym Eng Sci 28:291–310
Payré G, de Broissia M, Bazinet J (1982) An ‘upwind’ finite element method via numerical integration. Int J Num Methods Eng 18:381–396
Barakos G, Mitsoulis E (1996) Non-isothermal viscoelastic simulations of extrusion through dies and prediction of the bending phenomenon. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 62:55–79
Sun J, Phan-Thien N, Tanner RI (1996) An adaptive viscoelastic stress splitting scheme and its applications: AVSS/SI and AVSS/SUPG. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 65:75–91
Luo X-L, Tanner RI (1987) A pseudo-time integral method for non-isothermal viscoelastic flows and its application to extrusion simulation. Rheol Acta 26:499–507
Meissner J (1975) Basic parameters, melt rheology, processing and end-use properties of three similar low density polyethylene samples. Pure Appl Chem 42:551–612
Nguyen H, Boger DV (1979) The kinematics and stability of die entry flows. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 5:353–368
Mitsoulis E (1986) The numerical simulation of Boger fluids: a viscometric approximation approach. Polym Eng Sci 26:1552–1562
Papanastasiou AC, Scriven LE, Macosco CW (1983) An integral constitutive equation for mixed flows: viscoelastic characterization. J Rheol 27:387–410
Luo X-L, Tanner RI (1988) Finite element simulation of long and short circular die extrusion experiments using integral models. Int J Num Meth Eng 25:9–22
Mitsoulis E (2001) Numerical simulation of entry flow of the IUPAC-LDPE melt. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 97:13–30
Acknowledgements
Financial assistance for one of the authors (EM) from the programme “PEBE 2009–2011” for basic research from NTUA is gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Our recent work [13] contains detailed derivations of the FEM formulation based on the “stiffness” matrix and “load” vector approach advocated by Huebner and Thornton [22]. Here we concentrate on the appropriate modifications to incorporate the FBC for differential viscoelastic models.
Mass and momentum discrete equations
Combining the discrete forms of the conservation equations of mass and momentum (including compressibility) into one matrix equation leads (in two-dimensional axisymmetric domains, r-z-θ corresponding to 1-2-3) to the following system of an element (stiffness) matrix [S], a vector of unknowns {x}, and a RHS (load) vector {F} for each element:
The entries for each term in the above system are given in detail in [13].
Contribution from the FBC
With the FBC, the extra terms along the outflow boundary are:
After the appropriate manipulations, the following matrix system is obtained:
where the components of the element (stiffness) matrix [S O] of Eq. A.1 are:
The above contributions of [S O] and [F O] must be added to the corresponding terms of Eq. A.1 for the elements having the FBC on one side.
For the contribution to the energy equation from the FBC (Eq. A.3), the matrix Eq. A.4 has a 4th unknown, \( \bar{T} \), and the stiffness element corresponding to this is simply:
It should be noted that when using the N-R iteration, Eqs. A.2 and A.3, as such, simply constitute the residuals, \( \{ \bar{R}\} \), from which the Jacobian \( [J] = [\partial \bar{R}/\partial \bar{x}] \) is derived, and the system is solved for the vector of unknowns \( \{ \Delta \bar{x}\} \), according to \( [J]\{ \Delta \bar{x}\} = - \{ \bar{R}\} \). Thus, it is not necessary to derive “stiffness” matrices and “load” vectors, as in the above.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mitsoulis, E., Malamataris, N.A. The free (open) boundary condition (FBC) in viscoelastic flow simulations. Int J Mater Form 6, 49–63 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-011-1071-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-011-1071-6