Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Optimal injection method for long-range computed tomography angiography

  • Published:
Radiological Physics and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We aimed to obtain high-stable computed tomography (CT) values for CT angiography (CTA). We verified the optimal use of the new protocol for long-range scanning using a contrast material flow phantom (Ichikawa, CT imaging theory. Igaku syoin Publishing, Tokyo, 8; Awai et al., Am J Roentgenol 186(2):379–385, 1) to obtain high-stable CT values (Fig. 2). We have developed a novel contrast injection method called the stable line imaging protocol (SLIP). This method involved a gradual reduction in the rate of administration of the contrast medium, which was accompanied by simultaneous administration of saline to compensate for the resultant decrease in the rate of administration. A saline flush was further added after the contrast medium injection. The rate of administration of the saline flush was the same as that of the initial contrast medium. We injected a contrast medium from the injector into the flow phantom. The time-enhancement curve (TEC) data were obtained five times by changing the injection method, and the average CT values were determined. The maximum simulation of the aortic peak enhancement of TEC was defined as pTEC. The time required to keep the CT value more than 80% of the pTEC was defined as the time period of contrast enhancement (p80). The pTEC of a single injection was 295.7 ± 5.3 HU, while that of SLIP was 296.5 ± 2.3 HU; the two values did not differ significantly. The p80 of a single injection was 19.1 ± 0.2 s, while that of SLIP was 23.2 ± 0.4 s; p80 of SLIP was 18% longer than that of the single injection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Awai K, Hatcho A, Nakayama Y, Kusunoki S, Liu D, Hatemura M, Yamashita Y, et al. Simulation of aortic peak enhancement on MDCT using a contrast material flow phantom: feasibility study. Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186(2):379–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bae KT. Intravenous contrast medium administration and scan timing at CT: considerations and approaches 1. Radiology. 2010;256(1):32–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Behrendt FF, Bruners P, Keil S, Plumhans C, Mahnken AH, Das M, Mühlenbruch G, et al. Effect of different saline chaser volumes and flow rates on intravascular contrast enhancement in CT using a circulation phantom. Eur J Radiol. 2010;73(3):688–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Behrendt FF, Jost G, Pietsch H, Keil S, Mottaghy FM, Günther RW, Mahnken AH. Computed tomography angiography: the effect of different chaser flow rates, volumes, and fluids on contrast enhancement. Invest Radiol. 2011;46(4):271–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cameron JR, Skofronick JG, Grant RM. Physics of the body. 2nd ed. Madison: Medical Physics; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fleischmann D. CT angiography: injection and acquisition technique. Radiol Clin N Am. 2010;48(2):237–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hudson DM. Top shelf human anatomy & physiology. J Weston Walch Publishing; 2006.

  8. Ichikawa T. CT imaging theory. Tokyo: Igaku syoin Publishing; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kim T, Murakami T, Takahashi S, Tsuda K, Tomoda K, Narumi Y, Nakamura H, et al. Effects of injection rates of contrast material on arterial phase hepatic CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;171(2):429–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lu JG, Lv B, Chen XB, Tang X, Jiang SL, Dai RP. What is the best contrast injection protocol for 64-row multi-detector cardiac computed tomography? Eur J Radiol. 2010;75(2):159–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Marin D, Nelson RC, Guerrisi A, Barnhart H, Schindera ST, Passariello R, Catalano C. 64-section multidetector CT of the upper abdomen: optimization of a saline chaser injection protocol for improved vascular and parenchymal contrast enhancement. Eur Radiol. 2011;21(9):1938–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Takeyama N, Kuroki K, Hayashi T, Sai S, Okabe N, Kinebuchi Y, Gokan T, et al. Cerebral CT angiography using a small volume of concentrated contrast material with a test injection method: optimal scan delay for quantitative and qualitative performance. Br J Radiol. 2012;85(1017):e748.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Tatsugami F, Matsuki M, Inada Y, Nakai G, Tanikake M, Yoshikawa S, Narabayashi I. Usefulness of saline pushing in reduction of contrast material dose in abdominal CT: evaluation of time–density curve for the aorta, portal vein and liver. Br J Radiol. 2007;80:231–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tomizawa N, Suzuki F, Akahane M, Torigoe R, Kiryu S, Ohtomo K. Effect of saline flush on enhancement of proximal and distal segments using 320-row coronary CT angiography. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82(8):1255–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yamaguchi I, Kidoya E, Suzuki M, Kimura H. Optimizing scan timing of hepatic arterial phase by physiologic pharmacokinetic analysis in bolus-tracking technique by multi-detector row computed tomography. Radiol Phys Technol. 2011;4(1):43–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Radiology, Departments of Medical Technology, Hokkaido University Hospital, Kita 14, Nishi 5, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8648, Japan

    Aogu Yamaguchi & Tsukasa Sasaki

Authors
  1. Aogu Yamaguchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tsukasa Sasaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aogu Yamaguchi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Human/animal rights

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yamaguchi, A., Sasaki, T. Optimal injection method for long-range computed tomography angiography. Radiol Phys Technol 10, 301–310 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-017-0402-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-017-0402-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation