Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

One extreme or the other or perhaps the golden mean? Issues of spatial resolution in face processing

  • Article
  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The findings of some of the key studies that have examined the contribution of different bands of spatial information, specified in terms of cycles per face, to face recognition, and identification are reviewed. Based on findings from studies of low-, high-, and band-pass filtering, it is concluded that neither low facial scales nor high facial scales are optimal. Instead, a center range of facial scales, approximately 8-16 cycles per face, appears to make the greatest contribution to the recognition process. A study of identification of band-pass filtered faces is reported that reinforces the view derived from the literature. This indicated that a band with a harmonic mean of 11.1 cycles per face provided the most efficient recognition, with speed and accuracy declining at lower and higher bands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bachmann, T. (1991). Identification of spatially quantised tachistoscopic images of faces: How many pixels does it take to carry identity? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 3, 85–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breitmeyer, B.G. (1975). Simple reaction times as a measure of the response properties of transient and sustained channels. Vision Research, 15,1411–1412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, V. (1988). Recognising faces. London: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, V., Hanna, E., Dench, N., Healey, P., and Burton, M. (1992). The importance of mass in line drawings of faces. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 619–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costen, N.P., Parker, D.M., and Craw, I.G. (1994). Spatial content and spatial quantisation effects in face recognition. Perception, 23, 129–146.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Costen, N.P., Parker, D.M., and Craw, I.G. (1996). Effects of high-pass and low-pass filtering on face identification. Perception and Psychophysics, 58,602–612.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, G.M., Ellis, H.D., and Shepherd, J.W. (1978). Face recognition accuracy as a function of mode of representation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 180–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiorentini, A., Maffei, L., and Sandini, G. (1983). The role of high spatial frequencies in face perception. Perception, 12, 195–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Galper, R.E. (1970). Recognition of faces in photographic negative. Psychonomic Science, 19, 207–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, L.D. (1973). The recognition of faces. Scientific American, 229,70–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, T., Morrone, M.C., and Burr, D.C. (1986). Recognition of positive and negative bandpass-filtered images. Perception, 15,596–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Toole, A.J., Millward, R.B., and Anderson, J.A. (1988). A physical system approach to recognition memory for spatially transformed faces. Neural Networks, 1, 179–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, D.M. (1980). Simple reaction times to the onset, offset and contrast reversal of sinusoidal grating stimuli. Perception and Psychophysics, 28, 365–368.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, D.M., Lishman, J.R., and Hughes, J. (1996). Role of coarse and fine spatial information in face and object processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22,1448–1466.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, D.M. and Salzen, E.A. (1977). Latency changes in the human visual evoked potential to sinusoidal gratings. Vision Research, 17, 1201–1204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, D.E. and Robinson, J.A. (1985). Visual communication at very low data-rates. Proceedings of the IEEE, 73,795–811.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peli, E., Young, G.M., Goldstein, R.B., and Trempe, C.L. (1991). The critical spatial frequency for face recognition. Noninvasive Assessment of the Visual System, Technical Digest, Vol. 1, Optical Society of America, Washington D.C., pp. 105–108.

  • Phillips, R.J. (1972). Why are faces hard to recognise in photographic negative? Perception and Psychophysics, 12,425–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riley, D. and Costall, A. (1980). Comment on “Recognition of faces in the presence of two-dimensional sinusoidal masks” by Tieger and Ganz. Perception and Psychophysics, 27,373–374.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sergent, J. (1986). Microgenesis in face perception. In: H.D. Ellis. M.A. Jeeves, F. Newcombe, and A. Young (eds.), Aspects of face processing (pp. 17–73). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Glasgow Caledonian University, USA

    Denis M. Parker

  2. University of Manchester, USA

    Nicholas P. Costen

Authors
  1. Denis M. Parker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nicholas P. Costen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parker, D.M., Costen, N.P. One extreme or the other or perhaps the golden mean? Issues of spatial resolution in face processing. Curr Psychol 18, 118–127 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-999-1021-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-999-1021-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation