Skip to main content
Log in

Segmented Paths? Mexican Generational Differences in the Transition to First-Time Homeownership in the United States

  • Published:
Journal of International Migration and Integration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Homeownership represents an important indicator of immigrant incorporation and assimilation. This study is a longitudinal analysis of the transition to first-time homeownership among a cohort of youths followed from 1979 to 2009 using the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY, 1979). In particular, I examine Mexican generational group differences in the transition to first-time homeownership over an observation period that spans 30 years while evaluating theories of straight-line and segmented assimilation. I find that Mexican homeownership rates do not increase in a linear fashion across generations, relative to native, non-Hispanic whites, even after controlling for various social, demographic, and economic characteristics. Furthermore, analyses limited to Mexicans reveal that first- and second-generation respondents exhibit more success in the transition to first-time homeownership than their third-generation counterparts. Contrary to observing linear gains in homeownership across generations, I find that Mexicans are experiencing segmented paths towards homeownership and achieving upward mobility across generations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The double cohort method identifies immigrants and native-born individuals of a specific age group (i.e., 25–34 years of age) in one observation period (i.e., 1990) and then identifies the group again (i.e., ages 35–44 years of age) by taking the years between observations into account in the second period (i.e., 2000). Although this method deals with duration and aging components, it cannot account for return migration and mortality which could influence observed changes among the cohort.

  2. Although the NLSY79 includes a measure of citizenship status at Wave 1 (1979), it does not ask the question again until 1990, which is also the last year respondents are asked about their citizenship. Because this study uses an observation window that extends to 2008, I am unable to use citizenship status as a time-varying variable in the analyses.

  3. An alternative specification of time would be to include a set of dummy variables for each observation period and omitting the first-time period. However, this approach would result in 20 dummy variables and decrease the overall statistical power of the analyses (Singer and Willet 2003).

References

  • Alba, R. D., & Logan, J. R. (1992). Assimilation and stratification in the homeownership patterns of racial and ethnic groups. International Migration Review., 26(4), 1314–1341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alba, R. D., & Nee, V. (2003). Remaking the American mainstream: assimilation and contemporary immigration. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alba, R., & Tariqul. (2009). The case of disappearing Mexican Americans: an ethnic identity mystery. Population Research and Policy Review., 28(2), 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Author's analysis of the (2015). American Community Survey.

  • Basolo, V. (2007). Examining the support for homeownership policy in U.S. cities: a political economy perspective. Housing Studies., 22(1), 99–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borjas, G. J. (2002). Homeownership in the immigrant population. Journal of Urban Economics., 52(3), 448–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, C. J. (2005). Racial gaps in the transition to first-time homeownership: the role of residential location. Journal of Urban Economics., 58(3), 537–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flippen, C. A. (2010). The spatial dynamics of stratification: metropolitan context, population redistribution, and black and Hispanic homeownership. Demography, 47(4), 845–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, M. M. (1961). Assimilation in America: theory and reality. Daedalus, 90, 262–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R., & White, M. (1997). Measuring the benefits of homeowning: effects on children. Journal of Urban Economics., 41(3), 444–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haan, M. (2007). The homeownership hierarchies of Canada and the United States: the housing patterns of white and non-white immigrants of the past thirty years. International Migration Review., 41(2), 433–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harder, V. S., Morrall, A. R., & Arkes, J. (2006). Marijuana use and depression among adults: testing for causal associations. Addiction, 101, 1463–1472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harkness, J., & Newman, S. J. (2002). Homeownership for the poor in distressed neighborhoods: does this make sense? Housing Policy Debate, 13(3), 597–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbert, C. E., & Belsky, E. S. (2008). The homeownership experience of low-income households: a review and synthesis of the literature. City, 10(2), 5–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochhar, R., & Cilluffo A.. (2017). “How wealth inequality has changed in the U.S. since the Great Recession, by race, ethnicity, and income.” Washington D.C.: Pew Research Center, November.

  • Krivo, L. J. (1986). Home ownership differences between hispanics and anglos in the United States. Social Problems, 33(4), 319–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, B. J. (2013). Are homeowners better citizens? Homeownership and community participation in the United States. Social Forces, 91(3), 929–954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, E. D. (2015). Hurdles or walls? Nativity, citizenship, legal status and Latino homeownership in Los Angeles. Social Science Research., 53, 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, E. D., & Akresh, I. R. (2008). Through the front door: the housing outcomes of lawful immigrants. International Migration Review., 42(1), 134–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell, E. D., & Marcelli, E. A. (2007). Buying into the American dream? Mexican immigrants, legal status, and homeownership in Los Angeles County. Social Science Quarterly., 88(1), 199–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menjivar, C. (2006). Liminal legality: Salvadoran and Guatemalan immigrants’ lives in the United States. American Journal of Sociology., 111(4), 999–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, C. H. (2006). Home-ownership and family formation. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 21(3), 281–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, D., & Lee, S. W. (1998). Immigrant trajectories into homeownership: a temporal analysis of residential assimilation. International Migration Review., 32(3), 593–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Association of Realtors. (2015). http://www.realtor.org/research-and-statistics

  • Oropesa, R. S., & Landale, N. S. (1997). In search of the new second generation: alternative strategies for identifying second generation children and understanding their acquisition of English. Sociological Perspectives., 40(3), 429–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz, V., & Telles, E. (2012). Racial identity and racial treatment of Mexican Americans. Race and Social Problems, 4, 41–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Painter, G., Gabriel, S., & Myers, D. (2001). Race, immigrant status, and tenure choice. Journal of Urban Economics., 49(1), 150–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J., & Myers, D. (2010). Intergenerational mobility in the post-1965 immigration era: estimates by an immigrant generation cohort method. Demography, 47(2), 369–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passel, J. S. (2011). Demography of immigrant youth: past, present, and future. The Future of Children, 21(1), 19–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passell, J., D’Vera, C., & Gonzalez-Barrera, A.. (2012). “Net migration from Mexico falls to zero—and perhaps less.” Washington D.C.: Pew Hispanic Center, April.

  • Perreira, K. M., Harris, K. M., & Lee, D. (2006). Making it in America: high school completion by immigrant and native youth. Demography, 43(3), 511–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A., & Rumbaut, R. (2001). Legacies: the story of the immigrant second generation. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A., & Zhou, M. (1993). The new second generation: segmented assimilation and its variants. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences., 530, 74–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohe, W. M., Van Zandt, S., & McCarthy, G. (2002). Home ownership and access to opportunity. Housing Studies, 17, 51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. L., & Turner, M. A. (2005). Housing discrimination in metropolitan America: explaining changes between 1989 and 2000. Social Problems, 52(2), 152–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rugh, J. S., & Massey, D. S. (2010). Racial segregation and the American foreclosure crisis. American Sociological Review, 75(5), 629–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumbaut, R. G. (2004). Ages, life stages, and generational cohorts: decomposing the immigrant first and second generations in the United States. International Migration Review, 38(3), 1160–1205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shlay, A. (2006). Low-income homeownership: American dream or delusion? Urban Studies, 43, 511–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J. B., & Willet, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal analysis: modeling changes and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Telles, E., & Ortiz, V.. (2008). Generations of exclusion: Mexican Americans, assimilation, and race. (Chapter 2 “Theoretical background and Chapter 3 “The Mexican American Study Project”) New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

  • Waters, M. C., & Jimenez, T. R. (2005). Assessing immigrant assimilation: new empirical and theoretical challenges. Annual Review of Sociology, 31, 105–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis A. Sánchez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sánchez, L.A. Segmented Paths? Mexican Generational Differences in the Transition to First-Time Homeownership in the United States. Int. Migration & Integration 19, 737–755 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-018-0560-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-018-0560-6

Keywords

Navigation