How Role Replaced Personality as a Major Category of Sociology

Article
  • 82 Downloads

Abstract

Try to imagine sociology being without the role concept. The thought experiment will strike us as impossible. And yet, through the early decades of the 20th century, remarkably few sociologists thought of social agents as incumbents of social roles and as performing roles in their day to day lives. This article addresses a set of related questions. How did sociologists manage without the concept social role? How did they describe the social agent and his agency? When and in what circumstances was the term social role initially formulated and when did it enter the vocabulary of social science? Ralph Linton’s The Study of Man (1936) is identified as the key text in this history of the concept social role, foreshadowed in writings of Robert Park, E. A. Burgess, and Kimball Young. Linton introduced his role idea in the midst of disciplinary change with boundaries between sociology and psychology (particularly social, and personal, psychology) being redrawn.

Keywords

Role Personality Social psychology Status Self 

References

  1. Allport, F. (1924). Social psychology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  2. Allport, G. (1937). Personality. New York: Henry Holt and Co..Google Scholar
  3. Allport, F., & Allport, G. (1921). Personality traits. Journal of Abnormal Psychology and Social Psychology, 16(1), 6–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Almog, O. (1998). The problem of social type. Electronic Journal of Sociology. https://www.sociology.org/content/vol003.004/almog.html.
  5. Baldwin, J. (1911). The individual and society or psychology and sociology. London: Rebman Limited.Google Scholar
  6. Barenbaum, N., & Winter, D. (2008). History of modern personality theory and research. In O. John, R. Robins, & L. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of Personality 3rd ed. (pp. 3-26). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bates, R. (1956). Position, role, and status. Social Forces, 34(4), 313–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Benedict, R. (1934). Patterns of culture. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  9. Bernard, L. (1926). Introduction to social psychology. New York: Henry Holt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Binet, A. (1896). Alterations of personality. New York: D. Appleton & Co..Google Scholar
  11. Bogardus, E. (1924). Fundamentals of social psychology. New York: Century.Google Scholar
  12. Brown, J. (1936). Psychology and the social order. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  13. Burgess, E. (1923). The study of the delinquent as a person. American Journal Sociology, XXVIII, 28(6), 657–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burgess, E. (1929). The family and the person. In E. Burgess (Ed.), Personality and the social group. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Burgess, E. (1930). Discussion. In C. Shaw (Ed.), The Jack-Roller (pp. 186–199). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Burgess, E. (1931). Family tradition and personality. In K. Young (Ed.), Social Attitudes (pp. 188–207). New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
  17. Burgess, E. (1939). The influence of Sigmund Freud upon sociology in the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 45(3), 356–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Burr, V. (2002). The person in social psychology. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  19. Collier, G., Minton, H., & Reynolds, G. (1991). Currents of thought in American social psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Cook, G. (1993). George Herbert Mead. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  21. Coser, L. (1971). Masters of sociological thought. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  22. Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Davis, K. (1948). Human society. New York: The Macmillan Co..Google Scholar
  24. Dewey, J. (1922). Human Nature and Conduct. New York: Henry Holt and company.Google Scholar
  25. DiRenzo, G. (1977). Socialization, personality, and social systems. In: Annual Review of Sociology., 3, 261–295 http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.so.03.080177.001401.Google Scholar
  26. Dunlap, K. (1919). Are there any instincts? Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 14, 307–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ellwood, C. (1925). The psychology of human society. New York: Appleton.Google Scholar
  28. Emmet, D. (1958). Function purpose and powers. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  29. Emmet, D. (1966). Rules, roles and relations. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  30. Eubank, E. (1931). The concepts of sociology. Boston: D. C. Heath.Google Scholar
  31. Faris, E. (1937). The social psychology of George Mead. American Journal of Sociology, 43(3), 391–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fine, W. (1979). Progressive evolutionism and American sociology, 1890–1920. Ann Arbor MI: UMI Research Press.Google Scholar
  33. Gergen, K. (2012). The social dimension of social psychology. In W. Stroebe & A. Krugianski (Eds.), Handbook of the history of social psychology (pp. 137–157). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  34. Gerth, H., & Mills, C. (1953). Character and social structure. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co..Google Scholar
  35. Giddings, F, (1901), Inductive sociology. London: Macmillan and Co.Google Scholar
  36. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday Anchor.Google Scholar
  37. Good, J. (2000). Disciplining social psychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 36(4), 383–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Greenwood, J. (2004). The disappearance of the social in American social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Heine, P. (2008). Personality in social theory. New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction.Google Scholar
  40. Hinkle, R. (1994). Developments in American sociological theory. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  41. Hughes, E. (1928). Personality types and the division of labor. American Journal of Sociology, 33(5), 754–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hughes, E. (1937). Institutional office and the person. American Journal of Sociology, 43(3), 404–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Irvine, J. (2002). Editor’s introduction. In E. Sapir The Psychology of culture: A course of lectures (pp. 1–22). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  44. James W (2001[1892]) Psychology: The Briefer Course. New York: Dover books.Google Scholar
  45. Klineberg, O. (1940). Social psychology. New York: Holt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Levine, R. (2001). Culture and personality studies, 1918-1960. Journal of Personality, 69(6), 803–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Levine, D., Carter, E., & Gorman, E. (1976). Simmel’s influence on American sociology 1. American Journal of Sociology, 81(4), 813–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Linton, R. (1936). The study of man. New York: D. Appleton-Century Company.Google Scholar
  49. Linton, R. (1945). The cultural background of personality. New York: D. Appleton-Century.Google Scholar
  50. Lombardo, G., & Foschi, R. (2003). The concept of personality in 19th-century French and 20th-century American psychology. History of Psychology, 6(2), 123–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lundberg, G. (1931-1932). The interests of the members of the American sociological society, 1930. American Journal of Sociology, 37 (3), 458–460.Google Scholar
  52. Lynd, R. (1939). Knowledge for what? Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Maine, H. (1906[1861]). Ancient Law. 10th ed. New York: Henry Holt and co..Google Scholar
  54. Mandelbaum, M. (1973). Societal facts. In A. Ryan (Ed.), The philosophy of social explanation (pp. 105–118). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Mandelbaum, M. (1987). Purpose and necessity in social theory. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Manson, W. (1986). Abraham Kardiner and the neo-Freudian alternative in culture and personality. In G. Stocking (Ed.), Malinowski, Benedict, rivers and others (pp. 72–94). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  57. McAdams, D. P. (1997). A conceptual history of personality psychology. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, and S. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of personality psychology (pp. 3–39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  58. McDougall, W. (1908). Introduction to social psychology. New York: John W Luce.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Mead, G. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  60. Mead, M. (1959). A new preface. In R. Benedict Patterns of Culture (pp. xiii-xvi). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
  61. Merton, R. (1940). Bureaucratic structure and personality. Social Forces, 18(4), 560–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Merton, R. (1957). The role-set: Problems in sociological theory. The British Journal of Sociology, 8(2), 106–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Morawski, J. (2012). The importance of history to social psychology. In W. Stroebe & A. Kruglanski (Eds.), Handbook of the history of social psychology (pp. 19–41). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  64. Moreno, J. (1934). Who shall survive? Washington, D.C.: Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing Co..Google Scholar
  65. Murphy, G., & Murphy, L. (1931). Experimental social psychology. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
  66. Murray, H. (1938). Explorations in personality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Murray, S. (1986). Edward Shapir in “the Chicago School of Sociology”. In W. Cowan, M. Foster, & K. Koerner (Eds.), New perspectives in language, culture and personality (pp. 241–291). Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Nadel, S. (1957). The theory of social structure. London: Cohen & West Ltd..Google Scholar
  69. Nicholson, I. (2003). Inventing personality. Washington: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  70. Oishi, S., Kesebir, S., & Snyder, B. (2009). Sociology: A lost connection in social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(4), 334–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Park, R. (1926). Behind our masks. The Survey, 1 may, 135-139.Google Scholar
  72. Park, R., & Burgess, E. (Eds.). (1921). Introduction to the science of sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  73. Parkovnick, S. (2000). Contextualizing Floyd Allport’s Social Psychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 36(4), 429–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Parsons, T. (1937). The structure of social action. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  75. Parsons, T. (1939). The professions and social structure. Social Forces, XVII (May), 457–467.Google Scholar
  76. Parsons, T. (1964a[1951]). The Social System. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  77. Parsons, T. (1964b). Social structure and personality. Glencoe: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  78. Parsons, T. (1968). Preface. In The Structure of Social Action, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  79. Parsons, T., & Shils, E. (1951). Values, motives, and Systems of Action. In T. Parsons & E. Shils (Eds.), Toward a general theory of action (pp. 47–243). Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Reuter, E. (1940). Some observations on the status of social psychology. American Journal of Sociology, 46(3), 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Role in Oxford English Dictionary Online. (September 2015). Oxford University Press. http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/166971?rskey=wlFwQO&result=1. Accessed 02 November 2015.
  82. Ross, E. (1908). Social psychology. New York: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
  83. Sapir, E. (2002). The Psychology of Culture: A Course of Lectures. Irvine J (ed.) 2nd ed. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  84. Sharp, L. (1968). Linton, Ralph. In: International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Encyclopedia.Com. <http://www.Encyclopedia.Com> accessed 19 Oct. 2015.
  85. Shaw, C. (1930). The Jack-Roller. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  86. Silver, D. (2007) Social type (Simmel). In Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. <http://www.blackwellreference.com/public/tocnode?id=g9781405124331_chunk_g978140512433125_ss1-320> accessed 9 May 2016.
  87. Smith, R. (1997). The Norton history of the human sciences. New York: Norton and Co..Google Scholar
  88. Sorokin, P. (1928). Contemporary sociological theories. New York: Harper and Brothers.Google Scholar
  89. Sorokin, P. (1947). Society, culture, and personality. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
  90. Stagner, R. (1937). Psychology of personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  91. Swingewood, A. (2000). A short history of sociological thought. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  92. Thomas, E., & Biddle, B. (1966). The nature and history of role theory. In B. Biddle & E. Thomas (Eds.), Role theory: Concepts and research (pp. 3–19). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  93. Thomas, W. and Znaniecki, F. (1958[1920]). The Polish Peasant in Europe and America vol. 2, New York: Dover publications.Google Scholar
  94. Tolman, E. (1923). The nature of instincts. Psychological Bulletin, 20, 200–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Turner, R. (1956). Role taking, role standpoint, and reference-group behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 61(4), 316–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Wepman, D. (2000). Moreno, Jacob L. American National Biography Online <http://www.anb.org/articles/12/12-02119.html> (accessed 3 June 2016).
  97. Young, K. (1930). Social psychology. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  98. Young, K. (1934). An introductory sociology. New York: American Book Company.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Arts-EducationDeakin UniversityGeelongAustralia

Personalised recommendations