Abstract
A well-organized sustainable risk management in an organization often generates environmental and economic advantages. Addressing “sustainability and risk” simultaneously, an organization is more capable of enduring challenges that produce environmental and operational stability in management. In an industrial organization, these primary areas of concern involve social responsibility and a focus on occupants’ health and well-being; both areas address environmental and climate change, with an end result of increasing competitiveness and profitability. The key challenge lies in exploring sustainable risks associated with the industry so that they are addressed strategically. This research work is one such attempt to find sustainable risks in the manufacturing sector. This research is the outcome of a case study conducted in three leading surgical cotton manufacturing companies in the southern part of India. A hybrid multi criteria decision making based fuzzy decision making trial and evaluation laboratory and analytic network process with preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluations (FDANP with PROMETHEE) methodologies is used to derive the results. The final outcome of this paper presents the identified critical sustainable risks from the case study, and also serves as a model for risk managers in manufacturing sectors. By identifying sustainable risks at an early stage, a company may avert the occurrence of undesirable incidents while, at the same time, may enhance their production capacity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Govindan K, Shankar K M and Kannan D 2016 Sustainable material selection for construction industry—A hybrid multi criteria decision making approach. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 55: 1274–1288
Patidar R, Agrawal S and Pratap S 2018 Development of novel strategies for designing sustainable Indian agri-fresh food supply chain. Sādhanā 43(10): 167
Orji I J and Wei S 2015 An innovative integration of fuzzy-logic and systems dynamics in sustainable supplier selection: A case on manufacturing industry. Comput. Ind. Eng. 88: 1–12
Mohammadhosseini H and Tahir M M 2018 Production of sustainable fibre-reinforced concrete incorporating waste chopped metallic film fibres and palm oil fuel ash. Sādhanā 43(10): 156
Bakhiyi B, Labrèche F and Zayed J 2014 The photovoltaic industry on the path to a sustainable future—Environmental and occupational health issues. Environ. Int. 73: 224–234
Brans J P, Vincke P and Mareschal B 1986 How to select and how to rank projects: The PROMETHEE method. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 24(2): 228–238
Baland J M, Bardhan P and Bowles S 2018 Inequality, Cooperation, and Environmental Sustainability Princeton University Press
Hussain N, Rigoni U and Orij R P 2018 Corporate governance and sustainability performance: Analysis of triple bottom line performance. J. Bus. Ethics 149(2): 411–432
Bennett E M, Cramer W, Begossi A, Cundill G, Díaz S, Egoh B N and Lebel L 2015 Linking biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human well-being: Three challenges for designing research for sustainability. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 14: 76–85
Haresankar J, Galappaththi U I K and Perera R L 2018 Factors Affecting the Sustainability of SME Industries: A Case Study in the Southern Province of Sri Lanka. In: International Conference on Production and Operations Management Society (POMS) 1–5
Sari E, Shaharoun A M, Ma’aram A and Yazid A M 2015 Sustainable maintenance performance measures: A pilot survey in Malaysian automotive companies. Procedia CIRP 26: 443–448
Helleno A L, de Moraes A J I and Simon A T 2017 Integrating sustainability indicators and Lean Manufacturing to assess manufacturing processes: Application case studies in Brazilian industry. J. Clean. Prod. 153: 405–416
Ahmadi H B, Kusi-Sarpong S and Rezaei J 2017 Assessing the social sustainability of supply chains using best worst method. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 126: 99–106
Missimer M, Robèrt K H and Broman G 2017 A strategic approach to social sustainability–Part 1: Exploring the social system. J. Clean. Prod. 140: 32–41
Mani V, Gunasekaran A and Delgado C 2018 Supply chain social sustainability: Standard adoption practices in Portuguese manufacturing firms. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 198: 149–164
Eizenberg E and Jabareen Y 2017 Social sustainability: A new conceptual framework. Sustainability 9(1): 68
Evans R, Brereton D and Joy J 2007 Risk assessment as a tool to explore sustainable development issues: Lessons from the Australian coal industry. Int. J. Risk Assess. Manag. 7(5): 607–619
Rigamonti L, Sterpi I and Grosso M 2016 Integrated municipal waste management systems: An indicator to assess their environmental and economic sustainability. Ecol. Indic. 60: 1–7
Zhong Y and Wu P 2015 Economic sustainability, environmental sustainability and constructability indicators related to concrete-and steel-projects. J. Clean. Prod. 108: 748–756
Cepolina S E 2012 Textile and clothing industry: An approach towards sustainable life cycle production. Int. J. Trade Econ. Finance 3(1): 7
Mujkic Z, Qorri A and Kraslawski A 2018 Sustainability and optimization of supply chains: A literature review. Oper. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 11(4): 186–199
Wong J K W and Zhou J 2015 Enhancing environmental sustainability over building life cycles through green BIM: A review. Autom. Constr. 57: 156–165
Pereira A M, Silva L J, Meisel L M, Lino C M and Pena A 2015 Environmental impact of pharmaceuticals from Portuguese wastewaters: Geographical and seasonal occurrence, removal and risk assessment. Environ. Res. 136: 108–119
Centobelli P, Cerchione R and Esposito E 2017 Developing the WH2 framework for environmental sustainability in logistics service providers: A taxonomy of green initiatives. J. Clean. Prod. 165: 1063–1077
Veleva V, Hart M, Greiner T and Crumbley C 2003 Indicators for measuring environmental sustainability: A case study of the pharmaceutical industry. Benchmarking An Int. J. 10(2): 107–119
Saaty T L and Ergu D 2015 When is a decision-making method trustworthy? Criteria for evaluating multi-criteria decision-making methods. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Making 14(06): 1171–1187
Kumar A, Sah B, Singh A R, Deng Y, He X, Kumar P and Bansal R C 2017 A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 69: 596–609
Mehregan M R, Hashemi S H, Karimi A and Merikhi B 2014 Analysis of interactions among sustainability supplier selection criteria using ISM and fuzzy DEMATEL. Int. J. Appl. Decis. Sci. 7(3): 270–294
Vinodh S and Girubha R J 2012 PROMETHEE based sustainable concept selection. Appl. Math. Modell. 36(11): 5301-5308
Xu P, Chan E H, Visscher H J, Zhang X and Wu Z 2015 Sustainable building energy efficiency retrofit for hotel buildings using EPC mechanism in China: analytic Network Process (ANP) approach. J. Clean. Prod. 107: 378–388
Valipour A, Sarvari H and Tamošaitiene J 2018 Risk assessment in PPP projects by applying different MCDM methods and comparative results analysis. Adm. Sci. 8(4): 80
Erdogan S A, Šaparauskas J and Turskis Z 2019 A multi-criteria decision-making model to choose the best option for sustainable construction management. Sustainability 11(8): 2239
Rostamzadeh R, Ghorabaee M K, Govindan K, Esmaeili A and Nobar H B K 2018 Evaluation of sustainable supply chain risk management using an integrated fuzzy TOPSIS-CRITIC approach. J. Clean. Prod. 175: 651–669
Arabsheybani A, Paydar M M and Safaei A S 2018 An integrated fuzzy MOORA method and FMEA technique for sustainable supplier selection considering quantity discounts and supplier’s risk. J. Clean. Prod. 190: 577–591
Asees Awan M and Ali Y 2019 Sustainable modeling in reverse logistics strategies using fuzzy MCDM: Case of China Pakistan Economic Corridor. Manag. Environ. Quality An Int. J.
Govindan K, Garg K, Gupta S and Jha P C 2016 Effect of product recovery and sustainability enhancing indicators on the location selection of manufacturing facility. Ecol. Ind. 67: 517–532
Jilcha K and Kitaw D 2017 Industrial occupational safety and health innovation for sustainable development. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 20(1): 372–380
Boileau P E 2016 Sustainability and prevention in occupational health and safety. Ind. Health 54(4): 293–295
Dooley K and Kartha S 2018 Land-based negative emissions: risks for climate mitigation and impacts on sustainable development. Int. Environ. Agreem. Politics Law Econ. 18(1): 79–98
Burke J J, Hoitash R and Hoitash U 2019 The heterogeneity of board-level sustainability committees and corporate social performance. J. Bus. Ethics 154(4): 1161–1186
Morgan E 2015 ‘Plan A’: analysing business model innovation for sustainable consumption in mass-market clothes retailing. J. Corp. Citizensh. (57): 73–98
Wright C F 2016 Leveraging reputational risk: Sustainable sourcing campaigns for improving labour standards in production networks. J. Bus. Ethics 137(1): 195–210
Zhao J, Liu X, Dong R and Shao G 2016 Landsenses ecology and ecological planning toward sustainable development
Diaz-Sarachaga J M, Jato-Espino D, Alsulami B and Castro-Fresno D 2016 Evaluation of existing sustainable infrastructure rating systems for their application in developing countries. Ecol. Indic. 71: 491–502
Dwivedi R, Bhowani B and Rao P K 2019 Development of an Integrated TOPSIS-Quality Function Deployment Model for Sustainability Assessment of Indian Banks. In Advanced Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Addressing Complex Sustainability Issues 267–285 IGI Global
Rodriguez Bolivar M P, Navarro Galera A, Alcaide Munoz L and Lopez Subires M D 2016 Risk factors and drivers of financial sustainability in local government: An empirical study. Local Gov. Stud. 42(1): 29–51
Pietrzak M B, Balcerzak A P, Gajdos A and Arendt Ł 2017 Entrepreneurial environment at regional level: the case of Polish path towards sustainable socio-economic development
Nyanga A, Kessler A and Tenge A 2016 Key socio-economic factors influencing sustainable land management investments in the West Usambara Highlands, Tanzania. Land Use Policy 51: 260–266
Awasthi A, Govindan K and Gold S 2018 Multi-tier sustainable global supplier selection using a fuzzy AHP-VIKOR based approach. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 195: 106–117
Virgili B B, Dolado J C, Lewis H G, Radtke J, Krag H, Revelin B, … and Metz M 2016 Risk to space sustainability from large constellations of satellites. Acta Astronaut. 126: 154–162
Pirnay J P, Blasdel B G, Bretaudeau L, Buckling A, Chanishvili N, Clark J R, … and Gabard J 2015 Quality and safety requirements for sustainable phage therapy products. Pharm. Res. 32(7): 2173–2179
Amui L B L, Jabbour C J C, de Sousa Jabbour A B L and Kannan D 2017 Sustainability as a dynamic organizational capability: a systematic review and a future agenda toward a sustainable transition. J. Clean. Prod. 142: 308–322
Manes-Rossi F, Tiron-Tudor A, Nicolò G and Zanellato G 2018 Ensuring more sustainable reporting in Europe using non-financial disclosure—De facto and de jure evidence. Sustainability 10(4): 1162
Kim S and Moon S K 2017 Sustainable platform identification for product family design. J. Clean. Prod. 143: 567–581
Poff N L, Brown C M, Grantham T E, Matthews J H, Palmer M A, Spence C M, … and Baeza A 2016 Sustainable water management under future uncertainty with eco-engineering decision scaling. Nat. Climate Change 6(1): 25
Sardar, S., Lee, Y., & Memon, M. (2016). A sustainable outsourcing strategy regarding cost, capacity flexibility, and risk in a textile supply chain. Sustainability, 8(3): 234
Montabon F, Pagell M and Wu Z 2016 Making sustainability sustainable. J. Supply Chain Manag. 52(2): 11–27
Vahidi F, Torabi S A and Ramezankhani M J 2018 Sustainable supplier selection and order allocation under operational and disruption risks. J. Clean. Prod. 174: 1351–1365
Pasmans F, Bogaerts S, Cunningham A A, Braeckman J, Hellebuyck T, Griffiths R A, … and Martel A 2017 Future of keeping pet reptiles and amphibians: towards integrating animal welfare, human health and environmental sustainability. Vet. Record 181(7)
Clonan A, Wilson P, Swift J A, Leibovici D G and Holdsworth M 2015 Red and processed meat consumption and purchasing behaviours and attitudes: impacts for human health, animal welfare and environmental sustainability. Public Health Nutr. 18(13): 2446–2456
Owusu P A and Asumadu-Sarkodie S 2016 A review of renewable energy sources, sustainability issues and climate change mitigation. Cogent Eng. 3(1): 1167990
Ren L and Luo C 2018 Questionnaire survey and DEMATEL method approach for analysis the influent factors of chinese scientific Principal Investigators. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 11(2): 848–855
Yue C and Yue Z L 2019 Measuring the satisfaction and loyalty for Chinese smartphone users: A simple symbol-based decision making method. Scientia Iranica 26(1): 589–604
Saaty T L 1996 Decision making with dependence and feedback. Anal. Netw. Process
Gardner L and Colwill J 2016 A framework for the resilient use of critical materials in sustainable manufacturing systems. Procedia CIRP 41: 282–288
Hallikainen P, Kivijärvi H and Tuominen M 2009 Supporting the module sequencing decision in the ERP implementation process—An application of the ANP method. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 119(2): 259–270
Yang Y P O, Shieh H M, Leu J D and Tzeng G H 2008 A novel hybrid MCDM model combined with DEMATEL and ANP with applications. Int. J. Oper. Res. 5(3): 160–168
Jassbi J, Mohamadnejad F and Nasrollahzadeh H 2011 A Fuzzy DEMATEL framework for modeling cause and effect relationships of strategy map. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(5): 5967–5973
Altuntas S, Selim H and Dereli T 2014 A fuzzy DEMATEL-based solution approach for facility layout problem: A case study. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 73(5–8): 749–771
Patil S K and Kant R 2014 A hybrid approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL and FMCDM to predict success of knowledge management adoption in supply chain. Appl. Soft Comput. 18: 126–135
Bhalaji R K A, Bathrinath S, Ponnambalam S G and Saravanasankar S 2019 A Fuzzy Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory approach to analyse risk factors related to environmental health and safety aspects in the healthcare industry. Sādhanā 44(3): 55
Wu C S, Lin C T and Lee C 2010 Optimal marketing strategy: A decision-making with ANP and TOPSIS. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 127(1): 190–196
Hsu C H, Wang F K and Tzeng G H 2012 The best vendor selection for conducting the recycled material based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 66: 95–111
Govindan K, Kannan D and Shankar M 2015 Evaluation of green manufacturing practices using a hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with PROMETHEE. Int. J. Prod. Res. 53(21): 6344–6371
Albadvi A, Chaharsooghi S K and Esfahanipour A 2007 Decision making in stock trading: An application of PROMETHEE. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 177(2): 673–683
Zhang X, Shen L, Tam V W and Lee W W Y 2012 Barriers to implement extensive green roof systems: a Hong Kong study. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 16(1): 314–319
Rusinko C 2007 Green manufacturing: an evaluation of environmentally sustainable manufacturing practices and their impact on competitive outcomes. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 54(3): 445–454
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix A
See Tables 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13.
Appendix B: Questionnaire
A questionnaire for the survey is provided to the industrial domain specialists to evaluate sustainable risk factors in the three surgical cotton manufacturing companies. The gathered data will be used for research purposes only. The replies from you will be kept confidential; it will not be shared on social media or with any third party. Your input is very much important and will assist in bringing about an optimistic outcome in this research. My heartfelt thanks to you for your time and effort on giving the rating.
Please tick [ ] any one rating that you feel suitable for each item. (Refer to Table 14)
Risk Factors | F1 | F2 | F3 |
---|---|---|---|
Social Factors (F1) | |||
Economical Factors (F2) | |||
Environmental Factors (F3) |
Please tick [ ] any one rating that you feel suitable for each item. (Refer to Table 14)
Sub-Factors | SF1 | SF2 | SF3 | SF4 | SF5 | SF6 | SF7 | SF8 | SF9 | SF10 | SF11 | SF12 | SF13 | SF14 | SF15 | SF16 | SF17 | SF18 | SF19 | SF20 | SF21 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SF1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
SF2 | |||||||||||||||||||||
SF3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
SF4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
SF5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
SF6 | |||||||||||||||||||||
SF7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
SF8 | |||||||||||||||||||||
SF9 | |||||||||||||||||||||
SF10 | |||||||||||||||||||||
SF11 | |||||||||||||||||||||
SF12 | |||||||||||||||||||||
SF13 | |||||||||||||||||||||
SF14 | |||||||||||||||||||||
SF15 | |||||||||||||||||||||
SF16 | |||||||||||||||||||||
SF17 | |||||||||||||||||||||
SF18 | |||||||||||||||||||||
SF19 | |||||||||||||||||||||
SF20 | |||||||||||||||||||||
SF21 |
Profile of the expert:
-
1.
Name: ……………………………………..
-
2.
Experience in surgical cotton manufacturing company (in years): ………..
-
3.
Name of organization: ………………………..
-
4.
Current position in organization:
-
5.
Mobile no & Email: …………………………..
Thank you very much for your time and effort in filling this questionnaire.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bhalaji, R.K.A., Bathrinath, S., Ponnambalam, S.G. et al. A soft computing methodology to analyze sustainable risks in surgical cotton manufacturing companies. Sādhanā 45, 68 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-020-1306-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-020-1306-7