Skip to main content
Log in

Cusp Overlap Technique: Should It Become the Standard Implantation Technique for Self-expanding Valves?

  • New Therapies for Cardiovascular Disease (AA Bavry and MR Massoomi, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Cardiology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Accurate imaging of the aortic root during valve implantation is crucial for proper prosthesis positioning during TAVR. The purpose of this review was to determine if routine use of the cusp-overlap view should be adopted for self-expanding valves.

Recent Findings

The use of the cusp-overlap view with the Evolut, Portico, ACURATE neo/neo2, and JenaValve systems is associated with lower post-procedural new permanent pacemaker implantation rates when compared with the standard 3-cusp view, presumably due to more precise valve implantation relative to the conduction system by the non-coronary cusp.

Summary

By elongating the left ventricular outflow tract and accentuating the right-non commissure in the center of the fluoroscopic view, the cusp-overlap technique allows operators to more precisely control the prosthesis implant depth during self-expanding valve deployment. While the early experience with this approach in Evolut TAVR has been promising, the results of larger studies with longer follow-up across multiple self-expanding systems are warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Otto CM, Nishimura RA, Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Erwin JP 3rd, Gentile F, et al. 2020 ACC/AHA guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2021;143(5):e72–227. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000923.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Carroll JD, Mack MJ, Vemulapalli S, Herrmann HC, Gleason TG, Hanzel G, et al. STS-ACC TVT Registry of transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(21):2492–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.09.595.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tchetche D, Van Mieghem NM. New-generation TAVI devices: description and specifications. EuroIntervention. 2014;10(Suppl U):U90-U100. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJV10SUA13.

  4. Tchetche D, de Biase C, Brochado B, Mastrokostopoulos A. How to make the TAVI pathway more efficient. Interv Cardiol. 2019;14(1):31–3. https://doi.org/10.15420/icr.2018.28.2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Jilaihawi H, Zhao Z, Du R, Staniloae C, Saric M, Neuburger PJ, et al. Minimizing permanent pacemaker following repositionable self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(18):1796–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2019.05.056.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Zaid S, Sengupta A, Okoli K, Tsoi M, Khan A, Ahmad H, et al. Novel anatomic predictors of new persistent left bundle branch block after Evolut transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am J Cardiol. 2020;125(8):1222–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.01.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. • Tang GHL, Zaid S, Michev I, Ahmad H, Kaple R, Undemir C et al. “Cusp-Overlap” view simplifies fluoroscopy-guided implantation of self-expanding valve in transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11(16):1663–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2018.03.018. This study was one of the first to conceptualize and popularize the concepts behind the cusp-overlap approach.

  8. Tchetche D, Siddiqui S. Optimizing fluoroscopic projections for TAVR: any difference between the double S-curve and the cusp-overlap technique? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14(2):195–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2020.11.020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Arnold M, Achenbach S, Pfeiffer I, Ensminger S, Marwan M, Einhaus F, et al. A method to determine suitable fluoroscopic projections for transcatheter aortic valve implantation by computed tomography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2012;6(6):422–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2012.10.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cockburn J, Trivedi U, de Belder A, Hildick-Smith D. Optimal projection for transcatheter aortic valve implantation determined from the reference projection angles. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;80(6):973–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.23393.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hell MM, Biburger L, Marwan M, Schuhbaeck A, Achenbach S, Lell M, et al. Prediction of fluoroscopic angulations for transcatheter aortic valve implantation by CT angiography: influence on procedural parameters. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18(8):906–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jew144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Binder RK, Leipsic J, Wood D, Moore T, Toggweiler S, Willson A, et al. Prediction of optimal deployment projection for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: angiographic 3-dimensional reconstruction of the aortic root versus multidetector computed tomography. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5(2):247–52. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.966531.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tzikas A, Schultz C, Van Mieghem NM, de Jaegere PP, Serruys PW. Optimal projection estimation for transcatheter aortic valve implantation based on contrast-aortography: validation of a Prototype Software. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;76(4):602–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.22641.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Steinvil A, Weissman G, Ertel AW, Weigold G, Rogers T, Koifman E, et al. Accuracy of predicted orthogonal projection angles for valve deployment during transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2018;12(5):398–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2018.05.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Piazza N, Mylotte D, Theriault Lauzier P. Fluoroscopic “heart chamber” anatomy - the case for imaging modality-independent terminology. EuroIntervention. 2016;12(Y):Y9-Y15. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJV12SYA3.

  16. Piazza N. Understanding the value of the fluoroCT “Double S Curve”: finding the optimal view for TAVR. TVT; 2017; Chicago, IL.

  17. Ben-Shoshan J, Alosaimi H, Lauzier PT, Pighi M, Talmor-Barkan Y, Overtchouk P, et al. Double S-Curve versus cusp-overlap technique: defining the optimal fluoroscopic projection for TAVR with a self-expanding device. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14(2):185–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2020.10.033.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Theriault-Lauzier P, Andalib A, Martucci G, Mylotte D, Cecere R, Lange R, et al. Fluoroscopic anatomy of left-sided heart structures for transcatheter interventions: insight from multislice computed tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7(9):947–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2014.06.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kuon E, Dahm JB, Empen K, Robinson DM, Reuter G, Wucherer M. Identification of less-irradiating tube angulations in invasive cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44(7):1420–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2004.06.057.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Vora AN, Gada H. Staying in the shallow end: minimizing permanent pacemaker implantation with a novel implantation method. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14(1): e010330. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.010330.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Pisaniello AD, Makki HBE, Jahangeer S, Daniels MJ, Hasan R, Fraser DGW. Low rates of permanent pacing are observed following self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement using an annular plane projection for deployment. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14(1): e009258. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009258.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Gada H, Vora A, Siddique S, Wert Y, Michev I, Piazza N et al. TCT CONNECT-457 reduction of rates of permanent pacemaker implantation with 34-MM Evolut R using cusp overlap technique. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(17 Supplement S):B196–B. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.09.486.

  23. Mendiz OA, Noc M, Fava CM, Gutierrez Jaikel LA, Sztejfman M, Pleskovic A, et al. Impact of cusp-overlap view for TAVR with self-expandable valves on 30-day conduction disturbances. J Interv Cardiol. 2021;2021:9991528. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9991528.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Aljabbary T, Wijeysundera H, Radhakrishnan S. Cusp overlap method for self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Can J Cardiol. 2020;36(10):S32–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjca.2020.07.078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mendiz O, Noc M, Fava C, Valdivieso L, Gamboa P, Lev G. TCT CONNECT-129 cusp overlapping technique for TAVR procedures with self-expandable valves. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(17 Supplement S):B57–B. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.09.143.

  26. Sztejfman M, Giuliani C, Zaidel E, Peralta S, Jubany G, Murillo L et al. TCT CONNECT-480 impact of cusp-overlap technique on pacemaker requirement among patients receiving transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(17 Supplement S):B205-B. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.09.509.

  27. Kitamura M, Wilde J, Dumpies O, Gutberlet M, Gohmann R, Shibata M, et al. Patient-specific neocommissural alignment of the Evolut valve: a pilot study in transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve replacement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14(8):934–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2020.12.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Grubb K, editor. An optimized TAVR care pathway using Evolut PRO and PRO+: early results from the Optimize PRO study. Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions’ SCAI 2021 Virtual Scientific Sessions.

  29. Wong I, Bieliauskas G, De Backer O, Sondergaard L. Technical considerations for transcatheter aortic valve replacement with ACURATE neo2. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14(2):224–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2020.10.022.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tagliari AP, Vicentini L, Zimmermann JM, Miura M, Ferrari E, Perez D, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve neo-commissure alignment with the Portico system. EuroIntervention. 2020. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-20-01095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Vora AN, Tang GHL, Reardon MJ, Deeb GM, Yakubov SJ, Huang J, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implant depth measurements differ by aortography versus computed tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2020.12.035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sengupta A, Alexis SL, Kovacic JC, Tang GHL. Current challenges in TAVI: neo-commissural alignment to mimic more physiologic valve implantation. Vessel Plus. 2020;4:40. https://doi.org/10.20517/2574-1209.2020.55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Alexis SL, Zaid S, Sengupta A, Lerakis S, Khera S, Sharma SK, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement aortic root orientation: implications for future coronary access and redo transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2020;9(6):502–4. https://doi.org/10.21037/acs-2020-av-10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. •• Tang GHL, Zaid S, Fuchs A, Yamabe T, Yazdchi F, Gupta E et al. Alignment of transcatheter aortic-valve neo-commissures (ALIGN TAVR): impact on final valve orientation and coronary artery overlap. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13(9):1030–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2020.02.005. This was the first systematic evaluation of commissural alignment in transcatheter aortic valve repalcement (TAVR). The authors showed that specific initial orientations of the Evolut transcatheter heart valve system improved alignment, with important implications for future coronary artery reaccess and valve-in-valve TAVR.

  35. Tang G, Alexis S, Sengupta A, Zaid S, Leipsic J, Blanke P et al. TCT CONNECT-93 commissural alignment in Evolut TAVR: results from the low risk LTI substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(17 Supplement S):B41-B. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2020.09.107.

  36. Khalique OK, Pulerwitz TC, Halliburton SS, Kodali SK, Hahn RT, Nazif TM, et al. Practical considerations for optimizing cardiac computed tomography protocols for comprehensive acquisition prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016;10(5):364–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcct.2016.07.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gilbert H. L. Tang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Khera is a consultant for Abbott Structural Heart, Medtronic, and Boston Scientific, and has received speakers’ honoraria from Medtronic. Dr. Dangas is on the advisory board and is a consultant for Boston Scientific and has common stock with Medtronic that is fully divested. Dr. Sharma has served on the Speakers Bureau for Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, TriReme, and Cardiovascular Systems. Dr. Tang has served as a physician proctor for Medtronic and is a consultant for Medtronic and Abbott Structural Heart. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

All reported studies/experiments with human or animal subjects performed by the authors have been previously published and complied with all applicable ethical standards (including the Helsinki declaration and its amendments, institutional/national research committee standards, and international/national/institutional guidelines).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on New Therapies for Cardiovascular Disease

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sengupta, A., Alexis, S.L., Lee, T. et al. Cusp Overlap Technique: Should It Become the Standard Implantation Technique for Self-expanding Valves?. Curr Cardiol Rep 23, 154 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-021-01583-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-021-01583-3

Keywords

Navigation