Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of increased letter spacing and font type on the reading ability of dyslexic children

  • Published:
Annals of Dyslexia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent research studies have shown that increased letter spacing has a positive effect on the reading ability of dyslexic individuals. This study aims to investigate the effect of spacing on the readability of different fonts for children with and without dyslexia. Results did not support the hypothesis of better performance among children with dyslexia when reading text in Dyslexie than in other fonts. They, however, revealed that only spacing plays a role in enhancing dyslexic individuals’ reading performance because Dyslexie and the Times New Roman interspaced font have no difference. Furthermore, the negative effect of the unfriendly fonts Times New Roman Italic and Curlz MT was eliminated through increased interletter spacing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bachmann, C., & Mengheri, L. (2018). Dyslexia and fonts: is a specific font useful? Brain Sciences, 8, 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaton, A., McDougall, S., & Singleton, C. (1997). Dyslexia in literate adults. Journal of Research in Reading, 20(1), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boer, C. T. (2016). Dyslexie font. Retrieved from http://www.dyslexiefont.com/en/dyslexie-font/ Date of retrieval: November 2016.

  • Bouma, H. (1970). Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature, 226, 177e178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • British Dyslexia Association (2012). Dyslexia style guide, January 2012. http://www.bdadyslexia.org.uk/.

  • Bruck, M. (1993). Word recognition and component phonological processing skills of adults with childhood diagnosis of dyslexia. Developmental Review, 13, 258–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruno-Golden, B. F. (2013). The integration of process analysis into the clinical assessment of children: A personal perspective: In Ashendorf, L., Swenson, R., Libon, D. The Boston process approach to neuropsychological assessment: a practitioner's guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 314–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duranovic, M. (2013). Test za procjenu disleksije [Dyslexia Screening Test]. In M. Duranovic & Z. Mrkonjic (Eds.), Procjena disleksije (Dyslexia assessment). Print-Com: Tuzla, Bosnia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabrieli, J. D. (2009). Dyslexia: a new synergy between education and cognitive neuroscience. Science, 325, 280–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gori, S., & Facoetti, A. (2014). Perceptual learning as a possible new approach for remediation and prevention of developmental dyslexia. Vision Research, 99, 78–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U. (2003). Why theories about developmental dyslexia require developmental designs. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 534–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawelka, S., & Wimmer, H. (2005). Impaired visual processing of multi-element arrays is associated with increased number of eye movements in dyslexic reading. Vision Research, 45, 855–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huckauf, A., Heller, D., & Nazir, T. A. (1999). Lateral masking: limitations of the feature interaction account. Perception & Psychophysics, 61, 177–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, L., & Frost, R. (1992). The reading process is different for different orthographies: The orthographic depth hypothesis. In R. Frost & L. Katz (Eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning (pp. 67–84). Amsterdam: Elsevier North Holland Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kooi, F. L., Toet, A., Tripathy, S. P., & Levi, D. M. (1994). The effect of similarity and duration on spatial interaction in peripheral vision. Spatial Vision, 8, 255–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuster, S. M., van Weerdenburg, M., Gompel, M., & Bosman, A. M. T. (2018). Dyslexie font does not benefit reading in children with or without dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 68, 25–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legge, G. E., & Bigelow, C. A. (2011). Does print size matter for reading? A review of findings from vision science and typography. Journal of Vision, 11, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockley, S. (2002). Dyslexia and higher education: accessibility issues. The Higher Education Academy. Retrieved 3 March 2014, from http://www.engsc.

  • Lyon, G. R., Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2003). A definition of dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 53, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinus, E., Mostard, M., Segers, E., Schubert, T. M., Madelaine, A., & Wheldall, K. (2016). A special font for people with dyslexia: does it work and, if so, why? Dyslexia, 22(3), 233–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martelli, M., Di Filippo, G., Spinelli, D., & Zoccolotti, P. (2009). Crowding, reading, and developmental dyslexia. Journal of Vision, 9(4), 14.1–14.1418.

  • Moret-Tatay, C., & Perea, M. (2011). Do serifs provide an advantage in the recognition of written words? Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23(5), 619–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, B. A., Mansfield, J. S., & Legge, G. E. (2005). The effect of print size on reading speed in dyslexia. Journal of Research in Reading, 28, 332–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oslo Corpus of Bosnian Texts (1997). http://www.tekstlab.uio.no/Bosnian/ Corpus.html. Accessed 12 March 2016.

  • Pelli, D. G., Tillman, K. A., Freeman, J., Su, M., Berger, T. D., & Majaj, N. J. (2007). Crowding and eccentricity determine reading rate. Journal of Vision, 7(2), 20.1–20.2036.

  • Perea, M., Giner, L., Marcet, A., & Gomez, P. (2016). Does extra interletter spacing help text reading in skilled adult readers? The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 19(e26), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2003). Does jugde activate COURT? Transposed-letter confusability effects in masked associative priming. Memory and Cognition, 31, 829–841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perea, M., & Lupker, S. J. (2004). Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions. Journal of Memory and Language, 51, 231–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perea, M., Panadero, V., Moret-Tatay, C., & Gómez, P. (2012). The effects of inter-letter spacing in visual-word recognition: evidence with young normal readers and developmental dyslexics. Learning and Instruction, 22, 420–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramus, F. (2003). Developmental dyslexia: specific phonological deficit or general sensorimotor dysfunction. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 13, 212–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramus, F., Rosen, S., Dakin, S. C., Day, B. L., Castellote, J. M., White, S., & Frith, U. (2003). Theories of developmental dyslexia: insights from a multiple case study of dyslexic adults. Brain, 126, 841–865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raven, M. S. (1963). Prirucnik za Progresivne matrice u boji. (manuals for colored progressive matrices). Beograd: Savez društava psihologa SR Srbije.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rello, L., & Baeza-Yates, R. (2013). Good fonts for dyslexia. ASSETS 2013: the 15th international ACM SIGACCESS conference of computers and accessibility, Bellevue, Washington USA, 22-24 October.

  • Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2005). Dyslexia (specific reading disability). Biological Psychiatry, 57, 1301–1309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjoblom, A. M., Eaton, E., & Stagg, S. D. (2016). The effects of letter spacing and coloured overlays on reading speed and accuracy in adult dyslexia. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 630–639. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snowling, M. J. (2000). Dyslexia (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowling, M. J. (2001). From language to reading and dyslexia. Dyslexia, 7, 37–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spinelli, D., De Luca, M., Judica, A., & Zoccolotti, P. (2002). Crowding effects on word identification in developmental dyslexia. Cortex, 38, 179–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. (1988). Explaining the difference between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader: the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 590–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terepocki, M., Kruk, R. S., & Willows, D. M. (2002). The incidence and nature of letter orientation errors in reading disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 214–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidyasagar, T. R., & Pammer, K. (2009). Dyslexia: a deficit in visuo-spatial attention, not in phonological processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(2), 57–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, D., & Levi, D. M. (2011). Visual crowding: a fundamental limit on conscious perception and object recognition. Trends in Cognitive Science, 15, 160–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (2016). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems, ICD-10 (10th revision). URL: http://apps.who.int/classifications/icd10/browse/2016/en.

  • Yu, D., Cheung, S. H., Legge, G. E., & Chung, S. T. L. (2007). Effect of letter spacing on visual span and reading speed. Journal of Vision, 7, 2.1–2.10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, J. C., Perry, C., Ma-Wyatt, A., Ladner, D., & Schulte-Koarrne, G. (2003). Developmental dyslexia in different languages: language specific or universal. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86, 169–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zorzi, M., Barbiero, C., Facoetti, A., Lonciari, I., Carrozzi, M., Montico, M., Bravar, L., George, F., Pech-Georgel, C., & Ziegler, J. C. (2012). Extra-large letter spacing improves reading in dyslexia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 11455–11459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mirela Duranovic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duranovic, M., Senka, S. & Babic-Gavric, B. Influence of increased letter spacing and font type on the reading ability of dyslexic children. Ann. of Dyslexia 68, 218–228 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-018-0164-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-018-0164-z

Keywords

Navigation