Abstract
Although brands increasingly disseminate their brand biographies through brand sources, this research shows that this practice can decrease brand attitudes and consumer preferences. A brand source activates consumers’ persuasion knowledge, increasing negative thoughts and impeding narrative transportation into the brand biography. This research furthermore demonstrates that the negative impact of a brand source in the dissemination of brand biographies depends on self-congruence, such that a detrimental effect on consumer attitudes and preferences occurs when the brand biography is incongruent with consumer’s self-concept, but is mitigated when the brand biography is self-congruent. These findings suggest that the dissemination of brand biographies by brand sources requires consideration of source and congruence effects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adaval, R., & Wyer, R. S., Jr. (1998). The role of narratives in consumer information processing. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7, 207–245.
Andsager, J. L., Bemker, V., Choi, H.-L., & Torwel, V. (2006). Perceived similarity of exemplar traits and behavior effects on message evaluation. Communication Research, 33, 3–18.
Artz, N., & Tybout, A. M. (1999). The moderating impact of quantitative information on the relationship between source credibility and persuasion: A persuasion knowledge model interpretation. Marketing Letters, 10, 51–62.
Avery, J., Paharia, N., Keinan, A., & Schor, J. B. (2010). The strategic use of brand biographies. Research in Consumer Behavior, 12, 213–229.
Banerjee, S. C., & Greene, K. (2012). Role of transportation in the persuasion process: Cognitive and affective responses to antidrug narratives. Journal of Health Communication, 17, 564–581.
Banerjee, S. C., & Greene, K. (2013). Examining narrative transportation to anti-alcohol narratives. Journal of Substance Abuse, 18, 196–210.
Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1981). Social psychological procedures for cognitive response assessment: The thought-listing technique. In T. V. Merluzzi, C. R. Glass, & M. Genest (Eds.), Cognitive assessment (pp. 309–342). New York: Guilford Press.
Campbell, M. C., & Kirmani, A. (2008). I know what you’re doing and why you’re doing it: The use of the persuasion knowledge model in consumer research. In C. Haugvstedt, P. Herr, & F. Kardes (Eds.), Handbook of consumer psychology (pp. 549–571). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cohen, J. (2001). Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication and Society, 4, 245–264.
De Graaf, A. (2014). The effectiveness of adaptation of the protagonist in narrative impact: Similarity influences health beliefs through self-referencing. Human Communication Research, 40, 73–90.
Deighton, J., Romer, D., & McQueen, J. (1989). Using drama to persuade. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 335–343.
Escalas, J. E. (2004). Narrative processing: Building consumer connections to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14, 168–180.
Escalas, J. E. (2007). Self-referencing and persuasion: Narrative transportation versus analytical elaboration. Journal of Consumer Research, 33, 421–429.
Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994). The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 1–31.
Gerrig, R. J. (1993). Experiencing narrative worlds: On the psychological activities of reading. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Green, M. C. (2004). Transportation into narrative worlds: The role of prior knowledge and perceived realism. Discourse Processes, 38, 247–266.
Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 701–721.
Hamby, A., Daniloski, K., & Brinberg, D. (2015). How consumer reviews persuade through narratives. Journal of Business Research, 68, 1242–1250.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Jin, L., & Huang, Y. (2018). How power states influence the persuasiveness of top-dog versus underdog appeals. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29, 243–261.
Kao, D. T. (2015). Is Cinderella resurging? The impact of consumers’ underdog disposition on brand preferences: Underdog biography and brand status as moderators. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 14, 307–316.
Kirmani, A., & Campbell, M. C. (2004). Goal seeker and persuasion sentry: How consumer targets respond to interpersonal marketing persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 573–582.
Marsh, H. W., & Shavelson, R. (2010). Self-concept: Its multifaceted, hierarchical structure. Educational Psychologist, 20, 107–123.
Paharia, N., Keinan, A., Avery, J., & Schor, J. B. (2011). The underdog effect: The marketing of disadvantage and determination through brand biography. Journal of Consumer Research, 37, 775–790.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123–205.
Pornpitakpan, C. (2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades' evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 243–281.
Rucker, D. D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Desire to acquire: Powerlessness and compensatory consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 257–267.
Thompson, D. V., & Paharia, N. (2014). When underdog effects backfire: The effect of perceived market advantage on brand status. In J. Cotte & S. Woods (Eds.), North American advances in consumer research, 42 (pp. 17–21). Duluth, MN: Association for Consumer Research.
Van den Hende, E. A., Dahl, D. W., Schoormans, J. P. L., & Snelders, D. (2012). Narrative transportation in concept tests for really new products: The moderating effect of reader-protagonist similarity. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29, 157–170.
Van Laer, T., de Ruyter, K., Visconti, L. M., & Wetzels, M. (2014). The extended transportation-imagery model: A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of consumers’ narrative transportation. Journal of Consumer Research, 40, 797–817.
Vandello, J. A., Goldschmied, N. P., & Richards, D. A. R. (2007). The appeal of the underdog. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33, 1603–1616.
Wiener, J. L., LaForge, R. W., & Goolsby, J. R. (1990). Personal communication in marketing: An examination of self-interest contingency relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 227–231.
Wilson, E. J., & Sherrell, D. L. (1993). Source effects in communication and persuasion research: A meta-analysis of effect size. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 21, 101–112.
Yoon, Y., Gürhan-Canli, Z., & Schwarz, N. (2006). The effect of corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities on companies with bad reputations. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16, 377–390.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Dipayan Biswas served as Area Editor for this article.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendices
Appendix 1
Appendix 2
Appendix 3
Product description (Study 3)
Sample choice task (Study 3)
Appendix 4
Product description (Study 4)
Sample choice task (Study 4)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tezer, A., Bodur, H.O. & Grohmann, B. Communicating brand biographies effectively: the role of communication source. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 48, 712–733 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00689-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00689-z