Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Does a non-invasive hemoglobin monitor correlate with a venous blood sample in the acutely ill?

  • EM - ORIGINAL
  • Published:
Internal and Emergency Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Non-invasive hemoglobin measuring technology has potential for rapid, portable, and accurate way of providing identification of blood loss or anemia. Our objective is to determine if this technology is reliable in critically ill patients presenting to the Emergency Department. Prospective cross-sectional observational study was done at an urban level-one trauma center, 135 subjects were conveniently sampled, suspected of having active bleeding, sepsis, or other critically ill condition. Non-invasive measurements with Masimo (Irvine, CA, USA) Radical-7 and Rad-57 hemoglobin monitors were compared with the Beckman-Coulter LH-550 (Brea, CA, USA) clinical laboratory blood cell analyzer. The primary outcome was the relationship of the non-invasive device to the clinical laboratory results. Secondary evaluations included the effect of pulse rate, systolic BP, respiratory rate, temperature, capillary refill, skin color, nail condition, extremity movement. The Radical-7 was able to capture reading in 78 % (88/113) of subjects, and the Rad-57 in 65 % (71/110) of subjects. The correlation (R2) of the device Hb was 0.69 and 0.67 (p < 00.01) for the Radical-7 and Rad-57, respectively. The coefficient of variation for the Radical-7 was 18 %, and for the Rad57 it was 13 %. Univariate analysis shows none of the observed factors is associated with the difference values between the device Hb and laboratory Hb. Our results show that Radical-7 and Rad-57 devices do not report readings in 29 % of patients and accuracy is significantly lower than reported by the manufacturer with over 50 % of readings falling outside of ± 1 g/dL. We determined that none of the several potential factors examined are associated with the degree of device accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barker SJ (2008) The measurement of dyshemoglobins and total hemoglobin via pulse co-oximetry. Curr Opin Anesthesiol 21(6):805–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Frasca D, Dahyot-Fizelier C, Catherine K, Levrat Q, Debaene B, Mimoz O (2011) Accuracy of a continuous noninvasive hemoglobin monitor in intensive care unit patients. Crit Care Med 39(10):2277–2881

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gayat E, Bodin A, Sportiello C, Boisson M et al (2011) Performance and evaluation of noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring device. Ann Emerg Med 57(4):330–333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Elbe R, Comella C, Fahn S, Hallett M, Jankovic J, Luncos JL et al (2012) Reliability of a new scale for essential tremor. Mov Disord 27(12):1567–1569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Olson DM, Grissom JL, Williamson RA, Bennett SN, Bellows ST, James ML (2013) Interrater reliability of the bedside shivering assessment scale. Am J Crit Care 22(1):70–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Taylor S, Westerhof W, Im S, Lim J (2006) Noninvasive techniques for the evaluation of skin color. J Am Acad Derm 54(5):s282–s290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Causey MW, Miller S, Foster A, Beekley A, Zenger D, Martin M (2011) Validation of noninvasive hemoglobin measurements using the Masimo Radical-7 SpHb Station. Am J Surg 201(5):590–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fact Sheets, Radical-7 and Rad-57. Masimo Corp, Irvine CA. http://www.massimo.com. Accessed November 9 2012

  9. Buttarello M (2004) Quality specification in heamatology: the automated blood cell count. Clin Chim Acta 346:45–54

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Skelton VA, Wijayasinghe N, Sharafudeen S, Sange A, Parry NS, Junghans C (2013) Evaluation of point-of-care haemoglobin measuring devices: a comparison of Radical-7TM pulse co-oximetry, HemoCue and laboratory haemoglobin measurements in obstetric patients. Anaesthesia 68:40–45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Berkow L, Rotolo S, Mirski E (2011) Continuous noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring during complex spine surgery. Anesth Analg 113(6):1396–1402

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Butwick A, Hilton G, Carvalho B (2012) Non-invasive haemoglobin measurement in patients undergoing elective Caesarean section. Br J Anaesth 108(2):271–277

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lamhaut L, Apriotesei R, Combes X, Lejay M, Carli P, Vivien B (2011) Comparison of the accuracy of noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring by spectrophotometry (SpHb) and HemoCue with automated laboratory hemoglobin measurement. Anesthesiology 115(3):548–554

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vos JJ, Kalmar AF, Struys MM, Porte RJ, Wietasch JK, Scheeren TW, Hendriks HG (2012) Accuracy of non-invasive measurement of hemoglobin concentration by pulse co-oximetry during steady-state and dynamic conditions in liver surgery. Br J Anaesth 109(4):522–528

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Coquin J, Dewitte A, Le Manach Y, Caujolle M, Joannes-Boyau O, Janvier G Fleureau C, Ouattara A (2012) Precision of noninvasive hemoglobin-level measurement by pulse co-oximetry in patients admitted to intensive care units for severe gastrointestinal bleeds. Crit Care Med 40(9):2576–2582

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nguyen BV, Vincent JL, Nowak E, Coat M, Paleiron N, Gouny P, Ould-Ahmed M, Guillouet M, Arvieux CC, Gueret G (2011) The accuracy of noninvasive hemoglobin measurement by multiwavelength pulse oximetry after cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 113(5):1052–1057

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Macknet MR, Allard M, Applegate RL II et al (2010) The accuracy of noninvasive and continuous total hemoglobin measurement by pulse oximetry in human beings undergoing hemodilution. Anesth Analg 111:1424–1426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gayat E, Aulagnier J, Matthieu E, Boisson M, Fischler M (2012) Non-invasive measurement of hemoglobin: assessment of two different point-of-care technologies. PLoS ONE 7(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kost GJ, Tran NK (2011) Continuous noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring: the standard of care and future impact. Crit Care Med 39(10):2369–2371

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Carson JL, Grossman BJ, Kleinman S et al (2012) Red blood cell transfusion: a clinical practice guideline from the AABB*. Ann Intern Med 157(1):49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant from the Telemedicine and Advance Technology Research Center, US Army Medical Research and Material Command, Fort Detrick, MD 21702 USA. Thanks to James K. Aden, PhD for his thoughtful statistical analysis. Special thanks to Olivia E. Dominguez and Vanessa N. Ellis for their tireless efforts as research technicians.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Emergency Medicine, San Antonio Military Medical Center, JBSA-Fort Sam Houston, TX, 78234, USA

    Benjamin A. von Schweinitz, Peter J. Cuenca, Richard L. Anschutz & Paul B. Allen

  2. Tactical Combat Casualty Care Research Program, US Army Institute of Surgical Research, 3698 Chambers Pass, Bldg 3611, JBSA-Fort Sam Houston, TX, 78234-6315, USA

    Robert A. De Lorenzo

  3. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA

    Robert A. De Lorenzo & Peter J. Cuenca

  4. San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium, 3551 Roger Brooke Drive, JBSA-Fort Sam Houston, TX, 78234, USA

    Benjamin A. von Schweinitz

Authors
  1. Benjamin A. von Schweinitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert A. De Lorenzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peter J. Cuenca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Richard L. Anschutz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Paul B. Allen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin A. von Schweinitz.

Additional information

The Society of Academic Emergency Medicine Annual conference, May 13–17, 2014, Dallas, TX.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 4, 5, 6 and 7.

Table 4 Patient movement assessment scale
Full size table
Table 5 Shivering scale
Full size table
Table 6 Finger or toe nail condition scale
Full size table
Table 7 Skin color scale
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

von Schweinitz, B.A., De Lorenzo, R.A., Cuenca, P.J. et al. Does a non-invasive hemoglobin monitor correlate with a venous blood sample in the acutely ill?. Intern Emerg Med 10, 55–61 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-014-1129-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-014-1129-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation