Warfarin is still the most used oral anticoagulant; in Italy approximately 650,000 subjects were taking warfarin in 2006 with an annual increase of 5 % [1]. The main drawback of warfarin is the high interindividual variability in the dose–response [2]. Variability depends on both environmental factors (e.g., diet and interfering comedications) and endogenous factors (e.g., age, gender, height, weight, comorbidities and genetic). VKORC1, CYP2C9 and CYP4F2 gene polymorphisms are clearly involved in determining the variation in warfarin dose. [3]. Less variability is reported for direct oral anticoagulants although trough plasma concentration varies individually on maintenance treatment [4]. As the increase in drug concentrations is closely related to bleeding events, it is suggested to monitor their effect through specific coagulation tests. The aim would be to find out the best dose for each patient. However, direct oral anticoagulants have shown a fairly predictable effect with no need for routine coagulation monitoring [5]. Moreover, Phase III clinical studies of direct anticoagulants on stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation have clearly shown the efficacy and safety of fixed dose of direct anticoagulants [6].
This is one of the main advantages of using these new drugs. According to this assumption, physicians will follow their patient only from a clinical point of view to assure adherence and compliance to treatment. It could be argued that in specific situations assessment of patient anticoagulant status may be useful [7]. Ecarin clotting time (ECT) or diluted thrombin time (dTT) or aPTT (if the previous ones are not available) is recommended for dabigatran. Prothrombin time (PT) in comparison to control PT is a sensitive and reliable test for rivaroxaban whereas no routine coagulation test seems to be suitable for apixaban. Possible indications for laboratory testing are the following (Table 1): (1) evaluation of coagulation tests when the patient reaches a steady state, (2) evaluation of possible over- or underdosing the anticoagulant due to drug interactions, (3) assessment of anticoagulant effect in frail patients. As recommended by Italian Federation of Thrombosis Centers (FCSA) appropriate coagulation tests should be performed after 2–3 months from the initiation of therapy in order to have a steady-state laboratory value that may be useful if future adverse clinical events (bleeding, thrombosis) occur. Interaction of novel anticoagulants with other drugs is apparently much lower than that of warfarin. However, dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban are substrates of the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) transporter, one-third of rivaroxaban is metabolized by the liver via CYP3A4/CYP3A5 and CYP2J2-dependent pathways and apixaban which has predominant non-renal clearance is eliminated via the CYP3A4, CYP1A2 and CYP2J2-dependent pathways. Therefore, the possibility exists that drug interactions may interfere with the anticoagulant effect of these agents. In frail patients prescribed with multiple drugs as for example with elderly patients with atrial fibrillation it might be wise to perform adequate coagulation tests at regular intervals comparing them with those initially obtained at steady state. In this way, the extent of drug interaction can be measured when a potential interfering drug is added on top of their usual therapy. Definite indications to laboratory testing comprise the following: (1) major or life-threatening bleeding, (2) renal or liver impairment, (3) urgent or elective surgery or invasive manoeuvres at high risk of bleeding. Under these circumstances, if the drug used is not known, coagulation tests may help to establish whether dabigatran (marked prolongation of the dTT) or rivaroxaban (marked prolongation of the Prothrombin Time) has been used whereas such a possibility does not exists for apixaban. Emergency physicians should also assess how the procedures to counteract the anticoagulant effect are working as no drug-specific antidote is available. Direct Xa Inhibitors but not dabigatran are (partially) antagonized by non-activated four factor prothrombin complex concentrates [8] that contain Factor II–VII–IX–X and dosage could be 50 UI/kg by one shot administration [9]. Other situations in which coagulation tests are needed are renal or liver impairment. Dabigatran is excreted unchanged by the kidneys (80 %). One-third of rivaroxaban is cleared unchanged via the kidneys and the remaining two-thirds are metabolized by the liver via CYP3A4/CYP3A5 and CYP2J2-dependent or independent pathways (one-third each, respectively). Apixaban, which has predominant a non-renal clearance, is eliminated via the liver and intestinal excretion, by over 70 %. Renal and liver function decline with age and the same drug dosage of novel anticoagulants may be inappropriate during long-term treatment [10]. Another important issue is treatment withdrawal before surgery or invasive maneuvers. In case of emergency surgery a reversal of anticoagulation could be evaluated by coagulation tests. If elective surgery at standard bleeding is performed, a 1- to 3-day drug suspension of dabigatran depending on renal function is mandatory. If elective surgery at high risk of bleeding is considered (neurosurgery, cardiovascular surgery), it is advisable that the active anticoagulant drug should be absent in the circulation. This is definitely assessed by the normalization of specific coagulation tests.
References
Pengo V, Pegoraro C, Cucchini U, Iliceto S (2006) Worldwide management of oral anticoagulant therapy: the ISAM study. J Thromb Thrombolysis 21:73–77
Scordo MG, Pengo V, Spina E, Dahl ML, Gusella M, Padrini R (2002) Influence of CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms on warfarin maintenance dose and metabolic clearance. Clin Pharmacol Ther 72:702–710
Zambon CF, Pengo V, Padrini R, Basso D, Schiavon S, Fogar P, Nisi A, Frigo AC, Moz S, Pelloso M, Plebani M (2011) VKORC1, CYP2C9 and CYP4F2 genetic-based algorithm for warfarin dosing: an Italian retrospective study. Pharmacogenomics 12:15–25
Ezekowitz MD, Reilly PA, Nehmiz G et al (2007) Dabigatran with or without concomitant aspirin compared with warfarin alone in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (PETRO Study). Am J Cardiol 100:1419–1426
Eikelboom JW, Weitz JI (2010) Update on antithrombotic therapy. New anticoagulants. Circulation 121:1523–1532
Pengo V, Crippa L, Falanga A, Finazzi G, Marongiu F, Moia M, Palareti G, Poli D, Testa S, Tiraferri E, Tosetto A, Tripodi A, Siragusa S, Manotti C (2012) Phase III studies on novel oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: a look beyond the excellent results. J Thromb Haemost 10:1979–1987
Pengo V, Crippa L, Falanga A, Finazzi G, Marongiu F, Palareti G, Poli D, Testa S, Tiraferri E, Tosetto A, Tripodi A, Manotti C (2011) Questions and answers on the use of dabigatran and perspectives on the use of other new oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation. Thromb Haemost 106:868–876
Eerenberg ES, Kamphuisen PW, Sijpkens MK, Meijers JC, Buller HR, Levi M (2011) Reversal of rivaroxaban and dabigatran by prothrombin complex concentrate: a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study in healthy subjects. Circulation 124:1573–1579
Palareti G, Ageno W, Ferrari A, Filippi A, Imberti D, Pengo V, Rubboli A, Toni D (2013) Clinical management of rivaroxaban-treated patients. Expert Opin Pharmacother 14:655–667
Kooiman J, van de Peppel WR, van der Meer FJ, Huisman MV (2011) Incidence of chronic kidney disease in patients with atrial fibrillation and its relevance for prescribing new oral antithrombotic drugs. J Thromb Haemost 9:1652–1653
Conflict of Interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pengo, V. Laboratory tests during direct oral anticoagulant treatment? Yes. Intern Emerg Med 8, 371–372 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-013-0949-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-013-0949-3