Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 1610–1621 | Cite as

Chitosan-limonene coating in combination with modified atmosphere packaging preserve postharvest quality of cucumber during storage

  • Gisoo Maleki
  • Naser Sedaghat
  • Ernst J. Woltering
  • Mehdi Farhoodi
  • Mohebbat Mohebbi
Original Paper


Since cucumbers suffer from a short postharvest life, applying different technologies is increasingly used as effective ways to increase their shelf life and quality. In this study a combination of chitosan-limonene coating and MAP storage has been used as a postharvest treatment to maintain cucumber quality. Samples were stored in three different packages: A (21% O2, macro-perforated package to be in equilibrium with air); package B (active MAP, starting concentrations 10% O2 + 5% CO2); package C (passive MAP starting concentrations 21% O2 + 0.1% CO2); they were stored at three temperatures (20, 10, and 4 °C). Quality parameters of cucumber such as weight loss, firmness, color, pH, fungal growth, Tg, organoleptic properties were determined. Interactive effects of coating, package, temperature, and storage time showed that coating and MAP in general had positive effects on several quality aspects. Coating combined with active MAP had the most positive effect on most postharvest attributes. However, using active MAP at higher temperature led to quality problems and is only useful if storage time is short. The combined usage of active MAP and chitosan-based coating on cucumber represents an innovative and interesting method for commercial application.


Coating Chitosan Cucumber MAP Postharvest 



This work was financially supported by Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. We are thankful to Ferdowsi University of Mashhad and Wageningen University for providing facilities for this research.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no competing interests.


  1. 1.
    M.A. Saltveit, A summary of CA requirements and recommendations for vegetables. Postharvest. Acta Hortic. 600, 723–727 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Moalemiyan, H.S. Ramaswamy, Quality retention and shelf-life extension in Mediterranean cucumbers coated with a pectin-based film. J. Food Res. 1, 159–168 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Benítez, I. Achaerandio, M. Pujol, F. Sepulcre, Aloe vera as an alternative to traditional edible coatings used in fresh cut fruits: a case of study with kiwifruit slice. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 61, 184–193 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. Mahfoudhi, S. Hamdi, Use of almond gum and gum Arabic as novel edible coating to delay postharvest ripening and to maintain sweet cherry (Prunus avium) quality during storage. J. Food Process. Preserv. 39, 1499–1508 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    C.E. Ochoa-Velasco, J.A. Guerrero-Beltrán, Postharvest quality of peeled prickly pear fruit treated with acetic acid and chitosan. Postharvest. Biol. Technol. 92, 139–145 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M.S. Pasquariello, D. Di Patre, F. Mastrobuoni, L. Zampella, M. Scortichini, M. Petriccione, Influence of postharvest chitosan treatment on enzymatic browning and antioxidant enzyme activity in sweet cherry fruit. Postharvest. Biol. Technol. 109, 45–56 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Mohammadi, M. Hashemi, S.M. Hosseini, Chitosan nanoparticles loaded with Cinnamomum zeylanicum essential oil enhance the shelf life of cucumber during cold storage. Postharvest. Biol. Technol. 110, 203–213 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Cissé, J. Polidori, D. Montet, G. Loiseau, M.N. Ducamp-Collin, Preservation of mango quality by using functional chitosan-lactoperoxidase systems coatings. Postharvest. Biol. Technol. 101, 10–14 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Z. Huang, J. Li, J. Zhang, Y. Gao, G. Hui, Physicochemical properties enhancement of Chinese kiwi fruit (Actinidia chinensis Planch) via chitosan coating enriched with salicylic acid treatment. J. Food Meas. Charact. 11, 184–191 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    W.S. Jo, H.Y. Song, N.B. Song, J.H. Lee, S.C. Min, K.B. Song, Quality and microbial safety of ‘Fuji’ apples coated with carnauba-shellac wax containing lemongrass oil. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 55, 490–497 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Ramos-García, E. Bosquez-Molina, J. Hernández-Romano, G. Zavala-Padilla, E. Terrés-Rojas, I. Alia-Tejacal, L. Barrera-Necha, M. Hernández-López, S. Bautista-Baños, Use of chitosan-based edible coatings in combination with other natural compounds, to control Rhizopus stolonifer and Escherichia coli DH5α in fresh tomatoes. Crop. Prot. 38, 1–6 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A.C. Guerreiro, C.M.L. Gago, M.L. Faleiro, M.G.C. Miguel, M.D.C. Antunes, The use of polysaccharide-based edible coatings enriched with essential oils to improve shelf-life of strawberries. Postharvest. Biol. Technol. 110, 51–60 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. Ali, N. Mohd Noh, M.A. Mustafa, Antimicrobial activity of chitosan enriched with lemongrass oil against anthracnose of bell pepper. Food Packag. Shelf Life 3, 56–61 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. Mohammadi, M. Hashemi, S.M. Hosseini, Integration between chitosan and Zataria multiflora or Cinnamomum zeylanicum essential oil for controlling Phytophthora drechsleri, the causal agent of cucumber fruit rot. LWT-Food Sci. Technol 65, 349–356 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    T. Hemalatha, T. UmaMaheswari, R. Senthil, G. Krithiga, K. Anbukkarasi, Efficacy of chitosan films with basil essential oil: perspectives in food packaging. J. Food Meas. Charact. 11, 2160–2170 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Á Perdones, L. Sanchez-Gonzalez, A. Chiralt, M. Vargas, Effect of chitosan-lemon essential oil coatings on storage-keeping quality of strawberry. Postharvest. Biol. Technol. 70, 32–41 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Á Perdones, I. Escriche, A. Chiralt, M. Vargas, Effect of chitosan-lemon essential oil coatings on volatile profile of strawberries during storage. Food Chem. 197, 979–986 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    V. Muriel-Galet, J.P. Cerisuelo, G. López-Carballo, M. Lara, R. Gavara, P. Hernández-Mu˜noz, Development of antimicrobial films for microbiological control of packaged salad. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 157, 195–201 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    A.A. Kader, D. Zagory, E.L. Kerbel, C.Y. Wang, Modified atmosphere packaging of fruits and vegetables. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. 28, 1–30 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    I. Leceta, S. Molinaro, P. Guerrero, J.P. Kerry, K. de la Caba, Quality attributes of map packaged ready-to-eat baby carrots by using chitosan-based coatings. Postharvest. Biol. Technol. 100, 142–150 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    E. Sanchís, C. Ghidelli, C.C. Sheth, M. Mateos, L. Palou, M.B. Pérez-Gago, Integration of antimicrobial pectin-based edible coating and active modified atmosphere packaging to preserve the quality and microbial safety of fresh-cut persimmon (Diospyros kaki Thunb. cv. Rojo Brillante). J. Sci. Food Agric. 97, 252–260 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    M. Mastromatteo, A. Conte, M.A. Del Nobile, Combined effect of active coating and MAP to prolong the shelf life of minimally processed kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa cv. Hayward). Food Res. Int. 44, 1224–1230 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    P. Hernández-Munoz, E. Almenar, V.D. Valle, D. Velez, R. Gavara, Effect of chitosan coating combined with postharvest calcium treatment on strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) quality during refrigerated. Food Chem. 110, 428–435 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    D. Wu, D.W. Sun, in Instrumental Assessment of Food Sensory Quality, ed. by D. Kilcast (Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, 2013), pp. 165–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    N. Maftoonazad, H.S. Ramaswamy, Effect of pectin-based coating on the kinetics of quality change associated with stored avocados. J. Food Process. Preserv. 32, 621–643 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    N. Djendoubi Mrad, C. Bonazzi, N. Boudhrioua, N. Kechaou, F. Courtois, Influence of sugar composition on water sorption isotherms and on glass transition in apricots. J. Food Eng. 111, 403–411 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    V. Chamanara, B. Shabanpour, S. Gorgin, M. Khomeiri, An investigation on characteristics of rainbow trout coated using chitosan assisted with thyme essential oil. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 50, 540–544 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    G.I. Olivas, G.V. Barbosa-Cánovas, Edible coatings for fresh-cut fruits. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 45, 657–670 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    C. Ghidelli, M. Mateos, C. Rojas-Argudo, M.B. Pérez-Gago, Extending the shelf life of fresh-cut eggplant with a soyprotein–cysteine based edible coating and modifiedatmosphere packaging. Postharvest. Biol. Technol. 95, 81–87 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    R.M. Raybaudi-Massilia, J. Mosqueda-Melgar, O. Martín-Belloso, Edible alginate-based coating as carrier of antimicrobials to improve shelf-life and safety of fresh-cut melon. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 121, 313–327 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    M.A. Rojas-Graü, R.M. Raybaudi-Massilia, R. Soliva-Fortuny, R.J. Avena-Bustillos, T.H. Mc Hugh, O. Martín-Belloso, Apple puree-alginate coating as carrierof antimicrobial agents to prolong shelf-life of fresh-cut apples. Postharvest. Biol. Technol. 45, 254–264 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    S.P. Dawange, S.K. Dash, L.M. Bal, M.K. Panda, Quality of minimally processed carrots in perforation-mediated modified-atmosphere packaging (PM-MAP). J. Food Meas. Charact. 10, 746–754 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    P.V. Mahajan, F.A.R. Oliveira, M.J. Sousa, S.C. Fonseca, L.M. Cunha, in Handbook of Food Science, Technology, and Engineering, ed. by Y.H. Hui (CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, 2006)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    J. Duan, R. Wu, B.C. Strik, Y. Zhao, Effects of edible coatings on the quality of fresh blueberries (Duke and Elliott) under commercial storage conditions. Postharvest. Biol. Technol. 59, 71–79 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    M. Maqbool, A. Ali, S. Ramachandran, D.R. Smith, P.G. Alderson, Control of postharvest anthracnose of banana using a new edible composite coating. Crop. Prot. 29, 1136–1141 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Y. Zhang, M. Zhang, H. Yang, Postharvest chitosan-g-salicylic acid application alleviates chilling injury and preserves cucumber fruit quality during cold storage. Food Chem. 174, 558–563 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    C.L. Xiao, L.W. Zhu, W. Luo, X.Y. Song, Y. Deng, Combined action of pure oxygen pretreatment and chitosan coating incorporated with rosemary extracts on the quality of fresh-cut pears. Food Chem. 121, 1003–1009 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    M.V. Bhaskara Reddy, K. Belkacemi, R. Corcuff, F. Castaigne, J. Arul, Effect of pre-harvest chitosan sprays on post-harvest infection by Botrytis cinerea quality of strawberry fruit. Postharvest. Biol. Technol. 20, 39–51 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    O.B. Sogvar, M. Koushesh Saba, A. Emamifar, Aloe vera and ascorbic acid coatings maintain postharvest quality and reduce microbial load of strawberry fruit. Postharvest. Biol. Technol. 114, 29–35 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    H. Arnon, Y. Zaitsev, R. Porat, E. Poverenov, Effects of carboxymethyl cellulose and chitosan bilayer edible coating on postharvest quality of citrus fruit. Postharvest. Biol. Technol. 87, 21–26 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    M. Manjunatha, R.K. Anurag, Effect of modified atmosphere packaging and storage conditions on quality characteristics of cucumber. J. Food Sci. Technol. 51, 3470–3475 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    K.N. Waliszewski, H.D. Cortes, V.T. Pardio, M.A. Garcia, Color parameter changes in banana slices during osmotic dehydration. Dry Technol. 17, 955–960 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    J. Jeong, D.J. Huber, S.A. Sargent, Delay of avocado (Persea americana) fruit by 1-methylcyclopropene and wax treatments. Postharvest. Biol. Technol. 28, 247–257 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    N. Maftoonazad, H.S. Ramaswamy, Postharvest shelf-life extension of avocados using methyl cellulose-based coating. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 38, 617–624 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    P. Jitareerat, S. Paumchai, S. Kanlayanarat, S. Sangchote, Effect of chitosan on ripening, enzymatic activity, and disease development in mango (Mangifera indica) fruit. New Zeal. J. Crop. Hortic. 35, 211–218 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    S.K. Wolf, Use of CO and CO2-enriched atmospheres for meat, fish, and produce. Food Technol. 34, 55–58 (1980)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    G.A. Gonzalez-Aguilar, E. Valenzuela-Soto, J. Lizardi-Mendoza, F. Goycoolea, M.A. Martinez-Tellez, M.A. Villegas-Ochoa, I.N. Monroy-Garcia, J.F. Ayala-Zavala, Effect of chitosan coating in preventing deterioration and preserving the quality of fresh-cut papaya ‘Maradol’. J. Sci. Food Agric. 89, 15–23 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    P.J. Chien, F. Sheu, F.H. Yang, Effects of edible chitosan coating on quality and shelf life of sliced mango fruit. J. Food Eng. 78, 225–229 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    D. Lin, Y. Zhao, Innovations in the development and application of edible coatings for fresh and minimally processed fruits and vegetables. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 6, 60–75 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    M. Bill, D. Sivakumar, L. Korsten, A.K. Thompson, The efficacy of combined application of edible coatings and thyme oil in inducing resistance components in avocado (Persea americana Mill.) against anthracnose during post-harvest storage. Crop Prot. 64, 159–167 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    H.Y. Song, W.S. Jo, N.B. Song, S.C. Min, K.B. Song, Quality change of apple slices coated with aloe vera gel during storage. J. Food Sci. 78, C817–C822 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    M. Le Meste, D. Champion, G. Roudaut, G. Blond, D. Simatos, Glass transition and food technology: a critical appraisal. J. Food Sci. 67, 2444–2458 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    V.R.N. Telis, P.J.A. Sobral, Glass transitions for freeze-dried and air-dried tomato. Food Res. Int. 35, 435–443 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    H. Wang, S. Zhang, G. Chen, Glass transition and state diagram for fresh and freeze-dried Chinese gooseberry. J. Food Eng. 84, 307–312 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Y.H. Roos, M. Karel, Differential scanning calorimetry study of phase transitions affecting the quality of dehydrated materials. Biotechnol. Prog. 6, 159–163 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    F. Khorram, A. Ramezanian, S.M.H. Hosseini, Effect of different edible coatings on postharvest quality of ‘Kinnow’ mandarin. J. Food Meas. Charact. 11, 1827–1833 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Food Sciences and TechnologyFerdowsi University of MashhadMashhadIran
  2. 2.Wageningen University, Food & Biobased ResearchWageningenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Wageningen University, Horticulture & Product PhysiologyWageningenThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Department of Food Sciences and TechnologyShahid Beheshti University of Medical SciencesTehranIran

Personalised recommendations