Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bioactive and sensorial characteristics of the milk based herbal (Rumex crispus L.) tea: multi-criteria decision making approach

  • Published:
Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are different herbal teas in the world, however always new and functional herbal teas are presented to consumer preference. The seeds of Rumex crispus L., also known as ‘kalmuk’ or ‘kalmek’ are infused by boiling water and filtrated and mixed boiled milk. Generally it is consumed in autumn and winter season. The consumption of this herbal tea could offer some beneficial influence as it contains antioxidant substances and phenolics which is associated with the health effects. In the present study, milk was incorporated with the Rumex crispus L. extract at different concentrations and some physicochemical, bioactive and sensory properties of samples were investigated by using multi-criteria decision making techniques. The technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) approach and simple additive weighting (SAW) approach were used for the determination of the optimum sensory and bioactive characteristics of the products. The total phenolic content of the extract of R. crispus L. seeds was found as 31.82 ± 1.6 mg GAE/g. The highest IC50 value was observed in sample containing 70% milk and the lowest was observed in extract of R. crispus L. According to the results of SAW and TOPSIS methods, the samples coded as S5 and S6 were the best samples based on the sensory and bioactive properties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. Desideri et al., Microchem. J. 98(1), 170–175 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. P. Deetae et al., Food Chem. 133(3), 953–959 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Zhao et al., J. Chromatogr. 1313, 2–23 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. S.I. Trevisanato, Y.I. Kim, Nutr. Rev. 58(1), 1–10 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. D.L. McKay, J.B. Blumberg., J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 21(1), 1–13 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Kosińska, W. Andlauer, in Processing and Impact on Antioxidants in Beverages. Antioxidant Capacity of Tea. Effect of Processing and Storage, (Elsevier, Oxford, 2014). pp. 109–120

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. D. Huang, B. Ou, R.L. Prior, J. Agric. Food Chem. 53(6), 1841–1856 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. B. Halliwell, Biochem. Pharmacol. 49(10), 1341–1348 (1995)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. C. Kaur, H.C. Kapoor, Food Sci. Technol. 36(7), 703–725 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. D.P. Arcari et al., J. Funct. Foods 3(3), 190–197 (2011). doi: 10.1016/j.jff.2011.04.001

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. H.-J. Suh et al., J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 102(2), 102–107 (2011)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Cullen, Rumex. Flora of Turkey and East Aegean Islands. ed. by Davis P.H., vol. 2 (Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 1972)

    Google Scholar 

  13. T. Baytop, Istanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları. (Istanbul University, Istanbul, 1996), p. 444

    Google Scholar 

  14. I. Coruh et al., Pharm. Biol. 46(9), 634–638 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Yildirim, A. Mavi, A.A. Kara, J. Agric. Food Chem. 49(8), 4083–4089 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. S. Pohekar, M. Ramachandran, Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 8(4), 365–381 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. T. Özcan, N. Çelebi, Ş. Esnaf, Expert Syst. Appl. 38(8), 9773–9779 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. T.L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1980)

    Google Scholar 

  19. H.P. Ren, W.Z. Liu, Adv. J Food Sci. Technol. 9(2), 87–91 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Dogan et al., Eur. Food Res. Technol. 242(6), 953–966 (2016)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. V.E. Gurmeric et al., Food Bioprocess Tech. 6(10), 2844–2859 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. G. Ozturk et al., Food Biosci. 7, 45–55 (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. AOAC, Official Methods of Analysis, (Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. C. Li, W. Han, M.H. Wang, J. Appl. Biol. Chem. 53(1), 8–12 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. H.M. Habib et al., Food Chem. 141(1), 148–152 (2013)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. D.L. Olson, Math. Comput. Modellıng 40(7), 721–727 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. D. Jato-Espino et al., Autom. Constr. 45, 151–162 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. A. Afshari, M. Mojahed, R.M. Yusuff, J. Int. Innov. Man. Technol. 1(5), 511–515 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  29. S. Nehir El, S. Karakaya, Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 55(1), 67–74 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. M. Korir et al., Food Chem., 145, 145–153, (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. M.J. Arts et al., J. Agric. Food Chem. 50(5), 1184–1187 (2002)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. V. Sharma, H.V. Kumar, L.J.M. Rao, Food Res. Int. 41(2), 124–129 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. A.A. Elzaawely, T.D. Xuan, S. Tawata, Biol. Pharm. Bull. 28(12), 2225–2230 (2005)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Y. Zhuang, L. Chen, L. Sun, J. Cao, J. Funct. Foods 4(1), 331–338 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. V. de Freitas, N. Mateus, Curr. Organ. Chem. 16(6), 724–746 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. I. Lesschaeve, A.C. Noble, Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 81(1), 330S–335S (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Unit of Scientific Investigations and Project in Erciyes University for its financial support of this work (Project Number: FBY09-1092).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Food Engineering, Engineering College, Erciyes University, 38039, Kayseri, Turkey

    Mahmut Dogan, Duygu Aslan & Aylin Ozgur

  2. TAGEM Food Analysis Center Co., Erciyes University Techno Park Area, 38039, Kayseri, Turkey

    Mahmut Dogan

Authors
  1. Mahmut Dogan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Duygu Aslan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Aylin Ozgur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahmut Dogan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dogan, M., Aslan, D. & Ozgur, A. Bioactive and sensorial characteristics of the milk based herbal (Rumex crispus L.) tea: multi-criteria decision making approach. Food Measure 12, 535–544 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-017-9665-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11694-017-9665-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation