Skip to main content
Log in

A comparative study of segmentation techniques for the quantification of brain subcortical volume

  • ORIGINAL RESEARCH
  • Published:
Brain Imaging and Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Manual tracing of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) represents the gold standard for segmentation in clinical neuropsychiatric research studies, however automated approaches are increasingly used due to its time limitations. The accuracy of segmentation techniques for subcortical structures has not been systematically investigated in large samples. We compared the accuracy of fully automated [(i) model-based: FSL-FIRST; (ii) patch-based: volBrain], semi–automated (FreeSurfer) and stereological (Measure®) segmentation techniques with manual tracing (ITK-SNAP) for delineating volumes of the caudate (easy-to-segment) and the hippocampus (difficult-to-segment). High resolution 1.5 T T1-weighted MR images were obtained from 177 patients with major psychiatric disorders and 104 healthy participants. The relative consistency (partial correlation), absolute agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC) and potential technique bias (Bland–Altman plots) of each technique was compared with manual segmentation. Each technique yielded high correlations (0.77–0.87, p < 0.0001) and moderate ICC’s (0.28–0.49) relative to manual segmentation for the caudate. For the hippocampus, stereology yielded good consistency (0.52–0.55, p < 0.0001) and ICC (0.47–0.49), whereas automated and semi-automated techniques yielded poor ICC (0.07–0.10) and moderate consistency (0.35–0.62, p < 0.0001). Bias was least using stereology for segmentation of the hippocampus and using FreeSurfer for segmentation of the caudate. In a typical neuropsychiatric MRI dataset, automated segmentation techniques provide good accuracy for an easy-to-segment structure such as the caudate, whereas for the hippocampus, a reasonable correlation with volume but poor absolute agreement was demonstrated. This indicates manual or stereological volume estimation should be considered for studies that require high levels of precision such as those with small sample size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

TNA’s doctoral training is funded by the College of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences Postgraduate Scholarship Scheme, NUI Galway (2016–2020). We would also like to thank all of the participants and their families for their involvement in the Research Programme of the Clinical Neuroimaging laboratory, NUI Galway.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theophilus N. Akudjedu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

All participants provided written informed consent for the relevant studies.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 9035 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akudjedu, T.N., Nabulsi, L., Makelyte, M. et al. A comparative study of segmentation techniques for the quantification of brain subcortical volume. Brain Imaging and Behavior 12, 1678–1695 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-018-9835-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-018-9835-y

Keywords

Navigation